SABR-Dual: a phase II/III trial of two-fraction versus five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy for localized low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen. METHODS: 502 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, radiopaque hydrogel spacer insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on either a standard CT-guided linear accelerator or MR-LINAC. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints. DISCUSSION: This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not obligate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06027892.

A randomised controlled trial of Standard Of Care versus RadioAblaTion in Early Stage HepatoCellular Carcinoma (SOCRATES HCC).

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individual patients can be limited by tumor and location, liver dysfunction and comorbidities. Many patients with early-stage HCC do not receive curative-intent therapies. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an effective, non-invasive HCC treatment option, however, randomized evidence for SABR in the first line setting is lacking. METHODS: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 21.07 SOCRATES-HCC is a phase II, prospective, randomised trial comparing SABR to other current standard of care therapies for patients with a solitary HCC ≤ 8 cm, ineligible for surgical resection or transplantation. The study is divided into 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 will compromise 118 patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm eligible for thermal ablation randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to thermal ablation or SABR. Cohort 2 will comprise 100 patients with tumors > 3 cm up to 8 cm in size, or tumors ≤ 3 cm ineligible for thermal ablation, randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to SABR or best other standard of care therapy including transarterial therapies. The primary objective is to determine whether SABR results in superior freedom from local progression (FFLP) at 2 years compared to thermal ablation in cohort 1 and compared to best standard of care therapy in cohort 2. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, adverse events, patient reported outcomes and health economic analyses. DISCUSSION: The SOCRATES-HCC study will provide the first randomized, multicentre evaluation of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of SABR versus other standard of care therapies in the first line treatment of unresectable, early-stage HCC. It is a broad, multicentre collaboration between hepatology, interventional radiology and radiation oncology groups around Australia, coordinated by TROG Cancer Research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12621001444875, registered 21 October 2021.

Beyond conventional bounds: Surpassing system limits for stereotactic ablative (SAbR) lung radiotherapy using CBCT-based adaptive planning system.

PURPOSE: Online adaptive radiotherapy relies on a high degree of automation to enable rapid planning procedures. The Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine (IOE) was originally designed for conventional treatments so it is crucial to provide clear guidance for lung SAbR plans. This study investigates using the Ethos IOE together with adaptive-specific optimization tuning structures we designed and templated within Ethos to mitigate inter-planner variability in meeting RTOG metrics for both online-adaptive and offline SAbR plans. METHODS: We developed a planning strategy to automate the generation of tuning structures and optimization. This was validated by retrospective analysis of 35 lung SAbR cases (total 105 fractions) treated on Ethos. The effectiveness of our planning strategy was evaluated by comparing plan quality with-and-without auto-generated tuning structures. Internal target volume (ITV) contour was compared between that drawn from CT simulation and from cone-beam CT (CBCT) at time of treatment to verify CBCT image quality and treatment effectiveness. Planning strategy robustness for lung SAbR was quantified by frequency of plans meeting reference plan RTOG constraints. RESULTS: Our planning strategy creates a gradient within the ITV with maximum dose in the core and improves intermediate dose conformality on average by 2%. ITV size showed no significant difference between those contoured from CT simulation and first fraction, and also trended towards decreasing over course of treatment. Compared to non-adaptive plans, adaptive plans better meet reference plan goals (37% vs. 100% PTV coverage compliance, for scheduled and adapted plans) while improving plan quality (improved GI (gradient index) by 3.8%, CI (conformity index) by 1.7%). CONCLUSION: We developed a robust and readily shareable planning strategy for the treatment of adaptive lung SAbR on the Ethos system. We validated that automatic online plan re-optimization along with the formulated adaptive tuning structures can ensure consistent plan quality. With the proposed planning strategy, highly ablative treatments are feasible on Ethos.

Markerless dynamic tumor tracking (MDTT) radiotherapy using diaphragm as a surrogate for liver targets.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using the diaphragm as a surrogate for liver targets during MDTT. METHODS: Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: a dome-shaped phantom with implanted markers was fabricated and underwent dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy sequences on the Vero4DRT linac. Ten patients participated in an IRB-approved, feasibility study to assess the MDTT workflow. All images were analyzed using an in-house program to back-project the diaphragm/markers position to the isocenter plane. ExacTrac imager log files were analyzed. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: The phantom "diaphragm" was contoured as a markerless tracking structure (MTS) and exported to Vero4DRT/ExacTrac. A single field plan was delivered to the phantom film plane under static and MDTT conditions. In the patient study, the diaphragm tracking structure was contoured on CT breath-hold-exhale datasets. The MDTT workflow was applied until just prior to MV beam-on. RESULTS: Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: phantom data confirmed the in-house 3D back-projection program was functioning as intended. In patients, the diaphragm/marker relative positions had a mean ± RMS difference of 0.70 ± 0.89, 1.08 ± 1.26, and 0.96 ± 1.06 mm in ML, SI, and AP directions. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: Building a respiratory-correlation model using the diaphragm as surrogate for the implanted markers was successful in phantom/patients. During the tracking verification imaging step, the phantom mean ± SD difference between the image-detected and predicted "diaphragm" position was 0.52 ± 0.18 mm. The 2D film gamma (2%/2 mm) comparison (static to MDTT deliveries) was 98.2%. In patients, the mean difference between the image-detected and predicted diaphragm position was 2.02 ± 0.92 mm. The planning target margin contribution from MDTT diaphragm tracking is 2.2, 5.0, and 4.7 mm in the ML, SI, and AP directions. CONCLUSION: In phantom/patients, the diaphragm motion correlated well with markers' motion and could be used as a surrogate. MDTT workflows using the diaphragm as the MTS is feasible using the Vero4DRT linac and could replace the need for implanted markers for liver radiotherapy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of oligometastatic and recurrent head and neck cancer: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) is a metastatic stage that could benefit maximally from local therapies. Patients in this state have a better prognosis relative to those with disseminated metastases. Stereotactic radiotherapy provides a non-invasive ablative tool for primary malignant tumors and metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched our register for patients with oligometastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer (OMD/R-HNC) who received stereotactic radiotherapy to manage their OMD/R. We evaluated the survival outcomes and prognostic factors that affected the survival of those patients. RESULTS: In all, 31 patients with 48 lesions met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The lesions comprised various metastatic sites, with the majority being pulmonary (37 lesions). Squamous cell cancer was the most common histology (26 patients). The median overall survival (mOS) was 33 months, with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.6 months. Eight patients received subsequent stereotactic radiotherapy after disease progression. The local control (LC) rates were 91.3, 87.7, and 83% at 6, 12, and 36 months. Patients with the de novo OMD who received stereotactic radiotherapy as their initial treatment had a median systemic treatment-free survival of 23.9 months. In univariate analysis, a trend for better OS was observed in patients with p16-positive squamous cell tumors; patients who progressed within 150 days after diagnosis had a significantly lower OS. De novo OMD showed significantly better PFS compared to induced OMD. Multivariate analyses identified p16-positive squamous cell cancer, metachronous OMD and a longer time to progression as positive predictors of OS, while de novo OMD was the only positive predictor for PFS. Treatment-related toxicities were generally mild, with two cases of grade 3 dysphagia reported. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiotherapy demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients with OMD/R-HNC with limited toxicities. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize treatment strategies for this patient population.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases with different respiratory motion management techniques.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been firmly established as a treatment choice for patients with oligometastases, as it has demonstrated both safety and efficacy by consistently achieving high rates of local control. Moreover, it offers potential survival benefits for carefully selected patients in real-world clinical settings. METHODS: Between January 2008 and May 2020, a total of 149 patients (with 414 liver metastases) received treatment. The Active Breathing Coordinator device was used for 68 patients, while respiratory gating was used for 65 and abdominal compression was used for 16 patients. The most common histological finding was colorectal adenocarcinoma, with 37.6% of patients having three or more metastases, and 18% having two metastases. The prescribed dose ranged from 36 to 60 Gy, delivered in 3-5 fractions. RESULTS: Local control rates at 2 and 3 years were 76.1% and 61.2%, respectively, with no instances of local recurrence after 3 years. Factors negatively impacting local control included colorectal histology, lower prescribed dose, and the occurrence of new liver metastases. The median overall survival from SBRT was 32 months, with the presence of metastases outside the liver and the development of new liver metastases after SBRT affecting survival. The median disease-free survival was 10 months. No substantial differences in both local control and survival were observed between the respiratory motion control techniques employed. Treatment tolerance was excellent, with only one patient experiencing acute grade IV thrombocytopenia and two patients suffering from ≥ grade II chronic toxicity. CONCLUSION: For radical management of single or multiple liver metastases, SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option. Regardless of the technology employed, experienced physicians can achieve similarly positive outcomes. However, additional studies are required to elucidate prognostic factors that can facilitate improved patient selection.

Study protocol for prospective multi-institutional phase III trial of standard of care therapy with or without stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer (SABR-ROC).

BACKGROUND: Efforts have been made to investigate the role of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in treating recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is a state-of-the-art therapy that uses intensity modulation to increase the fractional dose, decrease the number of fractions, and target tumors with high precision. METHODS: The SABR-ROC trial is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, prospective study to evaluate whether the addition of SABR to the standard of care significantly improves the 3-year overall survival (OS) of patients with ROC. Patients who have completed the standard treatment for primary epithelial ovarian cancer are eligible. In addition, patients with number of metastases ≤ 10 and maximum diameter of each metastatic site of gross tumor ≤ 5 cm are allowed. Randomization will be stratified by (1) No. of the following clinical factors met, platinum sensitivity, absence of ascites, normal level of CA125, and ECOG performance status of 0-1; 0-3 vs. 4; (2) site of recurrence; with vs. without lymph nodes; and (3) PARP inhibitor; use vs. non-use. The target number of patients to be enrolled in this study is 270. Participants will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio. Participants in Arm 2 will receive SABR for recurrent lesions clearly identified in imaging tests as well as the standard of care (Arm 1) based on treatment guidelines and decisions made in multidisciplinary discussions. The RT fraction number can range from 1 to 10, and the accepted dose range is 16-45 Gy. The RT Quality Assurance (QA) program consists of a three-tiered system: general credentialing, trial-specific credentialing, and individual case reviews. DISCUSSION: SABR appears to be preferable as it does not interfere with the schedule of systemic treatment by minimizing the elapsed days of RT. The synergistic effect between systemic treatment and SABR is expected to reduce the tumor burden by eradicating gross tumors identified through imaging with SABR and controlling microscopic cancer with systemic treatment. It might also be beneficial for quality-of-life preservation in older adults or heavily treated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05444270) on June 29th, 2022.

Salvage surgery for local recurrences after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of colorectal pulmonary metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Local control following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases is reportedly lower than for metastases from other tumors. Such recurrences may still be amenable to salvage therapy. We describe our experience with salvage surgery in 17 patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent salvage metastasectomy for a local recurrence following SABR for colorectal pulmonary metastases were identified from the surgical institutional databases of three Dutch major referral hospitals. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine survival. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent 20 salvage resections for local recurrence of colorectal pulmonary metastases. All patients had a progressive lesion on consecutive CT scans, with local uptake on 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET CT), and were discussed in a thoracic oncology tumor board. Median time to local recurrence following SABR was 20 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 13-29). Fourteen procedures were performed minimally invasively. Extensive adhesions were observed during three procedures. A Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complication occurred after four resections (20%). The 90-day mortality was 0%. The estimated median overall survival and progression-free survival following salvage resection were 71 months (confidence intervals [CI]: 50-92) and 39 months (CI: 19-58), respectively. Salvage resections were significantly more extensive, compared to the potential resection assessed on pre-SABR imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with 20 salvage pulmonary metastasectomy procedures for local recurrences following SABR in colorectal cancer patients demonstrates that salvage resection is a feasible option with acceptable morbidity and good oncological outcome in a highly selected cohort.

Increased toxicities associated with dose escalation of stereotactic body radiation therapy in prostate cancer: results from a phase I/II study.

BACKGROUND: This dose-escalation study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of different stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) doses for selecting an optimal dose for prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical trial was registered at UMIN (UMIN000014328). Patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa were equally assigned to 3 SBRT dose levels: 35, 37.5, and 40 Gy per 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was the occurrence rate of late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events at 2 years, while the secondary endpoint was the 2-year biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate. Adverse events were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (median age, 70 years) were enrolled from March 2014 to January 2018, of whom 10 (15%) and 65 (85%) had low- and intermediate-risk PCa, respectively. The median follow-up time was 48 months. Twelve (16%) patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. The 2-year occurrence rates of grade 2 late GU and GI toxicities were 34 and 7% in all cohorts, respectively (35 Gy: 21 and 4%; 37.5 Gy: 40 and 14%; 40 Gy: 42 and 5%). The occurrence risk of GU toxicities significantly increased with dose escalation (p = 0.0256). Grades 2 and 3 acute GU toxicities were observed in 19 (25%) and 1 (1%), respectively. Grade 2 acute GI toxicity was observed in 8 (11%) patients. No grade ≥3 GI or ≥4 GU acute toxicity or grade ≥3 late toxicity was observed. Clinical recurrence was detected in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: An SBRT dose of 35 Gy per 5 fractions is less likely to cause adverse events in patients with PCa than 375- and 40-Gy SBRT doses. Higher doses of SBRT should be applied with caution.

Systematic review of economic evaluations on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) compared to other radiotherapy techniques or surgical procedures for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is recommended as first-choice treatment to inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is not widely adopted in developing countries, and its cost-effectiveness is unclear. We aimed to perform a systematic review of full economic evaluations (EE) that compared SABR with other radiotherapy or surgical procedures to assess the results and methodological approach. METHODS: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021241640). We included full EE studies with early-stage NSCLC in which one group was submitted to SABR. Studies that were partial EE, included advanced NSCLC or other neoplasm were excluded. We performed the last search on June 2021 in Medline, EMBASE and other databases. The reporting quality were assessed by CHEERS checklist. The main characteristics of each study were tabulated, and the results were presented by a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We included nine studies. Three compared radiotherapy techniques, in which SABR was found to be dominant or cost-effective. Six compared SABR with surgery, and in this group, there was not a unanimous decision. All included only direct healthcare costs but varied about categories included. The parameters used in the model-based studies were highly heterogeneous using mixed data from various sources. The items properly reported varied from 29 to 67%. CONCLUSIONS: The studies were all from developed countries and lacked in reporting quality. We recommend that developing countries produce their own studies. More strict alignment to reporting guidelines and use of robust evidence as model parameters are also advised.

Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Speech-ABR is an auditory brainstem response that evaluates the integrity of the temporal and spectral coding of speech in the upper levels of the brainstem. It reflects the acoustic properties of the stimulus used and consists of seven major waves. Waves V and A represent the onset of the response; wave C transition region; D, E, and F waves periodic region (frequency following response); and wave O reflects the offset of the response. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical availability of the speech-ABR procedure through a literature review. METHODS: Literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Science Direct databases. Clinical studies of the last 15 years have been included in this review and 60 articles have been reviewed. RESULTS: As a result of the articles reviewed, it was seen that most of the studies on speech ABR were conducted with children and young people and generally focused on latency analysis measurements. Most used stimulus is the /da/ syllable. CONCLUSIONS: Speech ABR can objectively measure the auditory cues important for speech recognition and has many clinical applications. It can be used as a biomarker for auditory processing disorders, learning disorders, dyslexia, otitis media, hearing loss, language disorders and phonological disorders. S-ABR is an effective procedure that can be used in speech and language evaluations in people with hearing aids or cochlear implant. It may also be of benefit to the aging auditory system's ability to encode temporal cues.

Individualized breathing trace quality assurance for lung radiotherapy patients undergoing 4DCT simulation.

4DCT simulation is a popular solution for radiotherapy simulation of lung cancer patients as it allows the clinician to gain an appreciation for target motion during the patient breathing cycle. Resultant binning of images and production of the 4DCT dataset relies heavily on the recorded breathing trace; but quality assurance is not routinely performed on these and there lacks any substantial recommendations thereof. An application was created for Windows in C# that was able to analyze the VXP breathing trace files from Varian RPM/RGSC and quantify various metrics associated with the patient breathing cycle. This data was then used to consider errors in voluming of targets for several example cases in order to justify recommendations on quality assurance. For 281 real patient breathing traces from 4DCT simulation of lung targets, notable differences were found between RGSC and application calculations of phase data. For any new patient without individualized QA, the average marked phase calculation (which is used for 4DCT reconstruction) is only accurate to within 19% of the actual phases. The error in BPM within the scan due to breathing rate variation is 37%. The uncertainty in amplitude due to breathing variation is 34% in the mean. Phase uncertainty leads to misbinning which we have shown can lead to missing 66% of the target for gated treatment. Variation in inhalation/exhalation level leads to voluming errors which, without individualized QA, can be assumed to be 11% (PTV is smaller than actual). Without individualized quality assurance of patient breathing traces, large uncertainties have to be assumed for metrics of both phase and amplitude, leading to clinically significant uncertainties in treatment. It is recommended to perform individualized quality assurance as this provides the clinician with an accurate quantification of uncertainty for their patient.

Oligorecurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Chemo-Radiation Followed by Immunotherapy and Intracranial Radiosurgery: A Case Report and Mini Review of Literature.

Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer still represents a "grey zone" in terms of the best treatment choice and optimal clinical outcomes. Indeed, most patients may be suitable to receive different treatments with similar outcomes such as chemo-radiotherapy (CHT-RT) followed by immunotherapy (IO) or surgery followed by adjuvant local/systemic therapies. We report a clinical case of a patient submitted to primary thoracic surgery who developed a mediastinal nodal recurrence successfully treated by CHT-RT-IO. Subsequently, a single brain lesion was found to have been successfully treated by single fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. The patient is still on follow-up and she is free from disease having a good quality of life. In this report, we also perform a mini review about the role of CHT-RT followed by IO in treating loco-regional relapse after surgery. The role of SABR after IO is also evaluated, finding that it is safe and well tolerated. More robust and larger clinical data are needed in this particular setting to better define the role of the combination of systemic and local treatments in the management of intrathoracic and intracranial relapse for patients already submitted to CHT-RT followed by immunotherapy.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or best supportive care in patients with localized pancreatic cancer not receiving chemotherapy and surgery (PANCOSAR): a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial according to a TwiCs design.

BACKGROUND: Significant comorbidities, advanced age, and a poor performance status prevent surgery and systemic treatment for many patients with localized (non-metastatic) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These patients are currently treated with 'best supportive care'. Therefore, it is desirable to find a treatment option which could improve both disease control and quality of life in these patients. A brief course of high-dose high-precision radiotherapy i.e. stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be feasible. METHODS: A nationwide multicenter trial performed within a previously established large prospective cohort (the Dutch Pancreatic cancer project; PACAP) according to the 'Trial within cohorts' (TwiCs) design. Patients enrolled in the PACAP cohort routinely provide informed consent to answer quality of life questionnaires and to be randomized according to the TwiCs design when eligible for a study. Patients with localized PDAC who are unfit for chemotherapy and surgery or those who refrain from these treatments are eligible. Patients will be randomized between SABR (5 fractions of 8 Gy) with 'best supportive care' and 'best supportive care' only. The primary endpoint is overall survival from randomization. Secondary endpoints include preservation of quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -PAN26), NRS pain score response and WHO performance scores at baseline, and, 3, 6 and 12 months. Acute and late toxicity will be scored using CTCAE criteria version 5.0: assessed at baseline, day of last fraction, at 3 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months following SABR. DISCUSSION: The PANCOSAR trial studies the added value of SBRT as compared to 'best supportive care' in patients with localized PDAC who are medically unfit to receive chemotherapy and surgery, or refrain from these treatments. This study will assess whether SABR, in comparison to best supportive care, can relieve or delay tumor-related symptoms, enhance quality of life, and extend survival in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials, NCT05265663 , Registered March 3 2022, Retrospectively registered.

Endoscopic nodal staging in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (ENDO-SABR).

BACKGROUND: Research in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has shown promising results with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of oligometastatic disease, wherein distant disease may be limited to one or a few distant organs by host factors. Traditionally, PET/CT has been used in detecting metastatic disease and avoiding futile surgical intervention, however, sensitivity and specificity is limited to only 81 and 79%, respectively. Mediastinal staging still identifies occult nodal disease in up to 20% of NSCLC patients initially thought to be operative candidates. Endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive tool for the staging and diagnosis of thoracic malignancy. When EBUS is combined with endoscopic ultrasound using the same bronchoscope (EUS-B), the diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value increase to 84 and 97%, respectively. Endoscopic staging in patients with advanced disease has never been studied, but may inform treatment if a curative SABR approach is being taken. METHODS: This is a multi-centre, prospective, cohort study with two-stage design. In the first stage, 10 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (lung tumour ± hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy) with up to 5 synchronous metastases will be enrolled An additional 19 patients will be enrolled in the second stage if rate of treatment change is greater than 10% in the first stage. Patients will be subject to EBUS or combined modality EBUS/EUS-B to assess bilateral lymph node stations using a N3 to N2 to N1 progression. Primary endpoint is defined as the rate of change to treatment plan including change from SABR to conventional dose radiation, change in mediastinal radiation field, and change from curative to palliative intent treatment. DISCUSSION: If a curative approach with SABR for oligometastatic disease is being explored, invasive mediastinal staging may guide treatment and prognosis. This study will provide insight into the use of endoscopic mediastinal staging in determining changes in treatment plan of NSCLC. Results will inform the design of future phase II trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04852588. Date of registration: April 19, 2021. PROTOCOL VERSION: 1.1 on December 9, 2021.

Radiotherapy respiratory motion management in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies: a systematic review of patient factors influencing effectiveness of motion reduction with abdominal compression.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of abdominal compression for motion management in hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HPB) radiotherapy has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS & MATERIALS: A systematic review was carried out using PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases up to 1 July 2021. No date restrictions were applied. Additional searches were carried out using the University of Manchester digital library, Google Scholar and of retrieved papers' reference lists. Studies conducted evaluating respiratory motion utilising imaging with and without abdominal compression in the same patients available in English were included. Studies conducted in healthy volunteers or majority non-HPB sites, not providing descriptive motion statistics or patient characteristics before and after compression in the same patients or published without peer-review were excluded. A narrative synthesis was employed by tabulating retrieved studies and organising chronologically by abdominal compression device type to help identify patterns in the evidence. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 6 studies with a total of 152 patients. Designs were a mix of retrospective and prospective quantitative designs with chronological, non-randomised recruitment. Abdominal compression reduced craniocaudal respiratory motion in the majority of patients, although in four studies there were increases seen in at least one direction. The influence of patient comorbidities on effectiveness of compression, and/or comfort with compression was not evaluated in any study. CONCLUSION: Abdominal compression may not be appropriate for all patients, and benefit should be weighed with potential increase in motion or discomfort in patients with small initial motion (<5 mm). Patient factors including male sex, and high body mass index (BMI) were found to impact the effectiveness of compression, however with limited evidence. High-quality studies are warranted to fully assess the clinical impact of abdominal compression on treatment outcomes and toxicity prospective in comparison to other motion management strategies.

Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3-5 cm). RECENT FINDINGS: We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22-90% for all techniques; 22-89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67-90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose. Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an innovative therapeutic approach in patients (pts) with a diagnosis of refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) after the use of drugs, radiofrequency catheter ablation, and/or defibrillator (ICD) implant. The current efficacy data of SABR are limited and several prospective clinical studies are ongoing to support the use of ablative radiation dose to control VT. The aim of the current prospective pilot study is to report the efficacy and tolerability of SABR in ICD implanted pts with refractory VT in our centre. Non-invasive electroanatomical mapping (EAM), cardiac computed tomography (CT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission (FDG-PET)-CT scan were used and combined with a radiation CT scan. A dose prescription of 25 Gy in a single dose was delivered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Linac-based. The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined as a reduction in ICD shocks after SABR treatment, while the secondary endpoint was safety. Six consecutive pts (five males and one female) implanted with an ICD and with three or more VT were enrolled. One pts died after 1 month, due to end-stage heart failure. Two pts experienced ICD shocks in VT 2 and 5 months after treatment. Three pts experienced no more ICD shocks on VT after therapy. Our data suggest the efficacy and safety of SABR treatment in pts with VT. Larger dataset of pts and longer follow-up are otherwise required to validate the impact of SABR as a standardized treatment in these pts.

Limits for the therapeutic application of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in the context of ablative lung radiotherapy near the minima of lung density and tumor size.

PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the performance of the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) within the extremes of small tumor volumes and near-minimum lung and tumor tissue densities in order to identify combinations of these parameters where the use of AAA could result in a therapeutically unacceptable loss of tumor coverage on an energy and fractionation-specific basis. METHODS: Clinically appropriate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were generated with AAA for 180 unique combinations of lung density (0.05-0.30 g/cm3 ), tumor density (0.30-1.00 g/cm3 ), tumor diameter (0.5-2.5 cm), and beam energy (6 and 10 MV) and recomputed using the AcurosXB algorithm. Regression analysis was used to identify the strongest predictors of a reduction in biologically effective dose at a clinically relevant level (100 Gy BED10) for commonly utilized 1-5 fraction treatment regimens. Measurements were performed within a phantom mimicking the lower extremes of lung and tumor densities to validate AcurosXB as the approximate ground truth within these scenarios. RESULTS: The strongest predictors of a statistically significant reduction in tumor coverage were lung density ≤0.15 g/cm3 , tumor diameter ≤10 mm, tumor density equal to 0.30 g/cm3 , and a beam energy of 10 MV. Overestimation of clinical target volume (CTV) D95% and CTV V100Gy (BED10) by AAA can exceed 30%-40% in some scenarios. Measurements supported AcurosXB as highly accurate even for these challenging scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of AAA rapidly diminishes near the minima of clinical lung density, particularly in combination with small tumors and when using a photon energy of 10 MV. The magnitude of the effect can be more dramatic than previously reported data suggests and could potentially compromise the ablative qualities of treatments performed within these environments, particularly with less aggressive fractionation approaches.

A single centre evaluation of the 2019 UK SABR consortium guidelines for primary lung cancer: correlation between Prescription Dose Spillage and inverse Paddick Conformity Index.

Background: The aim of the study was to determine level of agreement between RTOG Conformity Index (RTOG-CI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI) and Prescription Dose Spillage (PDS) in describing lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) plan conformity; to elucidate any limitations, in practice, of PCI and PDS. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report 91 (ICRU 91) aimed to reduce inconsistencies in dose prescription and normalisation between centres by specifying SABR reporting rules, and suggested using PCI. UK SABR Consortium 2019 guidelines adopted PDS to measure plan quality, but not the PCI. Materials and methods: 51 consecutive lung SABR plans received 54 Gy in 3 fractions (54 Gy/3 Fr), 55 Gy/5 Fr or 60 Gy/8 Fr. Plans were developed according to 2016 UK SABR consortium guidelines, which did not specify PCI or PDS; these values were retrospectively calculated. As PCI varies from 0 to an optimum of 1, inverse PCI (invPCI) was used for calculations. Results: PTV-adjusted PDS tolerances were met in 80.4% of studied plans. A near-perfect positive correlation between invPCI and PDS (R2 = 0.978) was found - stronger than between invPCI and the previously-used RTOG-CI (R2 = 0.915). Conclusions: The strong invPCI-PDS correlation is likely dependent on adequate PTV coverage, present in our cohort. This supports the UK SABR Consortium's adoption of PDS provided PTV coverage is ensured. Plan conformity should be confirmed by visual slice-by-slice review.