The influence of spinal position on imaging findings: an observational study of thoracolumbar spine upright MRI in elite gymnasts.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a role in defining thoracolumbar spine pathology in elite gymnastics. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional observational study of National Senior and Junior Artistic gymnasts in three MRI positions (standard supine, upright flexed and extended positions). Two specialist musculoskeletal radiologists independently analysed images with neutral as a baseline with the effects of flexion and extension reported in line with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. RESULTS: Forty (18 males) gymnasts aged 13-24 years with a mean (SD) of 32 (5.3) training hours per week consented with 75% showing MRI abnormalities. Degenerative disc disease (DDD) was evident in 55% participants with vertebral end plate (VEP) changes in 42.5%. Spondylolysis was present in 40% with an additional 17% showing chronic bilateral complete L5 pars defects. 23% participants demonstrated different MRI findings in upright flexion compared to neutral. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest a high levels of MRI abnormalities in elite gymnastics including altered disc morphology and posterior element abnormalities. High prevalence of T11/12 DDD and VEP changes reflects the thoracolumbar junction being a transition zone. Upright MRI and varying spine position offer promise for enhanced visualisation of posterior element abnormalities.

Influence of microsurgical decompression on segmental stability of the lumbar spine - One-year results in a prospective, consecutive case series using upright, kinetic-positional MRI.

BACKGROUND: Standard procedure in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis is decompression to relieve the neural structures. Clinical results generally show superiority compared to nonoperative therapy after an observation period of several years. However, there is still a question of postsurgical segmental stability and correlation to clinical findings. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients who underwent microsurgical decompression in lumbar spine and particularly to analyze intervertebral movement by use of upright, kinetic-positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a period of 12 months and then to correlate the clinical and imaging data with each other. METHODS: Complete clinical data of 24 consecutive participants with microsurgical decompression of the lumbar spine were obtained by questionnaires including visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Short-Form-36 (SF-36), walking distance and use of analgesics with assessment preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 12 months. At the same points of time all patients underwent upright, kinetic-positional MRI to measure intersegmental motion of the operated levels with determination of intervertebral angles and translation and to correlate the clinical and imaging data with each other. RESULTS: VAS for leg, ODI, RMDQ and physical component scale of SF-36 improved statistically significantly without statistically significant differences regarding intersegmental motion and horizontal displacement 6 weeks and 12 months after operation. Regression analysis did not find any linear dependencies between the clinical scores and imaging parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In awareness of some limitations of the study, our results demonstrate no increase of intersegmental movement or even instability after microsurgical decompression of the lumbar spine over a follow-up period of 12 months, which is equivalent to preservation of intervertebral stability. Furthermore, the magnitude of intervertebral range of motion showed no correlation to the clinical score parameters at all three examination points of time.

Reliability of reporting differences in degenerative MRI findings of the lumbar spine from the supine to the upright position.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter-rater reliability of identifying differences and types of differences in lumbar degenerative findings comparing supine and upright MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine participants, low back pain patients (LBP) with or without leg pain and no-LBP individuals were consecutively enrolled to receive supine and upright MRI of the lumbar spine. Three raters independently evaluated the MRIs for degenerative spinal pathologies and compared for differences. Presence/absence of degenerative findings were recorded for all supine and upright images, and then differences from the supine to the upright positions were classified into no-change, appeared, disappeared, worsened, or improved at each individual disc level. Reliability and agreement were calculated using Gwet's agreement coefficients (AC1 or AC2) and absolute agreement. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of evaluating differences in eight degenerative lumbar findings comparing the supine and upright MRI position, ranged from 0.929 to 0.996 according to Gwet's agreement coefficients (AC2). The total number of positive MRI findings in the supine position ranged from 270 to 453, with an average of 366 per rater. Observed differences from supine to upright MRI ranged from 18 to 80, with an average of 56 per rater. CONCLUSION: Inter-rater reliability was found overall acceptable for classification of differences in eight types of degenerative pathology observed with supine and upright MRI of the lumbar spine. Results were primarily driven by high numbers and high reliability of rating negative findings, whereas agreement regarding positive findings and positive positional differences was lower.

The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner.

PURPOSE: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are a negative prognostic factor in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Forty percent of candidates for surgical decompression show RNRs (RNR+) on preoperative conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigated the prevalence of RNRs in three functional postures (standing, neutral sitting and flexed sitting) with an upright MRI (upMRI). METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a repeated measures design. Thirty surgical candidates underwent upMRI. Sagittal and axial T2-weighted images of the three functional postures were evaluated. The segmental length of the lumbar spine (sLLS), the lordotic angle (LA) and the dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) were measured in each body position. Generalized linear mixed models were carried out. The 0.05 level of probability was set as the criterion for statistical significance. RESULTS: The prevalence of RNRs decreased from 80% during standing to 16.7% during flexed sitting (p < 0.001). The sLLS increased significantly from standing to neutral sitting in both RNR groups (p < 0.001). The increase from neutral sitting to flexed sitting was only significant (p < 0.001) for the group without RNRs (RNR-). The LA decreased significantly for both RNR groups from standing to flexed sitting (p < 0.001). The DSCA increased significantly in the RNR- group (p < 0.001) but not in the RNR+ group (p = 0.9). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNRs is body position dependent. Increases in DCSA play a determinant role in resolving RNRs.

The effect of posture on lumbar muscle morphometry from upright MRI.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of upright, seated, and supine postures on lumbar muscle morphometry at multiple spinal levels and for multiple muscles. METHODS: Six asymptomatic volunteers were imaged (0.5 T upright open MRI) in 7 postures (standing, standing holding 8 kg, standing 45° flexion, seated 45° flexion, seated upright, seated 45° extension, and supine), with scans at L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle position with respect to the vertebral body centroid (radius and angle) were measured for the multifidus/erector spinae combined and psoas major muscles. RESULTS: Posture significantly affected the multifidus/erector spinae CSA with decreasing CSA from straight postures (standing and supine) to seated and flexed postures (up to 19%). Psoas major CSA significantly varied with vertebral level with opposite trends due to posture at L3/L4 (increasing CSA, up to 36%) and L5/S1 (decreasing CSA, up to 40%) with sitting/flexion. For both muscle groups, radius and angle followed similar trends with decreasing radius (up to 5%) and increasing angle (up to 12%) with seated/flexed postures. CSA and lumbar lordosis had some correlation (multifidus/erector spinae L4/L5 and L5/S1, r = 0.37-0.45; PS L3/L4 left, r = - 0.51). There was generally good repeatability (average ICC(3, 1): posture = 0.81, intra = 0.89, inter = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Changes in multifidus/erector spinae muscle CSA likely represent muscles stretching between upright and seated/flexed postures. For the psoas major, the differential level effect suggests that changing three-dimensional muscle morphometry with flexion is not uniform along the muscle length. The muscle and spinal level-dependent effects of posture and spinal curvature correlation, including muscle CSA and position, highlight considering measured muscle morphometry from different postures in spine models.

Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically diagnosed in the supine position, where the effect of gravity is simulated by having the patients put strain on their pelvic floor. The objective of this study was to determine the degree of POP underestimation in the supine position based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted with symptomatic POP grade ≥ 2 patients. Fifteen female patients were examined with an MRI system that allows supine and upright imaging. The differences between supine and upright in distances of the bladder neck, cervix, and pouch of Douglas from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) were estimated, together with changes in the genital hiatal area. Patients were scanned at rest and during straining. All distances were compared using the Wilcoxon ranking test. RESULTS: All mean distances from the PCL increased from the supine-strain to the upright-rest and from the supine-strain to the upright-strain position. These distances were found in the supine and upright positions: the bladder descended 1.3 cm to 1.4 cm, the cervix 1.1 cm to 2.2 cm, and the pouch of Douglas 0.8 cm to 1.5 cm respectively (all p values <0.05). The hiatal area was larger in the upright-strain position (mean 42.0 cm2; SD ±14.8) than during the supine-strain position (mean 33.5 cm2; SD ±14.5), with a p value of 0.02. CONCLUSION: Upright MRI scanning of patients with POP grade ≥ 2 both at rest and during straining shows a significantly larger extent of the prolapse than that observed during supine straining.

Upright MRI after decompression of spinal stenosis and concurrent spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVEThe treatment of patients with spinal stenosis and concurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis is controversial. Two large randomized controlled clinical trials reported contradictory results. The authors hypothesized that a substantial number of patients will show evidence of micro-instability after a sole decompression procedure.METHODSThis study was a retrospective analysis of all cases of lumbar spinal stenosis treated at the Frankfurt University Clinic (Universitätsklinik Frankfurt) from 2010 through 2013. Patients who had associated spondylolisthesis underwent upright MRI studies in flexion and extension for identification of subtle signs of micro-instability. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of SF-36 bodily pain (BP) and physical functioning (PF) scales.RESULTSA total of 21 patients were recruited to undergo upright MRI studies. The mean duration of follow-up was 65 months (SD 16 months). Of these 21 patients, 10 (47%) showed signs of micro-instability as defined by movement of > 4 mm on flexion/extension MRI. Comparison of mean SF-36 BP and PF scores in the group of patients who showed micro-instability versus those who did not showed no statistically significant difference on either scale.CONCLUSIONSThere seems to be a substantial subset of patients who develop morphological micro-instability after sole decompression procedures but do not experience any clinically significant effect of the instability.

Rotational-motion measurement of the sacroiliac joint using upright MRI scanning and intensity-based registration: is there a sex difference?

PURPOSE: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has attracted increasing attention as a source of low back and groin pain, but the kinematics of SIJ against standing load and its sex difference remain unclear due to the difficulty of in vivo load study. An upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system can provide in vivo imaging both in the supine and standing positions. The reliability of the mobility of SIJ against the standing load was evaluated and its sex difference was examined in healthy young volunteers using an upright MRI. METHOD: Static (reliability) and kinematic studies were performed. In the static study, a dry bone of pelvic ring embedded in gel form and frozen in the plastic box was used. In the kinematic study, 19 volunteers (10 males, 9 females) with a mean age of 23.9 years were included. The ilium positions for the sacrum in supine and standing positions were measured against the pelvic coordinates to evaluate the mobility of the SIJ. RESULTS: In the static study, the residual error of the rotation of the SIJ study was < 0.2°. In the kinematic study, the mean values of SIJ sagittal rotation from supine to standing position in males and females were - 0.9° ± 0.7° (mean ± standard deviation) and - 1.7° ± 0.8°, respectively. The sex difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). The sagittal rotation of the SIJ showed a significant correlation with the sacral slope. CONCLUSION: The residual error for measuring the SIJ rotation using the upright MRI was < 0.2°. The young healthy participants showed sex differences in the sagittal rotation of the SIJ against the standing load and the females showed a larger posterior rotation of the ilium against the sacrum from the supine to standing position than the males. Therefore, upright MRI is useful to investigate SIJ motion.

Morphometry of lumbar muscles in the seated posture with weight-bearing MR scans.

Conventional imaging studies of human spine are done in a supine posture in which the axial loading of the spine is not considered. Upright images better reveal the interrelationships between the various internal structures of the spine. The objective of the current study is to determine the cross-sectional areas, radii, and angulations of the psoas, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles of the lumbar spine in the sitting posture. Ten young (mean age 31 ± 4.8 years) asymptomatic female subjects were enrolled. They were seated in an erect posture and weight-bearing T1 and T2 MRIs were obtained. Cross-sectional areas, radii, and angulations of the muscles were measured from L1-L5. Two observers repeated all the measurements for all parameters, and reliability was determined using the inter- and intra-class coefficients. The Pearson product moment correlation was used for association between levels, while level differences were used using a linear regression model. The cross-sectional areas of the psoas and multifidus muscles increased from L1 to L5 (1.9 ± 1.1 to 12.1 ± 2.5 cm2 and 1.8 ± 0.3 to 5.7 ± 1.4 cm2). The cross-sectional area of the erector spinae was greatest at the midlevel (13.9 ± 2.2 cm2) and it decreased in both directions. For the angle, the range for psoas muscles was 75-105°, erector spinae were 39-46° and multifidus was 11-19°. Correlations magnitudes were inconsistent between levels and muscle types. These quantitated data improve our understanding of the geometrical properties in the sitting posture. The weight-bearing MRI-quantified morphometrics of human lumbar spine muscles from this study can be used in biomechanical models for predicting loads on spinal joints under physiological and traumatic situations.

Please be upstanding - A narrative review of evidence comparing upright to supine lumbar spine MRI.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the review was to examine the evidence comparing upright to supine MRI of the lumbar spine. KEY FINDINGS: A literature search identified 14 articles comparing data where subjects had been scanned in both supine and upright positions on the same scanner. Lumbar spine anatomy is dynamic and therefore subject to morphological changes when transitioning from the supine to the upright position. There is strong evidence to suggest structural changes in spinal morphology due to radiographic positioning, and that upright positioning is better for evaluating spondylolisthesis. CONCLUSION: It has been demonstrated that the scanning position is important in the outcome of the MRI examination of the lumbar spine. With this in mind, it would be beneficial for guidance to be written and adopted to improve the consistency and quality of scanning. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As upright MRI occupies a niche in the scanning sector, many professionals are unaware of its capabilities. This article aims to increase awareness of the use of upright MRI in evaluating the lumbar spine.