A comparison of intravenous sugammadex and neostigmine + atropine reversal on time to consciousness during wake-up tests in spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of sugammadex on consciousness is not yet fully understood. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was performed to compare the effects of intravenous (IV) sugammadex and neostigmine + atropine reversals on time-to-consciousness during intraoperative wake-up tests in patients undergoing spinal surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients aged 10-25 years undergoing spinal surgery were recruited. In all patients, bispectral index (BIS), motor-evoked potential (MEP), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), and train-of-four (TOF) scores were monitored. Patients received the same total IV anesthesia protocol with a propofol-remifentanil mixture. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. During wake-up test, when the TOF count reached 2 (T2), either sugammadex 2 mg.kg-1 in group S or neostigmine 0.04 mg.kg-1 + atropine 0.01 mg.kg-1 in group N were administered. BIS90, SSEP90, MEP90 was recorded when TOF ratio reached 90, whereas time-to-consciousness (Timecons) was recorded when the patient responded to verbal commands. RESULTS: BIS90 (77.4 ± 4.7, 74.8 ± 3.7), SSEP90(36 ± 9.9, 29.7 ± 8.5), and MEP90 (465.3 ± 34.8, 431.3 ± 28.2) values were significantly greater in group S than in group N (P < 0.05 for each variables). Timecons was significantly shorter with sugammadex than with the neostigmine + atropine combination (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Using IV sugammadex 2 mg.kg-1 reversal provides faster responses to verbal commands than neostigmine-atropine combination during the intraoperative wake-up test in patients undergoing spinal surgery because the time to consciousness was significantly shorter. This difference was thought to be related with faster return of neuromuscular transmission because the TOF ratio was >0.9 well before return of consciousness in both groups.

Early neurological wake-up test in intubated brain-injured patients: A long-term, single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: In prehospital setting, a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires tracheal intubation, sedation and mechanical ventilation pending the initial imagery. An early neurological wake-up test (ENWT), soon after the initial imaging assessment, allows a rapid neurological reassessment. This strategy authorises an initial clinical examination of reference with which will be compared the later examinations. The main objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of the patients who underwent an ENWT, and to determine its causes of failure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-centre study including all intubated TBI admitted in the trauma centre. An ENWT was defined as cessation of sedation within 24h after TBI. Data concerning patient characteristics, CT-scan results, and outcomes were extracted from a prospective register of all intubated TBI admitted in the ICU. Characteristic of ENWT and causes of failure were retrieved from patient files. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to determine the risk factors of ENWT failure. RESULTS: During 7 years, 242 patients with intubated TBI were included. An ENWT was started in 96 patients, for an overall rate at 40%. The ENWT was stopped in 38 patients (39.5%), mostly due to neurological deterioration in 27 cases (71%) or respiratory distress in 10 cases (26%). Significant predictors of ENWT failure were: the presence of subdural hematoma with a thickness >5mm on first imagery (OR=3.2; 95%CI [1.01-10.28]), and an initial GCS score <5 (OR=7.4; 95%CI [1.92-28.43]). Prevalence of poor outcome at 1year was lesser in patients with successful ENWT compared to those with failure or absence of ENWT: 4% vs. 48% and 49% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The ENWT is achieved in 40% of patients, with a success rate of 60.5%. In presence of a subdural hematoma with a thickness >5mm or an initial GCS score <5, an ENWT failure may be expected.

Median effective effect-site concentration of sufentanil for wake-up test in adolescents undergoing surgery: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: To determine the median effective concentration of sufentanil as an analgesic during wake-up tests after sevoflurane anesthesia during surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: This is a randomised controlled trial. Sixty patients aged 13-18 years scheduled for AIS surgery were randomized into six groups of 10 patients each to receive target effect-site concentrations of sufentanil of 0.19, 0.1809, 0.1723, 0.1641, 0.1563, and 0.1489 ng/ml (target concentration ratio, 1.05). Wake-up time was recorded. Median EC50 and 95% confidence interval (CI) for sufentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) were determined using Kärber's method. The primary outcome was median EC50 for sufentanil TCI as an analgesic during the wake-up test after sevoflurane anesthesia during surgery for AIS. RESULTS: The EC50 and 95% CI of sufentanil TCI were 0.1682 ng/ml and 0.1641 ~ 0.1724 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EC50 of sufentanil TCI was 0.1682 ng/ml (95% CI: 0.1641 ~ 0.1724 ng/ml) during sevoflurane anesthesia in adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis with intraoperative wake-up tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR-TTRCC-12002696.

The neurological wake-up test in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: a long term, single-center experience.

Objectives: To describe the use and outcomes of the neurological wake-up test (NWT) in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (pTBI). Design: Retrospective single-center observational cohort study. Setting: Medical-surgical tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a university medical center and Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients: Children younger than 18 years with severe TBI [i.e., Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of ≤8] admitted between January 2010 and December 2020. Subjects with non-traumatic brain injury were excluded. Measurements and main results: Of 168 TBI patients admitted, 36 (21%) met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 8.5 years [2 months to 16 years], 5 patients were younger than 6 months. Median initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Motor Scale (GMS) was 6 [3-8] and 3 [1-5]. NWTs were initiated in 14 (39%) patients, with 7 (50%) labelled as successful. Fall from a height was the underlying injury mechanism in those seven. NWT-failure occurred in patients admitted after traffic accidents. Sedation use in both NWT-subgroups (successful vs. failure) was comparable. Cause of NWT-failure was non-arousal (71%) or severe agitation (29%). Subjects with NWT failure subsequently had radiological examination (29%), repeat NWT (43%), continuous interruption of sedation (14%) or intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (14%). The primary reason for not doing NWTs was intracranial hypertension in 59%. Compared to the NWT-group, the non-NWT group had a higher PRISM III score (18.9 vs. 10.6), lower GCS/GMS at discharge, more associated trauma, and circulatory support. Nine patients (25%) died during their PICU admission, none of them had an NWT. Conclusion: We observed limited use of NWTs in pediatric severe TBI. Patients who failed the NWT were indistinguishable from those without NWT. Both groups were more severely affected compared to the NWT successes. Therefore, our results may indicate that only a select group of severe pTBI patients qualify for the NWT.

The effect of dexmedetomidine on wake-up test quality when muscle relaxants are not used: A randomized control trial.

Background and Aims: Stagnara wake-up test is a simple reproducible neuromonitoring method during spinal surgery which replaces the evoked potential monitoring in the absence of neuromonitoring facilities. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) effect on the intraoperative wake-up test is still unclear. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of DEX on the quality of wake-up test during spinal correction surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled study was carried out over 62 patients randomized into two equal groups planned for elective minimally invasive corrective spine surgery. Instead of atracurium administration in the control group, patients in the experimental group were administered titrated continuous intravenous infusion of DEX at a dose of 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/hour. Lidocaine 2% spray around the vocal cords was done in both the groups to facilitate toleration of the endotracheal tube. Results: The DEX group showed statistically significant longer duration and better quality of the wake-up test. Statistically significant better haemodynamic state, a lower amount of intraoperative sedatives and higher amount of intraoperative analgesics were also evident in the DEX group. The postoperative Ramsay sedation scale was significantly lower in the DEX group just after extubation. Conclusion: The DEX use has shown an improving effect on the wake-up test quality, with slightly prolonged wake-up time. The present work supports the use of DEX as an adjuvant drug alleviating the need for the neuromuscular blockade, inducing a better haemodynamic profile, exhibiting better sedation and improving the awakening condition.

Neuromuscular Monitoring and Wake-Up Test During Scoliosis Surgery.

A typical spine is straight and symmetrical, with all of the vertebrae facing forward when viewed from the posterior. Scoliosis is a term used to describe a lateral deviation of the spine's normal vertical line that is greater than 10° on an X-ray. More severe curves are sometimes accompanied by medical issues such as increased back discomfort and cardiorespiratory difficulties along with the cosmetic components of the deformity. The test for spinal cord integrity prior to the widespread adoption of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) was the wake-up test. In this article, we review the challenges faced by anesthesiologists and surgeons during intraoperative monitoring and the importance of clinical assessment of surgical outcomes.

Neurologic Assessment of the Neurocritical Care Patient.

Sedation is a ubiquitous practice in ICUs and NCCUs. It has the benefit of reducing cerebral energy demands, but also precludes an accurate neurologic assessment. Because of this, sedation is intermittently stopped for the purposes of a neurologic assessment, which is termed a neurologic wake-up test (NWT). NWTs are considered to be the gold-standard in continued assessment of brain-injured patients under sedation. NWTs also produce an acute stress response that is accompanied by elevations in blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, and ICP. Utilization of cerebral microdialysis and brain tissue oxygen monitoring in small cohorts of brain-injured patients suggests that this is not mirrored by alterations in cerebral metabolism, and seldom affects oxygenation. The hard contraindications for the NWT are preexisting intracranial hypertension, barbiturate treatment, status epilepticus, and hyperthermia. However, hemodynamic instability, sedative use for primary ICP control, and sedative use for severe agitation or respiratory distress are considered significant safety concerns. Despite ubiquitous recommendation, it is not clear if additional clinically relevant information is gleaned through its use, especially with the contemporaneous utilization of multimodality monitoring. Various monitoring modalities provide unique and pertinent information about neurologic function, however, their role in improving patient outcomes and guiding treatment plans has not been fully elucidated. There is a paucity of information pertaining to the optimal frequency of NWTs, and if it differs based on type of injury. Only one concrete recommendation was found in the literature, exemplifying the uncertainty surrounding its utility. The most common sedative used and recommended is propofol because of its rapid onset, short duration, and reduction of cerebral energy requirements. Dexmedetomidine may be employed to facilitate serial NWTs, and should always be used in the non-intubated patient or if propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) develops. Midazolam is not recommended due to tissue accumulation and residual sedation confounding a reliable NWT. Thus, NWTs are well-tolerated in selected patients and remain recommended as the gold-standard for continued neuromonitoring. Predicated upon one expert panel, they should be performed at least one time per day. Propofol or dexmedetomidine are the main sedative choices, both enabling a rapid awakening and consistent NWT.

Combined Use of Taylor Spatial Frame and Wake-up Test for Acute Correction of Idiopathic External Torsion of the Tibia: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: We herein report a case of idiopathic unilateral external torsion of the tibia treated with Taylor spatial frame (TSF) fixation combined with performance of the wake-up test under anesthesia. The wake-up test is performed toward the end of a surgical procedure after all corrections have been made and hardware has been placed. The patient is slowly awakened and asked to move their feet. After recovery from anesthesia, patients do not remember performing this test. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old Japanese male patient complained of a gait disturbance because of external torsion of his foot. The patient was determined to have lateral tibial torsion with a pre-operative foot progression angle of 40.8°. Deformity correction using the TSF was considered to be safe. The tibia was derotated by -34.8°, and the patient had a post-operative foot progression angle of 7.0°. His symptoms and signs improved after derotation osteotomy at the low tibial portion. Two years postoperatively, the patient exhibited no leg length discrepancy or rotation malalignment of the lower extremities as measured both clinically and radiographically. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the combined use of the TSF and wake-up test for acute correction of idiopathic external torsion of the tibia. Intraoperative use of the wake-up test with subsequent TSF fixation is effective and safe for acute correction of limb deformities.

Results of surgical treatment for Sprengle's deformity with vertical corrective scapular osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Sprengle deformity is the most common congential anomaly of shoulder complex that is the result of scapular placement in cephalad abnormal position. The purpose of this study is the evaluation of clinical and radiological results of vertical corrective scapular osteotomy and comparision of these results with previous studies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of the vertical corrective scapular osteotomy (VSO) with or without clavicular osteotomy and wake-up test in 31 consecutive patients at an average duration of follow up of 30 month (6 month-15 years). 22 patients were girls and 9 were boys. The average age of the patients was 7.3 years (3-13) at the time of surgery. We evaluated the clinical and radiological results of this method in last fallow-up. No funding was used for this study and there are no conflicts of interest. RESULTS: 31 surgical procedures were performed. All osteotomies were healed. No neurovascular complication. Postoperative the mean shoulder flexion and abduction were improved 30 and 36° respectively (p < 0.001). The mean improvement of superior scapular angle (S.S.A) and inferior scapular angle (I.S.A) were 16 and 21° respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It is intuitive that more cosmetic scapular lowering with little chance of neurovascular problems can be achieved after VSO. In addition, scapular rotation can be corrected using this technique, which should be considered as one of the advantages of this technique.We believe that a properly applied VSO procedure in severe deformities is safe with predictable outcomes in the treatment of a complex deformity that provides favorable functional and cosmetic outcomes in the longer term.

The Neurological Wake-up Test-A Role in Neurocritical Care Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients?

The most fundamental clinical monitoring tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is the repeated clinical examination. In the severe TBI patient treated by continuous sedation in a neurocritical care (NCC) unit, sedation interruption is required to enable a clinical evaluation (named the neurological wake-up test; NWT) assessing the level of consciousness, pupillary diameter and reactivity to light, and presence of focal neurological deficits. There is a basic conflict regarding the NWT in the NCC setting; can the clinical information obtained by the NWT justify the risk of inducing a stress response in a severe TBI patient? Furthermore, in the presence of advanced multimodal monitoring and neuroimaging, is the NWT necessary to identify important clinical alterations? In studies of severe TBI patients, the NWT was consistently shown to induce a stress reaction including brief increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) and changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). However, it has not been established whether these short-lived ICP and CPP changes are detrimental to the injured brain. Daily interruption of sedation is associated with a reduced ventilator time, shorter hospital stay and reduced mortality in many studies of general intensive care unit patients, although such clinical benefits have not been firmly established in TBI. To date, there is no consensus on the use of the NWT among NCC units and systematic studies are scarce. Thus, additional studies evaluating the role of the NWT in clinical decision-making are needed. Multimodal NCC monitoring may be an adjunct in assessing in which TBI patients the NWT can be safely performed. At present, the NWT remains the golden standard for clinical monitoring and detection of neurological changes in NCC and could be considered in TBI patients with stable baseline ICP and CPP readings. The focus of the present review is an overview of the existing literature on the role of the NWT as a clinical monitoring tool for severe TBI patients.

Comparison of propofol and midazolam on patients undergoing spinal surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Instrumentation in correction operations for spinal deformities carries a 0.5-5% risk of injuring the spinal cord. The wake-up test is used for early detection of these injuries. In this study we compared the effects of propofol and midazolam during wake-up test in scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly assigned as group P and group M. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) for group P or midazolam 0.5 mg kg(-1) for group M with remifentanil 0.5 µg kg(-1) and cisatracurium 0.15 mg kg(-1) for both groups. At the maintenance of anesthesia O2/air and infusions of remifentanil and cisatracurium were used. In group P, propofol 6-10 mg kg(-1)h(-1) and in group M, midazolam 0.5 mg mg kg(-1) were preferred. Approximately 15 min before the wake-up test, all drugs were discontinued. At the wake-up test, anesthesiologist asked the patients to open their eyes and squeeze his/her hand at every 30s until the patients responded. Then patients were told to wiggle their toes. Hemodynamic parameters, time of eye-opening, appropriate movement upon verbal command were evaluated. BIS frequency throughout the operation was recorded. RESULTS: The eye opening time was 9 ± 2.15 min in group P and 7 ± 3.15 min in group M. Motor movement time was 12 ± 2.55 min in group P and 21.25 ± 3.93 min in group M. CONCLUSION: Propofol provided better wake-up conditions and conducted a better neurologic assessment within the same BIS values than midazolam.

[Comparison of propofol and midazolam on patients undergoing spinal surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: randomized clinical trial]. / Comparação de propofol e midazolam em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de coluna vertebral com teste de despertar no intraoperatório: estudo clínico randomizado.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Instrumentation in correction operations for spinal deformities carries a 0.5-5% risk of injuring the spinal cord. The wake-up test is used for early detection of these injuries. In this study we compared the effects of propofol and midazolam during wake-up test in scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly assigned as group P and group M. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5mgkg(-1) for group P or midazolam 0.5mgkg(-1) for group M with remifentanil 0.5µgkg(-1) and cisatracurium 0.15mgkg(-1) for both groups. At the maintenance of anesthesia O2/air and infusions of remifentanil and cisatracurium were used. In group P, propofol 6-10mgkg(-1)h(-1) and in group M, midazolam 0.5mgmgkg(-1) were preferred. Approximately 15min before the wake-up test, all drugs were discontinued. At the wake-up test, anesthesiologist asked the patients to open their eyes and squeeze his/her hand at every 30s until the patients responded. Then patients were told to wiggle their toes. Hemodynamic parameters, time of eye-opening, appropriate movement upon verbal command were evaluated. BIS frequency throughout the operation was recorded. RESULTS: The eye opening time was 9±2.15min in group P and 7±3.15min in group M. Motor movement time was 12±2.55min in group P and 21.25±3.93min in group M. CONCLUSION: Propofol provided better wake-up conditions and conducted a better neurologic assessment within the same BIS values than midazolam.

Effect of the intraoperative wake-up test in sevoflurane-sufentanil combined anesthesia during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a randomized study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the intraoperative wake-up test on sevoflurane-sufentanil anesthesia for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel trial. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status 1 patients, aged 13 to 20 years, scheduled for AIS surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to two groups: Group W patients received sevoflurane-sufentanil combined anesthesia and underwent the intraoperative wake-up test; Group NW received sevoflurane-sufentanil combined anesthesia without the wake-up test. Anesthesia was induced with an intravenous (IV) injection of midazolam, propofol, and sufentanil and maintained with sevoflurane inhalation, a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of sufentanil, and IV infusion of cisatracurium besylate. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was postoperative delirium. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, exposure of drugs administered, time to eye opening, extubation, and consciousness. MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative delirium occurred in one patient from each group (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in duration of surgery (322 ± 65 min vs 336 ± 72 min), duration of anesthesia (356 ± 76 min vs 368 ± 81 min), intraoperative blood loss (1847 ± 423 mL vs 1901 ± 451 mL) and transfusion (1663 ± 398 mL vs 1649 ± 382 mL), average exposure of drugs (72 ± 13 mg vs 75 ± 15 mg for propofol, 116 ± 28 µg vs 109 ± 25 µg for sufentanil, and 22 ± 5 vs 23 ± 4 mg for cisatracurium), time to eye opening (4.7 ± 1.5 min vs 4.8 ± 1.4 min), extubation (7.5 ± 2.0 min vs 7.3 ± 2.2 min), and consciousness (8.9 ± 1.8 min vs 9.1 ± 2.1 min) (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane-sufentanil combined anesthesia provides hemodynamic stability and rapid recovery from AIS surgery. There is no correlation between the intraoperative wake-up test and postoperative delirium after sevoflurane-sufentanil combined anesthesia.

Bispectral index and their relation with consciousness of the patients who receive desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia during wake-up test for spinal surgery for correction.

BACKGROUND: Wake-up tests may be necessary during surgery for kypho-scoliosis to ensure that spinal function remains intact. It is difficult to predict the time when patients can respond to a verbal command. We evaluated the effectiveness of the bispectral index (BIS) and its relation to patients' levels of consciousness in wake-up tests during desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Eighteen patients each were enrolled in the desflurane and sevoflurane groups for spinal correction surgery. We measured BIS values, blood pressure, heart rate, and consciousness state and time, at the points when patients responded during the wake-up test. RESULTS: The BIS values when patients made fists upon a verbal command (T3) were 86.7 ± 7.5 for desflurane and 90.3 ± 5.4 for sevoflurane. Patients in the desflurane group had significantly shorter wake up delays than those in the sevoflurane group (6.9 ± 1.8 min vs. 11.8 ± 3.6 min). However, there was no difference between the groups in the time between the response to a verbal command and the time when a patient moved their toes in response to verbal commands. No recall of the wake-up tests occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The values obtained using the BIS index could to some extent predict the time of a patient's and would be informative during desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Moreover, desflurane permitted faster responses to verbal commands than sevoflurane, and allowed the wake-up test to be performed sooner.

Comparison of propofol and midazolam on patients undergoing spinal surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: randomized clinical trial / Comparação de propofol e midazolam em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de coluna vertebral com teste de despertar no intraoperatório: estudo clínico randomizado

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Instrumentation in correction operations for spinal deformities carries a 0.5-5% risk of injuring the spinal cord. The wake-up test is used for early detection of these injuries. In this study we compared the effects of propofol and midazolam during wake-up test in scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly assigned as group P and group M. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg kg-1 for group P or midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1 for group M with remifentanil 0.5 µg kg-1 and cisatracurium 0.15 mg kg-1 for both groups. At the maintenance of anesthesia O2/air and infusions of remifentanil and cisatracurium were used. In group P, propofol 6-10 mg kg-1 h-1 and in group M, midazolam 0.5 mg mg kg-1 were preferred. Approximately 15 min before the wake-up test, all drugs were discontinued. At the wake-up test, anesthesiologist asked the patients to open their eyes and squeeze his/her hand at every 30 s until the patients responded. Then patients were told to wiggle their toes. Hemodynamic parameters, time of eye-opening, appropriate movement upon verbal command were evaluated. BIS frequency throughout the operation was recorded. RESULTS: The eye opening time was 9 ± 2.15 min in group P and 7 ± 3.15 min in group M. Motor movement time was 12 ± 2.55 min in group P and 21.25 ± 3.93 min in group M. CONCLUSION: Propofol provided better wake-up conditions and conducted a better neurologic assessment within the same BIS values than midazolam.

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A instrumentação em cirurgias de correção de deformidades da coluna vertebral tem risco de 0,5 a 5% de lesionar a medula espinhal. O teste de despertar é usado para a detecção precoce dessas lesões. Neste estudo comparamos os efeitos de propofol e midazolam durante o teste de despertar em cirurgia de escoliose. MÉTODOS: Trinta pacientes foram designados de forma aleatória para os grupos P e M. A anestesia foi induzida com propofol (2,5 mg kg-1) no grupo P ou midazolam (0,5 mg kg-1) no grupo M, com remifentanil (0,5 µg kg-1) e cisatracúrio (0,15 mg kg-1) em ambos os grupos. A manutenção da anestesia foi feita com O2/ar e infusões de remifentanil e cisatracúrio. Nos grupos P e M, respectivamente, doses de propofol (6-10 mg kg-1 h-1) e de midazolam (0,5 mg mg kg-1) foram preferidas. Aproximadamente 15 min antes do teste de despertar, todos os medicamentos foram interrompidos. No teste de despertar, o anestesiologista pedia ao paciente que abrisse os olhos e apertasse sua mão a cada 30 s até que o paciente respondesse. Depois, o paciente era solicitado a mexer os dedos dos pés. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos, o tempo de abertura dos olhos e o movimento apropriado sob comando verbal foram avaliados. A frequência do BIS foi registrada durante toda a cirurgia. RESULTADOS: O tempo de abertura dos olhos foi de 9 ± 2,15 min no grupo P e de 7 ± 3,15 min no grupo M. O tempo de movimento motor foi de 12 ± 2,55 min no grupo P e de 21,25 ± 3,93 min no grupo M. CONCLUSÃO: Propofol proporcionou melhores condições de despertar e possibilitou uma melhor avaliação neurológica dentro dos mesmos valores do BIS que midazolam.