A dosimetric comparison of brachytherapy sources for endometrial cancer: an electronic brachytherapy and an iridium-192 source with multichannel cylinders and a three-dimensional technique.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ir192 vaginal brachytherapy (IBT) is commonly used for patients with postoperative endometrial cancer (EC). We devised a novel multichannel vaginal applicator that could be equipped with an electronic brachytherapy (EBT) device. We aimed to explore the differences in physical parameters between the EBT and IBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 EC patients who received adjuvant IBT from March 1, 2023, to May 1, 2023. Multichannel vaginal cylinders were used, and three-dimensional plans were generated. We designed an electronic multichannel vaginal applicator model and simulated a three-dimensional EBT plan. In order to ensure comparability, D90 of the CTV for the EBT plan was normalized to be equivalent to that of the IBT plan for the same patient. RESULTS: Twenty EBT plans were compared with 20 IBT plans. Results showed, the mean D90 value of clinical target volume (CTV) was 536.1 cGy for both treatment plans. For the mean dose of CTV, the EBT was significantly greater (738.3 vs. 684.3 cGy, p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in CTV coverage between the EBT and IBT plans. For high-dose areas (V200% and V150%), the EBTs were significantly greater. There were no significant differences in the maximum doses to the vaginal mucosa between the EBT and IBT, whether at the apex or in the middle segment. For the bladder and rectum, both the low-dose area and high-dose area were significantly lower in the EBT plans. For the conformity index, there was no significant difference between the EBT and IBT plans. For the dose homogeneity index, the EBT value was lower. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, under the premise of a three-dimensional brachytherapy plan, for patients receiving multichannel vaginal applicator brachytherapy, compared with IBT, EBT could reduce the dose to the surrounding organs at risk while maintaining the dose in the target area.

Multiple use applicator for vaginal tablets/vaginal inserts: compliance verification and suitability studies.

BACKGROUND: A newly developed multiple use applicator for vaginal tablets/vaginal inserts* was evaluated for its general suitability. There are no standard procedures described in guidelines or general accepted publications as to how this kind of product should be tested for suitability of purpose. METHODS: Due to the lack of existing standard procedures, three separate tests were designed and successful executed: (a) First, a patient acceptability evaluation was carried out as part of a phase III trial (registered in EudraCT on 9 Jan 2017, number 2017-000142-22 2. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=eudract_number%3A2017-000142-22 ). (b) Secondly, a cleaning procedure for the applicator after simulated multiple use was developed and verified in order to prove a minimized risk of microbiological contamination of the device. A newly developed vaginal fluid to simulate multiple applications was applied for this trial. (c) Lastly, a third trial evaluated the mechanical stability and proper functionality of the applicator after multiple simulated uses. Even potential abrasion of material of the device was checked. RESULTS: Acceptable patient compliance of the new multiple use applicator was verified after 2 weeks of daily use. Furthermore, diary data assessments of patients participating in the Pharmacodynamic part of the trial were evaluated as well. Overall, patient acceptability of the new applicator was proven. The easy-to-use cleaning procedure for the applicator, which can even be carried out in a domestic environment, was developed and successfully verified for effectiveness, meeting all microbiological acceptance criteria for vaginal products of the European Pharmacopeia. The mechanical stability and proper functionality of the applicator after 50 simulated uses was also evaluated. All tested applicator batches (fresh and aged) passed the final evaluation, with no limitations in functionality. CONCLUSION: The tests developed and executed consider various compliance aspects of the newly developed applicator. Results of these individual tests met the expectations and/or the predefined acceptance criteria. All included trials performed produced results justifying and qualifying the applicator for the intended multiple-use. The procedures outlined may also be a guide as to how this kind of medical device can be tested for suitability. Trial registration Registered in EudraCT, number 2017-000142-22, start date 24 May 2017.

A Randomized Crossover Study Evaluating the Use and Acceptability of the SILCS Diaphragm Compared to Vaginal Applicators for Vaginal Gel Delivery.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess acceptability and preferences for the SILCS diaphragm for vaginal gel delivery compared to a prefilled applicator. METHODS: A randomized crossover study among 115 women in South Africa, using both methods during five sex acts. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in acceptability between the two products. Experience of gel leakage after sex was greater when inserted via applicator. More women were interested in SILCS/gel for multipurpose protection (68%) than in either SILCS alone (17%) or microbicide gel alone (14%). CONCLUSIONS: A SILCS gel delivery system for multipurpose prevention seems feasible and acceptable.

Evaluation of the acceptability of intravaginal prasterone ovule administration using an applicator.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the acceptability of the intravaginal administration of ovules/suppositories of DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone, prasterone) for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) in women with moderate to severe dyspareunia who were administered daily for 12 weeks intravaginal 0.50% (6.5 mg) DHEA or placebo. There were a total of 373 women in the per-protocol population who responded to the questionnaire for both treatment groups. While it was planned that the applicator would be evaluated as suitable if at least 80% of participants have a global score ≤ 2 units, 99% and 100% of participants had a score ≤ 2 units in the placebo and DHEA groups, respectively, for the global score (mean of 5 questions). When asked about like and dislike the technique of drug administration, 284 comments were positive, while 114 women gave no comment. About 92-94% of women indicated that they were very confident to be able use the applicator successfully in the future. The survey shows a high degree of satisfaction and of confidence to use the applicator successfully in the future.

Universal vaginal applicator for the uniform distribution of vaginal gel and cream formulations: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional vaginal applicators with a single apical hole do not distribute vaginal formulations homogenously and do not cover the entire vaginal and cervical mucosa. To overcome this problem and offer women further protection against vaginal infections, we designed a unique vaginal applicator with multiple apical and lateral holes. We have previously shown that the new applicator distributes an investigational vaginal gel homogenously over the entire vaginal and cervical mucosa. In this study, we investigated (using MRI) whether the new applicator works as well with marketed vaginal gels and creams. METHODS: Eighteen women participated in the study and six vaginal gels and creams were tested. Each woman used a marketed vaginal product with its own commercial applicator (CA) once and with our universal vaginal applicator (UVA) once to deliver the same product. The applications were separated by a one-week period. Pelvic MRI was performed immediately after vaginal application to evaluate the product's distribution and mucosal coverage. RESULTS: Immediately after application of the vaginal product, the UVA homogenously distributed the six products (3 gels and 3 creams) over the entire vaginal and cervical mucosa. On the other hand, the tested CA delivered four products (3 gels and 1 cream) mainly to the cervix and the upper vagina, but not to the mid and lower vagina; for the other two creams, the distribution was similar to that of UVA. Furthermore, the UVA received the highest acceptability score. CONCLUSION: The UVA can be used to deliver different vaginal gel and cream products homogenously throughout the vagina. This was the first time the UVA had been tested with marketed vaginal gels and creams. This applicator, giving uniform mucosal coverage and being highly acceptable, may help women to better protect themselves against sexually transmitted infections.

Objectif : Les applicateurs vaginaux conventionnels dotés d'un seul orifice apical ne permettent pas de distribuer les formulations vaginales de façon homogène et ne couvrent pas l'intégralité de la muqueuse vaginale et cervicale. Pour surmonter ce problème et offrir aux femmes davantage de protection contre les infections vaginales, nous avons conçu un applicateur vaginal unique en son genre doté de multiples orifices apicaux et latéraux. Nous avons déjà démontré que ce nouvel applicateur permettait de distribuer un gel vaginal expérimental de façon homogène sur l'intégralité de la muqueuse vaginale et cervicale. Dans le cadre de cette étude, nous nous sommes penchés (en ayant recours à l'IRM) sur la question de savoir si ce nouvel applicateur fonctionnait tout aussi bien dans le cas des crèmes et des gels vaginaux offerts sur le marché. Méthodes : Dix-huit femmes ont participé à l'étude et six crèmes et gels vaginaux ont été mis à l'essai. Chacune de ces femmes a utilisé à deux reprises un même produit vaginal offert sur le marché : une fois au moyen de l'applicateur commercial fourni par le fabricant (AC) et une autre fois au moyen de notre applicateur vaginal universel (AVU). Une période d'une semaine séparait ces deux applications. Une IRM pelvienne a été menée immédiatement à la suite de chacune de ces applications vaginales afin d'évaluer la distribution du produit et l'aire couverte en ce qui concerne la muqueuse. Résultats : Immédiatement à la suite de l'application du produit vaginal, nous avons constaté que l'utilisation de l'AVU permettait la distribution homogène des six produits (trois gels et trois crèmes) sur l'intégralité de la muqueuse vaginale et cervicale. En revanche, dans le cas de quatre des produits en question (trois gels et une crème), l'AC mis à l'essai a donné lieu à une distribution ayant principalement atteint le col utérin et la partie supérieure du vagin (excluant ainsi les parties intermédiaire et inférieure du vagin); pour ce qui est des deux autres crèmes, la distribution obtenue était semblable à celle qu'a permise l'AVU. De surcroît, l'AVU a obtenu le score d'acceptabilité le plus élevé. Conclusion : L'AVU peut être utilisé pour assurer l'administration de divers produits vaginaux en gel et en crème de façon homogène dans tout le vagin. Il s'agissait de la première mise à l'essai de l'AVU au moyen de crèmes et de gels vaginaux offerts sur le marché. Cet applicateur, qui permet de couvrir l'aire muqueuse de façon uniforme et qui compte une acceptabilité élevée, pourrait aider les femmes à mieux se protéger contre les infections transmissibles sexuellement.

Comparison of 3D-printed multichannel non-co-planar vaginal applicators and single-channel vaginal applicators for brachytherapy with positive or close surgical margins in cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the differences between 3D-printed multichannel non-co-planar vaginal applicators and single-channel vaginal applicators in cervical cancer patients with positive or close surgical margins. METHODS: Between January 2015 and June 2023, 104 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical surgery with positive or close surgical margins were enrolled to receive concurrent intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy combined with 3D-printed multichannel non-co-planar vaginal applicators (3D-printed group, 41 patients) or single-channel vaginal applicators (single-channel group, 63 patients) guided brachytherapy. The dosimetric parameters, 5-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) of two groups were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The high-risk clinical target volume (D90, D100) and high-dose volume fraction (V150) in 3D-printed group were significantly higher than those in single-channel group (p < 0.05), and the homogeneity index (HI) and conformal index (COIN) were equally better in 3D-printed group. In 3D-printed group, the D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc of the bladder and rectum were significantly lower than those of the single-channel group (p < 0.05). The 3D-printed group had significantly superior 5-year LC (70.0% vs. 51.3%, p = 0.041) and PFS (63.0% vs. 44.2%, p = 0.045), but OS were not significantly different between treatment groups (75.4% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.112). The incidence of radiation enteritis and cystitis was lower in the 3D-printed group than in the single-channel group, but no statistical difference was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-printed multichannel non-co-planar vaginal insertion applicators show the advantage of target dose, improve the LC and PFS in patients with positive or close surgical margins after cervical cancer surgery. Thus, the popularization of this method and its application may be of value.

Individualized vaginal applicator for stage IIb primary vaginal adenocarcinoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary vaginal cancer is rare and most vaginal tumors are metastatic, often arising from adjacent gynecologic structures. Primary vaginal cancers are also more common among postmenopausal women and most of these are squamous cell carcinomas, with adenocarcinomas being relatively rare. Vaginal bleeding is the most common clinical manifestation of vaginal adenocarcinoma. About 70% of vaginal adenocarcinomas are stage I lesions at the time of diagnosis, for which radical surgery is recommended. However, more advanced vaginal cancers are not amenable to radical surgical treatment and have poor clinical outcomes. Optimal treatments modes are still being explored. Here, we report a rare case of stage IIb primary vaginal adenocarcinoma for which an individually designed vaginal applicator for after-loading radiotherapy was used to achieve good tumor control. CASE SUMMARY: A 62-year-old woman presented to our clinic after 3 months of abnormal postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Gynecological examination, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography-CT showed a large mass (about 5 cm) on the anterior vaginal wall. Colposcopy biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of vaginal origin. After three cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy, the lesion partially shrunk. The patient then received external irradiation of 45 gray (gy) in 25 fractions, which further reduced the vaginal lesion, followed by after-loading radiotherapy of 30 gy in 5 fractions with an individually designed vaginal applicator. Three months later, magnetic resonance imaging showed a slight thickening of the anterior vaginal wall. CONCLUSION: Primary vaginal adenocarcinoma is rare, and prognosis is poor in most vaginal cancers of locally advanced stages, which cannot be treated with radical surgery. Better tumor control can be achieved with an individualized vaginal applicator that allows administration of a higher radical dose to the tumor area while protecting normal tissues.

An innovative gynecological HDR brachytherapy applicator system for treatment delivery and real-time verification.

The multichannel vaginal cylinder (MVC) applicator employed for gynecological high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy increases dose delivery complexity, and thus makes the treatment more prone to errors. A quality assurance (QA) procedure tracking the source throughout dose delivery can detect dwell position and time errors in the multiple channels of the applicator. A new MVC system with integrated real time in vivo treatment delivery QA has been developed based on diodes embedded on the outer surface of the MVC. It has been pre-calibrated and verified using a non-clinical treatment plan with consecutive test positions and dwell times within each catheter, followed by the delivery of ten clinical plans of adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy following hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. The non-clinical verification showed overall mean dwell position and time discrepancies between the nominal and measured treatment of -0.2 ±â€¯0.5 mm and -0.1 ±â€¯0.1 s (k = 1), respectively. The clinical plans showed mean positional discrepancies of 0.2 ±â€¯0.4 and 0.0 ±â€¯0.8 mm, for the central and peripheral catheters, respectively, and mean dwell time discrepancies of -0.1 ±â€¯0.2 and -0.0 ±â€¯0.1 s for central and peripheral catheters, respectively. The innovative prototype of the MVC system has shown the ability to track the source with sub-mm and sub-second accuracy, and demonstrated potential for its incorporation into the clinical routine.

Three-dimensional-printed vaginal applicators for electronic brachytherapy of endometrial cancers.

PURPOSE: Vaginal applicators for a novel miniature x-ray tube were developed using three-dimensional (3D) printing to be used in brachytherapy of endometrial cancers. METHODS: Cylindrical vaginal applicators with various diameters, lengths, and infill percentages (IFPs) were fabricated using a 3D printer. X-ray dose distributions and depth-dose profiles were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The performances of the applicators were evaluated by measuring and analyzing the dosimetric characteristics of x rays generated from the miniature x-ray tube equipped with the applicators. RESULTS: Quite uniform dose distributions around the applicators were achieved by optimizing the dwell positions and the dwell times of the miniature x-ray tube inside the applicators. In addition, identical absolute dose and depth-dose profiles were obtained through the control of the IFP values even though different-sized applicators are used. CONCLUSION: The presented 3D printing technique provides an efficient approach to provide vaginal applicators with optimal IFPs that allow consistent treatment time for patients of varying vaginal canal size.

Use of a Flexible Inflatable Multi-Channel Applicator for Vaginal Brachytherapy in the Management of Gynecologic Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluate use of novel multi-channel applicator (MC) Capri™ to improve vaginal disease coverage achievable by single-channel applicator (SC) and comparable to Syed plan simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight plans were evaluated from four patients with primary or recurrent gynecologic cancer in the vagina. Each received whole pelvis radiation, followed by three weekly treatments using HDR brachytherapy with a 13-channel MC. Upper vagina was treated to 5 mm depth to 1500 cGy/3 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost totaling 2100 cGy/3 fractions to tumor. Modeling of SC and Syed plans was performed using MC scans for each patient. Dosimetry for MC and SC plans was evaluated for PTV700 cGy coverage, maximum dose to 2 cm(3) to bladder, rectum, as well as mucosal surface points. Dosimetry for Syed plans was calculated for PTV700 cGy coverage. Patients were followed for treatment response and toxicity. RESULTS: Dosimetric analysis between MC and SC plans demonstrated increased tumor coverage (PTV700 cGy), with decreased rectal, bladder, and contralateral vaginal mucosa dose in favor of MC. These differences were significant (p < 0.05). Comparison of MC and Syed plans demonstrated increased tumor coverage in favor of Syed plans which were not significant (p = 0.71). Patients treated with MC had no cancer recurrence or ≥grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Use of MC was efficacious and safe, providing superior coverage of tumor volumes ≤1 cm depth compared to SC and comparable to Syed implant. MC avoids excess dose to surrounding organs compared to SC, and potentially less morbidity than Syed implants. For tumors extending ≤1 cm depth, use of MC represents an alternative to an interstitial implant.