[Prognostic factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line targeted therapies]. / Étude des facteurs pronostiques pour le carcinome rénal métastatique traité par une deuxième ligne de thérapies ciblées.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological features in patients treated with second-line targeted therapies (TT) for a metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including 60 patients treated with second-line TT from 2006 to 2013. Clinical and biological features were collected, including TT-induced toxicities, Heng and MSKCC prognostic scores, and renal function. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years [39-81]. MSKCC and Heng scores were significantly prognostic for OS and PFS (P<0.05). Hypo-albuminemia, anemia and brain metastasis were associated with poorer OS and PFS (P<0.05). Severe induced toxicities had a prognostic impact with higher OS (26 months vs 10 months, P=0.003) and PFS (5 months vs 4 months, P=0.047). Renal function impairment at the initiation of the second line was also associated with higher survival (OS=24 months vs 9 months, P=0.035 and PFS=7 months vs 4 months, P=0.043). On multivariate analysis, induced toxicity was found as an independent factor of good prognosis for OS (HR=0.36; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that renal function impairment and TT-induced toxicities in the second line of treatment for mRCC have a potential prognostic interest as it had previously been reported for the first line of TT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Prognostic value of toxicities induced by targeted therapies in patients treated for a metastatic renal cell carcinoma]. / Valeur pronostique de la toxicité induite par les thérapies ciblées dans le carcinome rénal métastatique.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological variables in the era of targeted therapies, especially induced toxicity in patients treated for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed in patients treated in our center from 2006 to 2012. The clinical and biological variables and toxicity data were retrospectively collected. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log-Rank test. Multivariate analysis was also performed using the Cox model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were included, with a median follow-up of 20 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 21 months, and 6 months for the progression free survival (PFS). As expected, the variables included in the Mozter prognostic score had a significant impact on OS (P < 0.0001) and PFS (P < 0.0001). However, hypoalbuminemia (P < 0.0001), brain metastasis (P = 0.003) and the absence of nephrectomy (P < 0.0001) were found as poor prognosis factors for OS. In addition, severe toxicity (grade 3-4) was significantly associated with higher OS (P < 0.0001) and PFS (P = 0.0003) and appeared as an independent factor in multivariate analysis for OS (P = 0.02) and PFS (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Severe toxicity induced by targeted therapies was found as a prognostic factor increasing significantly the survival. Further studies are needed to assess the real value of this factor in the development of sequential therapies for the treatment of RCC.