RESUMO
We conducted a thorough examination of the paper titled " Rhinofiller: Fat Grafting (Surgical) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (Non-surgical)" authored by Gentile et al. in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery with significant interest. The author shared their practical insights gained from employing "fat grafting" and "hyaluronic acid" methods for nasal remodeling in a randomized controlled trial. The research is notably captivating and executed with commendable proficiency. However, we do hold specific reservations concerning the methodologies employed. Precise understanding of the properties of the active substances utilized is fundamental for any medical intervention, and standardization stands as a pivotal element. It is essential to grasp the core characteristics of the administered HAs to potentially uncover links between these attributes, resulting outcomes, and possible complications. In the context of tissue volumization using fillers, rheology-an investigation into material flow and deformation under stress-holds particular importance. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of HA's rheological properties is imperative, especially when selecting an appropriate dermal filler for nasal applications. Among the critical properties of HA are viscosity, elasticity, and cohesiveness. While acknowledging the valuable contributions made by the authors, it is imperative that further analysis takes into account these influential factors during the course of their investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Preenchedores Dérmicos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Estética , Ácido Hialurônico , Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The author presented his experience using "fat grafting" (FG) and "hyaluronic acid" (HA) techniques in nasal remodeling. OBJECTIVES: The paper aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of FG and HA in nasal remodeling for aesthetic improvement. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. 15 patients affected by soft defects of the dorsum, low and boxy nasal tip, and hidden columella, were treated with FG (study group-SG), comparing results with the control group (CG) (n = 17) treated with hyaluronic acid (HA). Post-operative follow-up took place at 1, 2, 4, weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually. RESULTS: 73.7% of SG patients showed excellent cosmetic results after 1 year compared with only 29.7% of CG patients. At one-month, major part of people who underwent the treatments (FG and HA) referred to satisfaction with the resulting volume contours (p = 0.389). 88.3% of CG patients versus 53.8% of SG described the HA and FG injection, respectively, as a very comfortable and non-invasive procedure. As expected, patient satisfaction with the appearance of nasal contouring was higher in the FG group at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: FG and HA were safe and effective in this series of cases performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Assuntos
Ácido Hialurônico , Septo Nasal , Humanos , Septo Nasal/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Resultado do Tratamento , EstéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is great demand for nonsurgical aesthetic procedures. In this case series, the authors describe their stepwise technique of injecting hyaluronic acid (HA) into the nose to yield pleasing, stable results. CASE SERIES: A total of 148 patients underwent minimally invasive rhinoplasty by injection of HA filler. Anatomic contraindications for the procedure were a large dorsal hump, extreme tip projection, or excessive nasal deviation. HA injections were made in a specific order to reshape and stabilize the nose; the surgical plan was conceptually similar to placement of cartilage grafts. Patients indicated their satisfaction with the surgical results on a visual analog scale. Immediately after the procedure, all patients had transient redness and slight swelling at the injection site; this resolved spontaneously by 24 h posttreatment. Vascular impairment developed in 1 patient and was managed with hyaluronidase. In general, patients expressed a high level of satisfaction. Thirty-two patients returned for a "touch-up" filler injection 1 year posttreatment. DISCUSSION: Nasal reshaping by HA injection can be carried out quickly, safely, and effectively with minimal patient discomfort or downtime. Care must be given to select patients who are indicated for this procedure, and meticulous pretreatment planning is necessary.