RESUMO
Pelvic venous reflux and obstruction can lead to chronic pelvic pain and extra-pelvic varicosities. This paper will discuss the contemporary understanding of this pathophysiology and its clinical manifestations. It will review evidence-based clinical and imaging criteria of pelvic venous disorders, data supporting benefit from venous interventions, criticisms of the available data and highlight evidence research gaps that exist. Finally, it will argue that comparative outcomes research utilizing standardized patient selection for embolization and stenting, embolization treatment strategies that eliminate the pelvic varices (at least to start), and clinically relevant outcome measures are necessary to establish the benefit of vascular treatments.
RESUMO
Vulvar varicose veins (VVs) are seen in 4% of women, most of them secondary to pregnancy and usually regressing spontaneously. The treatment of choice during pregnancy is conservative and symptomatic. Management of vulvar varicosities in non-pregnant women consists of various techniques, including phlebectomy, endovascular embolization or surgical ligation of contributing veins, sclerotherapy and, recently, conservative treatment with the venoactive agent MPFF (micronized purified flavonoid fraction). We report an unusual case of a large hematoma of the right labium majus following bilateral vulvar phlebectomy and embolization of the left ovarian vein. The patient was a non-pregnant woman, who underwent incision and drainage of this rare complication. At follow-up almost a year after this procedure the patient reported comfort and cosmetic satisfaction regarding her vulvar symptoms. A multidisciplinary team approach to vulvar varicosities is important, with the involvement of gynecologists, angiologists, interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons.
RESUMO
AIM: To consider if it is essential to perform embolization in the treatment of leg varices due to pelvic venous insufficiency. METHODS: Review of the current literature concerning treatment options of leg varicose veins of pelvic origin. RESULTS: Pelvic venous insufficiency, vulvar and pudendal varicose veins as well as pelvic congestive syndrome are under diagnosed entities. Embolization of ovarian and pelvic veins is well established in patients with pelvic congestive syndrome. In varicose veins of pelvic origin but without pelvic congestive syndrome, comparative studies comparing the outcome of embolization or treatment of varicose veins by sclerotherapy or phlebectomy alone are missing. Foam sclerotherapy or phlebectomy shows good results in patients with varicose veins of pelvic origin. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization is not essential in the treatment of leg varices of pelvic origin without pelvic congestive syndrome. Foam sclerotherapy or phlebectomy shows good results in patients with vulvar or pudendal varicose veins. Randomized comparative studies using embolization of incompetent pelvic veins or sclerotherapy of varicose veins with pelvic origin should be performed.