Immunological mechanisms underlying clinical phenotypes and noninvasive diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced kidney disease.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a mainstay of cancer therapy, with over 80 FDA-approved indications. Used in a variety of settings and in combination with each other and with traditional chemotherapies, the hyperactive immune response induced by ICIs can often lead to immune-related adverse events in bystander normal tissues such as the kidneys, lungs, and the heart. In the kidneys, this immune-related adverse event manifests as acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN). In the era of widespread ICI use, it becomes vital to understand the clinical manifestations of ICI-AIN and the importance of prompt diagnosis and management of these complications. In this review, we delve into the clinical phenotypes of ICI-AIN and how they differ from traditional drug-induced AIN. We also detail what is known about the mechanistic underpinnings of ICI-AIN and the important diagnostic and therapeutic implications behind harnessing those mechanisms to further our understanding of these events and to formulate effective treatment plans to manage ICI-AIN.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors induce acute interstitial nephritis in mice with increased urinary MCP1 and PD-1 glomerular expression.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induce acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) in 2-5% of patients, with a clearly higher incidence when they are combined with platinum derivatives. Unfortunately, suitable disease models and non-invasive biomarkers are lacking. To fill this gap in our understanding, we investigated the renal effects of cisplatin and anti-PD-L1 antibodies in mice, assessing PD-1 renal expression and cytokine levels in mice with AIN, and then we compared these findings with those in AIN-diagnosed cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty C57BL6J mice received 200 µg of anti-PD-L1 antibody and 5 mg/kg cisplatin intraperitoneally and were compared with those receiving cisplatin (n = 6), anti-PD-L1 (n = 7), or saline (n = 6). After 7 days, the mice were euthanized. Serum and urinary concentrations of TNFα, CXCL10, IL-6, and MCP-1 were measured by Luminex. The kidney sections were stained to determine PD-1 tissue expression. Thirty-nine cancer patients with AKI were enrolled (AIN n = 33, acute tubular necrosis (ATN) n = 6), urine MCP-1 (uMCP-1) was measured, and kidney sections were stained to assess PD-1 expression. RESULTS: Cisplatin and anti PD-L1 treatment led to 40% AIN development (p = 0.03) in mice, accompanied by elevated serum creatinine and uMCP1. AIN-diagnosed cancer patients also had higher uMCP1 levels than ATN-diagnosed patients, confirming our previous findings. Mice with AIN exhibited interstitial PD-1 staining and stronger glomerular PD-1 expression, especially with combination treatment. Conversely, human AIN patients only showed interstitial PD-1 positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Only mice receiving cisplatin and anti-PDL1 concomitantly developed AIN, accompanied with a more severe kidney injury. AIN induced by this drug combination was linked to elevated uMCP1, consistently with human AIN, suggesting that uMCP1 can be potentially used as an AIN biomarker.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis and a Review of Related Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, they pose the risk of immune-related adverse events, including ICI-mediated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). Recent studies have implicated proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as potential contributors to ICI-AKI development. This meta-analysis examines the association between PPI use and ICI-AKI, exploring a potential modifiable risk factor in ICI therapy while also reviewing the possible outcomes of ICI-AKI. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, assessing the risk of ICI-AKI in cancer patients concurrently using PPIs and potential outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate heterogeneity and potential biases. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies involving 12,694 patients were included. In total, we analyzed 639 patients with all-cause AKI and 779 patients with ICI-AKI. The pooled OR for the overall incidence of AKI from all-causes was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.40) among patients on PPIs. Specifically, the risk of ICI-AKI associated with PPI use was significantly higher, with a pooled OR of 1.84 (95% CI 1.16-2.90). This indicates approximately 84% higher likelihood of developing ICI-AKI with concurrent use of PPIs. Additionally, among patients with ICI-AKI, 67% had complete or partial recovery of renal function, 32% progressed to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and about 36% died during a follow-up period of at least 3 months. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights the importance of cautious PPI prescription in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy. Clinicians are advised to evaluate the risks and benefits of PPI use and consider alternative therapies when feasible.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephritis - treatment standard.

Over the last 13 years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has grown remarkably, owing to their unprecedented anti-tumor efficacy in certain tumor groups. With increased use of ICIs, we are seeing immune-related adverse events (irAE's) more frequently. Renal irAE's, such as ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), are reported in 2-5% of patients treated with ICIs, with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) as the most common histopathologic lesion, though various forms of glomerulonephritis have also been reported. Modifiable risk factors for ICI-AKI include concurrent use of ATIN-associated drugs, like proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics, and dual ICI therapy with both CTLA-4 and PD1/PDL-1 blockade. Kidney biopsies remain the diagnostic modality of choice, though several promising non-invasive biomarkers, which have not yet been broadly clinically validated have emerged. The treatment of ICI-AKI involves holding ICIs, discontinuation of ATIN-associated drugs, and initiation of immunosuppression with corticosteroids as first-line therapy. With prompt treatment initiation, most patients achieve full or partial renal recovery, allowing for re-challenge with ICI. However, a subset of patients will require additional steroid-sparing therapies for corticosteroid-dependent or refractory ICI-AKI. Here we review developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology of ICI-AKI, the approach to diagnosis (with a focus on the emergence of novel diagnostic tools), prognostic factors and the current evidence for establishing treatment standards for ICI-AKI. As the evidence base remains largely retrospective, we identify questions that would benefit from future prospective studies in the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of ICI-AKI.

Acute kidney injury in lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome.

We present a case of lamotrigine-triggered DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome with acute kidney injury stage 3. A 17-year-old girl with known epilepsy treated with lamotrigine presented with acute kidney injury as well as skin eruption, fever, and apathy. Extended diagnostics, considering infectious and autoimmune diseases, remained unremarkable. Lamotrigine blood levels were within the target range. Kidney biopsy showed acute interstitial nephritis with tubular necrosis. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy led to an improvement in kidney function; skin eruption and neurological symptoms resolved. During the hospital stay, the girl admitted to inconsistent and variable intake of lamotrigine, occasionally resulting in notable overdosing. This report demonstrates that acute kidney injury in lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome is an acute interstitial nephritis with tubular necrosis, an aspect that has not been deeply characterized so far. Additionally, we aim to elevate awareness towards non-adherence as cause of disease, especially among the adolescent population.

Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced acute interstitial nephritis: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a recognized complication of immunotherapy (IO), but literature on its management and outcomes is limited. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received ICIs and developed biopsy-proven or clinically-suspected ICI-associated AIN at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2012-2023. We analyzed baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including treatment interruption and rechallenge rates. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined as a ≥ 1.5-fold increase in baseline creatinine under seven days, a two-fold increase above the upper limit of normal, or an increase by ≥0.3 mg/dL. Kidney function returning to within 0.3 mg/dL or less than twice baseline was considered complete (CRc) and partial (PRc) recovery, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 12 cases of ICI-AIN: four by biopsy (33%) and eight (67%) by clinical suspicion. Two patients received anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1, six received anti-PD1 alone, and four received chemo-immunotherapy. The majority (58%) of patients developed AIN within the first 5 cycles. Eight patients developed ≥ Grade 3 AKI, and six developed multiple irAEs. ICI was permanently discontinued in seven patients (58%) and temporarily interrupted in four (30%). The CRc and PRc rates were 67% and 8%, respectively. Upon AIN onset, the best disease response was stable disease in five patients, partial response in three, and progressive disease in three. Median overall survival was 4.87 years, and progression-free survival was 1.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Rechallenge with IO after kidney irAE may be possible in some patients but requires careful evaluation on an individual basis.

Nephrotoxicity associated with anticancer agents: perspective on onconephrology from nephrologists.

Nephrotoxicity is one of the most important complications in cancer patients. In particular, acute kidney injury (AKI) is known to be associated with discontinuing effective oncological treatments, longer hospitalizations, increased costs, and a higher risk of death. In addition to acute kidney injury, clinical signs associated with nephrotoxicity during treatment with anticancer agents include chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, hypertension, electrolyte abnormalities, and other characteristic manifestations. Many of these signs are caused both by cancer treatment as well as by cancer itself. Therefore, it is important to carefully recognize whether the underlying causes of renal impairment in cancer patients are cancer-related, treatment-related, or both. This review describes the epidemiology and pathophysiology of anticancer agent-induced acute kidney injury, proteinuria, hypertension, and other characteristic manifestations.

A low BUN/creatinine ratio predicts histologically confirmed acute interstitial nephritis.

INTRODUCTION: In hospitalized patients with acute renal injury (AKI), acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (AIN) constitutes one of the leading etiologies. The objective of this study was to identify clinical and biochemical variables in patients with AKI associated with kidney biopsy-confirmed AIN. METHODS: For our prospective study, we recruited hospitalized patients aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with AKI based on biochemical criteria. Prior to enrollment, each patient was assessed with a complete metabolic panel and a kidney biopsy. RESULTS: The study consisted of 42 patients (with a mean age of 45 years) and equal numbers of male and female patients. Diabetes and hypertension were the main comorbidities. Nineteen patients had histological findings consistent with AIN. There was a correlation between histology and the BUN/creatinine ratio (BCR) (r = -0.57, p = 0.001). The optimal Youden point for classifying AIN via a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was a BCR ≤ 12 (AUC = 0.73, p = 0.024). Additionally, in diagnosing AIN, BCR had a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 81%, a positive predictive value of 81%, a negative predictive value of 76%, and OR of 14 (95% CI = 2.6 to 75.7, p = 0.021). In the multivariable analysis, BCR was the sole variable associated with AIN. CONCLUSION: A BCR ≤ 12 identifies AIN in patients with AKI. This study is the first to prospectively assess the relationship between renal biopsy results and BCR.

Alectinib - induced acute renal failure.

Introduction: Alectinib is a potent and selective orally active tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer, which has a better safety profile than other inhibitors of anaplastic lymphoma kinase. We report a case of a mixed pattern of acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis proven by renal biopsy upon starting alectinib therapy. Case report: A 68-year-old man with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia, diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer stage IV, had 27 days previously started alectinib 600 mg twice daily. He presented at the emergency room due to vomiting, nausea, and more dyspnoea than usual. A high creatinine level and metabolic imbalances were detected in laboratory tests. Management and outcomes: After a diagnosis of acute renal failure, the patient was admitted to hospital. Nephrotoxic drugs were suspended, and haemodialysis was required. After dismissing other causes, a probable diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis due to alectinib was established. Corticotherapy was initiated and renal function returned to baseline levels. Renal biopsy showed a mixed pattern of acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis. The patient was discharged, and alectinib therapy was modified to lorlatinib. No polymorphisms were found in a pharmacogenetic test. After 10 months with lorlatinib, renal function remains stable. Discussion: The relationship between acute renal failure and alectinib initiation is considered probable in this patient. Although it is an adverse effect reported in less than 1% of cases, it would be advisable to monitor renal function in this kind of patient.

Clinical significance of kidney immune complex deposition in children with acute interstitial nephritis disease.

BACKGROUND: Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a relatively rare cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in children. Immune complex (IC) deposition was rare in renal pathology of AIN. METHODS: Based on the status and position of IC deposition, a total of 78 children with AIN were divided into two groups: the non-IC group and IC group. IC group was further divided into two subgroups: intraglomerular (IG)-IC group and extraglomerular (EG)-IC group. To compare the clinical and histological features, renal outcomes between groups. RESULTS: The IC deposition, IG-IC and EG-IC deposition were observed in 22 (28.21%), 12 (15.38%) and 10 (12.82%) children, respectively. The IC group demonstrated a higher frequency of AKI, higher level of Scr, urine N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosidase (NAG) enzyme, retinol-binding protein (RBP), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), higher frequency of neutrophils, plasma cells and eosinophils infiltrate, higher scores of interstitial inflammation (i), total inflammation (ti) and interstitial edema, lower level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as compared to non-IC group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). EG-IC deposition positively moderate correlated with levels of RBP, IG-IC deposition positively moderate correlated with plasma cell infiltrate, interstitial inflammation (i), total inflammation (ti) and interstitial edema. Interstitial inflammation, EG-IC deposition and interstitial edema were risk factors for AKD in AIN, and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) was a risk factor for CKD in children with AIN. CONCLUSION: IG-IC and EG-IC deposition positively correlated with severe clinical manifestations, glomerular and tubular injuries, and EG-IC deposition was risk factor for the progression of AIN in children.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with acute kidney injury in Japan in whom kidney biopsy was performed: a cross-sectional analysis of the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J­RBR).

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a worldwide concern and it leads to a poor prognosis or end-stage kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of patients with AKI in whom kidney biopsy was performed using data of the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J-RBR). METHODS: We screened 38,351 cases that were registered in the J-RBR from 2007 to 2018. We obtained data for 383 patients with AKI based on clinical diagnosis for analysis 1 and data for 714 patients with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) based on pathological diagnosis for analysis 2. RESULTS: Of the cases screened, 383 patients with AKI (1.0%) were included in analysis 1. The main pathological diagnoses of AKI were AIN, ATN, chronic interstitial nephritis, nephro-sclerosis and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Of the cases screened, 589 patients with AIN (1.5%) and 110 patients with ATN (0.3%) were included in analysis 2. The main clinical diagnoses of AIN were AKI, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), chronic nephritic syndrome (CNS) and drug-induced nephropathy (DIN), whereas those of ATN were AKI, RPGN, DIN and CNS. ATN patients had a higher serum creatinine level than that of AIN patients. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that cases in the J-RBR included 1.0% of AKI cases based on clinical diagnosis and 1.5% and 0.3% of AIN and ATN cases, respectively, based on pathological diagnosis. In patients with suspected intrinsic AKI, kidney biopsy should be performed for diagnosis of the precise etiology and selection of appropriate treatment.

COVID-19 Infection and Acute Kidney Injury: Cause or Complication?

Management of COVID-19 infection is the trend topic in the scientific community and case identification is a key step to contain the pandemic. While pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome represent the typical severe manifestations of the disease, atypical presentations pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for physicians, especially when diagnostic tests are repeatedly negative. Clinical picture of COVID-19 patients is often complicated by bacterial infections or thrombotic events. Here, we present and discuss a case report identified in our center as example of a challenging diagnosis and 2 uncommon complications: severe hyponatremia and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy, caused by parenchymal damage and with a possible direct involvement of the virus.

The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Kidney Lesions in Chikungunya Fever: A Report of 5 Cases With Kidney Biopsy.

Chikungunya nephropathy is an uncommon etiology of acute kidney injury, associated with the mosquito-borne chikungunya arbovirus (CHIKV). The very limited number of pathologic reports to date have only involved postmortem analyses. We here report 5 cases of acute kidney injury for which kidney biopsies were performed in patients with confirmed acute CHIKV infection, during the recent outbreak of chikungunya disease in the French West Indies. The patients ranged from 42 to 76 years of age. All of the patients developed kidney injury, 3 of whom required short-term dialysis and underwent a kidney biopsy. Analysis of kidney biopsies revealed 2 main histopathologic patterns: acute interstitial nephritis with predominant lymphoid inflammation and acute tubular injury. Epithelioid granulomas were observed in 2 cases. There were no glomerular lesions, except in biopsies from 2 patients, including 1 with a previous known primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. CHIKV antigen immunofluorescence microscopy revealed staining in tubular cells. In all of the cases, the short-term outcome was favorable, with recovery of kidney function.

The Promise of Tubule Biomarkers in Kidney Disease: A Review.

For over 70 years, serum creatinine has remained the primary index for detection and monitoring of kidney disease. Tubulointerstitial damage and fibrosis are highly prognostic for subsequent kidney failure in biopsy studies, yet this pathology is invisible to the clinician in the absence of a biopsy. Recent discovery of biomarkers that reflect distinct aspects of kidney tubule disease have led to investigations of whether these markers can provide additional information on risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and associated adverse clinical end points, above and beyond estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria. These biomarkers can be loosely grouped into those that mark tubule cell injury (eg, kidney injury molecule 1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) and those that mark tubule cell dysfunction (eg, α1-microglobulin, uromodulin). These kidney tubule biomarkers provide new opportunities to monitor response to therapeutics used to treat CKD patients. In this review, we describe results from some unique contributions in this area and discuss the current challenges and requirements in the field to bring these markers to clinical practice. We advocate for a broader assessment of kidney health that moves beyond a focus on the glomerulus, and we highlight how such tools can improve diagnostic accuracy and earlier assessment of therapeutic efficacy or harm in CKD patients.

Acute interstitial nephritis and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus following treatment with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and temozolomide.

We report a case of acute interstitial nephritis with associated nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient treated with temozolomide and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for glioblastoma multiforme. Kidney biopsy demonstrated focal tubulointerstitial change with tubular dilatation, epithelial change and interstitial inflammation. The patient's kidney function improved with cessation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and treatment with hydrochlorothiazide for nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Recommencement of temozolomide did not result in further deterioration in kidney function. In this case report, we discuss the novel association between sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim-induced acute interstitial nephritis and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and suggest possible mechanisms involved.

Prednisolone treatment in acute interstitial nephritis (PRAISE) - protocol for the randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an important and common cause of acute renal failure. There are no generally accepted guidelines for the treatment of AIN, due to the lack of prospective randomized trials. Since AIN is characterized by an enhanced immune response, immunosuppressive treatment could potentially improve prognosis by attenuating inflammation and subsequent fibrosis. Despite the limited evidence of effects of steroids and potential adverse effects, prednisolone is frequently used in the treatment of AIN and there is a strong need for clinical trials on the effects of immunosuppression, including steroids, in the treatment of AIN. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prednisolone treatment in AIN, and hypothesized a positive effect of prednisolone treatment on renal function in AIN. METHODS: The study is a randomized, controlled, prospective, open label multicenter study, including incident adult patients with biopsy proven AIN. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of 2 treatment regimens: A. No prednisolone treatment (control group) and B. B) Oral prednisolone treatment staring with 60 mg daily tapered over 8 weeks. One hundred ten patients (55 in each group) are planned to be included and followed for 1 year. Primary outcome is renal function estimated by eGFR 3 months after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are renal function after 12 months and need for renal replacement therapy and quality of life after 3 and 12 months. In addition, with-in prednisolone group analysis are performed to estimate the importance of treatment delay. Exploratory analyses include analysis of biomarkers in urine and plasma and the evaluation of these biomarkers in relation to renal prognosis and re-evaluation of renal biopsies to identify possible renal prognostic factors. DISCUSSION: Strengths and possible limitations in the design are evaluated. The study will provide important information on the effects of prednisolone treatment in AIN and as well as prognostic information relevant for future use of biomarkers and histology. Ultimately, this would lead to improved and evidence based clinical guidelines for the treatment of AIN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04376216 (Retrospectively registered on May 6, 2020).

Renal Toxicity.

With the increasing use of immunotherapy, there has been an associated increased survival in many cancers but has also resulted in unregulated organ-specific toxicities. In this review, we will discuss the renal toxicities associated with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) from the typical acute tubulointerstitial nephritis to glomerulonephritis and their proposed mechanisms and treatments. We also discuss the use of CPI and reactivation of preexisting autoimmune disease with a focus on renal cell cancer in setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Transplant rejection in setting of CPI use has been further evaluated with single-center and multicenter retrospective studies, and available data will be presented in this chapter.

Prognosis of severe drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis requiring renal replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (DAIN) is often associated with improved outcomes, whereas some patients may still progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of patients with severe DAIN requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) at baseline, and to explore the risk factors of progression to CKD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with severe DAIN confirmed by renal biopsies in our center over a 10 years period, all the patients received RRT at presentation. The clinical and pathological characteristics at baseline were recorded, and the outcomes (renal function recovered or progressed to CKD) during follow-ups were also evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the independent risk factors of progression to CKD. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, 13 patients (18.0%) progressed to CKD (GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) after at least 6 months of follow-up, the remaining 59 patients achieved a favorable renal function recovery. Compared with patients who achieved renal function recovery (recovery group), the patients progressed to CKD (progression group) were older and had longer interval from symptom onset to treatment with steroids. The peak serum cystatin C concentration was higher in progression group than recovery group. Higher score of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) and more interstitial inflammatory cells infiltration were detected in renal tissue in progression group. According to multivariable analysis, higher peak cystatin C concentration (OR = 2.443, 95% CI 1.257, 4.746, p = 0.008), longer interval to treatment with corticosteroids (OR = 1.183, 95% CI 1.035, 1.352, p = 0.014) were independent risk factors of progression to CKD. The cutoff value of cystatin C concentration was 4.34 mg/L, at which the sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 89.3%, respectively; the cutoff value of interval to treatment with corticosteroids was 22.5 days, at which the sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% and 79.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Renal function was reversible in majority of patients with severe DAIN requiring RRT when early identification and treatment. Higher peak cystatin C concentration and longer interval to treatment with corticosteroids associated with worse renal prognosis.

Ibrutinib-induced acute kidney injury via interstitial nephritis.

The introduction of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has made a significant progress in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other B-cell malignancies. Due to the reduction of cytokine release, it is effective in chronic graft-versus-host disease, and its use has also been suggested in autoimmune diseases and in prevention of COVID-19-associated lung damage. Despite this effect on the immune response, we report a severe hypersensitivity reaction in a 76-year-old male patient diagnosed with prolymphocytic leukemia. Four weeks after the ibrutinib start, non-oliguric acute kidney injury with proteinuria and microscopic hematuria developed and that was accompanied by lower limb purpuras and paresthesia. Renal biopsy revealed acute interstitial nephritis. Employing 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone administration, serum creatinine decreased from 365 µmol/L to 125 µmol/L at 11 days and the proteinuria-hematuria as well as the purpura, paresthesia resolved. Three months later at stabile eGFR of 56 ml/min/1.73 m2 methylprednisolone was withdrawn and a rituximab-venetoclax treatment was initiated without side effects. We conclude that despite the beneficial effect on cytokines response in Th1 direction, ibrutinib can cause acute interstitial nephritis. Early detection, discontinuation of ibrutinib, glucocorticoid administration may help to better preserve renal function, thereby lowering the risk of potential subsequent kidney injury.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Kidney: Implications of Current Evidence for Clinical Practice and When and How to Deprescribe.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), long thought to be safe, are associated with a number of nonkidney adverse health outcomes and several untoward kidney outcomes, including hypomagnesemia, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, incident chronic kidney disease, kidney disease progression, kidney failure, and increased risk for all-cause mortality and mortality due to chronic kidney disease. PPIs are abundantly prescribed, rarely deprescribed, and frequently purchased over the counter. They are frequently used without medical indication, and when medically indicated, they are often used for much longer than needed. In this In Practice review, we summarize evidence linking PPI use with adverse events in general and adverse kidney outcomes in particular. We review the literature on the association of PPI use and risk for hypomagnesemia, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, incident chronic kidney disease, kidney disease progression, end-stage kidney disease, and death. We provide an assessment of how this evidence should inform clinical practice. We review the impact of this evidence on patients' perception of risk, synthesize PPI deprescription literature, and provide our recommendations on how to approach PPI use and deprescription.