Use of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: The expanding availability of minimal or more precisely measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with its possible implications for therapeutic decisions is of high interest to clinicians treating AML patients. A variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that AML patients with a positive MRD test, assessed by different techniques at defined cutoffs and time-points, are at significantly higher risk of relapse and experience shorter overall survival compared to MRD-negative patients. How this valuable information may be adapted in the daily routine of patients' treatment to distinguish individuals who need more aggressive therapy from the ones who can be spared additional therapy to avoid treatment-related toxicities is still being investigated. With the exception of MRD analyses in acute promyelocitic leukemia (APL), the clinical implications of MRD tests for the individual AML patient are still mostly unknown. We currently lack hard evidence that MRD-based therapy modulation during treatment or pre-emptive intervention in MRD-positive patients after therapy would improve outcomes in non-APL AML patients. These questions will be evaluated in prospective randomized clinical trials. Today, however, some conclusions with regard to MRD assessment in AML can be drawn from the published data and are reviewed in this article.

The therapeutic decision as a reason of quarrel / La décision thérapeutique comme objet de dispute.

Introduction: The therapeutic decision usually is a regalia prerogative of the practitioner. However it seems to be contested. Materials and Methods: From three definition of sovereignty, given by classical author of political science and the observations of the current practices and needs (new attitude and need of the patients, changes in training's methods, use of new numeric tools) is illustrated this phenomenon of the decisions making field's degradation. Conclusion: Without a resistance to all current form of concurrence in the field of therapeutic decision, a transformation of the profession of practitioner in dento-maxillo-facial orthopedics on a simple executive or animator of the care process in this field is expected. The practitioner awareness and a reenforcement of the training resources could limit the impact.

Introduction: La décision thérapeutique est classiquement une prérogative régalienne du praticien. Il semble pourtant qu'elle lui soit actuellement disputée. Matériels et méthodes: À partir de trois définitions de la souveraineté, tirées d'auteurs classiques des sciences politiques, ainsi que de l'observation des pratiques et demandes actuelles (nouvelles attitudes et demandes des patients, changements des méthodes de formation, utilisations de nouveaux outils informatiques), nous illustrerons ce phénomène d'érosion du champ décisionnaire. Conclusion: Sans une résistance à toutes les formes actuelles de concurrences œuvrant dans le champ de la décision thérapeutique, une transformation du métier de praticien en orthopédie dento-maxillo-faciale en un simple emploi d'exécutant ou d'animateur du processus de soins dans cette discipline est à prévoir. Une prise de conscience des praticiens et un renforcement des moyens de formation permettraient d'en limiter l'impact.

Impact of an Advanced Practice Pharmacist Type 2 Diabetes Management Program: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of an Advanced Practice Pharmacist (APh) on lowering hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes within a patient centered medical home (PCMH) and to classify the types of therapeutic decisions made by the APh. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using data from electronic health records. The study evaluated a partnership between Chapman University School of Pharmacy and Providence St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare that provided diabetes management by an Advanced Practice Pharmacist in a PCMH under a collaborative practice agreement. Change in the HbA1c was the primary endpoint assessed in this study. The type of therapeutic decisions made by the APh were also evaluated. Descriptive analysis and Wilcoxon signed ranktest were used to analyze data. RESULTS: The study included 35 patients with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus managed by an APh from May 2017 to December 2017. Most of the patients were 60-79 years old (68.5%), 45.7% were female, and 45.7% were of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. The average HbA1cwas 8.8%±1.4% (range=6.0%-12.4%) and 7.5%±1.4% (range=5.5%-12.4%) at the initial and final APh visit, respectively (p<0.0001). Therapeutic decisions made by the APh included drug dose increase (35.5% of visits), drug added (16.4%), drug dose decrease (6.4%), drug switch (5.5%), and drug discontinuation (1.8%). CONCLUSION: The Advanced Practice Pharmacist's interventions had a significant positive impact on lowering HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a PCMH. The most common therapeutic decisions made by the APh included drug dose increase and adding a new drug.

Impact of Joint Involvement on Patients Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Joint involvement is common among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Aim of this work was to evaluate the correlation between the presence of joint involvement and patient-reported pain, perception of disease activity, general health and quality of life. METHODS: Fifty consecutive SLE patients were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent a complete clinical evaluation including a 44-joint count; in addition, an ultrasound evaluation of joint involvement of hands and wrists was performed. The following patients reported outcomes (PROs) were completed: Visual Analog Scales 0-100 mm (VAS) evaluating patients reported pain, patient's perception of global disease activity and general health (GH) and a validated Italian version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (28%) reported a significant morning stiffness lasting for more than 30 minutes; hand or wrist arthritis was clinically detectable in 10 (20%) patients, while the US evaluation exhibited at least one joint or tendon pathology in 18 patients (36%). The mean VAS score for pain and disease activity perception was 27 (±27.7) mm and 25.3 (±25.2) mm, respectively, the mean of GH score was 33.2 (±24.3) mm, and the mean HAQ score was 0.34 (±0.5). A significant correlation was observed between VAS score for pain, patient's perception of disease activity and GH and the presence of arthritis. CONCLUSION: PROs may play an important role in guiding therapeutic decisions and suggest the utility of ultrasound evaluation in patients reporting articular symptoms.

Aversion to ambiguity and willingness to take risks affect therapeutic decisions in managing atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention: results of a pilot study in family physicians.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation is the therapeutic paradigm for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unknown how physicians make treatment decisions in primary stroke prevention for patients with AF. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between family physicians' risk preferences (aversion risk and ambiguity) and therapeutic recommendations (anticoagulation) in the management of AF for primary stroke prevention by applying concepts from behavioral economics. METHODS: Overall, 73 family physicians participated and completed the study. Our study comprised seven simulated case vignettes, three behavioral experiments, and two validated surveys. Behavioral experiments and surveys incorporated an economic framework to determine risk preferences and biases (e.g., ambiguity aversion, willingness to take risks). The primary outcome was making the correct decision of anticoagulation therapy. Secondary outcomes included medical errors in the management of AF for stroke prevention. RESULTS: Overall, 23.3% (17/73) of the family physicians elected not to escalate the therapy from antiplatelets to anticoagulation when recommended by best practice guidelines. A total of 67.1% of physicians selected the correct therapeutic options in two or more of the three simulated case vignettes. Multivariate analysis showed that aversion to ambiguity was associated with appropriate change to anticoagulation therapy in the management of AF (OR 5.48, 95% CI 1.08-27.85). Physicians' willingness to take individual risk in multiple domains was associated with lower errors (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.86). CONCLUSION: Physicians' aversion to ambiguity and willingness to take risks are associated with appropriate therapeutic decisions in the management of AF for primary stroke prevention. Further large scale studies are needed.

An Investigation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence Associated with Diagnostic Checklists as Well as Gender Biases in Relation to Mental Disorders.

This study examines the utility of checklists in attaining more accurate diagnoses in the context of diagnostic decision-making for mental disorders. The study also aimed to replicate results from a meta-analysis indicating that there is no association between patients' gender and misdiagnoses. To this end, 475 psychotherapists were asked to judge three case vignettes describing patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder. Therapists were randomly assigned to experimental conditions in a 2 (diagnostic method: with using diagnostic checklists vs. without using diagnostic checklists) × 2 (gender: male vs. female case vignettes) between-subjects design. Multinomial logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the association between the usage of diagnostic checklists as well as patients' gender and diagnostic decisions. The results showed that when checklists were used, fewer incorrect co-morbid diagnoses were made, but clinicians were less likely to diagnose MDD even when the criteria were met. Additionally, checklists improved therapists' confidence with diagnostic decisions, but were not associated with estimations of patients' characteristics. As expected, there were no significant associations between gender and diagnostic decisions.