RESUMO
Introduction: Telemetric monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) in children with a complex cerebrospinal disorder might help parents distinguish acute and potential life-threatening symptoms of hydrocephalus from other illnesses. Research question: What is patient and parent perceptions of system utility of telemetric ICP monitoring, and how does a long-term telemetric implant influence daily life of both patients and their families? Material and methods: A qualitative case study design with a focus group interview including parents of children with a complex cerebrospinal fluid disorder and an implanted telemetric ICP sensor. Results: Three parents participated. Based on thematic analysis, three themes were created: 'Daily living with telemetric ICP monitoring', 'Parenting a child with a CSF disorder', and 'The healthy sibling'. The ICP sensor provided the parents with security and made them trust their intuition, while the possibility of home monitoring ensured stability for the entire family and had a calming effect on healthy siblings. Home monitoring was seen as the system's greatest advantages, whereas size, weight, and functionality of the external monitoring equipment were highlighted as disadvantages. Discussion and conclusion: All parents supported the telemetric ICP sensor as a valued tool in treatment guidance of their child and stated that advantages exceeded disadvantages. It was stated that the possibility of conducting ICP measurements at home reduced the need for acute hospital admissions, which consequently led to a more stable daily life for the entire family. Suggestions regarding technical improvements with focus on more compatible external monitoring equipment were raised by all parents included.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Optimizing the treatment of several neurosurgical and neurological disorders relies on knowledge of the intracranial pressure (ICP). However, exploration of normal ICP and intracranial pressure pulse wave amplitude (PWA) values in healthy individuals poses ethical challenges, and thus the current documentation remains scarce. This study explores ICP and PWA values for healthy adults without intracranial pathology expected to influence ICP. METHODS: Adult patients (age > 18 years) undergoing surgery for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm without any other neurological co-morbidities were included. Patients had a telemetric ICP sensor inserted, and ICP was measured in four different positions: supine, lateral recumbent, standing upright, and 45-degree sitting, at day 1, 14, 30, and 90 following the surgery. RESULTS: ICP in each position did not change with time after surgery. Median ICP was 6.7 mmHg and median PWA 2.1 mmHg in the supine position, while in the upright standing position median ICP was - 3.4 mmHg and median PWA was 1.9 mmHg. After standardization of the measurements from the transducer site to the external acoustic meatus, the median ICPmidbrain was 8.3 mmHg in the supine position and 1.2 mmHg in the upright standing position. CONCLUSION: Our study provides insights into normal ICP dynamics in healthy adults following a uncomplicated surgery for an unruptured aneurysm. These results suggest a slightly wider normal reference range for invasive intracranial pressure than previously suggested, and present the first normal values for PWA in different positions. Further studies are, however, essential to enhance our understanding of normal ICP. Trial registration The study was preregistered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03594136) (11 July 2018).