ConSIG: consistent discovery of molecular signature from OMIC data.

The discovery of proper molecular signature from OMIC data is indispensable for determining biological state, physiological condition, disease etiology, and therapeutic response. However, the identified signature is reported to be highly inconsistent, and there is little overlap among the signatures identified from different biological datasets. Such inconsistency raises doubts about the reliability of reported signatures and significantly hampers its biological and clinical applications. Herein, an online tool, ConSIG, was constructed to realize consistent discovery of gene/protein signature from any uploaded transcriptomic/proteomic data. This tool is unique in a) integrating a novel strategy capable of significantly enhancing the consistency of signature discovery, b) determining the optimal signature by collective assessment, and c) confirming the biological relevance by enriching the disease/gene ontology. With the increasingly accumulated concerns about signature consistency and biological relevance, this online tool is expected to be used as an essential complement to other existing tools for OMIC-based signature discovery. ConSIG is freely accessible to all users without login requirement at https://idrblab.org/consig/.

De novo gene signature identification from single-cell RNA-seq with hierarchical Poisson factorization.

Common approaches to gene signature discovery in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) depend upon predefined structures like clusters or pseudo-temporal order, require prior normalization, or do not account for the sparsity of single-cell data. We present single-cell hierarchical Poisson factorization (scHPF), a Bayesian factorization method that adapts hierarchical Poisson factorization (Gopalan et al, 2015, Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 326) for de novo discovery of both continuous and discrete expression patterns from scRNA-seq. scHPF does not require prior normalization and captures statistical properties of single-cell data better than other methods in benchmark datasets. Applied to scRNA-seq of the core and margin of a high-grade glioma, scHPF uncovers marked differences in the abundance of glioma subpopulations across tumor regions and regionally associated expression biases within glioma subpopulations. scHFP revealed an expression signature that was spatially biased toward the glioma-infiltrated margins and associated with inferior survival in glioblastoma.

Immune cell type signature discovery and random forest classification for analysis of single cell gene expression datasets.

Background: Robust immune cell gene expression signatures are central to the analysis of single cell studies. Nearly all known sets of immune cell signatures have been derived by making use of only single gene expression datasets. Utilizing the power of multiple integrated datasets could lead to high-quality immune cell signatures which could be used as superior inputs to machine learning-based cell type classification approaches. Results: We established a novel workflow for the discovery of immune cell type signatures based primarily on gene-versus-gene expression similarity. It leverages multiple datasets, here seven single cell expression datasets from six different cancer types and resulted in eleven immune cell type-specific gene expression signatures. We used these to train random forest classifiers for immune cell type assignment for single-cell RNA-seq datasets. We obtained similar or better prediction results compared to commonly used methods for cell type assignment in independent benchmarking datasets. Our gene signature set yields higher prediction scores than other published immune cell type gene sets in random forest-based cell type classification. We further demonstrate how our approach helps to avoid bias in downstream statistical analyses by re-analysis of a published IFN stimulation experiment. Discussion and conclusion: We demonstrated the quality of our immune cell signatures and their strong performance in a random forest-based cell typing approach. We argue that classifying cells based on our comparably slim sets of genes accompanied by a random forest-based approach not only matches or outperforms widely used published approaches. It also facilitates unbiased downstream statistical analyses of differential gene expression between cell types for significantly more genes compared to previous cell classification algorithms.