Comparison of clinical outcome and repair integrity after arthroscopic suture-bridge and triple-row rotator cuff repairs of Fosbury flop tears.

BACKGROUND: The Fosbury flop tear (FFT) has recently been described as a rotator cuff tear that has flipped upon itself and adhered medially. FFT is known to have a high retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The cause of the high postoperative retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is believed to be due to the inability to achieve anatomical reduction because of difficulties in reducing the torn tendon stump. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs using the triple-row technique may allow better anatomical reduction of the cuff tear when compared with the suture-bridge technique. We compared the clinical outcomes and cuff integrity of the triple-row and suture-bridge techniques in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for FFT. METHODS: Patients with small-to-medium sized cuff tears of the supraspinatus tendon alone who were diagnosed with FFT, underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and had 2 or more years of follow-up were included. A total of 34 shoulders underwent the triple-row technique and 22 shoulders underwent the suture-bridge technique. The following were compared between the two techniques: patient background, operation time, number of anchors used during the operation, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, active range of motion, and retear rate. RESULTS: No significant difference in patient background was found between the two techniques. Although active range of motion was significantly improved compared with preoperative scores, no significant difference was observed between techniques. The triple-row technique demonstrated a significantly higher 24-month postoperative JOA score, significantly shorter surgery time, significantly lower retear rate, and significantly larger number of anchors used during the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The triple-row technique was an effective method compared with the suture-bridge technique in cases with FFT.

Primary Deltoid Repair for Ankle Fracture Using All-Suture Anchors.

Primary repair of the deltoid ligament is a common surgical option for unstable ankle fracture. However, controversy exists regarding whether such repair is necessary or provides any benefit to patient outcomes. A retrospective study was performed following acute deltoid repairs using all-suture bone anchors. Patients at 2 surgical centers were included when they were over 18 years old at surgery, had a medial clear space (MCS) greater than 4 mm preoperatively, and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Subjective outcomes were measured with PROMIS, FAAM, and numeric rating scale. Preoperative and follow-up scores were compared with t tests (p < .05). For the 47 patients identified, age at time of surgery was 30.6 ± 14.9 years (range 15.4-65.0 years). Follow-up data were captured for 36 (73%) of the patients at 75 ± 37 weeks (range 18-169 weeks) after surgery. Mean time to weightbearing was 4 ± 1 weeks (range 1-7 weeks). Patients returned to sport 14 ± 5 weeks after surgery (range 8-41 weeks). Various complications consisted of wound infection, superficial dehiscence, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The PROMIS, FAAM, and NRS patient outcome scores improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative follow-up. Significant reduction in the radiographic MCS postoperatively occurred in all patients. These findings suggest primary deltoid repair when associated with ankle fracture to be a safe procedure and has the potential of allowing early weightbearing and return to sports.

Arthroscopic foveal repair with suture anchors for traumatic tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex.

BACKGROUND: Foveal tears of the traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) are the most commonly neglected high-energy injuries of the wrist joint, and the patients with such tears often experience unrecovered ulnar-sided wrist pain and poor wrist function. This study investigated the functional outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of foveal TFCC tears with suture anchors and adjuvant platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections after the surgery. METHODS: From September 2014 to August 2018, 156 men and 45 women with diagnoses of foveal TFCC tears without wrist fractures underwent arthroscopic repair by using the outside-in method with 1.3-mm suture anchors and subsequent PRP injection. After surgery, splinting was applied for 6 weeks, and the patients underwent rehabilitation, re-examination, and follow-up at our clinic. The patients' wrist functional scores and grip strength data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 32.6 months, and the mean age was 26.7 years. The mean modified Mayo wrist score improved from 48.5 ± 2.6 to 82.4 ± 2.5, whereas the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score decreased from 39.2 ± 6.7 to 10.6 ± 7.5. Overall, the wrist functions of 186 (92.5%) of the patients were satisfactory according to their modified Mayo wrist scores, and the patients with satisfactory scores returned to sports or work activities. These patients retained normal ranges of motion, and their average grip strength in the affected hand was restored to at least 85% of that of the other hand. CONCLUSIONS: According to the postoperative 25-36 months surgical results of our study, arthroscopic repair with adjuvant PRP injections is a satisfactory method of repairing early foveal tears of the TFCC and can enhance wrist function by relieving pain and increasing tolerance for work or sports.

A biomechanical comparison of subscapularis tenotomy repair techniques for stemless shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: One of the leading challenges for surgeons shifting to stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is subscapularis repair. In the available literature reporting outcomes after stemless TSA, subscapularis tenotomy with side-to-side repair is the most common technique despite some concerns regarding this technique in the biomechanical and clinical literature. Accordingly, this study investigated subscapularis tenotomy repair with stemless TSA with 2 primary objectives: (1) to evaluate the subscapularis tendon dimensions with reference to subscapularis tenotomy to determine the amount of tendon remaining for side-to-side repair after shoulder arthroplasty and (2) to biomechanically compare 2 methods of subscapularis tenotomy repair after stemless TSA-side-to-side repair and anchor-based repair. METHODS: We used 12 male shoulder specimens for this study. To address our first objective, measurements were made to calculate the dimensions of the subscapularis tendon at the superior, middle, and inferior levels to determine the amount of tendon remaining after tenotomy. These specimens were then divided into 2 groups (n = 6 in each group) to biomechanically compare subscapularis tenotomy repair with (1) traditional side-to-side repair and (2) anchor-based repair. The shoulders then underwent biomechanical testing with primary outcomes including load to failure and cyclic displacement. RESULTS: The mean subscapularis tendon width measured from the medial insertion at the lesser tuberosity to the muscle-tendon junction varied depending on the level: 19.5 mm superiorly (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.2-22.8 mm); 18.3 mm at the midportion (95% CI, 13.6-23.0 mm); and 13.1 mm inferiorly (95% CI, 9.1-17.1 mm). With a tenotomy made 1 cm medial to the lesser tuberosity insertion, a mean of 3.1 mm of tendon remained medially at the inferior subscapularis, with one-third of specimens having no tendon left medially at this level. On comparison of tenotomy repair techniques, the anchor-based technique had a 57% higher ultimate load to failure compared with the side-to-side repair (448 N vs. 249 N, P < .001). There were no significant differences in cyclic displacement (6.1 mm vs. 7.1 mm, P = .751) and construct stiffness (38.1 N/mm vs. 42.9 N/mm, P = .461) between techniques. CONCLUSIONS: With traditional techniques for subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic TSA, there is very little tendon remaining inferiorly for side-to-side repair. When subscapularis tenotomy is performed for stemless TSA, a double-row anchor-based repair has a better time-zero ultimate load to failure compared with side-to-side repair.

A systematic review about long-term results after meniscus repair.

PURPOSE: Aim of this systematic review was to analyze long-term results after meniscus refixation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on long-term results after meniscus refixation with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Primary outcome criterion was the failure rate. Secondary outcome criteria were radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) and clinical scores. RESULTS: A total of 12 retrospective case series (level 4 evidence) were identified that reported about failure rates of more than 7 years follow-up. There was no statistical difference in the failure rates between open repair, arthroscopic inside-out with posterior incisions and arthroscopic all-inside repair with flexible non-resorbable implants. In long-term studies that examined meniscal repair in children and adolescents, failure rates were significantly higher than in studies that examined adults. Six studies have shown minor radiological degenerative changes that differ little from the opposite side. The reported clinical scores at follow-up were good to very good. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that good long-term outcomes can be obtained in patients after isolated meniscal repair and in combination with ACL reconstruction. With regard to the chondroprotective effect of meniscus repair, the long-term failure rate is acceptable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Preliminary clinical outcomes of the double-row anchor suture-bridge technique for the fixation of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults: a 12-months minimal follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Tibial intercondylar eminence avulsion fractures occur primarily in adolescents and young adults. However, the incidence of such fractures is increasing in adults, concurrent with an increase in sports injuries and traffic accidents. This study describes the fixation-based double-row anchor suture-bridge technique, a novel technique for treating tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults; and evaluates its preliminary clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of adult patients with tibial intercondylar eminence fractures treated at our institution from June 2016 to June 2018 was conducted. Seven such patients, treated with the anchor suture-bridge technique, were included. All patients were assessed for knee joint range of motion (ROM), Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, Tegner activity score pre-surgery, and the healing of the fracture at 3, 6 and 12 months minimal post-surgery follow-up. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a mean of 12.43 months (range 9-15 months). By the final follow-up, all fractures had fully healed. The mean Lysholm score improved from 27.86 (range, 2 to 54) pre-surgery to 88.14 (range, 81 to 100) 3 months post-surgery (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean IKDC score improved from 48.86 (range, 43 to 55) to 84.29 (range, 75 to 90) (P < 0.05); and the mean Tegner activity score improved from 1.71 (range, 0 to 4) to 3.29 (range, 2 to 4) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, knee joint ROM, Lysholm scores, IKDC scores, and Tegner activity scores displayed excellent outcomes at the 6 and 12 months minimal follow-up. CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic anchor suture-bridge technique is a valid and secure method for achieving effective fixation of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults.

Periimplant osteolysis does not affect the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of rotator cuff repair, depending on the presence of developed periimplant osteolysis (PIO) after using suture anchors. METHODS: The electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for articles published up until October 2019 to find relevant articles comparing the outcomes of rotator cuff repair between the periimplant osteolysis group and non-periimplant osteolysis group. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The results are presented as risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Six clinical studies were included. No significant differences were found between the group with periimplant osteolysis and the group without periimplant osteolysis regarding retear rate (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 0.93-1.94; I2 = 28%), postoperative clinical scores (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI - 0.26 to 0.83; I2 = 80%) and range of motion (ROM); forward flexion (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI - 0.16 to 0.93; I2 = 0%), external rotation (SMD = - 0.10; 95% CI - 0.64 to 0.45; I2 = 0%) and internal rotation (SMD = - 0.37; 95% CI - 0.92 to 0.17; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: The presence of periimplant osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with suture anchor does not affect the clinical outcomes such as retear rate, clinical scoring, and ROM. However, as there was no standard consensus on the criteria for evaluating periimplant osteolysis, this result may not fully reflect the effect of periimplant osteolysis depending on its severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Arthroscopic remplissage with all-suture anchors causes cystic lesions in the humerus: a volumetric CT study of 55 anchors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate with computed tomography (CT) the incidence of implant-related osteolysis after implantation of two types of all-suture anchors during remplissage for the management of Hill-Sachs lesions in shoulder instability. METHODS: Single-cohort, observational study with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Twenty-five participants (19 males and 6 females; mean age 37.4 years [SD: 11.6]) with Hill-Sachs lesions requiring remplissage were evaluated with a CT performed a mean of 14.1 [3.74] months after surgery. Fifty-five all-suture anchors (19 2.3 mm Iconix and 36 1.7 mm Suturefix) were used. The volume of the bone defects was measured in the CT. Every anchor was classified into one of four groups: (1) no bone defect. (2) Partial bone defect (bone defects smaller than the drill used for anchor placement). (3) Tunnel enlargement (bone defect larger than the drill volume but smaller than twice that volume). (4) Cystic lesion (bone defect larger twice the drill volume). RESULTS: No bone defect was identified in only two anchors (3.6%, 95% CI 0.4-12.5%). A partial bone defect was found in eight anchors (14.5%, 95% CI 6.5-26.7%). In 35 anchors (63.6%, 95% CI 49.6-76.2%), there was enlargement of the bone defect that was smaller than 200% the size of the drill used. Ten anchors caused bone defects larger than twice the size of the drill used (18.2%, 95% CI 9.1-30.9%). The defect size was a mean of 89 mm3 (SD: 49 mm3, minimum 0 mm3, maximum 230 mm3). CONCLUSION: When using all-suture anchors in arthroscopic remplissage during instability surgery, relevant bone osteolytic defects are common at 1-year-follow-up. Cystic defects larger than twice the volume of the resected bone during implantation develop in one in six anchors and significant tunnel widening will develop in another three out of five anchors. This bone loss effectively increases the size and depth of the Hill-Sachs lesions but does not seem to affect short-term clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with all-suture anchors does not cause important glenoid bone osteolysis: a volumetric CT study of 143 anchors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate with computed tomography (CT) the incidence of anchor-related osteolysis after implantation of two types of all-suture anchors for the management of labral lesions in shoulder instability. METHODS: Single-cohort, observational study with 12-month follow-up. Thirty-three participants (27 males/6 females; age 38.3 years [SD 11.3]) with anterior labral lesions in which 143 all-suture anchors (71 Iconix 1.4 mm and 72 Suturefix 1.7 mm) were implanted were evaluated with a CT performed a mean of 15.4 [3.85] months after surgery. The volume of the bone defects was measured in the CT. Every anchor was classified into one of four groups: (1) no bone defect. (2) Partial bone defect (defects smaller than the drill used for anchor placement). (3) Tunnel enlargement (defects larger than the drill volume but smaller than twice that volume). (4) Cystic lesion (defects larger than twice the drill volume). RESULTS: No bone defect was identified in 16 anchors (11.2%, [95% CI 6.5-17.5%]). A partial bone defect was found in 84 anchors (58.7% [50.2-66.9%]). Tunnel enlargement was found in 43 anchors (30.11% [22.6-37.6%]). No anchor caused cystic lesions (0% [0-2.5%]). The defect volume was a mean of 27.8 mm3 (SD 18.4 mm3, minimum 0 mm3, maximum 94 mm3). Neither the position in the glenoid nor the type of implant used had a significant effect in the type or size of the defects. CONCLUSION: When using all-suture anchors in the glenoid during instability surgery, relevant bone osteolytic defects are rare at 1-year follow-up. Most anchor insertion tunnels will fill completely (11%) or partially (59%) with bone. Tunnel enlargement will develop in 30% of anchors. No cystic defects larger than 0.125 cm3 were observed. There is a low risk that all-suture anchors cause significant osteolytic bone defects in the glenoid. These implants can be used safely. Level of evidence IV.

Regenesorb and polylactic acid hydroxyapatite anchors are associated with similar osseous integration and rotator cuff healing at 2 years.

BACKGROUND: Commercially available suture anchors for rotator cuff repairs can differ significantly in architecture and material. Clinical data on their osseous integration and its effect on patient-reported outcomes is scarce. Preclinical investigations indicated a higher rate of osseous integration for the open-architecture design of the Healicoil Regenesorb anchor than the closed-threaded design of the Twinfix (Smith & Nephew). The purpose of this study was to investigate these 2 anchors with different architecture and material to determine their effect on osseous integration and clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed from 2014 to 2019. Sixty-four patients (39 females, 25 males) with an average age of 58.7 years who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by one of 4 board-certified, fellowship-trained surgeons were randomized to receive Healicoil Regenesorb (PLGA/ß-TCP/Calcium Sulfate) or Twinfix Ultra HA (PLLA/HA) anchors. Thirty-two patients had Healicoil anchors implanted, and 32 patients had Twinfix anchors implanted. Of the 64 patients, 51 returned at 24 months for computed tomographic (CT) examination (25 Twinfix and 26 Healicoil) to determine osteointegration of the anchors. Patient-reported outcomes, including Penn Shoulder Score (PENN), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, visual analog scale, EQ-5D, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Global Rating of Change, were collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Ultrasonography was used to assess rotator cuff integrity after 6 months. Two board-certified, fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, blinded to the type of anchors, analyzed the CT scans to assess the anchor osteointegration at 24 months using a previously published grading scale. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics, preoperative outcomes, or baseline characteristics such as tear size, number of anchors, Goutallier classification, or smoking status between groups. There was no difference in osseous integration between the 2 anchors at 24 months (P = .117). Eight patients had rotator cuff retears, of which 2 patients had Twinfix anchors and 6 patients had Healicoil anchors (P = .18). There were no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes or complications between groups. The 2-year PENN scores were 89 with the Twinfix and 88 with Healicoil anchors (P = .55). CONCLUSION: Despite differences in material and anchor architecture, the rate of healing and patient-reported outcomes were similar between the Twinfix and Healicoil anchor groups. The rate of osteointegration was the same at 2 years.

Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: Analysis of 166 Procedures and Return to Activity.

The surgical procedure for Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) varies widely with no consensus as to approach and documenting return to activity (RTA). This study presents outcomes of surgery for IAT by a single surgeon, documenting activity level and return to activity. From January 2001 through January 2018, 166 procedures were reviewed. Surgery included debridement of the Achilles insertion, resection of the superior calcaneus and bursa, and re-attachment with suture anchors. There were 110 males and 56 females. The majority of patients in the entire cohort were runners (n = 54). The average age of the cohort was 50.3 ± 12.1 years (range 20-80). Average follow-up was 114.0 ± 63.5 months (range 6-222 months). Average RTA for males and females were 6.43 months and 7.22 months, (p = .2), respectively. There was no difference in RTA between patients who had calcific tendinosis (n = 84) and noncalcific tendinosis (n = 82). Complications were 2 infections, 2 DVTs, and 17 deep suture reactions with a total complication rate of 12.6%; there were no re-ruptures postoperatively. There was no significant difference in number of complications between absorbable and nonabsorbable suture in the anchors (p = .41). The average RM score was 1.5 ± 0.7. The RM scores were better for males (p = .002), but there were no differences in RTA or complications between sexes. Overall, 95.8% of the procedures resulted in improved outcome and ability to return to activity including sports. This retrospective investigation shows surgical intervention for IAT yields good results with an average return to activity including sports in approximately 7 months.

Mid-term to long-term results of primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The arthroscopic method offers a less invasive technique of Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The aim of the study is to determine the mid-/long-term functional outcome, failure rates and predictors of failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A total of 100 patients were primarily operated using arthroscopic Bankart repair after traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and patients were assessed using postal questionnaire after a mean follow-up of 8.3 years [3-14]. Clinical assessment was performed using Constant score, Rowe score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate was 22%. The Kaplan-Meier failure-free survival estimates. were 80% at 5 years and 70% at 10 years. Nearly half (54.5%) of recurrences occurred at 2 years postoperative. Compared with normal shoulder, there were statistical differences in all 3 scores. Failure rate was significantly affected by age at the time of surgery with 86% of recurrence cases observed in patients aged 30 years or younger. Nevertheless, Younger age at the time of surgery (P = 0.007) as well age at the time of initial instability (P = 0.03) was found to correlate negatively with early recurrence within 2 years of surgery. Among those with recurrent instability, recurrence rate was found to be higher if there had been more than 5 instability episodes preoperatively (P = 0.01). Return to the preinjury sport and occupational level was possible in 41 and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Failure-free survival rates dropped dramatically over time. Alternative reconstruction techniques should be considered in those aged ≤30 years due to the high recurrence rate.

Attitudes and awareness of suture anchor cost: a survey of shoulder surgeons performing rotator cuff repairs.

BACKGROUND: The cost of health care in the United States accounts for 18% of the nation's gross domestic product and is expected to reach 20% by 2020. Physicians are responsible for 60%-80% of decisions resulting in health care expenditures. Rotator cuff repairs account for $1.2-$1.6 billion in US health care expenditures annually. The purpose of this study is to assess surgeons' cost awareness in the setting of rotator cuff repairs. The hypothesis is that practice environment and training affect cost consciousness and incentivization will lead to more cost-effective choices. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a 21-item survey was distributed via the email list services of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America. Data collected included demographics, variables regarding rotator cuff repair (technique, number of companies used, procedures per month), and knowledge of costs. RESULTS: Responses from 345 surgeons in 23 countries were obtained with the majority (89%) being from the United States. Most surgeons were "cost-conscious" (275, 70.7%). Of these surgeons, 62.9% are willing to switch suture anchors brands to reduce overall costs if incentivized. Cost-conscious surgeons were more likely to be fellowship trained in shoulder and elbow (51.81% vs. 38.57%, P = .048), be paid based on productivity (73.53% vs. 61.43%, P = .047), and receive shared profits (85.4% vs. 75%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: The majority of orthopedic surgeons are both cost-conscious and willing to change their practice to reduce costs if incentivized to do so. A better understanding of implant costs combined with incentives may help reduce health care expenditure.

Patellar fixation graft via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques during isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: There is still a lack of evidence concerning the patellar fixation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) graft in selected patient with recurrent instability. The purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare clinical outcomes and further complications of isolated MPFL reconstruction via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques for recurrent patellofemoral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2019, the main databases were accessed. All the clinical trials performing isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were included in the present study. Only articles fixing the MPFL graft through suture anchors and/ or patellar tunnel techniques were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Data from 46 papers (1712 patients) were recorded. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 18 months. No differences were found in Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analogic scale, range of motion and re-dislocation rate. The suture anchors fixation group detected reduced rate of apprehension test (OR: 0.6; p = 0.03), revision surgeries (OR: 0.4; p = 0.02) and anterior knee pain (OR: 0.05; p < 0.0001) and reduced not-classified complications (OR: 0.18; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Both the suture anchors and the bone-tunnels are a feasible option for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Patellar fixation via suture anchors evidenced a reduced rate of anterior knee pain, revision surgeries, apprehension test and an overall reduced complication compared to the bone-tunnel technique.

Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study.

BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) performed using metal or biodegradable suture anchors. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in shoulder function using metal or biodegradable suture anchors as evaluated by UCLA shoulder score, Wolfgang criteria, and Oxford shoulder score. METHODS: Arthroscopic RCR was performed in 110 patients included in this case control study. They were divided into 2 groups of 51 and 59 patients respectively. Metal suture anchors were used in group 1, and biodegradable suture anchors in group 2. Results were obtained at a mean follow up of 4.05 + 2 years. Clinical outcomes and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean modified UCLA shoulder score was 26.9 + 7.1 in group 1, and 27.7 + 6.5 in group 2 (P = 0.5); the mean Wolfgang score was 13.3 + 3.3 in group 1, and 14 + 2.6 in group 2 (P = 0.3); the mean OSS was 23.7 + 11.4 in group 1, and 20.7 + 9.2 points in group 2 (P = 0.1). The mean active anterior elevation was 163.5° + 28.2° in group 1 and 163.6° + 26.9 in group 2 (P = 0.9); the mean active external rotation was 46° + 19.7° in group 1 and 44.6° + 16.3° in group 2 (P = 0.7). The mean strength in anterior elevation was 4.8.02 + 23.52 N in group 1, and 43.12 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.2); the mean strength in external rotation was 48.02 + 22.54 N in group 1 and 46.06 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.6); the mean strength in internal rotation was 67.62 + 29.4 N in group 1, and 68.6 + 25.48 N in group 2 (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences at a mean follow-up of 4.05 + 2 years in clinical and functional outcomes of single row arthroscopic RCR using metallic or biodegradable suture anchors for RC < 5 cm.

Long-term clinical outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors.

BACKGROUND: The most common surgical technique in traumatic anterior shoulder instability is the arthroscopic Bankart repair, which has excellent short-term results. The long-term results of the arthroscopic Bankart repair are less frequently studied, with a high recurrence rate of 23% to 35%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term to long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors and to identify specific risk factors for recurrent instability. METHODS: Included were 147 patients after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation who underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair. The primary outcome was recurrent instability, defined as dislocation or subluxation as perceived by the patients. The secondary outcome was subjective shoulder stability and function as well as quality of life, evaluated using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Prognostic factors for recurrent instability were analyzed. RESULTS: Recurrent instability occurred in 22% of patients with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. Survival at 5 and 10 years without recurrent instability was 79% and 78%, respectively (95% confidence interval, 72%-85% and 71%-85%, respectively). The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score, the Simple Shoulder Test score, and the 12-item Short Form Physical Component Summary improved significantly in the nonrecurrence group (P < .001, P = .004, and P = .002, respectively). Younger age and use of fewer than 3 anchors were associated with a higher risk of recurrent dislocation (P = .008 and P = .039, respectively). CONCLUSION: We found an overall recurrent instability rate of 22% (dislocation or subluxation). Good long-term results were observed after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients older than 20 years with 3 or more suture anchors used.

Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors: a midterm magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of repair integrity and cyst formation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the feasibility and safety of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: All patients were diagnosed with a rotator cuff tear by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with partial tears, massive tears, subscapularis tears, or previous shoulder surgery, were excluded. MRI and clinical outcome were investigated in all patients at 1.58 years (range, 1.0-2.0 years) after rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors (prospective case series). Integrity of the cuff repair, cyst formation (encapsulated fluid signal around the anchor), ingrowth of the bone into the anchor, and integrity of the bone tunnel border were evaluated for 47 anchors. Clinical results were evaluated using the Constant-Murley score. RESULTS: An MRI evaluation was performed in 20 patients at 1.58 years (range, 1.0-2.0 years) after rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors. MRI evaluation showed a very small rim of fluid around 10% of the anchors. None of the anchors showed cyst formation with fluid diameter more than twice the anchor diameter. In approximately 90% of the anchors, no fluid could be detected between the anchors and the edge of the bony tunnel. Full rotator cuff integrity was seen in 19 patients. Only 1 patient sustained a retear. Clinical results comparable with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using classic anchors were seen. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective clinical cohort study shows promising early radiographic and clinical results after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors.

Arthroscopic soft tissue reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability.

Anterior glenohumeral instability remains a difficult problem in the athletic and working patient populations. Treatment strategies are variable and range from nonoperative approaches incorporating immobilization and rehabilitation to surgical management. Surgical decision-making can be challenging, especially with a high-level patient who wishes to return to high-demand activities. Operative options range from open soft tissue stabilization to arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization, with both open and arthroscopic options for bony reconstruction in the setting of clinically significant anterior glenoid bone loss. In all cases, understanding appropriate indications and utilizing sound surgical techniques are critical for achieving a successful result. For the majority of patients with anterior shoulder instability, arthroscopic soft tissue reconstruction with suture anchors is a successful, minimally invasive approach that results in a stable shoulder with excellent outcomes and low complication rates.

[Arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization of posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability : Techniques, limitations and long-term results]. / Arthroskopische Weichteilstabilisierung der posttraumatischen ventralen Schulterinstabilität : Techniken, Limitationen und Langzeitergebnisse.

Arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization is a well-established and broadly accepted procedure to treat posttraumatic shoulder instability. Advantages in comparison to open stabilization procedures include improved visualization of the structural damage and a less invasive approach. Technical developments in recent years have led to further improvement of the arthroscopic technique for shoulder instability. This article presents a description of principles and new developments as it contains basic techniques including patient positioning, access portals, preparation of the glenoid bone, soft tissue handling and shuttle techniques. Modern suture anchor systems to achieve arthroscopic stabilization with the corresponding advantages and disadvantages are also presented. Furthermore, the limitations and long-term results of arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization are discussed.

Open versus arthroscopic surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis over the past 20 years.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing open and arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability by analyzing comparative studies during 2 different time intervals during the last 20 years. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Two groups were created by dividing studies according to the year of publication, those published from 1995 to 2004 or from 2005 to 2015. Publication bias and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies (n = 1633) met the eligibility criteria. Comparison of the pooled estimate for all of these studies demonstrated no significant differences (P = .64) in clinical outcomes between open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. However, studies published from 1995 through 2004 demonstrated significant differences (P = .015) in recurrence rates favoring open surgery. In contrast, no significant differences (P = .09) in recurrence rates were observed for studies published from 2005 through 2015. The pooled estimate for all studies in both groups demonstrated significant differences (P = .001) in external rotation deficits between open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization favoring arthroscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite advances in surgical techniques and devices during the last 20 years, either open or arthroscopic surgical treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation results in similar clinical outcomes. The recurrence rate for arthroscopic surgical stabilization has only marginally decreased, from 16.8% to 14.2%. However, during the earlier decade from 1995 through 2004, patients treated with arthroscopic surgery had twice the risk of recurrence compared with an open procedure.