Phenotypic heterogeneity by site of infection in surgical sepsis: a prospective longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: The role of site of infection in sepsis has been poorly characterized. Additionally, sepsis epidemiology has evolved. Early mortality has decreased, but many survivors now progress into chronic critical illness (CCI). This study sought to determine if there were significant differences in the host response and current epidemiology of surgical sepsis categorized by site of infection. STUDY DESIGN: This is a longitudinal study of surgical sepsis patients characterized by baseline predisposition, insult characteristics, serial biomarkers, hospital outcomes, and long-term outcomes. Patients were categorized into five anatomic sites of infection. RESULTS: The 316 study patients were predominantly Caucasian; half were male, with a mean age of 62 years, high comorbidity burden, and low 30-day mortality (10%). The primary sites were abdominal (44%), pulmonary (19%), skin/soft tissue (S/ST, 17%), genitourinary (GU, 12%), and vascular (7%). Most abdominal infections were present on admission and required source control. Comparatively, they had more prolonged proinflammation, immunosuppression, and persistent organ dysfunction. Their long-term outcome was poor with 37% CCI (defined as > 14 in ICU with organ dysfunction), 49% poor discharge dispositions, and 30% 1-year mortality. Most pulmonary infections were hospital-acquired pneumonia. They had similar protracted proinflammation and organ dysfunction, but immunosuppression normalized. Long-term outcomes are similarly poor (54% CCI, 47% poor disposition, 32% 1-year mortality). S/ST and GU infections occurred in younger patients with fewer comorbidities, less perturbed immune responses, and faster resolution of organ dysfunction. Comparatively, S/ST had better long-term outcomes (23% CCI, 39% poor disposition, 13% 1-year mortality) and GU had the best (10% CCI, 20% poor disposition, 10% 1-year mortality). Vascular sepsis patients were older males, with more comorbidities. Proinflammation was blunted with baseline immunosuppression and organ dysfunction that persisted. They had the worst long-term outcomes (38% CCI, 67% poor disposition, 57% 1-year mortality). CONCLUSION: There are notable differences in baseline predisposition, host responses, and clinical outcomes by site of infection in surgical sepsis. While previous studies have focused on differences in hospital mortality, this study provides unique insights into the host response and long-term outcomes associated with different sites of infection.

Clinical- and surgery-specific risk factors for post-operative sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 30 million patients.

Post-operative sepsis is a severe complication of surgery, which often worsens the clinical outcomes. While several risk factors have been identified, the importance of others remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine patient and surgery-related risk factors for post-operative sepsis. We reviewed Medline, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane library, systematically, for articles describing risk factors for sepsis. The role of eligible risk factors was investigated using a random-effects model, while analyzing univariate and multivariate data separately. Among 193 pro- and retrospective articles, comprising over 30 million patients, 38 eligible risk factors were selected for this meta-analysis. The patient-related risk factors associated with post-operative sepsis included male gender (odds ratio, OR 1.41), pre-existing heart failure (OR 2.53), diabetes (OR 1.41), and chronic kidney disease (OR 1.26). The surgery-related risk factors identified included emergency surgery (OR 3.38), peri-operative blood transfusion (OR 1.90), inpatient hospital stay (OR 2.31), and open surgery (OR 1.80). The adjusted overall incidence of surgical sepsis was 1.84%. In conclusion, multiple-patient and surgery-related risk factors are associated with the development of post-operative sepsis. Recognizing these risk factors could assist in the pre-operative identification of patients at risk of post-operative sepsis.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Pediatric Postsurgical versus Medical Severe Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery. Most studies regarding sepsis do not differentiate between patients who have had recent surgery and those without. Few data exist regarding the risk factors for poor outcomes in pediatric postsurgical sepsis. Our hypothesis is pediatric postsurgical, and medical patients with severe sepsis have unique risk factors for mortality. METHODS: Data were extracted from a secondary analysis of an international point prevalence study of pediatric severe sepsis. Sites included 128 pediatric intensive care units from 26 countries. Pediatric patients with severe sepsis were categorized into those who had recent surgery (postsurgical sepsis) versus those that did not (medical sepsis) before sepsis onset. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients were included: 138 with postsurgical and 418 with medical sepsis. In postsurgical sepsis, older age, admission from the hospital ward, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome at sepsis recognition, and cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities were independent risk factors for death. In medical sepsis, resource-limited region, hospital-acquired infection, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome at sepsis recognition, higher Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 score, and malignancy were independent risk factors for death. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with postsurgical sepsis had different risk factors for mortality compared with medical sepsis. This included a higher mortality risk in postsurgical patients presenting to the intensive care unit from the hospital ward. These data suggest an opportunity to develop and test early warning systems specific to pediatric sepsis in the postsurgical population.

Impact of red blood cell transfusion and hemoglobin threshold on 1-year mortality among surgical sepsis survivors: A propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is commonly applied in surgical intensive care unit (ICU), the effect of RBC transfusion on long-term outcomes remains undetermined. We aimed to explore the association between RBC transfusion and the long-term prognosis of surgical sepsis survivors. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on adult sepsis patients admitted to a tertiary surgical ICU center in China. Patients were divided into transfusion and non-transfusion groups based on the presence of RBC transfusion. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)were performed to balance the potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1421 surgical sepsis survivors were enrolled, including 403 transfused patients and 1018 non-transfused patients. There was a significant difference in 1-year mortality between the two groups (23.1 â€‹% vs 12.7 â€‹%, HR: 1.539, 95 â€‹% confidence interval [CI]: 1.030-2.299, P â€‹< â€‹0.001). After PSM and IPTW, transfused patients still showed significantly increased 1-year mortality risks compared to non-transfused individuals (PSM: 23.6 â€‹% vs 15.9 â€‹%, HR 1.606, 95 â€‹% CI 1.036-2.488 â€‹P â€‹= â€‹0.034; IPTW: 20.1 â€‹% vs 12.9 â€‹%, HR 1.600, 95 â€‹% CI 1.040-2.462 â€‹P â€‹= â€‹0.032). Among patients with nadir hemoglobin below 70 â€‹g/L, 1-year mortality risks in both groups were similar (HR 1.461, 95 â€‹% CI 0.909-2.348, P â€‹= â€‹0.118). However, among patients with nadir hemoglobin above 70 â€‹g/L, RBC transfusion was correlated with increased 1-year mortality risk (HR 1.556, 95 â€‹% CI 1.020-2.374, P â€‹= â€‹0.040). CONCLUSION: For surgical sepsis survivors, RBC transfusion during ICU stay was associated with increased 1-year mortality, especially when patients show hemoglobin levels above 70 â€‹g/L.

One-Hour Bundle Protocols for Surgical Sepsis and Septic Shock in Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Outcome Aspects in the Thai Context.

BACKGROUND: Surgical sepsis is a syndrome occurring during the perioperative period with a high mortality rate. Since the one-hour bundle protocol was recommended to decrease sepsis-related morbidity and mortality in clinical practice, the protocol has been applied to surgical patients with sepsis and septic shock. However, clinical outcomes in these surgical patients remain unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare survival outcomes in patients before and after the implementation of one-hour bundle care in clinical practice. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 401 surgical patients with sepsis were divided into two groups, with 195 patients undergoing the one-hour bundle from December 25, 2021, to March 31, 2024, and 206 patients undergoing usual care from January 1, 2018, to December 24, 2021, before the one-hour bundle protocol was implemented by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). Demographic data, treatment processes, and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: After the one-hour bundle protocol was applied in surgical practice, the median survival time was significantly increased in surgical patients who underwent one-hour bundle care (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.32-19.68) (p= 0.016). Factors influencing the increase in the mortality rate were delays in fluid resuscitation of >2 hours, vasopressor initiation of >2 hours, and empirical antibiotics of >5 hours (p= 0.017, 0.028, and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: One-hour bundle care for surgical patients with sepsis resulted in an increased median survival time. Delays in fluid resuscitation (>2 hours), vasopressor initiation (>2 hours), and empirical antibiotics (>5 hours) were factors associated with mortality.

Differences in Mortality and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction between Surgical and Non-Surgical Sepsis Patients.

(1) Background: Patients with sepsis following surgical intervention may exhibit fundamental distinctions from those experiencing sepsis without prior surgery. Despite the potential clinical importance of distinguishing these two sepsis subpopulations, dissimilarities, particularly in outcome, between surgical and non-surgical patients have been subject to limited scientific investigations in the existing literature. This study aimed to investigate the differences in mortality and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction between these two groups. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a large cohort of prospectively enrolled patients with sepsis (n = 737) admitted to three intensive care units at University Medical Center Goettingen; patients were categorized into surgical (n = 582) and non-surgical sepsis groups (n = 155). The primary outcomes assessed were 28- and 90-day mortality rates, and secondary endpoints were multiple clinical parameters and measures of sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. (3) Results: Non-surgical patients presented a significantly higher 90-day mortality (37%) compared to surgical sepsis patients (30%, p = 0.0457). Moreover, the non-surgical sepsis group exhibited increased sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, as evidenced by higher average SOFA scores (p < 0.001), elevated levels of serum Procalcitonin (p = 0.0102), and a higher utilization of organ replacement therapies such as ventilation (p < 0.001), vasopressor treatment (p < 0.001), and renal replacement therapy (p = 0.0364). Additionally, non-surgical sepsis patients had higher organ-specific SOFA respiratory (p < 0.001), cardiovascular (p < 0.001), renal (p < 0.001), coagulation (0.0335), and central nervous system (p = 0.0206) subscores. (4) Conclusions: These results suggested that patients with non-surgical sepsis may face distinct challenges and a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to patients with sepsis following surgical intervention. These findings have important implications for clinical decision-making, patient management, and resource allocation in sepsis care.

The Contribution of Procalcitonin, C-Reactive Protein and Interleukin-6 in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Surgical Sepsis: An Observational and Statistical Study.

Background: Sepsis affects over 30 million people worldwide each year, causing approximately 6 million deaths. Challenges in clinical diagnosis and the need for an early diagnosis to prevent mortality due to sepsis have led to dependence on inflammatory biomarkers like Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). Objective: This study was performed to observe the contribution of inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with surgical sepsis. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study in a Clinical Emergency Hospital, which included a number of 125 patients with surgical sepsis admitted between January 2020 and December 2021. The patients were included in the study based on the Sepsis-3 definition. PCT, CRP, IL-6, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the time up to surgery, the days of treatment in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the total days of hospitalization had been statistically analyzed. Results: The mean age of all patients was 65.14 years. The mean value in all patients for PCT was 20.08 ng/mL, for CRP was 175.42 mg/l, and for IL-6 was 799.6 pg/mL. The strongest correlation between biomarkers was between CRP and IL-6 (r = 0.425; p < 0.0001). Of all biomarkers, the CRP correlated the strongest with patient outcomes (r = 0.544; p < 0.0001). The area under curve (AUC) for the mean values of the inflammatory biomarkers was calculated and the best diagnostic performance was for CRP with 0.816 (95% CI: 0.744-0.887). Conclusion: CRP and IL-6 were the most efficient in sepsis diagnosis. The association of PCT, CRP and IL-6 has increased the range of certainty in sepsis diagnosis. CRP was the most efficient biomarker in the prognosis of sepsis.

[Management of suspected early infection after osteosynthesis]. / Management bei Verdacht auf frühe Infektion nach Osteosynthese.

The infection rate after fracture osteosynthesis depends on many factors. The postoperative infection rate after osteosynthesis (inpatient treatment) was between 1.15% and 2.04% for the years 2017-2019. The total number of postoperative wound infections was estimated at around 225,000 annually in 2018. Essential factors for reducing the infection rate after osteosynthesis are the favorable choice of the timing of the operation and the surgical procedure as well as the treatment of relevant secondary diseases. If a postoperative wound infection is suspected critical assessment of the wounds in the postoperative course is essential in order to be able to identify and treat this complication at an early stage. After osteosynthesis, early diagnosis of a peri-implant infection and differentiated surgical and antibiotic treatment are the prerequisites for the best possible treatment success.

Special aspects of systemic inflammation course in animals.

AIM: In this study, we identified characteristics of systemic inflammation associated with surgical sepsis in animals. We evaluated the role of purine metabolism, functionally associated lipoperoxidation processes of membrane structures, and the antioxidant system in the development of surgical sepsis in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs with a provisional exclusion of sepsis were included in the study. The control group (Group 1) included clinically healthy dogs (n=5), and medium-breed dogs with systemic inflammation response syndrome (n=30) were categorized in the experimental group (Group 2). Along with hemogram and biochemical analysis, we determined the amount of malondialdehyde, glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase on the 1st and 14th day of the study. Treatment included a thorough reorganization of the septic focus, followed by antibacterial therapy. Sick animals were injected with a drug (dexamethasone) that suppresses the synthesis and inhibits the action of inflammatory mediators. Decompensation of the functions of organs and systems was carried out using symptomatic therapy. RESULTS: We found that enhanced lipid peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids of membrane structures stimulates the generalization of inflammatory process, as evidenced by the significant deviation from the physiologically normal values of lipid peroxidation, C-reactive protein, blood cell count, etc. The course of systemic inflammation associated with surgical sepsis in animals can be attributed to several consistently developing processes that function as a result of increased purine mononucleotide catabolism, peroxide compound formation, and their excessive breakdown in reactions associated with the consumption of glutathione due to the insufficient recovery of glutathione disulfide. CONCLUSION: The amount of uric acid, glycosaminoglycans, hyaluronic acid in blood plasma, and the content of malondialdehyde, glutathione, and glutathione reductase in erythrocytes should be considered when assessing the severity of the systemic inflammatory process. The increased glutathione requirement in dogs with surgical sepsis requires intervention with pharmacological agents, and further research is needed in this aspect.

Outcomes of Surgical Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Discussion of outcomes of surgical sepsis is no longer straightforward. Definitions of sepsis have changed recently and updated data are scant. Surgical patient populations are often heterogeneous; the patient population being considered must be described with precision. Traditional 30-d operative mortality may not be the most relevant outcome to consider. What should change or be the emphasis going forward? METHODS: Review and synthesis of pertinent English-language literature. RESULTS: Epidemiologic data are abundant for short-term outcomes of sepsis in general, but despite the fact that approximately 30% of patients with sepsis are surgical patients, sepsis outcome data for surgical patients are scant, especially for durations longer than 30 d, and essentially non-existent for patients defined under the new Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria. Interpretability of extant data is hampered by non-standard and changing definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis and organ dysfunction may be decreasing in prevalence and magnitude among surgical patients, but terminology must be standardized to enhance the interpretability of data generated in the future. It behooves journal editors, reviewers, and authors to insist upon standardized definitions and rigorous study design and data interpretation. Longer term data (e.g., 90-d mortality as opposed to in-hospital or traditional 30-d mortality) will be needed to justify to payers the complex, expensive care that these patients require. There is an urgent need to redefine the research agenda for surgical infections.

Mortality rates increase dramatically below a systolic blood pressure of 105-mm Hg in septic surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: This study used a prospective surgical database, to investigate the level of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at which the mortality rates begin to increase in septic surgical patients. METHODS: All acute, septic general surgical patients older than 15 years of age admitted between January 2012 and January 2015 were included in these analyses. RESULTS: Of a total of 6,020 adult surgical patients on the database, 3,053 elective patients, 1,664 nonseptic, 52 duplicates, and 11 patients with missing SBP were excluded to leave a cohort of 1,232 acute, septic surgical patients. The median age (intraquartile range [IQR]): 48 (32 to 62) and roughly 50:50 sex ratio (620 female: 609 male). Most of the patients were African: 988 (80.2%) followed by Asians (128 or 10.4%). More than two-thirds (852 or 69.2%) of the patient cohort underwent some form of surgery, and 152 or 12.3% required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The median length of ICU stay (IQR) was 2 (1 to 4.5) days. The median length of total hospital stay (IQR) was 4 (2 to 9) days. The median SBP (IQR) on admission was 122 (107 to 138). A total of 167 patients died (13.6%). Those that died did have a significantly lower mean SBP compared with the survivors (116 vs 125, P <. 001). Six of 10 patients (60%) with a SBP less than 70 died. The receiver operating characteristic analysis suggests an optimal SBP cut-off of 111 when predicting mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: .6 [.551, .65]). This cut-off yields a moderate sensitivity (70%), high positive predictive value (90%) but low specificity, and negative predictive value when predicting mortality. Based on this optimal cut-off, 388 or 31.5% of the patients would be classified as shocked. The inflection curve below with fitted nonlinear curve (95% confidence intervals) clearly shows the upward change in observed mortality frequency at lower systolic and base excess (ie base deficit) values. Shocked patients had a significantly higher frequency of mortality (20% vs 11%, P < .001), a significantly higher median lactate (1.9 vs 1.5, P < .001), and mean base deficit (-2.8 vs -1.0, P = .001). No significant difference in mean age, ICU admission, duration of ICU admission, and total length of hospital stay was observed by shocked status. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients who die have a significantly lower SBP and clinically significant hypotension in sepsis with regard to increased mortality risk begins at a level of âˆ¼111-mm Hg. This finding needs to be incorporated into bundles of care for surgical sepsis.

Sepsis en Cirugía / Sepsis in Surgery

Resumen La sepsis constituye una causa frecuente de muerte por lo que es muy importante el diagnóstico precoz para conseguir un manejo oportuno y eficiente. Las definiciones y consensos han ido sufriendo modificaciones a lo largo del tiempo por lo que el equipo médico quirúrgico debe estar atento a estos cambios y debe mantenerse en constante actualización. El consenso de Sepsis-3, propone el uso del qSOFA y SOFA con el fin de mejorar la especificidad del reconocimiento de pacientes de mayor gravedad; no obstante, esto se logra a expensas de una menor sensibilidad, es por esto que los criterios clásicos de SIRS deben seguir utilizándose ante la sospecha de sepsis. Es clave la identificación temprana de los pacientes para que el resultado de las medidas a tomar sea el óptimo. La sepsis quirúrgica sigue siendo un cuadro clínico difícil de reconocer y manejar, es una urgencia que requiere medidas iniciales durante la primera hora de sospecha por lo que es transcendental para el cirujano conocer estas medidas, para poder planificar una posible cirugía de urgencia con el respaldo médico adecuado, según corresponda. El objetivo de esta revisión es que el cirujano y el equipo médico actualicen los cambios de los consensos de sepsis en cuanto al diagnóstico y al manejo bajo una mirada crítica y conozcan también el enfrentamiento adecuado de una sepsis quirúrgica para, de esta manera, mejorar la sobrevida de nuestros pacientes.

Sepsis constitutes a frequent cause of death, early diagnosis is essential to achieve proper management. Definitions and consensus have undergone modifications over time, so the surgical and medical team must be aware of these changes and must be constantly updated. The consensus of Sepsis-3 proposes the use of qSOFA and SOFA in order to improve the specificity of the recognition of patients with greater severity; however, this is achieved at the expense of lower sensitivity, so that the standard SIRS criteria should continue to be used when sepsis is suspected.The early identification of patients is very important to optimize the handling of the medical team. Surgical sepsis remains a difficult clinical picture to recognize and manage. It is an emergency that requires initial actions during the first hour of suspicion. By this it is important for the surgeon to know these actions that allow him or her to plan a possible emergency surgery when appropriate with adequate medical support. The objective of this update is for surgeon and medical team to know the changes in sepsis consensus regarding diagnosis and management under a critical view, as well as to know the therapeutic approach of a surgical sepsis to improve the survival of our patients.