Antiretroviral Treatment Gaps and Adherence Among People with HIV in the U.S. Medicare Program.

Approximately one-quarter of people with HIV (PWH) in the U.S. receive coverage through the Medicare program; however, no prior real-world study has examined antiretroviral therapy (ART) gaps and adherence and associated factors in this population. This retrospective cohort analysis used 2013-2018 national Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all PWH initiated on a new ART regimen including protease inhibitors [PI], non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs], or integrase strand transfer inhibitors [INSTIs] between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017. Study outcomes included ART adherence (based on proportion of days covered [PDC]), continuous treatment gaps ranging from 1 to 6 days to ≥ 180 days, and discontinuation (continuous gap ≥ 90 days) in the 12-month follow-up period. Multivariable regressions were used to assess factors associated with ART adherence and discontinuation. The final sample included 48,627 PWH (mean age: 54.5 years, 74.4% male, 47.5% White, 89.8% disabled). Approximately 53.0% of PWH had a PDC ≥ 0.95, 30.2% had a PDC between 0.70 and < 0.95, and 16.8% had PDC < 0.70. Treatment gaps of at least ≥ 7-days (55.2%) and ≥ 30-days (26.2%) were common and 10.1% PWH discontinued treatment. Younger age, female sex, Black race, higher comorbidity score, mental health conditions, and substance use disorder were associated with higher odds of lower adherence and discontinuation (all p-values < 0.05). In conclusion, suboptimal adherence and treatment gaps in ART use were commonly observed among PWH in Medicare. Interventions and policies to mitigate barriers to adherence are urgently needed in this population to both improve their survival and increase the potential for ending the HIV epidemic in the US.

The influence of social determinants of health on epilepsy treatment delays in an Arizona Medicaid population.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to better understand the role of social determinants of health (SDoH) in both treatment delays and treatment gaps for individuals with epilepsy (IWE) enrolled in Arizona's Medicaid program using predictive models at the population and individual levels. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, two statistical regression models were developed using Arizona Medicaid medical and pharmacy claims records from 2015-2019 and selected census tract-level SDoH data. Three treatment outcomes were defined: timely treatment (treated within thirty days); delayed treatment (treated after thirty days); and untreated. For the first model, least squares regression was used to regress the epilepsy treatment delays on selected SDoH factors at the population-level. For the second model, multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate associations between epilepsy treatment delays and individual-level sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Of the 5965 IWE identified with a new epilepsy diagnosis during the study period, 43.1% were treated with a mean delay of 180 days. Among the treated population, 42% received timely treatment. A treatment gap of at least 40.6% and potentially up to 56.9% was calculated. Individuals with epilepsy diagnosed in an inpatient setting or in emergency departments were more likely to be treated and receive timely treatment than those diagnosed in an office or clinic setting. Individuals with epilepsy diagnosed in "other" settings were more likely to go untreated or receive delayed treatment than a patient diagnosed in an office or clinic. Compared to IWE aged 31-50 years, IWE aged 0-30 years were more likely to receive timely treatment, IWE aged 51-64 years were more likely to receive delayed treatment, and IWE aged 65 years or older were more likely to go untreated. Widowed IWE were more likely to go untreated relative to single patients. Individuals with epilepsy experiencing homelessness were also more likely to go untreated. Unemployed IWE were more likely to go untreated or receive delayed treatment. Native American IWE were more likely to go untreated compared to White patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment gaps and treatment delays are experienced by IWE in the Arizona Medicaid population. The SDoH factors predicted to impact treatment delays include care setting, age, race, marital status, homelessness, and employment.

Treatment gaps and challenges in epilepsy care in the Philippines.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a neurologic disease that carries a high disease burden and likely, a huge treatment gap especially in low-to-middle income countries (LMIC) such as the Philippines. This review aimed to examine the treatment gaps and challenges that burden Philippine epilepsy care. MATERIALS & METHODS: Pertinent data on epidemiology, research, health financing and health systems, pharmacologic and surgical treatment options, cost of care, and workforce were obtained through a literature search and review of relevant Philippine government websites. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of epilepsy in the Philippines is 0.9%. Epilepsy research in the Philippines is low in quantity compared with the rest of Southeast Asia (SEA). Inequities in quality and quantity of healthcare services delivered to local government units (LGUs) have arisen because of devolution. Programs for epilepsy care by both government and nongovernment institutions have been implemented. Healthcare expenditure in the Philippines is still largely out-of-pocket, with only partial coverage from the public sector. There is limited access to antiseizure medications (ASMs), mainly due to cost. Epilepsy surgery is an underutilized treatment option. There are only 20 epileptologists in the Philippines, with one epileptologist for every 45,000 patients with epilepsy. In addition, epilepsy care service delivery has been further impeded by the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. CONCLUSION: There is a large treatment gap in epilepsy care in the Philippines in terms of high epilepsy disease burden, socioeconomic limitations and inadequate public support, sparse clinico-epidemiologic research on epilepsy, inaccessibility of health care services and essential pharmacotherapy, underutilization of surgical options, and lack of specialists capable of rendering epilepsy care. Acknowledgment of the existence of these treatment gaps and addressing such are expected to improve the overall survival and quality of life of patients with epilepsy in the Philippines.

Gaps and barriers in health-care provision for co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are a complex subset of the growing number of patients with diabetes, due to multi-morbidity. Gaps between recommended and received care for diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are evident despite promulgation of guidelines. Here, we document gaps in tertiary health-care, and the commonest patient-reported barriers to health-care, before exploring the association between these gaps and barriers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited patients with diabetes and CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) across 4 large hospitals. For each patient, questionnaires were completed examining clinical data, recommended care, and patient-reported barriers limiting health-care. Descriptive statistics, subgroup analyses by CKD stage and hospital, and analyses examining the relationship between health-care gaps and barriers were performed. RESULTS: 308 patients, of mean age 66.9 (SD 11.0) years, and mostly male (69.5%) and having type 2 diabetes (88.0%), participated. 49.1% had stage 3, 24.7% stage 4 and 26.3% stage 5 CKD. Gaps between recommended versus received care were evident: 31.9% of patients had an HbA1c ≥ 8%, and 39.3% had a measured blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg. The commonest barriers were poor continuity of care (49.3%), inadequate understanding/education about CKD (43.5%), and feeling unwell (42.6%). However, barriers associated with a failure to receive items of recommended care were inadequate support from family and friends, conflicting advice from and poor communication amongst specialists, the effect of co-morbidities on self-management and feeling unmotivated (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to health-care varied across CKD stages and hospitals. Barriers associated with a deviation from recommended care were different for different items of care, suggesting that specific interventions targeting each item of care are required.

Treatment gaps in the care of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Philippines: A scoping review.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive disease affecting both the upper and lower motor neurons. Much of the management of ALS is supportive with the goal of maximizing patient quality of life. While the Philippines was participative in the "Ice Bucket Challenge" in 2014, it is up for investigation whether substantial changes occurred to improve healthcare for ALS patients. This study aims to evaluate the treatment gaps in the management of ALS in the Philippines through a scoping review. Data on epidemiology, health systems, and pharmacotherapy available regarding ALS in the local setting were synthesized. Nine articles were included. As of July 2023, there were only four indexed studies on ALS from the Philippines. Five of the included articles investigated ALS in Filipino populations but were not authored by Filipinos nor affiliated with Philippine institutions. The available literature showed a distinct lack of local ALS epidemiologic data, as well as limited availability in diagnostic centers, medications, health financing options, and digestible information for Filipinos. The limitations in managing ALS in the country are multifactorial - from political, medical, and social. It is imperative to establish a national database, financing systems, support groups, and accessible diagnostic centers for ALS patients.

Pituitary Adenoma in the Philippines: A Scoping Review on the Treatment Gaps, Challenges, and Current State of Care.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas are benign brain tumors that impose a heavy burden on patients worldwide. The local burden of disease is yet to be established due to scarcity of data. In line with this, this study aims to present the challenges and gaps in the treatment of pituitary adenomas in the Philippines. METHODS: A scoping review of available relevant literature on epidemiology, clinical experience with treatment, health financing, and healthcare delivery system based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted. RESULTS: The scarcity of updated local clinical data, inequity of distribution of resources, inadequate government support, and lack of affordable diagnostic testing, medications, and neurosurgical procedures are the factors that hinder provision of adequate care of pituitary adenomas in the Philippines. CONCLUSION: There are notable treatment gaps in the management of pituitary adenomas in the Philippines, which may be addressed by strengthening universal healthcare. Strategies to address these gaps were proposed, including improving public-private insurance coverage, increasing manpower, enhancing accessibility to resources, and spreading more awareness.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. It remains underdiagnosed, undertreated, and portends worse outcomes in women than men. Disparities exist in every stage of science, from bench research to the editorial board of major journals and in every cardiovascular subspecialty. This review summarizes differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disparities in management and outcomes of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, aortic stenosis, and atrial fibrillation. It also provides an overview of female representation as participants and leaders of clinical trials, editorial boards, and academic institutions. Strategies to overcome these disparities are proposed with examples of successful programs.

Use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists according to the 2019 ESC guidelines and the 2019 ADA/EASD consensus report in a national population of patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To assess treatment eligibility for, and received treatment with, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists according to the 2019 the American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) consensus report and the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines in a nationwide sample of patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Both sets of guidelines included the treatment indications of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease while only the 2019 ESC guidelines also recommended treatment based on high or very high cardiovascular risk. The analyses included 435 000 patients with type 2 diabetes identified from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2020-21). According to the 2019 ESC guidelines, 79.5% were recommended any of the two drugs (SGLT2 inhibitors: 37.2%; SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists: 40.9%; GLP-1 receptor agonists: 1.4%). According to the 2019 ADA/EASD consensus report, 48.8% were recommended any of the two drugs (SGLT2 inhibitors: 37.2%; GLP-1 receptor agonists: 11.6%). Of those who had been recommended any of the two drugs, 33.7% had received the recommended treatment according to the 2019 ESC guidelines and 25.4% according to the 2019 ADA/EASD consensus report. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who were recommended treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist was approximately 80% according to the 2019 ESC guidelines and around half according to the 2019 ADA/EASD consensus report. Uptake of these recommendations in routine clinical practice was limited.

We investigated the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden who were recommended treatment with two types of diabetes drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists, according to two European clinical guidelines. • Depending on the guideline used, between half and 80% of the patients with type 2 diabetes were recommended treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor. • Of those who had been recommended any of the two drugs, one in three or one in four, depending on the guideline used, had received the recommended treatment.

Development and implementation of a laboratory monitoring dashboard to reduce treatment gaps in inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE: Patients receiving biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require routine laboratory monitoring to ensure the safety and efficacy of therapy. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the implementation of a dashboard to prevent treatment gaps by prospectively identifying patients with IBD and outdated laboratory results receiving biologics. METHODS: We performed a pre/post analysis of dashboard implementation to assess the number of patients with overdue laboratory work resulting in treatment gaps. The dashboard combined data from the electronic health record (EHR) and pharmacy claims database to identify patients on a biologic with laboratory tests (white blood cell count, liver transaminases, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) completed 5 or more months ago and/or a tuberculosis screen completed 11 or more months ago. After implementation, specialty pharmacists reviewed the dashboard and communicated via EHR if a new prescription and laboratory tests were needed. Messages were sent 4 weeks in advance of the next refill-eligible date. Mixed methods were used for analysis of qualitative data, including surveys, and quantitative data, assessing treatment gap length. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients who had outdated laboratory values and required a new prescription (15 before dashboard implementation and 25 after implementation) were included in the analysis. The frequency of a treatment gap decreased from 80% (n = 12) in the preimplementation phase to 32% (n = 8) in the postimplementation phase. The median gap length was shorter after dashboard implementation, decreasing from 21 days (range, 3-97 days) to 11 days (range, 2-23 days). CONCLUSION: Utilization of a quality measures dashboard decreased treatment gaps in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapy. Integrated specialty pharmacists are uniquely positioned to monitor adherence to laboratory monitoring parameters for patients on biologics.

Patterns of Care for Adolescent With Schizophrenia: A Delphi-Based Consensus Study.

Background: The current conceptualization of schizophrenia as neurodevelopmental disorder should lead to innovative public health policies in terms of a reorganization of the mental health care systems, particularly in the transition from adolescence to adulthood, to reduce personal, familiar, and social costs and burdens. The purpose of the project was to perform a survey among a panel of Italian schizophrenia experts, to share evidence-based information on adolescent schizophrenia and explore the degree of consensus among professionals in the following four macro-areas: early diagnosis; pharmacological treatment; health care system organization and transition process from adolescent to adulthood; and psychosocial interventions. Methods: The consensus process consisted of a two-step web-based Delphi method, which took place between June and November 2021. The survey was developed by a panel of four psychiatrists and four child neuropsychiatrists, identified as key opinion leaders (KOLs). The KOLs identified 21 statements involving a total of 70 items with a major need of clarification on early-onset schizophrenia (EOS). The survey was distributed to 86 specialists in psychiatry and child neuropsychiatry. Results: The results revealed a large agreement among the expert group on all the investigated areas of adolescent schizophrenia patterns of care and management. Consensus was ultimately reached for 67 items of the Delphi survey (95.7%), while negative consensus was reached for 2 items and no consensus was reached for 1 item. Conclusions: Overall, results showed a significant gap between the acquired scientific knowledge and clinical practice. In this scenario, it should be necessary to plan specific initiatives at a multiple level, to edit recommendations on clinical decision-making, as well as to prompt changes at the political and organizational levels, also involving scientific societies, patients, and family associations, to overcome the barriers that delay the implementation process.

Changing paradigm in the treatment of amyloidosis: From disease-modifying drugs to anti-fibril therapy.

Cardiac amyloidosis is a rare, debilitating, and usually fatal disease increasingly recognized in clinical practice despite patients presenting with non-specific symptoms of cardiomyopathy. The current standard of care (SoC) focuses on preventing further amyloid formation and deposition, either with anti-plasma cell dyscrasia (anti-PCD) therapies in light-chain (AL) amyloidosis or stabilizers of transthyretin (TTR) in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR). The SoC is supplemented by therapies to treat the complications arising from organ dysfunction; for example, heart failure, arrhythmia, and proteinuria. Advancements in treatments have improved patient survival, especially for those whose disease is detected and for whom treatment is initiated at an early stage. However, there still are many unmet medical needs, particularly for patients with severe disease for whom morbidity and mortality remain high. There currently are no approved treatments to reverse amyloid infiltration and deplete the amyloid fibrils already deposited in organs, which can continue to cause progressive dysfunction. Anti-fibril therapies aimed at removing the deposited fibrils are being investigated for safety and efficacy in improving outcomes for patients with severe disease. However, there is no clinical evidence yet that removing deposited amyloid fibrils will improve organ function, thereby improving quality of life or extending life. Nevertheless, anti-fibril therapies are actively being investigated in clinical trials to evaluate their ability to complement and synergize with current SoC.

Neuro-oncology in the Philippines: a scoping review on the state of medical practice, deterrents to care and therapeutic gaps.

BACKGROUND: Neoplasms of the brain and spine are relatively uncommon compared to breast, lung and gastrointestinal tumours, which occur at higher rates in the Asian population. Updated guidelines in diagnosis and treatment of neuro-oncologic diseases recommend advanced molecular-based precision-medicine; thus the need for increasingly individualised regimens. It is, therefore, necessary to determine whether there are areas of improvement in the provision of care to these patients, especially in low- to middle-income economies like the Philippines. METHODS: In this study, we identified gaps in the delivery of medical care to Filipino patients with tumours of the central nervous system. We performed a scoping review on the available literature on clinical experience with treatment of neuro-oncologic cases from the Philippines and performed qualitative analysis viewed through the lens of the existing healthcare system. RESULTS: The medical practice of neuro-oncology in the Philippines lacks robust local data on epidemiology and treatment outcomes. There are existing legislative frameworks to support adequate healthcare delivery and financing to brain tumour patients. However, inequities in the geographic distribution of infrastructure, manpower and medications are roadblocks for accessibility to neuro-oncologic services like specialised molecular markers, neurosurgical procedures, sustained chemotherapy and radiation therapy centres. CONCLUSION: There are significant treatment gaps in the care of neuro-oncologic patients in the Philippines that need to be addressed. Early detection and initiation of prognosis-changing therapeutics through reduction of out-of-pocket expenses, access to readily available diagnostic tools and sustainability of management regimens are the main areas that necessitate strengthened partnership between the public and private sectors of Philippine society.

Motivational Interviewing to Support Oral AntiCoagulation adherence in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (MISOAC-AF): a randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: We aimed to assess the impact of an educational, motivational intervention on the adherence to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalized patients with non-valvular AF who received OAC were randomly assigned to usual medical care or a proactive intervention, comprising motivational interviewing, and tailored counselling on medication adherence. The primary study outcome was adherence to OAC at 1 year, which was evaluated according to proportion of days covered (PDC) by OAC regimens and was assessed through nationwide registers of prescription claims. Secondary outcomes included the rate of persistence to OAC, gaps in treatment, and clinical events. A total of 1009 patients were randomized, 500 in the intervention group and 509 in the control group. At 1-year follow-up, 77.2% (386/500) of patients in the intervention group were adherent (PDC > 80%), compared with 55% (280/509) in the control group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14-3.75; P < 0.001]. Mean PDC ± standard deviation was 0.85 ± 0.26 and 0.75 ± 0.31, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients that received the intervention were more likely to persist in their OAC therapy at 1 year (aOR 2.42, 95% CI 1.71-3.41; P < 0.001). Usual medical care was associated with more major (≥3 months) treatment gaps (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.76-3.26; P < 0.001). Clinical events over a median follow-up period of 2 years did not differ among treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving OAC therapy for non-valvular AF, a multilevel motivational intervention significantly improved medication adherence and rate of therapy persistence, and reduced major gaps in treatment. No significant impact on clinical outcomes was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02941978.

Schizophrenia and "unmet needs": From diagnosis to care in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a leading cause of disability. People living with schizophrenia (PLWS) present unemployment, social isolation, excess mortality and morbidity, and poor quality of life. Early recognition and appropriate treatment reduce the risk of chronicity and comorbidity. Personalization and integration of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions, as well as accurate identification and management of psychiatric and somatic comorbidities, can significantly improve mental and physical health of PLWS, promoting recovery. METHODS: A three-step Delphi approach was used to explore consensus on the essential components of early recognition and intervention, personalization, and integration of care to improve schizophrenia outcome, and on barriers and challenges to close treatment gaps. The consensus involved 8 Italian experts of schizophrenia, 100 psychiatrists from academic and nonacademic settings, including representatives of Italian Society of Psychiatry, and 65 trainees in psychiatry. RESULTS: A strong consensus (from mostly agree to totally agree) emerged on the importance of early diagnosis (97%), standardized assessments (91%), correct management of somatic and psychiatric comorbidities (99%), and personalization and integration of care (94%). Lack of time, human resources, and training were identified as the main barriers and challenges to the translation of knowledge into clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this Delphi study demonstrated a strong consensus on main components of schizophrenia care, as well as on unmet needs to promote best practice and gaps between knowledge and clinical practice. The involvement of a large group of professionals and trainees in this in-depth consensus process might contribute to raise awareness and stimulate innovative strategies to improve the outcome of PLWS.

Treatment gaps in Parkinson's disease care in the Philippines.

Neurological services and resources are scarce in low-income and developing countries, such as the Philippines. We looked into the treatment gaps in Parkinson's disease (PD) care in the Philippines in the following areas: epidemiology, healthcare, financial coverage, pharmacotherapy, surgical treatment and manpower. We collected relevant data on the above-mentioned areas. There is no available Philippine data on PD prevalence. Philippine healthcare is paid through user fees at the point of service. The average consultation fee in Manila ranges from US$10.57-31.74. The average minimum daily wage is US$9.39-10.17. Philippine healthcare is devolved to the local government units. Deep brain stimulation surgery is only available in Manila. Most PD medications are available in the Philippines. There are only nine movement disorder specialists for a population of 100.98 million. Gaps and challenges in PD care in the Philippines still exist.

Gaps in Medical and Device Therapy for Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: The EchoGap Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess gaps between guidelines and medicine prescription/dosing and referral for defibrillator therapy in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS: Outpatient echocardiography reports at an academic hospital centre were screened and outpatients with LVEF<40% were included. A questionnaire was mailed to the patients' physician, querying prescription/dosing of ACE-inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and beta-blockers (BB). Patients with LVEF<30% had additional questions on implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) referral. RESULTS: Mean age was 69.6+/-12.2 years and mean LVEF was 29.7+/-6.5%. ACEi and/or ARB prescription rate was 260/309(84.1%) versus 256/308(83.1%) for BB (p=NS for comparison). Of patients on ACEi, 77/183(42.1%) were on target dose, compared to 7/45(15.5%) for ARB and 9/254(3.5%) for BB (p<0.01). Of 171/309 patients (55.3%) with LVEF<30%, 72/171(42.1%) had an ICD and 16/171(9.4%) were referred for one. CONCLUSION: Prescription rates of evidence-based HF medicines are relatively high in outpatients with LVSD referred for echocardiography at this Canadian academic medical centre; however, the proportion of patients at target doses was modest for ACEi and low for ARB and BB. Approximately half of patients who qualify for ICD by EF alone have one or were referred. Important reasons for patients with LVSD not on evidence-based therapy were identified.