Fracture pain in children in the emergency department: the impact of a new pain management procedure.

PURPOSE: To compare compliance with the French national guidelines before and after the implementation (in 2018) of a new protocol on acute fracture pain management in the pediatric emergency department of a French university medical center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, before-after study in patients aged below 16 years presenting at the pediatric emergency department with a fracture. We compared pain management before (in 2017) and after (in 2019 and 2020) implementation of the new procedure. The primary endpoint was appropriate pain management, defined as (i) an appropriate initial assessment of pain, (ii) appropriate treatment with analgesic drugs (acetaminophen for mild pain, acetaminophen and ibuprofen for moderate pain, ibuprofen and morphine for severe pain) and (iii) reassessment of the pain intensity. RESULTS: 572 patients were included (mean age: 6.5 years; male: 60%). 190 in 2017 and 382 in 2019-2020. Pain management was appropriate for 40% of the patients in 2017 and 52% in 2019-2020 (p = 0.004). Pain was rated for 98% of patients in 2017 vs. 100% in 2019-2020 (p = 0.04). The frequency of appropriate treatment for mild pain and moderate pain increased significantly from 52 to 76% and from 0 to 44%, respectively. The administration of ibuprofen increased by 26% points (from 3 to 20 patients treated) and the administration of morphine increased by 29% points (from 1 to 17 patients treated). Pain reassessment rose significantly from 21 to 43%. Levels of compliance with the guidelines were similar in 2019 and 2020. Analgesia was significantly more effective in 2019-2020 than in 2017 (in 20% vs. 14% of the patients, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: After the implementation of a new protocol for the management of acute fracture pain, we observed an increase in compliance with the guidelines. Although the use of ibuprofen and morphine rose significantly as did the frequency of pain reassessment, further improvements are required.

Extent of bone marrow edema on dual-energy CT aids in differentiation of acute from post-acute fractures of lower legs.

OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow edema (BME) from dual-energy CT is useful to direct attention to radiographically occult fractures. The aim was to characterize utility of BME of lower extremity (LE) fractures with the hypothesis that stabilized and post-acute fractures exhibit decreased extent and frequency of BME than non-stabilized and acute fractures, respectively. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of known LE fractures. A total of 141 cases met inclusion criteria, including 82 fractures without splint/cast stabilization, and 59 cases with stabilization. Two readers independently recorded BME, and its multiplicity and area (mm2). A separate reader assessed fracture location, comminution, and chronicity. Wilcoxon rank sum test, multiple regression, intraclass correlation (ICC), kappa statistics, and chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: BME was significantly larger in non-stabilized (859.3 mm2 (420.6-1451.8)) than stabilized fractures (493.5 mm2 (288.8-883.2)), p = .011). Comminuted (p = 0.006), non-stabilized (p = 0.0004), and acute fractures (p = 0.036) were all associated with larger BME area. BME presence had excellent results for both stabilized (Cohen's Kappa = 0.81) and non-stabilized fractures (Cohen's Kappa = 0.84). ICC for BME area showed excellent correlation for both stabilized (ICC = 0.78) and non-stabilized groups (ICC = 0.86). BME multiplicity showed excellent agreement for stabilized (ICC = 0.81) and good agreement for non-stabilized (ICC = 0.67) fractures. Lastly, stabilized cases showed increased multiplicity of BME compared to non-stabilized fractures (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BME evaluation can assist in differentiation of acute versus post-acute fractures. Extent of BME is reduced with splint/cast stabilization, which may limit its accuracy in detection of lower extremity fractures. KEY POINTS: • Evaluation of bone marrow edema on dual-energy CT aids in differentiation of acute versus post-acute fracture. • Bone marrow edema evaluation is limited in the setting of post-acute or stabilized fractures. • There is decreased frequency and extent of bone marrow edema in post-acute, non-comminuted, and stabilized fractures.

Primary Deltoid Repair for Ankle Fracture Using All-Suture Anchors.

Primary repair of the deltoid ligament is a common surgical option for unstable ankle fracture. However, controversy exists regarding whether such repair is necessary or provides any benefit to patient outcomes. A retrospective study was performed following acute deltoid repairs using all-suture bone anchors. Patients at 2 surgical centers were included when they were over 18 years old at surgery, had a medial clear space (MCS) greater than 4 mm preoperatively, and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Subjective outcomes were measured with PROMIS, FAAM, and numeric rating scale. Preoperative and follow-up scores were compared with t tests (p < .05). For the 47 patients identified, age at time of surgery was 30.6 ± 14.9 years (range 15.4-65.0 years). Follow-up data were captured for 36 (73%) of the patients at 75 ± 37 weeks (range 18-169 weeks) after surgery. Mean time to weightbearing was 4 ± 1 weeks (range 1-7 weeks). Patients returned to sport 14 ± 5 weeks after surgery (range 8-41 weeks). Various complications consisted of wound infection, superficial dehiscence, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The PROMIS, FAAM, and NRS patient outcome scores improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative follow-up. Significant reduction in the radiographic MCS postoperatively occurred in all patients. These findings suggest primary deltoid repair when associated with ankle fracture to be a safe procedure and has the potential of allowing early weightbearing and return to sports.

Employing direct electromagnetic coupling to assess acute fracture healing: An ovine model assessment.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the efficacy of collecting temporal fracture site compliance data via an advanced direct electromagnetic coupling (DEC) system equipped with a Vivaldi-type antenna, novel calibration technique, and multi-antenna setup (termed maDEC) as an approach to monitor acute fracture healing progress in a translational large animal model. The overarching goal of this approach was to provide insights into the acute healing dynamics, offering a promising avenue for optimizing fracture management strategies. METHODS: A sample of twelve sheep, subjected to ostectomies and intramedullary nail fixations, was divided into two groups, simulating normal and impaired healing scenarios. Sequential maDEC compliance or stiffness measurements and radiographs were taken from the surgery until euthanasia at four or eight weeks and were subsequently compared with post-sacrifice biomechanical, micro-CT, and histological findings. RESULTS: The results showed that the maDEC system offered straightforward quantification of fracture site compliance via a multiantenna array. Notably, the rate of change in the maDEC-measured bending stiffness significantly varied between normal and impaired healing groups during both the 4-week (p = 0.04) and 8-week (p = 0.02) periods. In contrast, radiographically derived mRUST healing measurements displayed no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.46). Moreover, the cumulative normalized stiffness maDEC data significantly correlated with post-sacrifice mechanical strength (r2 = 0.80, p < 0.001), micro-CT measurements of bone volume fraction (r2 = 0.60, p = 0.003), and density (r2 = 0.60, p = 0.003), and histomorphometric measurements of new bone area fraction (r2 = 0.61, p = 0.003) and new bone area (r2 = 0.60, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the enhanced maDEC system provides a non-invasive, accurate method to monitor fracture healing during the acute healing phase, showing distinct stiffness profiles between normal and impaired healing groups and offering critical insights into the healing process's progress and efficiency.

Timing of osteoporosis therapies following fracture: the current status.

In most patients, osteoporosis is diagnosed only after the occurrence of the first fragility fracture. It is of utmost importance to start osteoporosis medications immediately in these patients to prevent future fractures and also to reduce associated mortality and morbidity. There remains a hesitancy over initiating osteoporotic medications, specifically for antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates following an acute fracture due to concern over their effect on fracture healing. The purpose of this review is to study the effect of the timing of initiation of different osteoporosis medications on healing after an acute fracture. Most of the human studies, including randomized control trials (RCTs), did not find any significant negative effect on fracture healing with early use of bisphosphonate after an acute fracture. Anabolic agents like teriparatide have shown either neutral or beneficial effects on fracture healing and thus can be started very early following any osteoporotic fracture. Although human studies on the early use of other osteoporosis medications like denosumab or strontium ranelate are very sparse in the literature, none of these medications have shown any evidence of delay in fracture healing. To summarize, among the commonly used anti-osteoporosis agents, both bisphosphonates and teriparatide are safe to be initiated in the early acute post-fracture period. Moreover, teriparatide has shown some evidence in favor of reducing fracture healing time.

Cost-utility analysis of surgical fixation with Kirschner wire versus casting after fracture of the distal radius : a health economic evaluation of the DRAFFT2 trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation with Kirschner (K-)wire ersus moulded casting after manipulation of a fracture of the distal radius in an operating theatre setting. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted based on data collected from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial 2 (DRAFFT2) multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK. Resource use was collected at three, six, and 12 months post-randomization using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from an NHS and personal social services perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of cost-effectiveness estimates, and decision uncertainty was handled using confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, surgical fixation with K-wire was more expensive (£29.65 (95% confidence interval (CI) -94.85 to 154.15)) and generated lower QALYs (0.007 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.016)) than moulded casting, but this difference was not statistically significant. The probability of K-wire being cost-effective at a £20,000 per QALY cost-effectiveness threshold was 24%. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust in the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that surgical fixation with K-wire is unlikely to be a cost-effective alternative to a moulded cast in adults, following manipulation of a fracture of the distal radius in a theatre setting.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1225-1233.

Quotation errors related to the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial paper.

Quotation error is an inaccuracy in the assertions made by authors when referencing another's work. This study aimed to assess the quotation errors in articles referencing the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT). A literature search was performed to identify all citations of DRAFFT from 2014 to 2020. The relevant publications were assessed by two reviewers using a validated framework of error classification. There were 83 articles containing references to DRAFFT. There was substantial agreement between the two reviewers (Kappa coefficient 0.66). We found 22/83 (28%) of articles contained an error, with one article containing two errors. There were 12 major errors, which were not substantiated by, were unrelated to or contradicted the findings of DRAFFT, and 11 minor errors, including numerical inaccuracies, oversimplification or generalization. This study highlights that a significant number of articles inaccurately quote DRAFFT. Authors and journals should consider checking the accuracy of key referenced statements.

The role of shockwaves in the enhancement of bone repair - from basic principles to clinical application.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a treatment modality, originally introduced into the clinic as lithotripsie, which has also been successfully used in the last two decades in the non-invasive treatment of delayed or non-healing fractures. Initially, the mechanism of action was attributed to microfracture-induced repair, but intensive basic research has now shown that the shockwave generates its effect in tissue via mechanotransduction. Numerous signal transduction pathways have already been demonstrated, which in their entirety trigger an endogenous regeneration process via cell proliferation, migration and differentiation. Clinically, these shockwave-conveyed biological signals support healing of acute, delayed and non-union fractures. The attainable outcome is comparable to surgery but avoiding an open approach with associated potential complications. These advantageous properties with a clearly positive cost-benefit ratio make shockwave therapy a first line treatment in delayed and non-union fractures.

Grammont reversed prosthesis for acute complex fracture of the proximal humerus in an elderly population with 5 to 12 years follow-up.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze outcome in 23 cases of Delta III reverse ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis implantation for acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in an elderly population with poor bone quality. In this type of population, this procedure could respond to the difficulties of a reliable and efficient re-fixation of the tubercles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1993 to 2000, 23 Delta III prostheses were implanted by a single operator for acute injury: 18 three-part and four-part fractures and five fracture-dislocations. The study population included two men and 21 women, mean age 75 years, ten on the dominant side. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia in the semi-sitting position via the anterolateral approach without osteotomy of the acromion, with 10-20° retroversion of the humeral stem (except in one shoulder) and cement fixation in two. For five shoulders, the tubercles were re-fixed. Postoperative physiotherapy was not possible in all patients. Outcome was assessed with the Constant score and with AP and lateral Lamy radiographs. RESULTS: Seven patients died so the series included 16 cases for analysis. Complications were: reflex sympathetic dystrophy (n=2), postoperative Acinetobacter infection (n=1) requiring revision to clean and drain allowing preservation of the prosthesis, and early postoperative anterior dislocation (n=1) (10° stem anteversion) with surgical revision to re-orient the stem. At a mean follow-up of 86 months, the Constant score was 60 points (contralateral shoulder, 83 points). Outcome, influenced in cases of re-fixation of the tubercles, was good for pain (14.1), activity (13.3), strength (16.1), anterior elevation (6.5), and abduction (6.5), but very poor for external (1.1) and internal (2.4) rotation. The radiographs showed aseptic glenoid loosening (n=1) at 12 years with surgical revision in 2005; the Constant score at 6 months follow-up was 48 points, inferior scapular notching (n=11) according the Nerot classification (six stage 1, four stage 2, one stage 3, at 2, 4.3, and 5 years follow-up), inferior spurs (n=9) appearing at a mean 2.5 years follow-up (stable after emergence without clinical impact), proximal humeral resorption (n=4) (medially for three at a mean 8 years follow-up and one laterally at 10 years), and a humeral radiolucent line (n=1) at 5 years follow-up. DISCUSSION: For acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly subjects with poor bone quality, when effective and reliable re-fixation of the tubercles is difficult or impossible, the reverse ball-and-socket shoulder prosthesis is a possible alternative providing good functional outcome except for rotations, but with the risk of inferior scapular notching. Although not problematic in the medium term, these notches may contribute to glenoid loosening with bone loss in the long term. Nevertheless, this procedure seems to improve the status of patients with such fractures.

Utility of follow-up radiographs in conservatively managed acute fifth metatarsal fractures.

Fifth metatarsal fractures are the most common fracture of the foot, with the majority being managed conservatively. A variety of treatment methods are described in the literature. Follow-up radiographs are taken to identify fracture displacement, and subsequently to assess for bony union throughout treatment. We assessed the utility of serial radiographic assessment in management of these fractures. Clinical notes and radiographs of 79 patients with fifth metatarsal fractures were analysed retrospectively. Serial radiographs were studied to identify displacement and the last X-ray was reviewed for evidence of fracture union. 96% of fractures were managed conservatively. 29% showed radiological healing at last clinic visit, the rest being discharged as were considered clinically healed. Similar fracture types were managed differently. 3 fractures were surgically treated after failed conservative management. 1 fracture showed displacement from initial radiographs, and was successfully managed conservatively. Without clear guidelines, these injuries are managed differently from a radiological perspective. Follow-up radiographs taken before 6-8 weeks do not appear to alter patient management. Based on the current study we present our recommendations for radiographic assessment of acute fifth metatarsal fractures.

Management of acute displaced midshaft clavicular fractures using Herbert cannulated screw: Technique and results in 114 patients.

PURPOSE: A new and simple operative technique has been developed to provide internal fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures. This involves the use of a large fragment Herbert Screw that is entirely embedded within the bone. Screw fixation is combined with bone grafting from intramedullary reamings of the fracture fragments. The purpose of this report is to assess the outcomes following treatment of midshaft clavicular fracture using this method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients with acute displaced midshaft fracture were identified between 2002 and 2007. All patients were followed until fracture union. Patients' medical records were reviewed. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow form (ASES) were posted to all patients. Outcome measures included union rate, time to union, implant removal rate, DASH, and ASES scores. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 29.5 years (interquartile range, 19-44 years). The most common injury mechanism was sports injury (28%). The median time from injury to surgery was 5 days (interquartile range, 2-9 days). Union occurred in an average of 8.8 weeks. Non-union occurred in three cases (2.6%). The re-operation rate for symptomatic hardware prominence screw was 1.7%. The median DASH score was 0.83 and the median ASES was 100 (n = 35). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary fixation using cannulated Herbert screw can be used as an effective approach for operative management of midshaft clavicular fractures. Using this method, an appropriate outcome could be achieved and a second intervention for implant removal could be avoided in great majority of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Fractures and alcohol abuse - patient opinion of alcohol intervention.

PURPOSE: To clarify patient opinions about alcohol intervention in relation to surgery before investigating the effect in a Scandinavian multi-centre randomized trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A qualitative study. Thirteen consecutive alcohol patients with fractures participated after informed consent. They were interviewed during their hospital stay. The number of participants was based on the criteria of data-saturation. The analysis followed the applied qualitative framework model aimed at evaluation of specific participant needs within a larger overall project. RESULTS: All patients regarded alcohol intervention in relation to surgery as a good idea. They did not consider quit drinking as a major problem during their hospital stay and had all remained abstinent in this period. About half of the patients were ready or partly ready to participate in an alcohol intervention. Patient opinions and their readiness to participate were expressed in four groups, which also reflected their readiness to stop drinking in the perioperative period, their general acceptance of supportive disulfiram as part of an alcohol intervention as well as their awareness of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study clarified that the patients found alcohol intervention relevant in relation to surgery.