Classification of primary mitral regurgitation using extramitral cardiac involvement in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: An enhanced classification of primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) based on extramitral cardiac involvement may refine patient selection and optimize the timing of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). AIMS: This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of a recently established classification system that characterizes the extent of extramitral cardiac damage in patients undergoing TEER for PMR. METHODS: Consecutive PMR patients who received MitraClip implantation were categorized according to the presence of extramitral cardiac damage, determined through preprocedural echocardiography. The classifications included no damage or only left ventricular dilatation (group 0), left atrial involvement (group 1), right ventricular volume/pressure overload (group 2), right ventricular failure (group 3), or left ventricular failure (group 4). Cox-proportional hazard models were used to ascertain the impact of PMR groups on the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (HHF) over 2 years. RESULTS: In a cohort of 322 eligible PMR patients undergoing TEER (median age: 83 years; 41% female) between 2013 and 2020, the following distribution emerged: group 0 (10 patients, 3%), group 1 (96 patients, 30%), group 2 (117 patients, 36%), group 3 (56 patients, 18%), and group 4 (43 patients, 13%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant decline in freedom from the primary outcome as group severity increased (log-rank p = 0.030). On multivariate analysis, the degree of extramitral cardiac involvement was significantly associated with the primary outcome (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.67; p = 0.043), primarily driven by HHF. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative classification system for PMR, based on extramitral cardiac involvement, carries significant prognostic implications for clinical outcomes following TEER. Integrating this classification system into clinical decision-making could enhance risk stratification and optimize the timing of TEER in these patients.

Geographic variability and operator trends of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in the United States.

BACKGROUNDS: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) devices are used for primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and secondary MR. Despite the growing use of TEER devices, there have not been many studies on operator experience or procedure volumes by state. AIMS: We aimed to investigate nationwide operator volume trends and geographic variation in access to TEER. METHODS: The United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) National Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database (MPUPD) was analyzed between 2015 and 2020 for initial TEER procedures. RESULTS: Procedure volume and total operators increased yearly from 2015 to 2019 but declined in 2020. Mean annual procedure volume per operator varied significantly by state, between 0 in multiple states and 35 in North Dakota. In 2019, 994 unique operators were identified, with 295 operators documented performing 10 or more procedures (29.68%). Operators performing 10 or more TEER procedures provided 68.46% of all operations in 2019, averaging 20.94 procedures per operator. CONCLUSIONS: TEER procedures are becoming increasingly common as more operators are being trained. However, significant variability exists in the procedural volume per operator.

A modified Carpentier classification in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common heart valve disease, and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been recommended as a therapy for severe MR patients by guidelines. The classic Carpentier classification used to guide surgical mitral valve repair but is inadequate for mitral TEER (M-TEER). We herein proposed a new modified Carpentier classification named after "type + segment," which is suitable for M-TEER. We shared our strategies in M-TEER procedure for screening and performing the M-TEER according to the new modified Carpentier classification.

Impact of systolic dominant pulmonary venous flow morphology on outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of intraprocedural pulsed-wave Doppler analysis of pulmonary venous flow (PVF) during mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains understudied. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of systolic dominant-PVF (SD-PVF) morphology post-TEER. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis from December 2019 to December 2022, patients undergoing mitral TEER were categorized into SD-PVF and systolic blunting (SB)-PVF groups based on post-TEER morphology. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization at 1 year. We investigated the association of PVF morphology post-TEER with the primary endpoint at 1 year using Cox regression and compared the prognostic accuracy of PVF variables through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Among 187 patients (mean age 76.4 ± 10.5 years, 51.3% primary etiology), residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤mild was observed in 147 (82.4%) patients and 105 (56.2%) had SD-PVF post-TEER. Patients with SD-PVF had a lower incidence of >2+ residual MR after clip deployment, at 30 days (2.1% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.005) and at 1 year (1.4% vs. 9%; p = 0.08). SD-PVF post-TEER was independently associated with the primary endpoint (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.87; p = 0.009). ROC curve analysis of the prognostic accuracy of SD-PVF demonstrated an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI = 0.54-0.73), comparable to other quantitative measures of PVF. CONCLUSION: Assessing PVF morphology after clip deployment offers a simple prognostic tool for patients undergoing mitral TEER. Multicenter cohorts will be necessary to further investigate its prognostic value.

Understanding transcatheter edge-to-edge repair "knobology": Advanced catheter steering for different scenarios of transseptal puncture.

Following the introduction in the latest European and American guidelines, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has become a valid alternative to surgery for ineligible patients. Among the available technologies, MitraClip (Abbott) was the first to be introduced for the percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation with the edge-to-edge technique. Although its safety and effectiveness has been widely demonstrated, the optimal procedural results are highly dependent from operators' experience. In this manuscript, we provide a full guide of advanced steering maneuvers of MitraClip in different scenarios of transseptal puncture.

Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA-FR-like patients) during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. METHODS: MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1-year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1-year. RESULTS: A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1-year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all-cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up. However, 1-year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA-FR-like patients.

Contemporary experience of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair technology in patients with mitral annular calcification.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) has been an exclusion for many of the earlier pivotal trials that were instrumental in gaining device approval and indications for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). AIMS: To evaluate the impact of MAC on the procedural durability and success of newer generation MitraClip® systems (G3 and G4 systems). METHODS: Data were collected from Northwell TEER registry. Patients that underwent M-TEER with third or fourth generation MitraClip device were included. Patients were divided into -MAC (none-mild) and +MAC (moderate-severe) groups. Procedural success was defined as ≤ grade 2 + mitral regurgitation (MR) postprocedure, and durability was defined as ≤ grade 2 + MR retention at 1 month and 1 year. Univariate analysis compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Of 260 M-TEER patients, 160 were -MAC and 100 were +MAC. Procedural success was comparable; however, there were three patients who required conversion to cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization in the +MAC group versus none in the -MAC group (though this was not statistically significant). At 1-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in MR severity. At 1-year follow-up, +MAC had higher moderate-severe MR (22.1% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.002) and higher mean transmitral gradients (5.3 vs. 4.0 mmHg; p = 0.001) with no differences in mortality, New York Heart Association functional class or ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: In selective patients with high burden of MAC, contemporary M-TEER is safe, and procedural success is similar to patients with none-mild MAC. However, a loss of procedural durability was seen in +MAC group at 1-year follow-up. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to assess newer mTEER devices and their potential clinical implications in patients with a high burden of MAC.

Iatrogenic atrial septal defects in structural heart interventions: Opening the Pandora's box.

In the modern era of structural heart interventions, the total number of transseptal procedures is growing exponentially, thus increasing the rate and need for management of iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASDs). To date, there are no official guidelines on the assessment and management of iASDs, due to inconclusive evidence on whether patients benefit more from the percutaneous closure of iASD than from conservative management and vigorous follow-up. Despite the abundance of observational studies on iASDs, there is still a lack of randomized studies. Evidence so far show that percutaneous closure is no superior over conservative treatment in patients with iASDs, however, it has been demonstrated that patients with spontaneous closure of iASDs experience less heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. On the other hand, researchers have investigated the beneficial nature of interatrial shunt therapy in patients with HFpEF and, more recently, with HFrEF, due to the presumed hemodynamic benefits. Herein, we provide an updated review of relevant literature, focusing on iASD persistence rates, predicting factors for their persistence, and clinical outcomes of iASD persistence, to summarize available evidence and discuss future directions in the field.

Impact of the MitraClip G4 System on Routine Practice and Outcomes in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: The MitraClip G4 system is a new iteration of the transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system. We assessed the impact of the G4 system on routine practice and outcomes in secondary mitral regurgitation (2°MR).Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with 2°MR treated with either the MitraClip G2 (n=89) or G4 (n=63) system between 2018 and 2021 were included. Baseline characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were compared. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and Cox regression were used to adjust for baseline differences. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a lower surgical risk in the G4 group (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality ≥8: 38.1% vs. 56.2%; P=0.03). In the G4 group, more patients had short (≤2 mm) coaptation length (83.7% vs. 54.0%; P<0.001) and fewer clips were used (17.5% vs. 36.0%; P=0.02). Acceptable MR reduction was observed in nearly all patients, with no difference between the G4 and G2 groups (100% vs. 97.8%, respectively; P=0.51). The G4 group had fewer patients with high transmitral gradients (>5mmHg; 3.3% vs. 13.6%; P=0.03). At 1 year, there was no significant difference between groups in the composite endpoint (death or heart failure rehospitalization) after baseline adjustment (10.5% vs. 20.2%; hazard ratio 0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.11-1.32; P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The G4 system achieved comparable device outcomes to the early-generation G2, despite treating more challenging 2°MR with fewer clips.

Efficacy of Native T1 Mapping for Patients With Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Functional Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of left ventricular (LV) myocardial damage by native T1mapping obtained with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 40 symptomatic non-ischemic heart failure (HF) patients and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR) undergoing TEER. LV myocardial damage was defined as the native T1Z-score, which was converted from native T1values obtained with CMR. The primary endpoint was defined as HF rehospitalization or cardiovascular death over 12 months after TEER. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the native T1Z-score was the only independent parameter associated with cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 3.40; 95% confidential interval 1.51-7.67), and that patients with native T1Z-scores <2.41 experienced significantly fewer cardiovascular events than those with native T1Z-scores ≥2.41 (P=0.001). Moreover, the combination of a native T1Z-score <2.41 and more severe VFMR (effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA] ≥0.30 cm2) was associated with fewer cardiovascular events than a native T1Z-score ≥2.41 and less severe VFMR (EROA <0.30 cm2; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of baseline LV myocardial damage based on native T1Z-scores obtained with CMR without gadolinium-based contrast media is a valuable additional parameter for better management of HF patients and VFMR following TEER.

Multimodality Imaging in the Management of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation.

Approximately 5% of elderly patients suffer from moderate or severe tricuspid valve regurgitation, which is an independent predictor of high morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment of isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation has been associated with elevated fatality rate, leading to a growing interest in minimal invasive, transcatheter-based therapies such as transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter valve replacement. Nevertheless, despite high procedural efficacy and safety of transcatheter-based therapies, a number of challenges limit their rapid adoption in routine clinical practice. In particular, the wide range of transcatheter approaches to address the significant variability in tricuspid valve pathology challenges the reproducibility of clinical outcomes. Multimodality imaging is pivotal for grading the regurgitation severity, determining the underlying pathology, assessing RV function and pulmonary pressures, identifying concomitant cardiac disease, and selecting the most beneficial treatment modality and access. This article reviews the role of different imaging modalities in guiding the management of patients with significant tricuspid valve regurgitation.

The safety of transesophageal echocardiography to guide transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is primarily used to guide transcatheter structural heart interventions, such as tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Although TEE has a good safety profile, it is still an invasive imaging technique that may be associated with complications, especially when performed during long transcatheter procedures or on frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess TEE-related complications during tricuspid TEER. METHODS: This is a prospective study enrolling 53 patients who underwent tricuspid TEER for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TEE-related complications were assessed clinically and divided into major (life-threatening, major bleeding requiring transfusions or surgery, organ perforation, and persistent dysphagia) and minor (perioral hypesthesia, < 24 h dysphagia/odynophagia, minor intraoral bleeding and hematemesis not requiring transfusion) RESULTS: The median age of the patient population was 79 years; 43.4% had severe, 39.6% massive, and 17.6% torrential TR. 62.3% of patients suffered from upper gastrointestinal disorders. Acute procedural success (APS) was achieved in 88.7% in a median device time of 36 min. A negative association was shown between APS and lead-induced etiology (r = -.284, p = .040), baseline TR grade (r = -.410, p = .002), suboptimal TEE view (r = -.349, p = .012), device time (r = -.234, p = .043), and leaflet detachment (r = -.496, p < .0001). We did not observe any clinical manifest major or minor TEE-related complications during the hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reinforces the good safety profile and efficacy of TEE guidance during tricuspid TEER. Adequate preoperative management and intraprocedural precautions are mandatory in order to avoid serious complications. Furthermore, suboptimal intraprocedural TEE views are associated with lower TR reduction rates. HIGHLIGHTS: Transesophageal echocardiography is a crucial and safe technique for guiding transcatheter structural heart interventions. A mix of mid/deep esophageal and trans gastric views, as well as real-time 3D imaging is generally used to guide the procedure. Adequate preoperative management and intraprocedural precautions are mandatory in order to avoid serious problems. A shorter device time is associated with more rarely probe-related complications. Suboptimal intraprocedural TEE views are associated with lower TR reduction rates.

Transcatheter Therapy for the Tricuspid Valve: A Focused Review of Edge-to-Edge Repair and Orthotopic Valve Replacement.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are at risk for significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) may offer patients less invasive treatment alternatives to surgery. This review evaluates the most common class of device currently used worldwide to treat TR, tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and orthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR), both of which are now approved in the USA and Europe. RECENT FINDINGS: The first pivotal randomized clinical trial, TRILUMINATE, demonstrated that T-TEER can safely reduce TR and is associated with improved health status outcomes. However, results of this trial have raised questions about whether this device can provide sufficient TR reduction to impact clinical outcomes. Orthotopic TTVR has recently gained attention with initial data suggesting near-complete TR elimination. The current review examines the technical features and anatomic limitations of the most commonly used devices for T-TEER and orthotopic TTVR, discusses the current clinical data for these devices, and offers a theoretical construct for device selection.

Cerebral Embolic Protection: Is There a Benefit for Left Atrial and Mitral Valve Procedures?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to highlight the current evidence on the use of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) in left atrial and transcatheter mitral valve procedures. It also aims to summarize the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing such procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Ischemic stroke is one of the most devastating complications of structural heart procedures. The manifestation of periprocedural stroke can range from asymptomatic and detectable only through brain imaging to major stroke with neurological deficits. CEP devices were initially developed to mitigate the risk of stroke associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the efficacy of such devices during different cardiac interventions is yet to be fully demonstrated, especially in left atrial appendage closure (LAAO), and mitral valve interventions. Few studies demonstrated that the risk of periprocedural strokes after LAAO and mitral valve interventions is not negligible and is highest during the periprocedural period and then falls. The majority of patients undergoing those procedures have cerebral ischemic injuries detected on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Moreover, a reasonable number of those patients had debris embolization on the filters of the CEPD. Pharmacological therapy with antithrombotic agents before, during, or after structural heart interventions is crucial and should be tailored to each patient's risk of bleeding and ischemia. Close monitoring that includes a full neurological assessment and frequent follow-up visits with cardiac echocardiography are important. The risk of periprocedural stroke in left atrial and transcatheter mitral valve procedures is not negligible. Pharmacological therapy with antithrombotic agents before, during, or after structural heart interventions is important to mitigate the risk of stroke, especially the long-term risk. More prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy of CEPD in such procedures.

Heart failure medical therapy prior to mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended before mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) in patients with heart failure (HF) and severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Whether MTEER is being performed on the background of optimal GDMT in clinical practice is unknown. METHODS: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who underwent MTEER for FMR from 23 July 2019 to 31 March 2022 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry were identified. Pre-procedure GDMT utilization was assessed. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate associations between pre-MTEER therapy (no/single, double, or triple therapy) and risk of 1-year mortality or HF hospitalization (HFH). RESULTS: Among 4199 patients across 449 sites, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors were used in 85.1%, 44.4%, 28.6%, and 19.9% before MTEER, respectively. Triple therapy was prescribed for 19.2%, double therapy for 38.2%, single therapy for 36.0%, and 6.5% were on no GDMT. Significant centre-level variation in the proportion of patients on pre-intervention triple therapy was observed (0%-61%; adjusted median odds ratio 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-3.88]; P < .001). In patients eligible for 1-year follow-up (n = 2014; 341 sites), the composite rate of 1-year mortality or HFH was lowest in patients prescribed triple therapy (23.0%) compared with double (24.8%), single (35.7%), and no (41.1%) therapy (P < .01 comparing across groups). Associations persisted after accounting for relevant clinical characteristics, with lower risk in patients prescribed triple therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.73, 95% CI .55-.97] and double therapy (aHR 0.69, 95% CI .56-.86) before MTEER compared with no/single therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Under one-fifth of patients with LVEF <50% who underwent MTEER for FMR in this US nationwide registry were prescribed comprehensive GDMT, with substantial variation across sites. Compared with no/single therapy, triple and double therapy before MTEER were independently associated with reduced risk of mortality or HFH 1 year after intervention.

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapies: Do They Have a Role in Advanced Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction?

Transcatheter mitral valve repair should be considered for patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction for symptom improvement and survival benefit. Patients with a higher severity of secondary mitral regurgitation relative to the degree of left ventricular dilation are more likely to benefit from transcatheter mitral valve repair. A multidisciplinary Heart Team should participate in patient selection for transcatheter mitral valve therapy.

Newer versus Early Generation of the MitraClip for Primary Mitral Regurgitation: A Japanese Single-Center Experience.

Background: The MitraClip G4 system is the latest version of the transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) system for mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to investigate the impact of the new system on routine clinical practice and patient outcomes in the treatment of primary MR. Methods: Consecutive patients with primary MR who underwent TEER with either the MitraClip G2 or G4 between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled from a single center registry. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics as well as procedural and clinical outcomes up to 1 year were compared between groups. Technical and device success were defined in accordance with the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Results: Among 71 patients with primary MR, 34 were treated with G2 and 37 were treated with G4. Patients treated with G4 had lower surgical risk (7.74 [5.04, 14.97] vs. 5.26 [3.98, 6.40]; p < 0.01) than those with G2. There were no significant differences in other baseline clinical variables between groups. On baseline echocardiography, MR volume and flail gap were significantly greater in the G4 group than in the G2 group (regurgitant volume: 63 [41-76] mL vs. 68 [62-84] mL; p = 0.04, flail gap: 4.5 [3.5-5.5] mm vs. 5.4 [4.5-7.1] mm; p = 0.04). Technical success was achieved in over 95% of both groups with no significant difference (p > 0.99). Device success was achieved in 61.8% of the G2 group, while in 70.3% of the G4 group (p = 0.47). Post-procedural MR severity was comparable (p = 0.42) and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of mitral stenosis (p = 0.61) between groups. Among patients who reached 1-year follow-up (n = 54), there was no significant difference between groups in a composite endpoint of death or heart failure rehospitalization (10.5% vs. 20.2%; HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.17-2.22; p = 0.45). Residual heart failure symptoms (NYHA ≥ 3) at 1 year were observed in 3.7% of the G2 group, while no patient in the G4 group (p > 0.99). Conclusions: The MitraClip G4 system achieved comparable device outcomes to the early-generation device (G2), despite treating more severe primary MR with a larger flail gap.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of Mitral Valve Regurgitation: Closing the Gap to Broaden the Coverage.

Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of mitral valve (M-TEER) is reasonable consideration in symptomatic patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) who are at high or prohibitive risk of surgical repair or replacement. In symptomatic patients on maximally tolerated medical therapy with severe secondary MR from left ventricular systolic dysfunction, M-TEER is reasonable therapeutic option. Methods: In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the most recent literature and considerations for M-TEER in patients excluded from key trials. These include patients with cardiogenic shock, acute ischemic MR, atrial functional MR, failed surgical mitral valve prosthesis and pulmonary hypertension. Conclusions: M-TEER is feasible and a reasonable alternative option for these patient populations with a significant clinical benefit. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to ascertain findings from these observational studies.

Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for atrial functional mitral regurgitation: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) may have potential benefits in the treatment of atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), but robust evidence is currently lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical outcomes of TEER for AFMR, including comparisons to ventricular functional MR (VFMR). METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through January 2023 to identify studies eligible for analysis. The primary outcome was postprocedural MR severity. Postprocedural New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class classification and all-cause mortality were also evaluated. Outcomes were stratified into short term (postprocedure to 6 months) and long term (6 months to 2 years). RESULTS: A total of eight observational studies met the inclusion criteria, enrolling 539 AFMR and 3486 VFMR patients. Postprocedural MR grade ≤2 in the AFMR group was observed in 93.7% (454/491 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI), 91.1%-96.2%, I2 = 24.3%) and 97.1% (89/93 patients; 95% CI, 92.9%-100%, I2 = 26.4%) in short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the rates of postprocedural MR grade ≤2 between AFMR and VFMR either in short-term (risk ratio [RR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.06]; p = 0.90; I2 = 53%) or long-term follow-up (RR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.89-1.32]; p = 0.44; I2 = 22%). Similarly, no difference was observed between AFMR and VFMR in the rates of postprocedural NYHA class ≤2 or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: TEER provides similar clinical outcomes for AFMR and VFMR. A high rate of MR grade ≤2 was observed in patients at both short- and long-term follow-ups. Further prospective studies with TEER versus medical therapy and/or rhythm control for AFMR are warranted.

Predictors of hemodynamic response to mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in left atrial pressure (LAP) during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is associated with improved outcomes. We sought to investigate the predictors of optimal hemodynamic response to TEER. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent TEER at Mayo Clinic between May 2014 and February 2022. Patients with missing LAP data, an aborted procedure, and those undergoing a concomitant tricuspid TEER were excluded. We performed a logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of optimal hemodynamic response to TEER (defined as LAP ≤ 15 mmHg). RESULTS: A total of 473 patients were included (Mean age 78.5 ± 9.4 years, 67.2% males). Overall, 195 (41.2%) achieved an optimal hemodynamic response after TEER. Patients who did not achieve an optimal response had higher baseline LAP (20.0 [17-25] vs. 15.0 [12-18] mmHg, p < 0.001), higher prevalence of AF (68.3% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.006), functional MR (47.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.009), annular calcification (41% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.02), lower left ventricular EF (55% vs. 58%, p = 0.02), and more frequent postprocedural severe MR (11.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.02) and elevated mitral gradient >5 mmHg (30.6% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, AF (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.35-0.96; p = 0.03), baseline LAP (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.75-0.84; p < 0.001) and postprocedural mitral gradient <5 mmHg (OR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.19-0.65; p < 0.001), were independent predictors of achieving an optimal hemodynamic response. In the multivariate model, residual MR was not independently associated with optimal hemodynamic response. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal hemodynamic response is achieved in 4 in 10 patients undergoing TEER. AF, higher baseline LAP, and higher postprocedural mitral gradient were negative predictors of optimal hemodynamic response after TEER.