A novel risk classification model integrating CEA, ctDNA, and pTN stage for stage 3 colon cancer: a post hoc analysis of the IDEA-France trial.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the added value of incorporating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and pathological TN (pTN) stage for risk classification in stage 3 colon cancer (CC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed postoperative CEA values in patients with CC from the IDEA-France phase 3 trial. The relation between disease-free survival (DFS) and CEA was modeled through restricted cubic splines. Prognostic value of CEA, ctDNA, and pTN was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic and predictive factors for DFS. RESULTS: Among 696 patients (35%), CEA values were retrievable, and for 405 (20%) both CEA and ctDNA were available. An optimized CEA threshold of 2 ng/mL was identified, the 3-year DFS was 66.4% for patients above the threshold and 80.9% for those below (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.33-2.28, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, CEA ≥ 2 ng/mL contributed significantly to model variability, becoming an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 1.82; 95% CI,1.27-2.59), alongside ctDNA (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.16-3.03) and pTN (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.24-2.54). A novel integrated risk classification combining CEA, ctDNA, and pTN stage reclassified 19.8% of pT4/N2 patients as low risk and 2.5% of pT3/N1 patients as high risk. This new classification demonstrated the 3-year DFS of 80.8% for low-risk patients and 55.4% for high-risk patients (HR, 2.66, 95% CI, 1.84-3.86, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CEA value is a prognostic factor for DFS in stage 3 CC, independently of ctDNA and pTN. It advocates for systematic reporting in future adjuvant trials. Integrating both biomarkers with pTN could refine risk classification in stage 3 CC.

Endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma (EC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 86 surgical patients with EC who were confirmed by endoscopy and biopsy underwent preoperative TN staging with EUS examination. The EUS findings were compared with surgical pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of EUS in T and N staging of EC was 82.6% and 84.9%, respectively. While determining whether EC invades the muscularis propria or outer membrane, EUS had the favorable sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The short-axis diameter of lymph nodes of 5mm had high sensitivity and negative predictive value to determine malignance with low specificity and positive predictive value. The short-axis diameter of 10mm presented the satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: EUS can accurately determine the TN staging of EC and provide a reliable basis for the treatment of EC.

Accuracy of preoperative T and N staging in colon cancer--a national population-based study.

AIM: To select patients for neoadjuvant therapy in colon cancer, there is a need to improve pre-therapeutic locoregional staging. There are now data showing that the TN stage can be adequately assessed by preoperative CT in dedicated centres. In Sweden the use of preoperative CT of the abdomen for staging of the primary tumour is increasing. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent the preoperatively reported radiological TN stage correlates with the histopathological TN stage in an entire population. METHOD: Data were collected on the preoperative cTN stage according to the radiologist and postoperative pTN stage according to the pathologist on all patients operated on for colon cancer in Sweden 2007-2010. The correlation between cTN stage and pTN stage was calculated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: T stage was compared in 4373 patients with cT and pT stage. The correlation coefficient was 0.44, indicating fair agreement. The cN and pN correlation coefficient was 0.28, indicating a slight correlation. There was no difference in correlation related to age, gender, tumour location, body mass index or emergent vs elective surgery. A slight difference was seen between different geographical regions. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CT in an unselected population does not result in an accurate cTN staging as previously reported from dedicated centres. To achieve adequate preoperative cTN staging nationally, the education of radiologists and optimization of the radiological method will be necessary.

Diagnostic accuracy of sequential co-registered PET+MR in comparison to PET/CT in local thoracic staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of sequential co-registered PET+MR (PET+MR) for local staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) compared to PET/CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective clinical trial 34 consecutive patients (median age 66 years; range 40-79 years; 1 female, 33 male) with known MPM, who underwent PET/CT and PET+MR exams for either staging or re-staging/follow-up were evaluated. Imaging was conducted using a tri-modality PET/CT-MR set-up (Discovery PET/CT 690, 3T Discovery MR 750w, both GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). In 26 cases histopathology served as standard of reference. Two independent readers evaluated images for T and N stage, confidence level (sure to unsure; 1-3) and subjective overall image quality (very good to non-diagnostic; 1-4). Inter-observer agreement of T and N stages (Cohen's kappa) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between PET/CT vs. PET+MR was calculated. RESULTS: Inter observer agreement for evaluation of T and N Stage in PET/CT images was excellent (k=0.844 and k=0.824, respectively), whereas PET+MR imaging showed substantial agreement in T and N stage (k=0.729 and k=0.691, respectively). The ICC of PET/CT vs. PET+MR for evaluation of both, T and N Stage, was excellent (ICC=0.951 and ICC=0.93, respectively). Diagnostic confidence was scored significantly higher in PET+MR compared to PET/CT (mean score=1.66 and 1.93, respectively; p=0.004). Image quality was diagnostic for all image series. Comparing pT and pN stage vs cT and cN stage (n=26 cases), both imaging modalities showed excellent agreement for T stage (ICCPET+MR=0.888 vs. ICCPET/CT=0.853, respectively) and substantial to moderate agreement for N stage (ICCPET+MR=0.683 vs. ICC=0.595PET/CT, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that diagnostic accuracy of PET+MR is comparable to PET/CT for local staging of MPM, whereas radiologists felt significantly more confident staging PET+MR compared to PET/CT images (p=0003), using dedicated sequences.