Pneumonitis associated with Trastuzumab emtansine in a patient with metastatic breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) is an antibody-drug conjugate effective in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 - expressing advanced breast cancer. Pulmonary complications of TDM-1 are rarely reported. TDM-1-associated interstitial lung disease is referred to as pneumonitis. CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old female patient who underwent modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection operations due to a palpable mass in the right breast and axillary region. The patient who had received multiple chemotherapy was last receiving TDM-1 treatment. Fatigue, dyspnea, and tachypnea were detected for the first time on 20 days after the 6th treatment. MENAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: In our case, we first considered metastasis, pneumonia and fungal infection based on radiological findings, but the lack of response to the treatments and the results of the investigations suggested drug-induced pneumonia and steroid treatment was started. Our case had a complete radiological recovery and complete response to sterod therapy. In such cases, it is important to first exclude infections and metastasis. In cases of drug-induced pneumonia, the first treatment option is systemic corticosteroids and generally responded well. DISCUSSION: Unlike other cases of interstitial pneumonia, lung imaging of our case was resembling a metastasis, pneumonia and fungal infection. With increasing use of TDM-1, we will have more experience in both efficacy and complications of TDM-1. Although TDM-1 is a well-tolerated drug, clinicians should be aware of rare pulmonary complications and prepared to respond appropriately.

HER-2 Neu gene: A valuable therapeutic target in metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland neoplasms (SGNs) respond poorly to the traditional chemotherapy agents limiting the availability of systemic treatment options in the metastatic setting. The recent identification of actionable molecular targets in SGNs has led to the evaluation of targeted therapies in non-approved advanced SGNs. CASE REPORT: We present the case of an elderly male with HER-2 Neu overexpressing metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) who demonstrated a prompt and sustained disease response to targeted therapies directed against HER-2 Neu with long survival interrupted by hepatoxicity to Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) treatment.Management and Outcome: The patient was started on Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab on a clinical trial and resulted in an objective improvement sustained over 3 years. Following the disease progression, TDM-1 was started with a response until the patient developed severe hepatotoxicity as an adverse effect of TDM-1 therapy resulting in its discontinuation. Close follow-up post-treatment-discontinuation demonstrated continued clinical improvement until 6 months, when the patient developed brain metastasis. He passed away a few months later in hospice care. DISCUSSION: The metastatic MEC in our patient overexpressed HER-2 Neu. Owing to Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab response, Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) was initiated on a compassionate basis which further extended the survival but had to be terminated owing to adverse effects. Given the paucity of data on targeted therapies in the treatment of metastatic SGNs and the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TDM-1 therapy among the elderly, further studies are warranted to answer these important questions and to identify eligible patients for this novel treatment option.

Comparison of outcomes in a population-based cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy with clinical trial outcomes.

PURPOSE: Little data exist for comparing cardiac safety and survival outcomes of trastuzumab/pertuzumab or ado-T emtansine (TDM1) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients enrolled in randomized clinical trial (RCT) vs the real-world. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort of all patients with MBC treated with trastuzumab/pertuzumab or TDM1 (2012-2017) in Ontario, Canada. Outcomes were incident heart failure (HF) and overall survival (OS). RCT data were obtained from digitizing survival curves and compared with cohort data using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Age-based comparison of outcomes was conducted for patients ≥ 65 years old vs younger than 65. RESULTS: The two cohorts composed of 833 and 397 patients treated with trastuzumab/pertuzumab and TDM1, of whom 5.5% and 7.6% had baseline HF, respectively. Incident HF following trastuzumab/pertuzumab or TDM1 was low (trastuzumab/pertuzumab 1.8 events/100 person years; TDM1 0.02 events/100 person years). The median OS was 39.2 and 56.4 months in the trastuzumab/pertuzumab population-based cohort and CLEOPATRA, respectively. The median OS was 15.4 and 30.9 months in the TDM1 population-based cohort and EMILIA, respectively. Cohort OS was significantly worse than RCT OS (trastuzumab/pertuzumab HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.37-2.03, p < 0.0001; TDM1 HR 2.80, 95% CI 2.27-3.44, p < 0.0001). Older patients had worse OS than younger patients for trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.19-2.16, p = 0.0018), but not for TDM1 (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.81-1.66, p = 0.43). CONCLUSION: HF incidence during trastuzumab/pertuzumab or TDM1 therapy in this real-world cohort was low. Survival in this cohort was worse compared to RCT, suggesting that recruitment of patients similar to the real-world population is required.

Recent advances and optimal management of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive early-stage breast cancer.

With the introduction of anthracycline-based regimens, 5-year survival rates have significantly improved in patients with early-stage breast cancer. With the addition of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), improvements in overall survival have been observed among patients with advanced HER2-positive disease. Subsequently, lapatinib, an orally bioavailable small molecule dual HER2- and EGFR/HER1-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor, received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in combination with capecitabine for patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Then, pertuzumab in 2012 and ado-trastuzumab emtansine in 2013 were approved in the US and elsewhere based on evidence showing an improvement in survival outcomes in patients with mostly trastuzumab naïve or trastuzumab-exposed metastatic disease. The FDA also approved 1 year of extended adjuvant neratinib after chemotherapy and a year of trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer on the basis of the ExteNET trial. The clinical benefit demonstrated by those drugs in advanced disease has triggered several adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials testing them in combination with chemotherapy, but also without conventional chemotherapy, using single or dual HER2-targeting drugs. In this article, we review the current data on the therapeutic management of HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. We also review the data the efficacy and safety of anthracycline-based and nonanthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens combined with trastuzumab, and optimum chemotherapy regimens in small HER2-positive tumors.

When to Add Additional Anti-HER2 Therapy to Adjuvant Trastuzumab.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: One year of trastuzumab dramatically improves outcomes in early HER2 positive breast cancer, irrespective of anatomic stage, receptor status and chemotherapy backbone. However, up to 25% of breast cancers treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy recur. Here, we review the current role for additional HER2 blockade to adjuvant trastuzumab. RECENT FINDINGS: Adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib modestly improve disease-free survival in early breast cancer, particularly for those at highest risk of recurrence. Lack of complete pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapies is associated with worse outcomes. In those with lack of pCR, adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine improves outcome in early breast cancer, irrespective of chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapy backbone. Preoperative chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapy should be discussed in early breast cancer, especially in tumors over 2 cm. Future trials must focus on de-escalation of chemotherapy and biomarkers for further tailored therapy in early HER2 positive breast cancer.

Preliminary experience of the concurrent use of radiosurgery and T-DM1 for brain metastases in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

This is preliminary study assessing the efficacy and safety of concurrent use of radiation therapy (RT) and T-DM1 for the treatment of brain metastases (BM) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC). We retrospectively studied 12 patients treated for BM at the Institut Curie in 2014-2015 with T-DM1 and concurrent (4) or sequential (8) radiosurgery with or without whole brain irradiation. The following variables were studied: local control, clinical and radiological response as well as early and late side effects. The mean age of the population was 38 years at the time of diagnosis of BC and 46 years at of BM. All patients were with good PS. The response rate of the concurrent treatment group was 75 % with 1 complete response, 1 partial response, one stable disease and 1 progression. Comparatively, the response rate in the sequential group was as follows: two complete responses, two partial responses, six cases of stable disease and two cases of local progression. No patient experienced interruption of irradiation because of side effects. About 50 % of patients were asymptomatic after treatment. Radiation necrosis was observed in 50 % of patients in the concurrent group and 28.6 % of patients in the sequential group with a similar rate of oedema in the two groups. We found that the combination of T-DM1 and radiosurgery was feasible but can increase the incidence of radiation necrosis. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to more clearly evaluate this association.

Efficacy of Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine After TDM-1 in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Different targeted therapy options exist for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the lapatinib plus capecitabine combination after TDM-1 in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients' data. The patients who progressed after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and TDM-1 were included in the study. We used the Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis. Eighteen patients were involved in the study. The average age was 48 (range 31-65). De novo metastatic patient's number was 5 (27.8%). The most common metastatic sites were liver (50%), lung (44.4%), and brain (44.4%), respectively. All patients were previously treated with trastuzumab + chemotherapy and TDM-1. Also, seven (38.9%) patients received hormonotherapy and twelve (66.7%) patients received palliative radiotherapy. The complete response ratio was 5.6%, partial response 11.8%, and stable response 29.4%. Median progression-free survival was found as 5.5 (95% CI, 3.2-7.7) months. The hematological and non-hematological toxicity ratio was 41.2% and 52.9%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity (diarrhea, anemia, and mucositis) was observed in four (22.2%) patients. The median OS duration was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-12.0). Treatment options are limited in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Despite a small number of patients, this study showed that the lapatinib plus capecitabine combination was effective and well-tolerated in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients after TDM-1.

Comparing the difference of adverse events with HER2 inhibitors: a study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Aim and background: This study attempted to identify similarities and differences in adverse events (AEs) between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors, especially those related to hemorrhagic events and nervous system disorders. Methods: This study summarized the types, frequencies, and system organ classes (SOCs) of AEs of HER2 inhibitors. The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from January 2004 through March 2022 was collected and analyzed. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to detect AEs signals for every HER2 inhibitor. The chi-square test, Wilcoxon test, and descriptive analysis were used to compare the differences of AEs for specific SOCs or drugs. Results: A total of 47,899 AE reports were obtained for eight HER2 inhibitors. Trastuzumab-related AEs were reported in the highest number and combination of regimens. In monotherapy, trastuzumab had the highest reported rate of cardiac disorders-related AEs (24.0%). However, small-molecule drugs exceeded other drugs in the reported rates of AEs related to gastrointestinal disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders. The highest reported rates of respiratory disorders (47.3%) and hematologic disorders (22.4%) were associated with treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) had the highest reported rate (7.28%) of hemorrhagic events, especially intracranial haemorrhage events. In addition, patients treated with TDM-1 with concomitant thrombocytopenia were likely to experience hemorrhagic events compared to other HER2 inhibitors (p < 0.001). The median time to onset of intracranial haemorrhage associated with trastuzumab (0.5 months) and TDM-1 (0.75 months) was short. However, there was no significant difference in median time to onset intracranial haemorrhage between patients in different age groups or with different outcomes. Disproportionality analysis results reveal that cerebral haemorrhage is a positive signal associated with T-DXd and TDM-1. In addition, tucatinib was the drug with the highest rate of reported nervous system disorders (31.38%). Memory impairment (83 cases) is a positive signal for tucatinib. Conclusion: The types and reporting rates of AEs associated with different HER2 inhibitors vary across multiple systems. In addition, hemorrhagic events concomitant with TDM-1 treatment and nervous system disorders concomitant with tucatinib treatment may be worthy of attention.

Rechallenge of Trastuzumab-based Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients who Progressed Under TDM-1.

Data on rechallenges of HER2 targetted agents in breast cancer patients is limited. The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of trastuzumab-based therapy in patients who progressed under trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1). The study was designed as a retrospective observational study. Survival plots were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Fifteen patients were involved in the study. The average age was 45 (range, 30-66). De novo metastatic patient number was six (40%), and the average number of metastatic sites was 2 (range, 1-4) at diagnosis. Fourteen patients (92.3%) had undergone breast surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy). All patients previously had been treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and TDM-1. Also, nine (60%) patients had received endocrine therapy, and nine (60%) patients had palliative radiotherapy. After progression under TDM-1, patients received trastuzumab with chemotherapy (73.3%) or alone (26.7%). The overall response ratio was 66.7%. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 3.4-15.3). The median OS duration was 24.2 (95% CI, 13.5-34.9) months. Toxicity in all grades was observed in ten (66.7%) patients, and grade 3-4 toxicity (anemia and neutropenia) in two patients (13.3%). This study showed that rechallenge trastuzumab-based therapy was effective and good-tolerated in heavily pretreated patients who had progressed under TDM-1.

The Clinical Utilisation and Duration of Treatment with HER2-Directed Therapies in HER2-Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Salivary Gland Cancers.

Salivary gland cancers (SGC) are rare tumours with limited availability of systemic therapies. Some SGC subtypes overexpress HER2, and this represents a potential therapeutic target, but the evidence base is limited. This study sought to analyse real-world data on the efficacy of HER2-directed therapies in SGC. This is a retrospective observational study using anonymised data from commercial compassionate-use access registrations and a privately funded pharmacy prescribing register. Treatment duration was defined as the time from drug initiation to treatment discontinuation. Kaplan-Meier analysis of treatment duration was performed using R for Windows (v4.3.2). A case report is also provided of an exceptional responder. Eighteen patients were identified who received HER2-directed therapies for HER2-positive recurrent/metastatic SGC, and complete data on treatment duration was available for 15/18. Histology was salivary duct carcinoma in 13/18 patients, adenocarcinoma NOS in 4/18, and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma in 1/18. The median treatment duration was 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.41-not reached), and the range was 1.0-47.0 months. Choice of HER2-directed therapy varied, with ado-trastuzumab emtasine being the most common (9/18). At the time of analysis, HER2-directed therapy was ongoing for 9/15, discontinued due to disease progression for 4/15, discontinued due to toxicity for 1/15, and 1/15 was discontinued for an unspecified reason. An exceptional responder experienced a complete response with a treatment duration of 47.0 months. These real-world data are comparable to the median PFS observed with HER2-directed therapies in phase II trials and support the use of HER2-directed therapies in this group.

The Value of Tucatinib in Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: An Italian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at estimating the appropriate price of tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine (TXC), as third-line treatment, in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients from the Italian National Health System (NHS) perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model with three mutually exclusive health states (i.e., progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and death) was used to estimate the price of tucatinib vs trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1), considering a willingness to pay (WTP) of 60,000 EUR. Data from the HER2CLIMB trial, the Italian population, and the literature were used as input. The model also estimated the total costs and the life-years (LY) of TXC and TDM1. Deterministic and probabilistic (PSA) sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: In the base case scenario, the appropriate price of tucatinib was 4828.44 EUR per cycle. The TXC resulted in +0.28 LYs and +16,628 EUR compared with TDM-1. Results were mainly sensitive to therapy intensity variation. In PSA analysis, TXC resulted cost-effective in 53% of the simulations. Assuming a WTP ranging 20,000-80,000 EUR, the tucatinib price ranged from 4090.60 to 5197.41 EUR. CONCLUSIONS: This study estimated the appropriate price for tucatinib according to different WTP in order to help healthcare decision makers to better understand the treatment value.

Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Immunogenicity of UJVIRA (ZRC-3256, Trastuzumab Emtansine) With the Kadcyla (Trastuzumab Emtansine) in the Treatment of HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study in India.

BACKGROUND: UJVIRA is the first DCGI approved biosimilar of trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla) which may offer an alternative cost-effective treatment option for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer patients in India. This article summarizes the available clinical evidence supporting the biosimilarity of UJVIRA and Kadcyla with respect to efficacy, pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted at 31 sites across India. A total of 168 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either UJVIRA or Kadcyla. Of which, only first 50 patients were included in pharmacokinetic assessment. UJVIRA or Kadcyla were administered at a dose of 3.6 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (21 days) for 8 cycles or until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity, whichever was earlier. The study assessed efficacy (ORR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: The ORR at the end of Week 24 was 37.76% in the UJVIRA and 33.33% in the Kadcyla group. The risk difference was 4.42% [-12.01, 20.85]. It met noninferiority margin of -15%. The pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between groups. No antidrug antibody was detected in any of the treatment groups. The overall safety profile in terms of TEAEs and laboratory abnormalities was also comparable between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated biosimilarity between UJVIRA and Kadcyla in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Therefore, UJVIRA could prove to be a cost-effective treatment alternative for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients in India.

Final results of the global and Asia cohorts of KAMILLA, a phase IIIB safety trial of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: KAMILLA is a single-arm safety study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (BC; NCT01702571). We report the final analysis of cohort 2 (Asia) within the context of published cohort 1 (Global) findings. METHODS: Patients had HER2-positive, locally advanced, or metastatic BC progressing after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy or ≤6 months after adjuvant therapy. The primary objective was to further evaluate T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks) safety/tolerability, including the following adverse events of primary interest (AEPIs): grade ≥3 AEPIs (hepatic events, allergic reactions, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage events), all grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and all-grade pneumonitis. RESULTS: KAMILLA enrolled 2185 patients (cohort 1, n = 2003; cohort 2, n = 182) as of 31 July 2019. Of these, 2002 and 181 per cohort were treated and included in the safety population. Approximately 70% of patients had two or more previous treatment lines in the metastatic setting. Median T-DM1 exposure was 5.6 and 5.0 months per cohort; median follow-up was 20.6 and 15.1 months. The overall AEPI rate was higher in cohort 2 (93/181; 51.4%) versus cohort 1 (462/2002; 23.1%), mostly driven by a higher grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia rate in cohort 2. In cohort 2, grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was not associated with grade ≥3 hemorrhagic events and most (128/138) fully resolved. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEPI rates were 18.4% (cohort 1) and 48.6% (cohort 2), the latter mainly due to thrombocytopenia. Any-grade pneumonitis rates were 1.0% and 2.2%. No new safety signals were identified. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 6.8 months (5.8-7.6 months) and 5.7 months (5.5-7.0 months) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively; median overall survival was 27.2 months (25.5-28.7 months) and 29.5 months (21.1 months to non-estimable). In both cohorts, median progression-free survival and overall survival decreased with increasing prior therapy lines. CONCLUSIONS: Cohort 2 results aligned with previous findings in Asian patients, supporting the manageable safety profile and use of T-DM1 in advanced BC.

Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) in a patient on hemodialysis for renal failure.

HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is an aggressive disease with a limited number of treatment options. In the last 15 years, new drugs such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib or trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) have sprouted for these patients. There is a huge lack of evidence on the use of some of these drugs in patients with chronic renal failure, who need hemodialysis. We have reviewed the use of TDM-1 in these type of patients in the literature with unsuccessful results. In this article we want to present a case report to illustrate the safety and efficacy of TDM-1 in a patient on hemodialysis.

HER2 in metastatic colorectal cancer: a new to target to remember.

Metastatic colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death. Standard chemotherapy in combination with targeted therapies represent the backbone for the treatment of advanced disease. However, options are limited for patients progressing on these regimens. Genetic testing can offer patients the opportunity to benefit from novel therapies, namely immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite instability-positive tumors. HER2 overexpression has recently emerged as a potentially targetable tumor marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite the absence of approvals for anti-HER2 therapies in CRC, many agents such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab were tested and demonstrated significant antitumor activity, even in heavily pretreated patients. Early trials are also evaluating lapatinib, T-DM1, tucatinib and other anti-HER2 agents in patients with metastatic CRC, with promising results.

Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status.

PURPOSE: Assessment of HER2 overexpression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) for the detection of HER2 amplifications is standard to identify patients for established HER2-directed treatments. Patients with lower HER2 expression levels have recently also become candidates for novel therapies targeting HER2. This study aimed to assess tumour and patient characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), relative to low HER2 expression levels. METHODS: PRAEGNANT is a prospective aBC registry (NCT02338167), focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis includes patients with conventionally HER2-negative aBC. Clinical outcome was compared in the groups with no (IHC score 0) or with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH negative). RESULTS: Low HER2 expression levels in triple-negative aBC patients did not influence progression-free survival. Overall survival appeared poorer in patients with IHC 2+ compared with patients with no HER2 expression in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1.12-4.47). However, this effect was not maintained in the adjusted analysis. In HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive patients, low HER2 expression appeared to have no effect on prognosis, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We could not demonstrate that HER2 expression at a low level and assessed in clinical routine can differentiate patients into prognostic groups. However, the prevalence of patients with a low expression makes this population interesting for clinical trials with potentially active treatments using HER2 as a target.

The evolving role of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases.

Approximately 30-50% of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer patients will develop brain metastases (BMs) during the disease course. Brain metastases may become a main limitation of life expectancy and a half of them will die from brain progression. Even in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer managed with curative therapy, the risk of brain metastases is also increased. Central nervous system (CNS) may usually present as the first site of recurrence in HER2-positive breast cancer. Local treatments including radiotherapy and surgery are essential while new chemotherapy and biological agents appear to contribute a significant role in the future treatment field of CNS metastases. This article will review recent progresses in HER2-positive breast cancer with BM, with a focus on the efficacy of the HER2 targeted agents-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).

Changing Natural History of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Metastatic to the Brain in the Era of New Targeted Therapies.

BACKGROUND: Given the wide adoption of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, we studied the natural history of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive BCBM identified from a prospectively maintained database at the University of North Carolina were divided into 3 cohorts by year of BCBM diagnosis. Cohorts were selected by year of HER2-targeted therapy US Food and Drug Administration approval. Overall survival (OS), time to first metastasis, time to BCBM, and BCBM survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between OS after BCBM and clinical variables were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were identified. Median age was 51 years, and 58% were white and 31% African American. OS from initial breast cancer diagnosis improved over time: 3.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-6.1) in the 1998-2007 cohort, 6.6 years (95% CI, 4.5-8.6) in the 2008-2012 cohort, and 7.6 years (95% CI, 4.4-9.6) in the 2013-2015 cohort (P = .05). While time from initial diagnosis to first metastasis did not differ (P = .12), time to BCBM increased over time (2.6 years [95% CI, 1.3-3.5] for 1998-2007; 2.6 years [95% CI, 2.1-4.3] for 2008-2012, and 3.3 years [95% CI, 2.2-6] for 2013-2015; P = .05). Although OS from BCBM did not significantly differ by cohort, patients who received HER2-targeted therapy after BCBM had a prolonged OS (2.1 years [95% CI, 1.6-2.6] vs. 0.65 years [95% CI, 0.4-1.3]; P = .001). CONCLUSION: OS from initial breast cancer diagnosis significantly improved over time for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who develop BCBM, now exceeding 7 years; survival from BCBM diagnosis may now exceed 2 years.

Efficacy and safety of a combination of HER2-targeted agents as first-line treatment for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Using network meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of HER2-targeted agents as first-line treatment for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases (through December 2016) for phase II/III randomized controlled trials that compared regimens of one or two HER2-targeted agents combined with trastuzumab or chemotherapy. A network meta-analysis including direct and indirect analyses was conducted in WinBUGS using fixed and random effects. Study quality was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations method. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: The network meta-analysis incorporated nine HER2-targeted regimens with 9 direct comparisons and 28 indirect comparisons for the main outcomes (8 studies; n = 3976). Combining direct and indirect effects showed significant increased efficacy of trastuzumab and docetaxel plus pertuzumab (TDP) over other regimens as first-line treatment. With indirect comparison of overall safety, TDP, TDM-1, and TDM-1 plus pertuzumab demonstrated a lower risk of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to other regimens. CONCLUSIONS: TDPs are a preferred first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer compared with other target agent regimens.

Practical consensus recommendations on Her2 +ve breast cancer with solitary brain mets.

Breast cancer is a common cause of brain metastases, with metastases occurring in at least 10-16% of patients. Longer survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer and the use of better imaging techniques are associated with an increased incidence of brain metastases. Current therapies include surgery, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapies. However, the timing and appropriate use of these therapies is controversial and careful patient selection by using available prognostic tools is extremely important. Expert oncologist discussed on the mode of treatment to extend the OS and improve the quality of life ofHER2-positivebreast cancer patients with Solitary brain metastases. This expert group used data from published literature, practical experience and opinion of a large group of academic oncologists to arrive at this practical consensus recommendations for the benefit of community oncologists.