Measuring Marriage and Cohabitation: Assessing Same-Sex Relationship Status in the Current Population Survey.

Since June 26, 2015, marriages to same-sex couples have been legally recognized across every state in the United States, bringing new challenges to measuring relationship status in surveys. Starting in 2015 for select households and in 2017 for all households, the Current Population Survey (CPS) used a new household roster that directly identified same-sex and different-sex cohabiting and married couples. We gauge how the estimates and characteristics of same-sex couples vary according to old and new roster categories using the 2015/2016 and 2017/2018 CPS. Employing the new roster, we distinguish the sociodemographic characteristics of married and cohabiting same-sex couples. These findings have implications for the measurement of same-sex couples and our understanding of marriage among sexual minorities.

Heteronormative Relationship Education for Same-Gender Couples.

In recent years, same-gender group-based relationship education has emerged as a viable intervention to prevent relationship distress among same-gender couples. However, many of these programs are conducted in metropolitan areas and lack the ability to reach rural populations. The current study sought to investigate whether two wide-reaching web-based heteronormative relationship education programs could positively impact same-gender relationships. In a sample of 49 same-gender couples, heteronormative relationship education had small (Cohen's d = 0.16-0.39) but reliably positive effects on key areas of relationship functioning and perceived stress relative to a waitlist control group. Additionally, when same-gender couples were matched with different-gender individuals with similar baseline characteristics, no reliable differences between the two groups emerged even though the program effects were sometimes half as large for same-gender couples. Finally, same-gender participants were as satisfied with the program as the matched different-gender individuals. Though the results of the present study indicate that heteronormative relationship education can be helpful for same-gender couples, additional tailoring should be undertaken to ensure that same-gender couples experience as much benefit as possible. Estimates from the current study could be used in future studies to detect what might be small-sized differences.

En los últimos años, la capacitación en relaciones grupal y del mismo sexo ha surgido como una intervención viable para prevenir el distrés relacional entre parejas del mismo género. Sin embargo, muchos de estos programas se realizan en áreas metropolitanas y no pueden llegar a las poblaciones rurales. El presente estudio tuvo como finalidad investigar si dos programas de capacitación heteronormativa en relaciones, por Internet y de amplio alcance podrían tener un efecto positivo en las relaciones del mismo género. En una muestra de 49 parejas del mismo género, la capacitación heteronormativa en relaciones tuvo efectos pequeños (d de Cohen = 0.16-0.39) pero fiablemente positivos en áreas clave del funcionamiento relacional y del estrés percibido respecto de un grupo control en lista de espera. Además, cuando las parejas del mismo género se igualaron con personas de diferente género con características iniciales similares, no surgieron diferencias fiables entre los dos grupos, aunque los efectos del programa fueron a veces de la mitad para las parejas del mismo género. Finalmente, los participantes del mismo género estuvieron tan satisfechos con el programa como las personas de diferente género con quienes se las igualó. Aunque los resultados del presente estudio indican que la capacitación heteronormativa en relaciones puede ser útil para parejas del mismo género, deberían realizarse más adaptaciones para garantizar que las parejas del mismo género tengan todos los beneficios posibles. En futuros estudios podrían usarse cálculos del presente estudio para detectar las posibles diferencias pequeñas.

The Perceptions of New Zealand Lawyers and Social Workers About Children Being Adopted by Gay Couples and Lesbian Couples.

Global trends increasingly appear to be legitimizing same-gender relationships, yet international research shows that despite statutory rights to marry-and by extension, adopt children-same-gender couples continue to experience difficulties when trying to adopt. Primary among these barriers are the persistent heteronormative beliefs, which strongly underpin the unfounded myths about parenting abilities of same-gender couples. Such biased beliefs are perpetuated by some adoption professionals who oppose placing children with lesbian or gay couples. In 2013, New Zealand passed the Marriage Equality Act, making it possible for same-gender couples to legally marry-and by extension, adopt. This provided an opportunity to investigate the perceptions of New Zealand professionals about children being placed with same-gender couples, in a country often perceived to be more tolerant of LGBT people. New Zealand social workers and lawyers (an under-studied group)-the professions most likely involved in adoption-were recruited via professional bodies. Because studying perceptions and beliefs on socially sensitive topics are highly susceptible to social desirability, we designed an instrument utilizing multiple methods to assess and corroborate participants' views about placing children for adoption with couples of the same gender. Administered online and anonymously, the survey included demographic questions, evaluation of negative-meaning and positive-meaning statements, and used a scenario describing a prospective adoptive couple whose gender was ambiguous, in the context of adopting children of varying needs. Overall, the study found that while New Zealand lawyers and social workers (N = 314) had generally favorable views of gay and lesbian adoption, they still reported a preference to see children adopted by heterosexual couples over same-gender couples, within which lesbian and gay couples were preferred equally. Moreover, being religious and politically conservative were characteristics associated with more negative views toward placing children with same-gender couples. We conclude that, despite winning the rights to marry (and adopt as couples), such legislative wins might be merely the first hurdle to be overcome; normalizing same-gender parenting is what needs to happen next. Our study adds to the research focused on adoption professionals in various countries, with the ultimate aim to inform practices and policies supportive of families headed by same-gender couples and formed through adoption.