Dosimetric characterization for GRID collimator-based spatially fractionated radiation therapy: Dosimetric parameter acquisition and machine interchangeability investigation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to characterize the dosimetric properties of a commercial brass GRID collimator for high energy photon beams including 15 and 10 MV. Then, the difference in dosimetric parameters of GRID beams among different energies and linacs was evaluated. METHOD: A water tank scanning system was used to acquire the dosimetric parameters, including the percentage depth dose (PDD), beam profiles, peak to valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and output factors (OFs). The profiles at various depths were measured at 100 cm source to surface distance (SSD), and field sizes of 10 × 10 cm2 and 20 × 20 cm2 on three linacs. The PVDRs and OFs were measured and compared with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. RESULTS: Compared with the open beam data, there were noticeable changes in PDDs of GRID fields across all the energies. The GRID fields demonstrated a maximal of 3 mm shift in dmax (Truebeam STX, 15MV, 10 × 10 cm2). The PVDR decreased as beam energy increases. The difference in PVDRs between Trilogy and Truebeam STx using 6MV and 15MV was 1.5% ± 4.0% and 2.1% ± 4.3%, respectively. However, two Truebeam linacs demonstrated less than 2% difference in PVDRs. The OF of the GRID field was dependent on the energy and field size. The measured PDDs, PVDRs, and OFs agreed with the TPS calculations within 3% difference. The TPS calculations agreed with the measurements when using 1 mm calculation resolution. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric characteristics of high-energy GRID fields, especially PVDR, significantly differ from those of low-energy GRID fields. Two Truebeam machines are interchangeable for GRID therapy, while a pronounced difference was observed between Truebeam and Trilogy. A series of empirical equations and reference look-up tables for GRID therapy can be generated to facilitate clinical applications.

Immune Priming with Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the current preclinical and clinical evidence of nontargeted immune effects of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT). We then highlight strategies to augment the immunomodulatory potential of SFRT in combination with immunotherapy (IT). RECENT FINDINGS: The response of cancer to IT is limited by primary and acquired immune resistance, and strategies are needed to prime the immune system to increase the efficacy of IT. Radiation therapy can induce immunologic effects and can potentially be used to synergize the effects of IT, although the optimal combination of radiation and IT is largely unknown. SFRT is a novel radiation technique that limits ablative doses to tumor subvolumes, and this highly heterogeneous dose deposition may increase the immune-rich infiltrate within the targeted tumor with enhanced antigen presentation and activated T cells in nonirradiated tumors. The understanding of nontargeted effects of SFRT can contribute to future translational strategies to combine SFRT and IT. Integration of SFRT and IT is an innovative approach to address immune resistance to IT with the overall goal of improving the therapeutic ratio of radiation therapy and increasing the efficacy of IT.

A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure.

The outcome of the exposure of living organisms to ionizing radiation is determined by the distribution of the associated energy deposition at different spatial scales. Radiation proceeds through ionizations and excitations of hit molecules with an ~ nm spacing. Approaches such as nanodosimetry/microdosimetry and Monte Carlo track-structure simulations have been successfully adopted to investigate radiation quality effects: they allow to explore correlations between the spatial clustering of such energy depositions at the scales of DNA or chromosome domains and their biological consequences at the cellular level. Physical features alone, however, are not enough to assess the entity and complexity of radiation-induced DNA damage: this latter is the result of an interplay between radiation track structure and the spatial architecture of chromatin, and further depends on the chromatin dynamic response, affecting the activation and efficiency of the repair machinery. The heterogeneity of radiation energy depositions at the single-cell level affects the trade-off between cell inactivation and induction of viable mutations and hence influences radiation-induced carcinogenesis. In radiation therapy, where the goal is cancer cell inactivation, the delivery of a homogenous dose to the tumour has been the traditional approach in clinical practice. However, evidence is accumulating that introducing heterogeneity with spatially fractionated beams (mini- and microbeam therapy) can lead to significant advantages, particularly in sparing normal tissues. Such findings cannot be explained in merely physical terms, and their interpretation requires considering the scales at play in the underlying biological mechanisms, suggesting a systemic response to radiation.

A simple dosimetric approach to spatially fractionated GRID radiation therapy using the multileaf collimator for treatment of breast cancers in the prone position.

The purpose of this study was to explore the treatment planning methods of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), commonly referred to as GRID therapy, in the treatment of breast cancer patients using multileaf collimator (MLC) in the prone position. A total of 12 patients with either left or right breast cancer were retrospectively chosen. The computed tomography (CT) images taken for the whole breast external beam radiation therapy (WB-EBRT) were used for GRID therapy planning. Each GRID plan was made by using two portals and each portal had two fields with 1-cm aperture size. The dose prescription point was placed at the center of the target volume, and a dose of 20 Gy with 6-MV beams was prescribed. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) curves were generated to evaluate dosimetric properties. A modified linear-quadratic (MLQ) radiobiological response model was used to assess the equivalent uniform doses (EUD) and therapeutic ratios (TRs) of all GRID plans. The DVH curves indicated that these MLC-based GRID therapy plans can deliver heterogeneous dose distribution in the target volume as seen with the conventional cerrobend GRID block. The plans generated by the MLC technique also demonstrated the advantage for accommodating different target shapes, sparing normal structures, and reporting dose metrics to the targets and the organs at risks. All GRID plans showed to have similar dosimetric parameters, implying the plans can be made in a consistent quality regardless of the shape of the target and the size of volume. The mean dose of lung and heart were respectively below 0.6 and 0.7 Gy. When the size of aperture is increased from 1 to 2 cm, the EUD and TR became smaller, but the peak/valley dose ratio (PVDR) became greater. The dosimetric approach of this study was proven to be simple, practical and easy to be implemented in clinic.

Computational Approach for Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) and Immunological Response in Precision Radiation Therapy.

The field of precision radiation therapy has seen remarkable advancements in both experimental and computational methods. Recent literature has introduced various approaches such as Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT). This unconventional treatment, demanding high-precision radiotherapy, has shown promising clinical outcomes. A comprehensive computational scheme for SFRT, extrapolated from a case report, is proposed. This framework exhibits exceptional flexibility, accommodating diverse initial conditions (shape, inhomogeneity, etc.) and enabling specific choices for sub-volume selection with administrated higher radiation doses. The approach integrates the standard linear quadratic model and, significantly, considers the activation of the immune system due to radiotherapy. This activation enhances the immune response in comparison to the untreated case. We delve into the distinct roles of the native immune system, immune activation by radiation, and post-radiotherapy immunotherapy, discussing their implications for either complete recovery or disease regrowth.

In Vivo Microbeam Radiation Therapy at a Conventional Small Animal Irradiator.

Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a still pre-clinical form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy, which uses an array of micrometer-wide, planar beams of X-ray radiation. The dose modulation in MRT has proven effective in the treatment of tumors while being well tolerated by normal tissue. Research on understanding the underlying biological mechanisms mostly requires large third-generation synchrotrons. In this study, we aimed to develop a preclinical treatment environment that would allow MRT independent of synchrotrons. We built a compact microbeam setup for pre-clinical experiments within a small animal irradiator and present in vivo MRT application, including treatment planning, dosimetry, and animal positioning. The brain of an immobilized mouse was treated with MRT, excised, and immunohistochemically stained against γH2AX for DNA double-strand breaks. We developed a comprehensive treatment planning system by adjusting an existing dose calculation algorithm to our setup and attaching it to the open-source software 3D-Slicer. Predicted doses in treatment planning agreed within 10% with film dosimetry readings. We demonstrated the feasibility of MRT exposures in vivo at a compact source and showed that the microbeam pattern is observable in histological sections of a mouse brain. The platform developed in this study will be used for pre-clinical research of MRT.

On the significance of the different geometrical and dosimetric parameters in microbeam and minibeam radiation therapy a retrospective evaluation.

Introduction: Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) is an unconventional therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT is believed to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to remarkable increases in normal tissue tolerance. To make optimal use of SFRT and its benefits, a deeper understanding of the biological response and its relationship with the complex dosimetric and geometric components of SFRT is essential. Method: A retrospective evaluation of preclinical studies was conducted to gain insight into the dosimetric and geometric parameters that are most correlated with normal tissue response. Current literature evaluates the response of tissue to MBRT and MRT according to various end points, e.g. the level of desquamation, degree of necrosis, or the amount of malcalcification. A set of metrics was developed to allow a quantitative comparison of these results. Results: The strongest correlations were observed with the doses in both the peaks and valleys as well as the ratio of the area covered by the peak over the total area. This emphasises the geometry of the beam. MBRT challenged previous uniform dose-distribution paradigms by highlighting the critical role of Peak Dose alongside Valley Dose in tissue sparing whereas MRT underscores the significant influence of geometric beam parameters on tissue preservation. Discussion: The data exhibits variability in the results obtained using different animal models and endpoints and additional research is warranted to explore the trends observed in this study under controlled conditions.

A journey to understand SFRT.

This article tells the story of a medical physicist's journey to understand SFRT which started by accident more than 15 years ago. For decades, clinical application and preclinical research have shown that spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) can achieve a magically high therapeutic index. However, only recently, SFRT received well-deserved attention from mainstream radiation oncology. Today, our understanding of SFRT remains limited, which significantly hinders the advancement of SFRT for patient care. In this article, the author intends to shed some light on several important but unanswered SFRT research questions, including what is the essence of SFRT, which dosimetric parameters have clinical relevance and which do not, how does SFRT spare normal tissue but not tumor, and why radiobiological models developed for conventional radiation therapy may not be suitable for SFRT.

Radiation-induced immune response in novel radiotherapy approaches FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies.

The last several years have revealed increasing evidence of the immunomodulatory role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy reshapes the tumoral microenvironment can shift the balance toward a more immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive microenvironment. The immune response to radiation therapy appears to depend on the irradiation configuration (dose, particle, fractionation) and delivery modes (dose rate, spatial distributions). Although an optimal irradiation configuration (dose, temporal fractionation, spatial dose distribution, etc.) has not yet been determined, temporal schemes employing high doses per fraction appear to favor radiation-induced immune response through immunogenic cell death. Through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and the sensing of double-stranded DNA and RNA breaks, immunogenic cell death activates the innate and adaptive immune response, leading to tumor infiltration by effector T cells and the abscopal effect. Novel radiotherapy approaches such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies (SFRT) strongly modulate the dose delivery method. FLASH-RT and SFRT have the potential to trigger the immune system effectively while preserving healthy surrounding tissues. This manuscript reviews the current state of knowledge on the immunomodulation effects of these two new radiotherapy techniques in the tumor, healthy immune cells and non-targeted regions, as well as their therapeutic potential in combination with immunotherapy.

2D mapping of radiation dose and clonogenic survival for accurate assessment ofin vitroX-ray GRID irradiation effects.

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT or GRID) is an approach to deliver high local radiation doses in an 'on-off' pattern. To better appraise the radiobiological effects from GRID, a framework to link local radiation dose to clonogenic survival needs to be developed. A549 lung cancer cells were irradiated in T25 cm2flasks using 220 kV x-rays with an open field or through a tungsten GRID collimator with periodical 5 mm openings and 10 mm blockings. Delivered nominal doses were 2, 5, and 10 Gy. A novel approach for image segmentation was used to locate the centroid of surviving colonies in scanned images of the cell flasks. GafchromicTMfilm dosimetry (GFD) and FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were employed to map the dose at each surviving colony centroid. Fitting the linear-quadratic (LQ) function to clonogenic survival data for open field irradiation, the expected survival level at a given dose level was calculated. The expected survival levels were then mapped together with the observed levels in the GRID-irradiated flasks. GFD and FLUKA MC gave similar dose distributions, with a mean peak-to-valley dose ratio of about 5. LQ-parameters for open field irradiation gaveα=0.24±0.02Gy-1andß=0.019±0.002Gy-2. The mean relative percentage deviation between observed and predicted survival in the (peak; valley) dose regions was (4.6; 3.1) %, (26.6; -1.0) %, and (129.8; -2.3) % for 2, 5 and 10 Gy, respectively. In conclusion, a framework for mapping of surviving colonies following GRID irradiation together with predicted survival levels from homogeneous irradiation was presented. For the given cell line, our findings indicate that GRID irradiation causes reduced survival in the peak regions compared to an open field configuration.

Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review.

Purpose: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. Method: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. Results: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3-6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. Conclusion: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described.

Combining FLASH and spatially fractionated radiation therapy: The best of both worlds.

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) are two new therapeutical strategies that use non-standard dose delivery methods to reduce normal tissue toxicity and increase the therapeutic index. Although likely based on different mechanisms, both FLASH-RT and SFRT have shown to elicit radiobiological effects that significantly differ from those induced by conventional radiotherapy. With the therapeutic potential having been established separately for each technique, the combination of FLASH-RT and SFRT could therefore represent a winning alliance. In this review, we discuss the state of the art, advantages and current limitations, potential synergies, and where a combination of these two techniques could be implemented today or in the near future.

Monte Carlo optimization of a GRID collimator for preclinical megavoltage ultra-high dose rate spatially-fractionated radiation therapy.

Objective. A 2-dimensional pre-clinical SFRT (GRID) collimator was designed for use on the ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) 10 MV ARIEL beamline at TRIUMF. TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine optimal collimator geometry with respect to various dosimetric quantities.Approach. The GRID-averaged peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) and mean dose rate of the peaks were investigated with the intent of maximizing both values in a given design. The effects of collimator thickness, focus position, septal width, and hole width on these metrics were found by testing a range of values for each parameter on a cylindrical GRID collimator. For each tested collimator geometry, photon beams with energies of 10, 5, and 1 MV were transported through the collimator and dose rates were calculated at various depths in a water phantom located 1.0 cm from the collimator exit.Main results. In our optimization, hole width proved to be the only collimator parameter which increased both PVDR and peak dose rates. From the optimization results, it was determined that our optimized design would be one which achieves the maximum dose rate for a PVDR≥5at 10 MV. Ultimately, this was achieved using a collimator with a thickness of 75 mm, 0.8 mm septal and hole widths, and a focus position matched to the beam divergence. This optimized collimator maintained the PVDR of 5 in the phantom between water depths of 0-10 cm at 10 MV and had a mean peak dose rate of3.06±0.02Gys-1at 0-1 cm depth.Significance. We have investigated the impact of various GRID-collimator design parameters on the dose rate and spatial fractionation of 10, 5, and 1 MV photon beams. The optimized collimator design for the 10 MV ultra-high dose rate photon beam could become a useful tool for radiobiology studies synergizing the effects of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) delivery and spatial fractionation.

A Dosimetric Parameter Reference Look-Up Table for GRID Collimator-Based Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy.

Computations of heterogeneity dose parameters in GRID therapy remain challenging in many treatment planning systems (TPS). To address this difficulty, we developed reference dose tables for a standard GRID collimator and validate their accuracy. The .decimal Inc. GRID collimator was implemented within the Eclipse TPS. The accuracy of the dose calculation was confirmed in the commissioning process. Representative sets of simulated ellipsoidal tumours ranging from 6-20 cm in diameter at a 3-cm depth; 16-cm ellipsoidal tumours at 3, 6, and 10 cm in depth were studied. All were treated with 6MV photons to a 20 Gy prescription dose at the tumour center. From these, the GRID therapy dosimetric parameters (previously recommended by the Radiosurgery Society white paper) were derived. Differences in D5 through D95 and EUD between different tumour sizes at the same depth were within 5% of the prescription dose. PVDR from profile measurements at the tumour center differed from D10/D90, but D10/D90 variations for the same tumour depths were within 11%. Three approximation equations were developed for calculating EUDs of different prescription doses for three radiosensitivity levels for 3-cm deep tumours. Dosimetric parameters were consistent and predictable across tumour sizes and depths. Our study results support the use of the developed tables as a reference tool for GRID therapy.

LITE SABR M1: Planning design and dosimetric endpoints for a phase I trial of lattice SBRT.

PURPOSE: Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) using SBRT methods. This study reports clinical dosimetric endpoints achieved for Lattice SBRT plans delivering 20 Gy in 5 fractions to the periphery of a tumor with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 66.7 Gy, as part of a prospective Phase I clinical trial (NCT04133415). Additionally, it updates previously reported planning and delivery techniques based on extended experience with a broader patient population. METHODS: Patients were enrolled on a single-arm phase I trial conducted between November 2019 and August 2020. Eligibility was restricted to tumors >4.5 cm in the largest dimension. Characteristic SFRT dose gradients were achieved using a lattice of 1.5 cm diameter spheres spaced within the GTV in a regular pattern, with peak-to-valley dose varying from 66.7 Gy to 20 Gy within 1.5 cm. Organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing followed AAPM TG101 recommendations for 5-fraction SBRT. RESULTS: Twenty patients (22 plans) were enrolled on study, with one additional plan treated off study. All OAR and target coverage planning objectives were achieved, with the exception of a single small bronchus. Conformity of the 20 Gy isodose line significantly improved over the course of the study. The majority (85.2%) of treatment fractions were delivered in a 30 minutes timeslot, with 4 (3.5%) exceeding a total treatment time of 40 minutes. CONCLUSION: Lattice SBRT planning techniques produce consistent and efficient treatment plans. Refined techniques described here further improve the quality of the planning technique.

How a very large sarcomatoid lung cancer was efficiently managed with lattice radiation therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The management of large tumors represent a concerning issue in the palliative setting. Since a surgical approach is excluded and systemic therapy has reported limited efficacy, the patients are commonly referred for radiation therapy as last resort. However, to improve quality of life and to avoid excessive toxicity, low doses of palliative radiotherapy (RT) are delivered. In these cases, with limited and short response. Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) represents an innovative technique aiming to increase tumor response without enhancing adjacent organs at risk (OAR) toxicity, by administering inhomogeneous doses with ablative high dose areas inside the tumor and low doses near the OAR. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 69-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital complaining of sacral pain and mild dyspnea. After a suspicious opacity on X-ray, the chest computed tomography (CT), the positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) and the endobronchial ultra sound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration confirmed the diagnosis of a bulky sarcomatoid lung cancer (stage IV: cT4N3M1c). After an effective antalgic RT on the sacral metastasis and three lines of systemic therapy without response, the patient started to have a disabling dyspnea. Thus, we administered LRT on the bulky lesion. The patients experienced no significant toxicity, with a marked lesion response on the 3 month-follow CT and a significant improvement in symptoms and in his daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first LRT treatment done in our Center and it provides another evidence in the efficacy of LRT planning. It shows how LRT could represent an innovative technique to provide durable response in large tumors, without increasing treatment-related toxicity.

An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical-Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Advanced Gynecologic Cancer.

Despite the unexpectedly high tumor responses and limited treatment-related toxicities observed with SFRT, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. High variability of SFRT technologies and methods, unfamiliar complex dose and prescription concepts for heterogeneous dose and uncertainty regarding systemic therapies present major obstacles towards clinical trial development. To address these challenges, the consensus guideline reported here aimed at facilitating trial development and feasibility through a priori harmonization of treatment approach and the full range of clinical trial design parameters for SFRT trials in gynecologic cancer. Gynecologic cancers were evaluated for the status of SFRT pilot experience. A multi-disciplinary SFRT expert panel for gynecologic cancer was established to develop the consensus through formal panel review/discussions, appropriateness rank voting and public comment solicitation/review. The trial design parameters included eligibility/exclusions, endpoints, SFRT technology/technique, dose/dosimetric parameters, systemic therapies, patient evaluations, and embedded translational science. Cervical cancer was determined as the most suitable gynecologic tumor for an SFRT trial. Consensus emphasized standardization of SFRT dosimetry/physics parameters, biologic dose modeling, and specimen collection for translational/biological endpoints, which may be uniquely feasible in cervical cancer. Incorporation of brachytherapy into the SFRT regimen requires additional pre-trial pilot investigations. Specific consensus recommendations are presented and discussed.

First-ever Clinical Experience With Magnetic Resonance-based Lattice Radiotherapy for Treating Bulky Gynecological Tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Bulky gynecological tumors are a rare entity of large primary tumors, for which only a limited range of therapeutic options is available. Among these, when surgical approach is deemed unsuitable based on comorbidities and/or technical feasibility, radiotherapy is administered at low doses with palliative intent only. Aggressive treatment of such large primary tumors might significantly prolong patient survival and improve their quality of life by effectively delaying tumor progression to extra-pelvic sites. Lattice radiotherapy is a type of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy, specifically devoted to treat and debulk large tumor masses, which are not candidates for normofractionated homogeneous high-dose radiotherapy schedules due to potential harmful dose-volume effects. The aim of this case study was to report on the feasibility of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Lattice approach. CASE REPORT: Herein we report a case of a patient with a locally advanced uterine serous papillary carcinoma submitted to radical surgery and rapidly experiencing a painful large pelvic recurrence eroding the sacrum. The patient was submitted to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Lattice radiotherapy consisting of an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map-Based boost followed by a normofractionated radiotherapy course. The patient impressively developed an almost complete clinical response with a long-lasting symptom relief. Subsequently, the disease course was burdened by limited extra- and in-field recurrences amenable of re-irradiation as long as the cumulative radiation dose did not seriously threaten the tolerance of neighboring organs at risk (especially the bowel). The patient is still alive 20 months after Lattice radiotherapy delivery with no radiation-related toxicities. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Lattice radiotherapy might be safe and effective for the treatment of inoperable bulky gynecological tumors.

Dose Profile Modulation of Proton Minibeam for Clinical Application.

The feasibility of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using a multislit collimator (MSC) and a scattering device was evaluated for clinical use at a clinical proton therapy facility. We fabricated, through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, not only an MSC with a high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) at the entrance of the proton beam, to prevent radiation toxicity, but also a scattering device to modulate the PVDR in depth. The slit width and center-to-center distance of the diverging MSC were 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm at the large end, respectively, and its thickness and available field size were 100 mm and 76 × 77.5 mm2, respectively. Spatially fractionated dose distributions were measured at various depths using radiochromic EBT3 films and also tested on bacterial cells. MC simulation showed that the thicker the MSC, the higher the PVDR at the phantom surface. Dosimetric evaluations showed that lateral dose profiles varied according to the scatterer's thickness, and the depths satisfying PVDR = 1.1 moved toward the surface as their thickness increased. The response of the bacterial cells to the proton minibeams' depth was also established, in a manner similar to the dosimetric pattern. Conclusively, these results strongly suggest that pMBRT can be implemented in clinical centers by using MSC and scatterers.

A Novel Radiotherapeutic Approach to Treat Bulky Metastases Even From Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Its Rationale and a Look at the Reliability of the Linear-Quadratic Model to Explain Its Radiobiological Effects.

Introduction: Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a very rare condition. The lack of definition of an oligometastatic subgroup means that there is no consensus for its treatment, unlike the mucosal head and neck counterpart. Like the latter, the cutaneous form is able to develop bulky tumor masses. When this happens, the classic care approach is just for palliative intent due to a likely unfavorable benefit-risk balance typical of aggressive treatments. Here we proposed a novel radiotherapy (RT) technique to treat bulky metastases from cSCC in the context of an overall limited tumor burden and tried to explain its clinical outcome by the currently available mathematical radiobiological and ad hoc developed models. Methods: We treated a case of facial cSCC with three metastases: two of them by classic stereotactic RT and the other by lattice RT supported by metabolic imaging (18F-FDG PET) due to its excessively large dimensions. For the latter lesion, we compared four treatment plans with different RT techniques in order to define the best approach in terms of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability (TCP). Moreover, we developed an ad hoc mathematical radiobiological model that could fit better with the characteristics of heterogeneity of this bulky metastasis for which, indeed, a segmentation of normoxic, hypoxic, and necrotic subvolumes might have been assumed. Results: We observed a clinical complete response in all three disease sites; the bulky metastasis actually regressed more rapidly than the other two treated by stereotactic RT. For the large lesion, NTCP predictions were good for all four different plans but even significantly better for the lattice RT plan. Neither the classic TCP nor the ad hoc developed radiobiological models could be totally adequate to explain the reported outcome. This finding might support a key role of the host immune system. Conclusions: PET-guided lattice RT might be safe and effective for the treatment of bulky lesions from cSCC. There might be some need for complex mathematical radiobiological models that are able to take into account any immune system's role in order to explain the possible mechanisms of the tumor response to radiation and the relevant key points to enhance it.