Stereotactic body radiation therapy for bone oligometastases.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is effective for the local management of oligometastases (at most five metastases) with a benefit in survival and local control. Most studies on the management of oligometastases focus on all oligometastatic sites in primary cancer and very few focus on a single oligometastatic site. In particular, there are few data on bone oligometastases, which represent one of the preferred sites for secondary cancer locations. This article focuses on the benefit of stereotactic radiotherapy for bone oligometastases of all cancers by histological types, and reviews the results of major studies in this field.

Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases.

In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.

Preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for the management of brain metastases.

Traditionally, postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been used for resected brain metastases, reducing local and intracerebral relapses. However, WBRT is associated with cognitive deterioration. Postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has emerged due to its neurocognitive preservation benefits. Despite its advantages, postoperative SRT has several drawbacks, including difficulties in target volume delineation, increased risk of radionecrosis (RN) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and prolonged treatment duration. Preoperative SRT has been proposed as a potential alternative, offering promising results in retrospective studies. Retrospective studies have suggested that preoperative SRT could achieve high local control rates with fewer LMD and RN rates compared to postoperative SRT. However, preoperative SRT is primarily based on retrospective data, and no phase 2/3 trials have been published to date. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide further insights into the efficacy and safety of preoperative SRT, addressing key questions regarding fractionation, dose, and timing relative to surgery.

A prospective observational study evaluating two patient immobilisation methods in lung stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to assess inter- and intrafraction errors for two patient immobilisation devices in the context of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: a vacuum cushion and a simple arm support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who were treated with lung stereotactic body radiation therapy in supine position with arms above their head were included in the study. Ten patients were setup in a vacuum cushion (Bluebag™, Elekta) and ten other patients with a simple arm support (Posirest™, Civco). A pretreatment four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and a post-treatment three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography were acquired to compare positioning and immobilisation accuracy. Based on a rigid registration with the planning computed tomography on the spine at the target level, translational and rotational errors were reported. RESULTS: The median number of fractions per treatment was 5 (range: 3-10). Mean interfraction errors based on 112 four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographies were similar for both setups with deviations less than or equal to 1.3mm in lateral and vertical direction and 1.2° in roll and yaw. For longitudinal translational errors, mean interfraction errors were 0.7mm with vacuum cushion and -3.9mm with arm support. Based on 111 three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographies, mean lateral, longitudinal and vertical intrafraction errors were -0.1mm, -0.2mm and 0.0mm respectively (SD: 1.0, 1.2 and 1.0mm respectively) for the patients setup with vacuum cushion, and mean vertical, longitudinal and lateral intrafraction errors were -0.3mm, -0.7mm and 0.1mm respectively (SD: 2.3, 1.8 and 1.4mm respectively) for the patients setup with arm support. Intrafraction errors means were not statistically different between both positions but standard deviations were statistically larger with arm support. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed similar inter and intrafraction mean deviations between both positioning but a large variability in intrafraction observed with arm support suggested a more accurate immobilization with vacuum cushion.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease.

Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.

Salvage reirradiation for locally recurrent prostate cancer: A narrative review.

In this narrative review, we will explore the different options for salvage re-irradiation for locally recurrent prostate cancer. Brachytherapy (BT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) appear to be successful options. We detailed doses, volumes, oncological outcomes, and toxicity events to identify the best salvage strategy. Salvage reirradiation can only be proposed in certain cases, depending on the patient and the clinical scenario. Specific imaging and tests are needed to safely deliver this treatment.

Role of stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of small-cell lung cancer.

Small-cell lung cancer is the most aggressive form of lung neoplasia, treated in recent decades with chemoradiotherapy in case of limited stage and chemotherapy alone at the metastatic stage. In the last few years, the advent of immunotherapy has changed the landscape in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, and to a lesser degree in small-cell lung cancer. Despite the recent advances in research, small-cell lung cancer is still considered an aggressive and lethal disease characterized by high recurrence or metastatic potential. As stereotactic radiotherapy has established itself as the standard of care in the early stage of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer and in metastatic disease to treat brain and extracranial metastases, these same issues now arise in the management of small-cell lung cancer. This article aims to review the current knowledge and the potential of stereotactic radiotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: A review on behalf of the CC-AFU.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is on the rise among individuals aged 70 and older. While the gold standard for treatment remains surgical resection, some elderly and frail patients with comorbidities are not eligible for this procedure. In selected cases, percutaneous thermal ablation, such as cryotherapy, microwave and radiofrequency, offers less invasive options. General anesthesia is sometimes necessary for such treatments, but most of the procedures can be conducted using mild or deep conscious sedation. This approach is preferably recommended for small cT1a tumors situated at a distance from the renal hilum and/or ureter. Active surveillance remains an alternative in the case of small low grade RCC although it may induce anxiety in certain patients. Recent research has highlighted the potentials of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) as a noninvasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for small renal tumors. This narrative review aims to explore recent advances in SABR for localized RCC, including appropriate patient selection, treatment modalities and administration, as well as efficacy and tolerance assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a literature review using the terms [kidney cancer], [renal cell carcinoma], [stereotactic radiotherapy], [SBRT], and [SABR] in the Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases, focusing on prospective and relevant retrospective studies published in English. RESULTS: Studies report local control rates ranging from 70% to 100% with SABR, highlighting its efficacy in treating RCC. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is approximately -5 to -17mL/min over the years following SABR. Common toxicities are rare, primarily CTCAE grade 1, include fatigue, nausea, chest or back pain, diarrhea, or gastritis. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be considered as a viable option for patients with localized RCC who are not suitable candidates for surgery with a high local control rate and a favorable safety profile. This approach should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting and results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited.

Myonecrosis as a rare side effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastases: Report of two cases and a comprehensive literature review.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a highly effective form of radiation therapy for palliation of bone metastases, but it can also lead to rare but severe side effects, such as myonecrosis. According to the literature, the incidence of myonecrosis after stereotactic body radiotherapy is low and mostly dose dependent. It is crucial to consider the potential impact of immunotherapy and other systemic therapies in the assessment. The course of radiation myonecrosis can vary, and corticosteroids or vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors may potentially play a role in its treatment. Herein, we report two patients presenting with myonecrosis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastasis.

[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]. / CBNPC sans addictions oncogéniques métastatique cérébral d'emblée : place de l'immunothérapie.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy. STATE OF THE ART: NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. PERSPECTIVES: The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

[The role of endoscopy in the management of peripheral pulmonary nodules, part 2: Treatment]. / Place de l'endoscopie dans la gestion des nodules pulmonaires périphériques, partie 2 : traitement.

The management of peripheral lung nodules is challenging, requiring specialized skills and sophisticated technologies. The diagnosis now appears accessible to advanced endoscopy (see Part 1), which can also guide treatment of these nodules; this second part provides an overview of endoscopy techniques that can enhance surgical treatment through preoperative marking, and stereotactic radiotherapy treatment through fiduciary marker placement. Finally, we will discuss how, in the near future, these advanced endoscopic techniques will help to implement ablation strategy.

Reirradiation of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with external photons: A practical review of the literature.

The modalities of management by reirradiation for recurrence or a second localization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in previously irradiated terrain is challenging due to the great heterogeneity of data in the literature, mainly retrospective data reporting non-negligible risks of serious late toxicity events. With the recent development of more precise and conformal radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT), the benefit-to-risk ratio of reirradiation has evolved in recent years with encouraging results, but patient selection is crucial. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of HNSCC reirradiation in terms of patient selection and external photon radiotherapy techniques for definitive tumor reirradiation and postoperative reirradiation.

Lung stereotactic radiation therapy: Intercomparison of irradiation devices in terms of outcome and predictive factors.

PURPOSE: To compare three different radiotherapy devices able to perform pulmonary stereotactic radiotherapy: CyberKnife® (CK), Helical Tomotherapy® (HT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study aims to define the patients' outcome in terms of SBRT efficacy and toxicities depending of the device choice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, radiological, and dosimetric data of patients treated with lung SBRT between 2016 and 2020 at Lausanne University Hospital, using the Chi2 test for proportions, the t-test for means comparisons, the Kaplan-Meier method for survival, and the Log-rank test and Cox-regression for intergroups comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 111 patients treated by either CK (59.9%), VMAT (38.0%), or HT (2.1%). Compared to other techniques, CK treated comparable gross tumor volume (GTV; 2.1 vs. 1.4cm3, P=0.84) with smaller planning treatment volume (PTV; 12.3 vs. 21.9cm3, P=0.013) and lower V5 (13.5 vs. 19.9cm3, P=0.002). Local control rates at 2years were not different whatever the irradiation device, respectively of 96.2% (range, 90.8-100) and 98.1% (range, 94.4-100), P=0.68. Toxicity incidence significantly increased with V5 value>17.2% (56.0 vs. 77.4%, P=0.021). CONCLUSION: Compared to other SBRT techniques, CK treatments permitted to treat comparable GTV with reduced PTV and V5. Toxicity incidence was less frequent when reducing the V5. CK is particularly attractive in case of multiple courses of lung SBRT or lung reirradiation.

Hypofractionated postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for large resected brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective study was to report outcomes after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for resected brain metastases (BM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed results of patients with resected BM treated with postoperative HSRT (3×7.7Gy to the prescription isodose 70%) between May 2013 and June 2020. Local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease relapse (LMDR), and radiation necrosis (RN) occurrence were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 23 brain cavities were included. Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) was≥70 in 77.3%. Median preoperative diameter was 37mm [21.0-75.0] and median planning target volume (PTV) was 23 cm3 [9.9-61.6]. Median time from surgery to SRT was 69 days [7-101] and 48% of patients had a local relapse on pre-SRT imaging. Median follow-up was 17.5 months [1.6-95.9]. One and two-year LC rates were 60.9 and 52.2% respectively. One and 2-year DBC rates were 45.5 and 40.9%. Median OS was 16.5 months. Four patients (18.2%) presented LMDR during follow-up. RN occurred in 6 patients (27.2%). Three factors were associated with OS: ECOG-PS (P=0.009), KPS (P=0.04), cystic or solid nature of the metastasis before surgery (P=0.037). Several factors were related to RN occurrence: PTV diameter and volume, Normal brain V21, V21 and V24 isodoses volumes. CONCLUSION: HSRT is the most widely used scheme for larger brain cavities after surgery. The optimal dose and scheme remain to be defined as well as the optimal delay between postoperative SRT and surgery. Dose escalation may be necessary, especially in case of subtotal resection.

[Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for less than 3cm (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) inoperable lung tumors: 10 years experience of Montpellier Cancer Institute]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique (RTST) pulmonaire des tumeurs de moins de 3cm (stade I) et 5cm (stade II) non opérées : 10 ans d'expérience de l'Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM).

PURPOSE: Search for predictive factors on survival and local control for less than 3 centimeters (cm) (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) inoperable lung tumors treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in a retrospective monocentric study from Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM) PATIENTS AND METHOD: Every patients treated at ICM for a stage I or II inoperable lung tumors from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy nine lesions were treated in 176 patients, with a major part (82,7%) in operated due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Median overall survival for all patients was 71,7 months with a 35 months follow-up and the 2 years loco-regional free survival was 94,0 months. Better associated outcomes were stage I (median overall survival 71,7 versus 29,0 months P=0,004 ; HR=2,37 P=0,005), BED≥150Gy (median time-to-progression not reached versus 76,7 months P=0,025), small size of Planning Target Volume (PTV) (HR=0,42 P=0,032 when PTV<15,6 cc). 7,3% of all patients developed radiation pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: SBRT is associated with an excellent overall survival and a high rate of local control for less than 3cm (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) lung tumors but a low rate of toxicities. For these patients with many comorbidities, BED over 150Gy seems to be associated with a better loco-regional free survival, while cause of death is often other than lung cancer.

[Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary kidney cancer]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique des carcinomes rénaux primitifs.

The incidence of primary renal cancer is increasing, particularly in elderly patients who may have comorbidities and/or a surgical contraindications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy has primarily been evaluated retrospectively to date. The most commonly used dose schedules are 40Gy in five fractions, 42Gy in three fractions, and 26Gy in one fraction. The results in terms of local control and toxicity are very encouraging. The advantages of stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to thermal ablative treatments are its non-invasive nature, absence of general anesthesia, ability to treat larger lesions, and those close to the renal hilum. Prospective evaluations are still necessary.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for ultracentral lung tumours.

Ultracentral (UC) lung lesions are generally defined by the presence of the tumour or the Planning Target Volume (PTV) abutting proximal bronchial tree (PBT) or the esophagus. Initial reports rose awareness regarding the potential toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) when delivered to UC lesions. Major concerns include necrosis, stenosis, and bleeding of the PBT. Technological improvements now enable the delivery of more accurate treatments, possibly redefining the historical "no-fly zone". In this review, studies focusing on the treatment of UC lesions with SBRT are presented. The narrow therapeutic window requires a multidisciplinary approach.

[Stereotactic radiotherapy for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer]. / Place de la radiothérapie stéréotaxique pour les cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules de stade I opérables.

Standard treatment stage of non-small cell lung cancer is currently surgery. For inoperable patients, stereotactic body radiotherapy is the reference treatment. This non-invasive technique has developed considerably and its excellent results in terms of carcinological control and tolerance raise the question of its indication for operable patients, especially for old patients and/or with comorbidities. This article reviews the available data in the literature of the place of stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically operable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

[Nephron sparing in the management of localized solid renal mass]. / Épargne néphronique dans la prise en charge des tumeurs rénales malignes solides localisées.

Managing a malignant renal tumor requires, first of all, a reflection on the necessity of its treatment. It must consider the renal function, altered at the time of diagnosis in 50% of cases. The treatment method chosen depends on many factors, in particular, the predicted residual renal function, the risk of chronic kidney disease, the need for temporary or long-term dialysis, and overall long-term survival. Other factors include the size, position, and number of tumors and a hereditary tumor background. When a renal-sparing management alternative is available, total nephrectomy should no longer be performed in patients with small malignant renal masses (cT1a). This may consist of surgery (partial nephrectomy or lumpectomy), percutaneous thermo-ablation (by radiofrequency, microwave, or cryotherapy). In patients with limited life expectancy, imaging-based surveillance may be proposed to suggest treatment in case of local progression. Good coordination between urologist, radiologist, nephrologist, and sometimes radiotherapist should allow optimal management of patients with a malignant renal tumor with or without underlying renal failure.

What effective technique to differentiate radiation brain necrosis from a tumor progression in patients treated with radiation: A monocentric retrospective study combining the MRI TRAMs technique and the (18F)-dopa PET/CT.

PURPOSE: Brain necrosis after radiotherapy is a challenging diagnosis, since it has similar radiological appearance on standard MRI to tumor progression. Consequences on treatment decisions can be important. We compare recent imaging techniques in order to adopt a reliable diagnostic protocol in doubtful situations. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This is a retrospective study comparing the performance of three imaging techniques after radiotherapy of brain metastasis: Perfusion-MRI, TRAMs technique and F-dopa PET-CT. The evolution of the treated metastasis volume was also analyzed by contouring all patients MRIs. All included patients were suspected of relapse and had the three exams once the volume of treated metastasis increased. RESULTS: The majority of our patients were treated by stereotactic radiotherapy. Suspicion of relapse was on average around 17months after treatment. Four cases of radionecrosis were diagnosed and six cases of real tumor progression. Neurological symptoms were less present in radionecrosis cases. All of our radionecrosis cases had relative cerebral blood volume below 1. F-dopa PET-CT succeeded to set the good diagnosis in eight cases, although we found one false positive and one false negative exam. The TRAMs technique failed in one case of false negative exam. CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion-MRI showed high performance in the diagnosis of radionecrosis, especially when calculating relative cerebral blood volume rate. The TRAMs technique showed interesting results and deserves application in daily routine combined with the perfusion-MRI. F-dopa CT might induce false results because of different metabolic uptake according to tumor type, medication and brain blood barrier leak.