Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on advanced life support units' prehospital management of the stroke code in four Spanish regions: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the most common time-dependent pathology that pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) are confronted with. Prioritisation of ambulance dispatch, initial actions and early pre-notification have a major impact on mortality and disability. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to disruptions in the operation of EMS due to the implementation of self-protection measures and increased demand for care. It is crucial to evaluate what has happened to draw the necessary conclusions and propose changes to improve the system's strength for the future. The study aims to compare prehospital time and neuroprotective care metrics for acute stroke patients during the first wave of COVID-19 and the same periods in the years before and after. METHODS: Analytical, observational, multicentre study conducted in the autonomous communities of Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid in the pre-COVID-19 (2019), "first wave" of COVID-19 (2020) and post-COVID-19 (2021) periods. Consecutive non-randomized sampling. Descriptive statistical analysis and hypothesis testing to compare the three time periods, with two by two post-hoc comparisons, and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,709 patients were analysed. During 2020 there was a significant increase in attendance time of 1.8 min compared to 2019, which was not recovered in 2021. The time of symptom onset was recorded in 82.8% of cases, and 83.3% of patients were referred to specialized stroke centres. Neuroprotective measures (airway, blood glucose, temperature, and blood pressure) were performed in 43.6% of patients. CONCLUSION: During the first wave of COVID-19, the on-scene times of pre-hospital emergency teams increased while keeping the same levels of neuroprotection measures as in the previous and subsequent years. It shows the resilience of EMS under challenging circumstances such as those experienced during the pandemic.

Predictors of perfusion computed tomography alterations in stroke mimics attended as stroke code.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke mimics (SMs) account for a significant number of patients attended as stroke code (SC) with an increasing number over the years. Recent studies show perfusion computed tomography (PCT) alterations in some SMs, especially in seizures. The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and PCT alterations in SMs attended as SC in order to identify potential predictors of PCT alterations in SMs. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including all SC activations undergoing a multimodal CT study including non-enhanced computed tomography (CT), CT angiography and PCT, as part of our SC protocol, over 39 months. Patients with a final diagnosis of SM after complete diagnosis work-up were therefore selected. Clinical variables, diagnosis, PCT alteration patterns and type of map affected (Tmax or time to peak, cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume) were registered. RESULTS: Stroke mimics represent up to 16% (284/1761) of SCs with a complete multimodal study according to our series. Amongst SMs, 26% (74/284) showed PCT alterations. PCT abnormalities are more prevalent in seizures and status epilepticus and the main pattern is alteration of the time to peak map, of unilateral hemispheric distribution or of non-vascular territory. In our series, the independent predictors of alteration in PCT in SMs are aphasia, female sex and older age. CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion computed tomography alterations can be found amongst almost a third of SMs attended as SC, especially older women presenting with aphasia with a final diagnosis of epileptic seizures and status epilepticus.

Improving Acute In-Hospital Stroke Care by Reorganization of an In-Hospital Stroke Code Protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delays in recognition and assessment of in-hospital strokes (IHS) can lead to poor outcomes. The aim was to examine whether reorganized IHS code protocol can reduce treatment time. METHODS: IHS code protocol was developed, educational workshops were held for medical personnel. In the protocol, any medical personnel should directly consult a stroke neurologist before any diagnostic studies. Time intervals were compared between the pre- and post-implementation periods and between direct consultation with a stroke neurologist (DC group) and non-DC group in the post-implementation period. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included (pre, 42; post, 103). Time from recognition to stroke neurologist assessment (91 vs. 35 min, p = 0.002) and time from recognition to neuroimaging (123 vs. 74, p = 0.013) were significantly lower in the post-implementation period. Time from stroke neurologist assessment to groin puncture was significantly lower (135 vs. 81, p = 0.037). In the post-implementation period, DC group showed significant time savings from last known well (LKW) to recognition (93 vs. 260, p = 0.001), LKW to stroke neurologist assessment (145 vs. 378, p = 0.001), and recognition to stroke neurologist assessment (16 vs. 76, p < 0.001) compared with non-DC group. CONCLUSIONS: Reorganization of IHS code protocol reduced time from stroke recognition to assessment and treatment time. Reorganized IHS code and direct consultation with a stroke neurologist improved the initial response time.

Covid-19: As a Fear Factor in Response to Stroke Code and Other Interventional Radiology Emergencies?

The COVID-19 coronavirus crisis has posed an international challenge for all health systems. The first patient registered in Spain with the COVID-19 coronavirus was known on January 31, and the state of alarm was declared on March 14, 2020. The advance of the infection worldwide has caused a modification of the usual pattern in hospital emergency responses. This study describes the incidence of emergencies in the interventional radiology section of the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital and analyzes whether the presence of COVID-19 caused a decrease in the number of patients treated especially for ischemic strokes. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 236 patients treated at the interventional radiology on call between June 1, 2019 and May 10, 2020, at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital. No specific results were found that indicate a decrease in the incidence of urgent procedures, especially mechanical thrombectomies in patients with ischemic strokes performed by the interventional radiology team since the establishment of the alarm state by COVID-19 in Cantabria. Patients' fear of contracting COVID-19 infection in the hospital environment has not led to a decrease in urgent procedures, especially for ischemic strokes.

A Stroke Care Model at an Academic, Comprehensive Stroke Center During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has required the adaptation of hyperacute stroke care (including stroke code pathways) and hospital stroke management. There remains a need to provide rapid and comprehensive assessment to acute stroke patients while reducing the risk of COVID-19 exposure, protecting healthcare providers, and preserving personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. While the COVID infection is typically not a primary cerebrovascular condition, the downstream effects of this pandemic force adjustments to stroke care pathways to maintain optimal stroke patient outcomes. METHODS: The University of California San Diego (UCSD) Health System encompasses two academic, Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). The UCSD Stroke Center reviewed the national COVID-19 crisis and implications on stroke care. All current resources for stroke care were identified and adapted to include COVID-19 screening. The adjusted model focused on comprehensive and rapid acute stroke treatment, reduction of exposure to the healthcare team, and preservation of PPE. AIMS: The adjusted pathways implement telestroke assessments as a specific option for all inpatient and outpatient encounters and accounts for when telemedicine systems are not available or functional. COVID screening is done on all stroke patients. We outline a model of hyperacute stroke evaluation in an adapted stroke code protocol and novel methods of stroke patient management. CONCLUSIONS: The overall goal of the model is to preserve patient access and outcomes while decreasing potential COVID-19 exposure to patients and healthcare providers. This model also serves to reduce the use of vital PPE. It is critical that stroke providers share best practices via academic and vetted social media platforms for rapid dissemination of tools and care models during the COVID-19 crisis.

Spinal epidural hematoma as a stroke mimic.

PURPOSE: Spinal epidural hematoma is a rare but important disease as it can be a stroke mimic. Our aim was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with an activated stroke code and spinal epidural hematoma. METHODS: Patients with an activated stroke code were examined retrospectively. Patients with spinal epidural hematoma were evaluated with further neurological examinations and neuroimaging. RESULTS: Of 2866 patients with an activated stroke code, spinal epidural hematoma was detected in 5 (0.2%, 63-79 years, 2 men). In all 5 cases, hematoma was located in the unilateral dorsal region of the spinal canal and spread to 5-9 vertebral segments at the C1-T3 level. None of the patients had a medical history of head or neck injury, coagulopathy, or use of anti-thrombotic agents. All of the patients had occipital, neck, and/or back pain, and their hemiparesis occurred simultaneously or within 1 h after the onset of pain. Hyperalgesia ipsilateral to the hematoma was observed in 1 patient, hypoalgesia contralateral to the hematoma was observed in 1, and quadriparesis and bilateral hypoalgesia were observed in 1. The hematomas spontaneously decreased in size in 4 patients, and cervical laminectomy was performed in the other patient. In the 1860 patients with an activated stroke code and spontaneous eye opening, the sensitivity of pain as a predictor of spinal epidural hematoma was 100%, with a specificity of 88.7%, and positive predictive value of 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Patients with spinal epidural hematoma could present with clinical characteristics mimicking ischemic stroke. Spinal epidural hematoma should be differentiated in patients treated under stroke code activation.

Arterial ischemic stroke in non-neonate children: Diagnostic and therapeutic specificities.

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a severe condition, with long-lasting devastating consequences on motor and cognitive abilities, academic and social inclusion, and global life projects. Awareness about initial symptoms, implementation of pediatric stroke code protocols using MRI first and only and adapted management in the acute phase, individually tailored recanalization treatment strategies, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs with specific goal-centered actions are the key elements to improve pediatric AIS management and outcomes. The main cause of pediatric AIS is focal cerebral arteriopathy, a condition with unilateral focal stenosis and time-limited course requiring specific management. Sickle cell disease and moyamoya angiopathy patients need adapted screening and therapeutics.

Isolated Anisocoria as a Presenting Stroke Code Symptom is Unlikely to Result in Alteplase Administration.

BACKGROUND: Acute stroke codes may be activated for anisocoria, but how often these codes lead to a final stroke diagnosis or alteplase treatment is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of anisocoria in stroke codes that ultimately resulted in alteplase administration. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed consecutive alteplase-treated patients from a prospectively-collected stroke registry between February 2015 and July 2018. Based on the stroke code exam, patients were categorized as having isolated anisocoria [A+(only)], anisocoria with other findings [A+(other)], or no anisocoria [A-]. Baseline demographics, stroke severity, alteplase time metrics, and outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients received alteplase during the study period. Of the 94 who met inclusion criteria, there were 0 cases of A+(only). There were 9 cases of A+(other) (9.6%). A+(other) exhibited higher baseline National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale scores compared to A- (17 versus 7; P = .0003), and no additional differences in demographics or alteplase time metrics. Final stroke diagnosis and other outcome measures were no different between A+(other) and A-. Of the A+ patients without pre-existing anisocoria, 5 of 6 (83%) had posterior circulation events or diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis, zero patients with isolated anisocoria received alteplase treatment. Anisocoria as a part of the neurologic presentation occurred in 10% of alteplase patients, and was strongly associated with a posterior circulation event. Therefore, we conclude that anisocoria has a higher likelihood of leading to alteplase treatment when identified in the presence of other neurologic deficits.

Clinical Characteristics and Emergent Therapeutic Interventions in Patients Evaluated through the In-hospital Stroke Alert Protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Emergent evaluation of inpatients with suspected acute ischemic stroke faces difficulty of symptoms recognition, false alarms, and high rate of contraindications to reperfusion therapies. We aim to assess the clinical characteristics and therapeutic interventions implemented in patients evaluated though the in-hospital Stroke Alert Protocol. METHODS: We analyzed 4 years-worth of Stroke Alert cases at a university hospital. Demographics, clinical presentation, final diagnosis, and acute interventions were compared between inpatients and those presenting to the emergency department. FINDINGS: A total of 1965 Stroke Alert cases were included: 959 (48.8%) were acute cerebrovascular events and 1006 (51.2%) were noncerebrovascular. Hospitalized patients accounted for 489 (24.9%) of Stroke Alerts and patients in the emergency department for 1476 (75.1%). Inpatients were more likely to present with nonfocal neurological deficits (46.2% versus 32.4%, P < .0001) and be diagnosed with noncerebrovascular disorders (62.4% versus 47.5%, P < .0001). Acute interventions other than thrombolysis were delivered in 77.1% of in-hospital cases. Compared to the emergency department, inpatients were more commonly managed with rectification of metabolic abnormalities (21.5% versus 13.7%, P < .001), suspension or pharmacological reversal of drugs (11% versus 3.7%, P < .001), and initiation of respiratory support (13.5% versus 9.3%, P = .01). Inpatients with acute ischemic stroke received intravenous thrombolysis less frequently (4.9% versus 23.9%, P < .001), but the endovascular treatment rate was comparable (9.8% versus 10.3%) to the emergency department. CONCLUSION: Nonfocal neurological deficits and noncerebrovascular disorders are commonly encountered during in-hospital Stroke Alerts. In the inpatient setting, intravenous thrombolysis is rarely delivered while other time-sensitive therapeutic interventions are frequently implemented.

Impact of "Stroke Code"-Rapid Response Team: An Attempt to Improve Intravenous Thrombolysis Rate and to Shorten Door-to-Needle Time in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: "Stroke code" (SC) implementation in hospitals can improve the rate of thrombolysis and the timeline in care of stroke patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective data of patients treated for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after implementation of "SC" (post-SC era) were analyzed (2015-2016) and compared with the retrospective data of patients treated in the "pre-SC era." Parameters such as symptom-to-door, door-to-physician, door-to-imaging, door-to-needle (DTN), and symptom-to-needle time were calculated. The severity of stroke was calculated using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Patients presented with stroke symptoms in pre- and post-SC era (695 vs. 610) and, out of these, patients who came in window period constituted 148 (21%) and 210 (34%), respectively. Patients thrombolyzed in pre- and post-SC era were 44 (29.7%) and 65 (44.52%), respectively. Average DTN time was 104.95 min in pre-SC era and reduced to 67.28 min (P < 0.001) post-SC implementation. Percentage of patients thrombolyzed within DTN time ≤60 min in pre-SC era and SC era was 15.90% and 55.38%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implementation of SC helped us to increase thrombolysis rate in AIS and decrease DTN time.

A systemized stroke code significantly reduced time intervals for using intravenous tissue plasminogen activator under magnetic resonance imaging screening.

BACKGROUND: A stroke code can shorten time intervals until intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) treatment in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Recently, several reports demonstrated that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based thrombolysis had reduced complications and improved outcomes in AIS despite longer processing compared with computed tomography (CT)-based thrombolysis. METHODS: In January 2009, we implemented CODE RED, a computerized stroke code, at our hospital with the aim of achieving rapid stroke assessment and treatment. We included patients with thrombolysis from January 2007 to December 2008 (prestroke code period) and from January 2009 to May 2013 (poststroke code period). The IV t-PA time intervals and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were collected. RESULTS: During the observation period, 252 patients used IV t-PA under the CODE RED (MRI based: 208; CT based: 44). The remaining 71 patients (MRI based: 53; CT based: 18) received it before the implementation of our stroke code. After implementation of CODE RED, door-to-image time, door-to-needle time, and the onset-to-needle time were significantly reduced by 11, 18, and 22 minutes in MRI-based thrombolysis. Particularly, the proportion of favorable outcome (mRS score 0-2) was significantly increased (from 41.5% to 60.1%, P = .02) in poststroke than in prestroke code period in MRI-based thrombolysis. However, in ordinal regression, the presence of stroke code showed just a trend for favorable outcome (odds ratio, .99-2.87; P = .059) at 90 days of using IV t-PA after correction of age, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that a systemized stroke code shortened time intervals for using IV t-PA under MRI screening. Also, our results showed a possibility that a systemized stroke code might enhance the efficacy of MRI-based thrombolysis. In the future, we need to carry out a more detailed prospective study about this notion.

Comparison of Stroke Codes in the Emergency Room and Inpatient Setting.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of acute stroke management are time dependent. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is indicated within 3-4.5 hours of symptom onset and endovascular intervention within 6 hours. Time to treatment may depend on the patient's location. This study seeks to determine whether there is a difference in the timing of key aspects of stroke codes between the emergency room and the inpatient setting. METHODS: Stroke codes ending in t-PA administration or endovascular intervention between 2010 and 2013 were included. Emergency room stroke codes were compared with those in the inpatient setting. Data were obtained from the Yarmon Stroke Center log. The variables were time to neurological evaluation, time to computed tomography (CT) scan, time to t-PA administration, time from CT scan to t-PA, and time to endovascular intervention. The variables were compared using the t test. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two stroke codes were included (106 from emergency room and 16 from inpatient setting). There was no difference in the time to neurological evaluation (P = .19). The time to CT scan and to t-PA administration was significantly increased in the inpatient group (P ≤ .001 and P = .01, respectively). There was no difference in the time from CT scan to t-PA (P = .09) and in the time to endovascular intervention (P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in the inpatient setting, there was a significant delay in the time to CT scan and to t-PA administration and that the source of the delay is the time to CT scan.

Accuracy of First Recorded "Last Known Normal" Times of Stroke Code Patients.

BACKGROUND: Given the time sensitivity of thrombolytic therapy, the accurate documentation of last known normal (LKN) time is crucial to ensure optimal management of stroke patients. This study investigates whether a difference exists between preliminary LKN times (first responders and emergency department practitioners) and revised LKN times (neurology/stroke practitioners), and what potential impact on emergent management of acute stroke this discrepancy may pose. METHODS: All stroke code patients from UC San Diego hospitals from October 2008 to July 2013 with treatment time data were included and grouped based on the disparity between preliminary LKN time and revised LKN time: preliminary earlier than revised, 2 times equal, and preliminary later than revised. We compared baseline characteristics, stroke code intervals, rates of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) administration, 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, discharge disposition, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. RESULTS: Of 261 patients, 73.6% had disparity between preliminary and revised times: 57.5% had later preliminary LKN than revised, and 16.1% had earlier preliminary LKN than revised. Baseline characteristics, stroke code speed, 90-day mRS score, rates of rt-PA administration, discharge disposition, or rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were not significantly different between the groups. Among rt-PA-treated stroke patients whose preliminary time was earlier than the revised time, had the preliminary LKN been used, 29.4% would have had rt-PA withheld inappropriately. In those stroke patients excluded from rt-PA treatment for being outside the treatment window, whose preliminary time was later than the revised time, had the preliminary time been used, 69.7% would have been inappropriately treated outside the relevant rt-PA window. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had disparity between preliminary and revised LKN times. Had the preliminary LKN time been used for acute stroke decision-making, 58% of patients would have potentially been treated outside the approved thrombolytic time window, with higher risk of adverse events, and 16% may have been inappropriately excluded from thrombolysis. This study highlights the need for training in the determination and refinement of the actual time of stroke onset, especially at hospitals without stroke expertise.

Detecting in-hospital stroke: Assessment of results from a training programme for medical personnel.

INTRODUCTION: In-hospital stroke (IHS) is a frequent event, but its care priority level is not well established in many hospitals. IHS care at our centre has been redefined by implementing a training programme for medical personnel not usually involved in stroke management, in order to optimise IHS detection and treatment. This study evaluates results from the training programme. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal intervention study. Neurologists experienced in vascular diseases developed a training programme for medical personnel. We recorded incidence, epidemiological data, reason for hospitalisation, department, aetiology, severity (NIHSS), time from symptom onset to neurological assessment, use of endovascular thrombolysis, exclusion criteria for untreated patients, and 90-day outcome (mortality/disability) in 2 patient groups: patients experiencing IHS in the 6 months before (PRE) and the 6 months after the training programme (POST). RESULTS: Sixty patients were included (19 PRE, 41 POST) with a mean age of 75.3 ± 12.5; 41% were male. There were no differences between groups regarding assessment time, treatment administered, or morbidity/mortality. Overall, 68.3% of the patients were assessed in < 4.5hours; however, only 6 patients (10%) were able to undergo endovascular therapy. This situation was mainly due to pre-existing disability (26%) and comorbidity (13%). CONCLUSIONS: More IHS code activations were recorded after the training programme. However, that increase was not accompanied by a higher percentage of treated patients or improvements in patient prognosis during the study period, and these findings could probably be explained by the high rates of pre-existing disability and comorbidity in this series.

Problems and limitations in thrombolysis of acute stroke patients at a tertiary care center.

AIM: (1) To evaluate the number of patients thrombolysed within 1 h of arrival to emergency room (ER) (2) To identify reasons for delay in thrombolysis of acute stroke patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients admitted to ER with symptoms suggestive of stroke from January 2011 to November 2013 were studied. Retrospective data were collected to evaluate ER to needle (door to needle time [DTNt]) time and reasons for delay in thrombolysis. The parameters studied (1) onset of symptoms to ER time, (2) ER to imaging time (door to imaging time [DTIt]), (4) ER to needle time (door to needle) and (5) contraindications for thrombolysis. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients with suspected stroke were admitted during study period. 547 (78%) patients were out of window period. 148 patients (21%, M = 104, F = 44) arrived within window period (<4.5 h.). 104 (70.27%) were contraindicated for thrombolysis. Majority were intracerebral bleeds. 44 (29.7%) were eligible for thrombolysis. 7 (15.9%) were thrombolysed within 1 h. The mean time for arrival of patients from onset of symptoms to hospital (symptom to door) 83 min (median - 47). The mean door to neuro-physician time (DTPt) was 32 min (median - 15 min). The mean DTIt was 58 min (median - 50 min). The mean DTNt 104 (median - 100 min). CONCLUSION: Reasons for delay in thrombolysis are: Absence of stroke education program for common people. Lack of priority for triage and imaging for stroke patients.

Time of the day and season distribution among stroke code subtypes: differences between ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and stroke mimic.

Background: Circadian variations in the timing of the onset of stroke symptoms have been described, showing a morning excess of cardiovascular risk. To date, no differences have been found between stroke subtype and time distribution throughout the day. The present study aims to compare the seasonal and circadian rhythm of symptoms onset in ischemic, hemorrhagic, and stroke mimic patients. Methods: This study was conducted prospectively at a hospital and involved a cohort of stroke alert patients from 2018 to 2021. Stroke subtypes were classified as ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and stroke mimic. Clinical variables were recorded, and each patient was assigned to a 4-h interval of the day according to the time of onset of symptoms; unwitnessed stroke patients were analyzed separately. Seasonal changes in stroke distribution were analyzed at 3-month intervals. Results: A total of 2,348 patients were included in this analysis (ischemic 67%, ICH 13%, mimic 16%, and TIA 3%). Regardless of stroke subtype, most of the patients were distributed between 08-12 h and 12-16 h. Significant differences were found in the time distribution depending on stroke subtype, with ICH predominating in the 4-8 h period (dawn), most of which were hypertensive, TIA in the 12-16 h period (afternoon), and stroke mimic in the 20 h period (evening). The ischemic stroke was evenly distributed throughout the different periods of the day. There were no differences in the seasonal pattern between different stroke subtypes, with winter being the one that accumulated the most cases. Conclusion: The present study showed different circadian patterns of stroke subtypes, with a predominance of ICH at dawn and stroke mimic in the afternoon. The stroke circadian rhythm resembles previous studies, with a higher incidence in the morning and a second peak in the afternoon.

Are we missing an opportunity? Prehospital delay in patients with acute ischemic stroke and known atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The follow-up of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presents an opportunity to alert patients and their families on how to recognize and act in the event of stroke. Our aim was to compare stroke recognition-to-door time and prehospital stroke code activation in patients with known AF (KAF) and AF detected after stroke (AFDAS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients receiving acute recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke between January 2016 and August 2022, with AF as a potential stroke cause. Patients were divided into KAF and AFDAS, and stroke recognition-to-door time and prehospital stroke code activation were compared. In the KAF subgroup, we assessed whether the use of preadmission anticoagulation was associated with the studied prehospital parameters. RESULTS: We included 438 patients, 290 female (66.2%), mean age 79.3±9.4 years. In total, 238 patients had KAF (54.3%) and 200 (45.7%) had AFDAS. Of those with KAF, 114 (48.1%) were pretreated with anticoagulation. Patients with KAF and AFDAS had no differences in stroke recognition-to-door time (74.0 [55.0-101.0] vs. 78.0 [60.0-112.0] min; p=0.097) or prehospital stroke code activation [148 (64.6%) vs. 128 (65.3%); p=0.965]. In the KAF subgroup, preadmission anticoagulation did not influence stroke recognition-to-door time or mode of hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Stroke recognition-to-door time and prehospital stroke code activation were similar between patients with known or newly diagnosed AF. Preadmission anticoagulation treatment also did not affect the studied parameters. Our findings highlight a missed opportunity to promote stroke knowledge in patients followed due to AF.

Acute recanalization treatments in postnatal paediatric ischaemic arterial stroke. Paediatric stroke code.

In children, arterial ischemic stroke is a much less understood disease compared to in adults due to its lower frequency and different aetiology. However, it is also a serious disease, with a high incidence of severe and permanent sequelae that exceeds 50% of total cases. The acute management of postnatal arterial ischaemic stroke (MNAIS) has changed drastically in recent years, chiefly on account of recanalization treatments (thrombolysis and endovascular therapies). These treatments, which used to not be recommended in childhood, are increasingly implemented in everyday clinical practice. Although the evidence from studies carried out in children is not of high quality due to their retrospective design and the small number of reported cases, they support the hypothesis that these treatments are as safe and effective as they are in adults as long as appropriate eligibility criteria are applied and they are used within a certain time from the onset of symptoms (therapeutic window). This article reviews the MNAIS based on the current scientific evidence. Since the efficacy of these treatments is highly dependent on their early initiation, a paediatric stroke code needs to be in place as an extension of the stroke code applied to adults. It has started to be introduced in Spain since 2019, although there are still large areas of the country where it has yet to be applied.

The use of a smartphone application to improve stroke code workflow metrics: A pilot study in a comprehensive stroke centre.

Background: Timely coordination between stroke team members is of relevance for stroke code management. We explore the feasibility and potential utility of a smartphone application for clinical and neuroimaging data sharing for improving workflow metrics of stroke code pathways, and professionals' opinions about its use. Methods: We performed an observational pilot study including stroke code activations at La Paz University Hospital in Madrid, from June 2019 to March 2020. Patients were classified according to the activation or not of the JOIN app by the attending physician. Clinical data and time-to-procedures were retrieved from the app or from the hospital records and the Madrid regional stroke registry as appropriate and compared between both groups. An anonymous survey collected professionals' opinions about the app and its use. Results: A total of 282 stroke code activations were registered. The JOIN app was activated in 111 (39%) cases. They had a significant reduction in imaging-to-thrombolysis (31 vs 20 min, p = .026) and in door-to-thrombolysis times (51 vs 36 min, p = .004), with more patients achieving a door-to-needle time below 45 min (68.8% vs 37.8%, p = .016). About 50% of the users found the app useful for facilitating the diagnosis and decision-making; interoperability with clinical files was considered an opportunity for improvement. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that JOIN helps improve and document workflow metrics in acute stroke management in a comprehensive stroke centre. These results support testing JOIN in a prospective randomised study to confirm its usefulness and the general applicability of the results.

Changing Demographics of Stroke Mimics in Present Day Stroke Code Era: Need of a Streamlined Clinical Assessment for Emergency Physicians.

Background There is an apparently high incidence of stroke mimics in the present-day stroke code era. The reason being is the intense pressure to run with time to achieve the "time is brain"-based goals. Methods The present study was a retrospective analysis of the data collected over a duration of 6 months from April 2019 to September 2019. We observed the incidence of stroke mimics among the patients for whom rapid response stroke code was activated during the study period. We also performed a logistic regression analysis to identify the clinical features which can act as strong predictors of stroke and mimics. Results A total of 314 stroke codes were activated of which 256 (81.5%) were stroke and 58 (18.5%) were the mimics. Functional disorders and epilepsy were the most common mimics (24.1% each). Female gender ( p = 0.04; odds ratio [OR] 2.9[1.0-8.8]), isolated impairment of consciousness ( p < 0.01; OR 4.3[1.5-12.6]), and isolated dysarthria ( p < 0.001) were the strong independent predictors for a stroke mimic. Hemiparesis was the strong independent predictor for a stroke ( p < 0.001; OR 0.0[0.0-0.1]). Conclusion In the present epoch of rapid response stroke management, a streamlined assessment by the emergency physicians based on the above clinical predictors may help in avoiding the misdiagnosis of a mimic as stroke.