Developing a novel international undergraduate surgical masterclass during a financial crisis: our 4-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Essential Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases (ESMSC) is a novel 3-day international undergraduate surgical masterclass. Its current curriculum (Cores integrated for Research-Ci4R) is built on a tetracore, multiclustered architecture combining high-fidelity and low-fidelity simulation-based learning (SBL), with applied and basic science case-based workshops, and non-technical skills modules. We aimed to report our experience in setting up ESMSC during the global financial crisis. METHODS: We report the evolution of our curriculum's methodology and summarised the research outcomes related to the objective performance improvement of delegates, the educational environment of the course and the use of mixed-fidelity SBL. Feedback from the last three series of the course was prospectively collected and analysed using univariate statistics on IBM SPSS V.23. RESULTS: 311 medical students across the European Union (EU) were selected from a competitive pool of 1280 applicants during seven series of the course between 2014 and 2017. During this period, curriculum 14 s evolved to the final Ci4R version, which integrates a tetracore structure combining 32 stations of in vivo, ex vivo and dry lab SBL with small group teaching workshops. Ci4R was positively perceived across different educational background students (p>0.05 for any comparison). CONCLUSIONS: ESMSC is considered an innovative and effective multidisciplinary teaching model by delegates, where it improves delegates objective performance in basic surgical skills. Our experience demonstrates provision of high-quality and free surgical education during a financial crisis, which evolved through a dynamic feedback mechanism. The prospective recording and subsequent analysis of curriculum evolution provides a blueprint to direct development of effective surgical education courses that can be adapted to local needs.

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships and Undergraduate Surgical Education: A Scoping Review and Gap Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) are an increasingly popular approach to medical student clinical education, and the literature describing them is expanding. Despite this, there is a lack of understanding for how surgery didactics and skills are currently taught as a part of the LIC curriculum. DESIGN: We conducted a scoping literature review in July 2022 using terms related to LIC and surgical education. Abstract and full-length text screening followed. Data extraction was completed in August 2022. Articles published in English, focused on LIC students, and discussed any element of LIC curriculum surgical education was included. SETTING: Scoping literature review. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 282 studies describing LICs were identified from the scoping literature review. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 (13%) studies describing some element of surgical education were included. RESULTS: Of these 37 studies, the majority did not delve into pertinent details related to students' surgery experience, expectations, and surgical skills accomplishments. Four studies (11%) reported on the outpatient surgical experience, such as minimum required time that students were expected to be in the clinic, and 8 studies (22%) described the inpatient and operating room exposure. Only 1 study (3%) described the surgical floor management of surgical patients, including tasks like documentation and wound care, and 3 studies (8%) reported formal assessment of surgical skills, such as suturing technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the paucity LIC literature examining the relationship between this curricular innovation and the unique needs of medical students on a surgical clerkship. Surgeon educators should embrace the opportunity to contribute LIC curriculum development and subsequent investigation into how this modality interfaces with the learning objectives of undergraduate surgical education. A formal description of essential curriculum components for all surgical LIC programs is needed to ensure appropriate surgical education across the varied LIC models.

[Portfolio-based learning in surgery : Making competencies "visible"]. / Portfoliobasiertes Lernen in der Chirurgie : Kompetenzen "sichtbar" machen.

BACKGROUND: Due to an increasing competence orientation of medical studies, surgical curricula are being adapted in many places. In addition to surgical knowledge and practical skills, these should also teach competencies in differential diagnostics and treatment. The teaching of surgical knowledge through lectures and seminars and the demonstration of practical skills, e.g., through the use of logbooks in the Bock Practical Surgery (BP), only allows limited active engagement with surgical competencies on differential diagnostics and treatment. A reflection-based portfolio allows, through the independent written elaboration of surgical topics, an active engagement with the competencies and promises a higher learning effect. In the context of the implementation of such a portfolio as part of the proof of activity in BP, the effects on the acquisition of competencies and on the way of learning were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a mixed methods approach, we compared competence acquisition using a reflection-based portfolio with learning using a logbook. Students conducted a self-assessment of competencies using questionnaire surveys before and after the BP. Through focus group interviews with discussions among students using a guideline, we explored the different ways of acquiring competencies. In addition, the examination and evaluation results of both cohorts were compared. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Students' self-assessed competency acquisition and examination and evaluation results showed no differences when comparing the two cohorts. During the focus group interviews, we were able to show that in the perception of the students, surgical competencies can be made more visible and thus more explicit with the help of a reflection-based portfolio. In addition, self-regulated learning was promoted without neglecting practical skills. Students demanded greater supervision and guidance by mentors in both groups.

Robotic training for medical students: feasibility of a pilot simulation curriculum.

While robotic procedures are growing rapidly, medical students have a limited role in robotic surgeries. Curricula are needed to enhance engagement. We examined feasibility of augmenting Intuitive Surgical (IS) robotic training for medical students. As a pilot, 18 senior students accepted an invitation to a simulation course with a daVinci robot trainer. Course teaching objectives included introducing robotic features, functionalities, and roles. A 1-h online module from the IS learning platform and a 4-h in-person session comprised the course. The in-person session included an overview of the robot by an IS trainer (1.5 h), skills practice at console (1.5 h), and a simulation exercise focused on the bedside assist role (1 h). Feasibility included assessing implementation and acceptability using a post-session survey and focus group (FG). Survey responses were compiled. FG transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis techniques. Fourteen students participated. Implementation was successful as interested students signed up and completed each of the course components. Regarding acceptability, students reported the training valuable and recommended it as preparation for robotic cases during core clerkships and sub-internships. In addition, FGs revealed 4 themes: (1) perceived expectations of students in the OR; (2) OR vs. outside-OR learning; (3) simulation of stress; and (4) opportunities to improve the simulation component. To increase preparation for the robotic OR and shift robotic training earlier in the surgical education continuum, educators should consider hands-on simulation for medical students. We demonstrate feasibility although logistics may limit scalability for large numbers of students.

Racial and Ethnic Bias in Medical School Clinical Grading: A Review.

OBJECTIVE: Improving diversity in healthcare is a widely recognized national goal. The diversity of medical student matriculants has increased, yet this trend is not seen in the composition of competitive residency programs. In this review, we examine racial and ethnic disparities in medical student grading during clinical years and explore the consequences of how this may exclude minority students from accessing competitive residency positions. DESIGN: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ERIC databases using variations of the terms "race," "ethnicity," "clerkship," "rotation," "grade," "evaluation", or "shelf exam." Of 391 references found using the criteria, 29 were related to clinical grading and race/ethnicity and included in the review. The GRADE criteria were used to determine the quality of evidence. SETTING: Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD. RESULTS: Five studies examining a total of 107,687 students from up to 113 different schools found racial minority students receive significantly fewer Honors grades in core clerkships compared to White students. Three studies examining 94,814 medical student evaluations from up to 130 different schools found significant disparities in the wording of written clerkship evaluations based on race and/or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: A large body of evidence suggests the presence of racial bias in subjective clinical grading and written clerkship evaluations of medical students. Grading disparities can disadvantage minority students when applying to competitive residency programs and may contribute to a lack of diversity in these fields. As low minority representation has a negative impact on patient care and research advancement, strategies to resolve this issue must be further explored.

Qualities of excellent resident and attending teachers recognized by medical students: A qualitative analysis of nominations for surgical clerkship teaching awards.

BACKGROUND: Effective teaching positively impacts student experience during the surgical clerkship. We sought to better understand how medical students characterize excellent surgical educators and how these characteristics may differ between residents and attendings. METHODS: 289 nominations by third-year medical students for a surgical resident and attending teaching award were examined for thematic content using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Six major themes emerged: inclusion of students, prioritizing student education, facilitating procedural involvement, utilizing effective educational methods, providing mentorship, and role modeling. Residents were more frequently commended for the first three themes, while residents and attendings were recognized equally for the latter three. CONCLUSIONS: In identifying excellent surgical educators, students emphasized the educators' roles in fostering a positive learning environment where student education is prioritized. Residents were recognized more often than attendings for a broader set of qualities valued by students. Residents as teachers training should be structured to develop these qualities.

The Role of Anxiety in Simulation-Based Dexterity and Overall Performance: Does It Really Matter?

BACKGROUND: Essential Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases (ESMSC) is an international undergraduate surgical masterclass which combines ex vivo, dry lab and high fidelity in vivo simulation-based learning (SBL). It consists of 32 stations of skills-based learning, including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures. Current literature suggests early involvement in skills-based learning at the undergraduate level is vital. AIMS: To compare students' dexterity and skills-based performance with demographic and educational background parameters. METHODS: 112 medical students from European Union countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, Greece, Cyprus, Germany, and Bulgaria were selected from a competitive pool of candidates to attend the course. Students undertook ORIF in an ex vivo swine model, and in a simulated fracture on a bamboo rod. Skills-based performance was assessed by two consultant surgeons with validated direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) forms. Anxiety was self-assessed using the Westside Anxiety Scale prior to the ORIF stations. Dexterity was measured with the O'Connor tweezer dexterity test. RESULTS: Female students had significantly higher dexterity scores (median difference 7, p =.003). Right-handed students achieved higher dexterity than left-handed students (median difference 7, p =.043). There was no difference in students' performance across different medical schools, and across year groups (p <.05 for any correlation). Self-reported anxiety was not correlated with high fidelity skills-based performance (r = 0.032, p =.74). CONCLUSION: Anxiety does not seem to play a significant role in Simulation Skills-Based learning. Undergraduate surgical curricula should incorporate SBL-based modules to enhance practical skills learning and motivate future orthopedic surgeons.

Perceived Barriers to the Development of Technical Skill Proficiency in Surgical Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students are expected to achieve proficiency in a prescribed set of technical skills during surgical clerkship. However, available literature indicates students routinely report a lack of confidence and proficiency in these skills. Our study aims to identify barriers to technical skill development encountered by medical students during surgical clerkship with the goal of developing interventions to address these barriers. DESIGN: Three hundred and forty two medical students were surveyed about their experience learning and performing technical skills during surgical clerkship. Students reported confidence in skill performance and subjective barriers to achieving competency using forced-choice and free-text responses. Multivariate regression models identified factors independently associated with specific barriers and more frequent technical skills performance. SETTING: Main and satellite campuses of a Medical Council of Canada accredited Canadian academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All third-year medical students. RESULTS: A total of 253 students (74%) responded to the survey. Following surgical clerkship, the only technical skills participants felt confident performing independently were sterile technique (96%) and basic suturing (52%). Interest in a surgical career, observership experience, gender, and medical campus site were independently associated with the frequency of skill performance. With respect to developing technical proficiency, commonly cited barriers included lack of suitable cases for student participation (35.0%), time constraints (33.4%), and lack of opportunities provided by both consultants (29.1%) and residents (24.7%). Female gender was independently associated with decreased resident instruction, decreased confidence in skill performance, and fewer opportunities to perform requisite skills. Students at satellite campuses reported fewer barriers. CONCLUSIONS: We identified (1) lack of suitable cases, (2) time constraints, and (3) failure to provide students opportunities as the most common barriers to technical skill proficiency. Female gender increased the perception of barriers, while there were fewer barriers perceived by students at satellite campuses. Skill-specific simulation training and other interventions may improve skill development in medical students given obstacles to developing proficiency in the clinical setting.

Optimizing engagement of undergraduate students in medical education research: The eMERG training network.

BACKGROUND: The practice of evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal are essential for the modern doctor. Early engagement of medical students in research methodology is considered as a rising need for most medical school curricula; however, few peer-reviewed initiatives have been reported so far. We developed a Medical Education Research Group (eMERG) as part of a novel undergraduate surgical masterclass, which aimed to train undergraduate students on basic research methodology, as well as to motivate them to pursue a clinical and academic career in surgical specialties.Methods: eMERG consists of an international structured network of senior academics, consultant-level clinicians, senior and junior trainees who support undergraduate trainees. Students are selected from a competitive pool of applicants. Several small prospective studies in skills-based education, as well as systematic reviews on similar topics, have run under the umbrella of this framework, in the form of scholarship awards. Structured feedback questionnaires were distributed to evaluate the experience of the first three years. RESULTS: 12 students have participated in this pilot initiative. 11 manuscripts have been submitted for publication and 8 were accepted following peer-review in MEDLINE-indexed journals. Delegates perceived this experience as an excellent training opportunity which improved their research productivity. Delegates also stated engagement in research developed interest in the relevant surgical speciality, impacting their career aspirations. CONCLUSIONS: eMERG is one of the first reported European educational research networks for undergraduates. Research outcomes and students' perceptions conclude that eMERG enhances engagement with research methodology and motivation towards a career in surgery.

Is In-Vivo laparoscopic simulation learning a step forward in the Undergraduate Surgical Education?

BACKGROUND: Essentials Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases - ESMSC is an International Combined Applied Surgical Science and Wet Lab course addressed at the Undergraduate level. Laparoscopic Skills is a fundamental element of Surgical Education and various Simulation-Based Learning (SBL) models have been endorsed. This study aims to explore if there is any significant difference in delegates' performance depending on whether they completed In Vivo module prior to the equivalent in the laparoscopic simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 Medical Students from various EU countries were divided in 2 groups, and both completed the "Fundamentals in Laparoscopic Surgery" module in the Dry-lab Laparoscopic Simulator as well as the same module "In Vivo" on a swine model. Group A (18 students, 48.6%) completed the "Fundamentals in Laparoscopic Surgery - FLS" module prior to the "In Vivo", whereas group B completed the "In Vivo" module first. Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) were used to assess delegates' performance. RESULTS: The mean DOPS scores for the "FLS" and "In Vivo" models were 2.27 ± 0.902 and 2.03 ± 0.833, respectively, and the delegates' performance was not statistically significantly different between them (p = 0.128). There was no statistically significant difference in the scores among different gender, year of study, school and handedness groups. The alteration in the sequence between Dry-lab "FLS" and "In Vivo" modules did not affect the performance in neither the "FLS" nor the "In Vivo" models. CONCLUSIONS: The inexpensive, but low-fidelity "FLS" model could serve an equal alternative Simulation-Based Learning model for the early undergraduate training. Our study demonstrated that high fidelity In Vivo simulation for laparoscopic skills does not affect significantly the improvement in the delegates' performance at the undergraduate level. Further studies should be conducted to identify at which stage of training should high fidelity simulation be introduced.

Promoting Undergraduate Surgical Education: Current Evidence and Students' Views on ESMSC International Wet Lab Course.

BACKGROUND: Undergraduate Surgical Education is becoming an essential element in the training of the future generation of safe and efficient surgeons. Essential Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases (ESMSC), is an international, joint applied surgical science and simulation-based learning wet lab course. METHODS: We performed a review of the existing literature on the topic of undergraduate surgical education. Following that, we analyzed the feedback questionnaire received 480 from 2 recent series of ESMSC courses (May 2015, n = 49 and November 2015, n = 40), in order to evaluate European Union students' (UK, Germany, Greece) views on the ESMSC course, as well as on the undergraduate surgical education. Results Using a 10 point graded scale, the overall ESMSC concept was positively evaluated, with a mean score of 9.41 ± 0.72 (range: 8-10) and 8.94 ± 1.1 (range: 7-10). The majority of delegates from both series [9.86 ± 0.43 (range: 8-10) and 9.58 ± 0.91 (range: 6-10), respectively] believed that ESMSC should be incorporated in the undergraduate surgical curriculum. Comparison of responses from the UK to the Greek Medical Student, as well as the findings from the third and fourth year versus the fifth and sixth year Medical Students, revealed no statistically significant differences pertaining to any of the questions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence in the literature supports the enhancement of surgical education through the systematic use of various modalities that provide Simulation-Based Training (SBT) hands-on experience, starting from the early undergraduate level. The findings of the present study are in agreement with these previous reports.

Surgical subinternships: bridging the chiasm between medical school and residency: a position paper prepared by the Subcommittee for Surgery Subinternship and the Curriculum Committee of the Association for Surgical Education.

BACKGROUND: Surgery subinternship rotations are clinical rotations intended to provide senior medical students with experiential exposure and increased autonomy during the care of surgical patients in clinical settings. Due to the lack of guidelines from national surgical organizations, these rotations remain largely unstructured and unstandardized with wide variability in the goals and experiences they provide for medical students. METHODS: Through synthesis of the literature and by applying an iterative process among members of the subcommittee for surgery subinternship and the curriculum committee of the Association for Surgical Education (ASE) consensus recommendations were established. RECOMMENDATIONS: Five defined domains were identified as essential for establishing surgery subinternship rotations. These are: administrative structure, goals and objectives, curricular elements, instructional methods, and assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should serve as a blue print for establishing a structured, educationally sound, and rewarding clinical rotation for medical students. Applying these recommendations may also provide educators with opportunities for scholarships and academic advancement.