A randomized double-blinded trial to assess recurrence of systemic allergic reactions following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Systemic allergic reactions (sARs) following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines were initially reported at a higher rate than after traditional vaccines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety of revaccination in these individuals and to interrogate mechanisms underlying these reactions. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, participants aged 16 to 69 years who previously reported a convincing sAR to their first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were randomly assigned to receive a second dose of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) vaccine and placebo on consecutive days in a blinded, 1:1 crossover fashion at the National Institutes of Health. An open-label BNT162b2 booster was offered 5 months later if the second dose did not result in severe sAR. None of the participants received the mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) vaccine during the study. The primary end point was recurrence of sAR following second dose and booster vaccination; exploratory end points included biomarker measurements. RESULTS: Of 111 screened participants, 18 were randomly assigned to receive study interventions. Eight received BNT162b2 second dose followed by placebo; 8 received placebo followed by BNT162b2 second dose; 2 withdrew before receiving any study intervention. All 16 participants received the booster dose. Following second dose and booster vaccination, sARs recurred in 2 participants (12.5%; 95% CI, 1.6 to 38.3). No sAR occurred after placebo. An anaphylaxis mimic, immunization stress-related response (ISRR), occurred more commonly than sARs following both vaccine and placebo and was associated with higher predose anxiety scores, paresthesias, and distinct vital sign and biomarker changes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support revaccination of individuals who report sARs to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Distinct clinical and laboratory features may distinguish sARs from ISRRs.

The Beneficial Role of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 in the Prevention of Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a recurrent allergic disease characterized by symptoms such as itching, redness, swelling, dryness, scaling skin, inflammation, and tissue damage. The underlying pathogenesis of AD remains unclear. Steroid drugs are commonly used in the clinical treatment of AD; however, their long-term use may lead to associated complications. Numerous studies have indicated that probiotics could modulate the immune system, enhance immune function, or suppress excessive immune responses. In this study, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 (NTU 101) was orally administered for a duration of 4 weeks, followed by the induction of AD using ovalbumin (OVA) in a mouse model. The skin condition of the stimulated site was observed during the induction period. Subsequently, the serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) content, splenocyte T cell typing, and skin histological interpretation were examined to evaluate the efficacy of NTU 101 in alleviating AD symptoms in allergen-exposed animals. The findings indicated that administering NTU 101 beforehand effectively alleviated skin symptoms in animals with AD. It reduced the infiltration of inflammatory cells in skin tissue sections, and compared to the OVA group, there was a significant reduction in the thickening of the epidermal cell layer (decreased from 89.0 ± 20.2 µM to 48.6 ± 16.0 µM) and dermis layer (decreased from 310.3 ± 69.0 µM to 209.7 ± 55.5 µM). Moreover, the proportion of regulatory T (Treg) cells and T helper 2 (Th2) cells in splenocytes significantly increased, while the proportions of T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells did not differ. It is speculated that the potential mechanism by which NTU 101 prevents AD involves increasing the expression of Forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3) and promoting Treg cell maturation, thereby alleviating allergic reaction symptoms associated with AD.

Uronium peptide coupling agents: Another case of occupational airborne allergic sensitization induced by HBTU.

Uronium peptide coupling agents (HBTU, HATU, and HCTU) create a special hazard as they are immune sensitizers. Few reported cases are mentioned in the literature; despite that, it is important to raise the awareness on the subject and to highlight the risk and potential symptoms that could occur to those who directly work in contact with uronium peptide coupling agents, as well as to the safety deputies in the universities and industries. Based on a personal experience, the health impact of laboratory exposure to HBTU is described, and the insights gained from the experience are developed. A skin irritation reaction and allergy symptoms induced by HBTU exposure are shown here as well as the rate of worsening of symptoms since the first allergic reaction. Recommendations for handling coupling agents more safely in the research laboratory will also be given, and a casuistry of the matter to help other lab-users to recognize, assess, minimize, prepare for emergencies (RAMP) process.

Crosstalk between Myopia and Inflammation: A Mini Review.

Myopia represents a significant public health concern worldwide, particularly affecting the ocular health of children and adolescents. The escalating prevalence of myopia in recent years underscores its urgency as a health issue among this demographic. Research indicates a profound connection between the onset of myopia, inflammatory processes and fibrosis. Individuals with inflammatory conditions like allergic conjunctivitis, choroiditis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and diabetes exhibit a heightened susceptibility to myopia. Conversely, myopic patients are at an increased risk of developing ocular inflammatory disorders, notably idiopathic multifocal choroiditis. We postulate that the expression of inflammatory markers, including NF-κB, TGF-ß, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, may contribute to the chronic inflammatory state observed in myopia. This paper highlights a substantial correlation between myopia and inflammation, suggesting the potential efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents in managing inflammation and slowing myopia progression.

Successful desensitization to etoposide in a patient after cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Etoposide phosphate is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat various malignant neoplasms. Hypersensitivity reactions may occur with its use, and in rare cases, an anaphylactic reaction can manifest. Available options for patients experiencing hypersensitivity reactions include premedication, changing treatment, or undergoing desensitization. Various pediatric desensitization protocols have been described, ranging from six to fifteen steps, while published adult cases are rare. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 61-year-old woman with small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases. In November 2019, she underwent the second cycle of cisplatin and etoposide phosphate treatment. While receiving etoposide phosphate, she experienced dyspnea and suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest, leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent admission to the Intensive Care Unit. Her acute tryptase levels were notably elevated at 18 µg/L (compared to a baseline tryptase level of 6,6 µg/L) during the reaction. CASE MANAGEMENT: We implemented a 16-step desensitization protocol (without premedication) under close monitoring in an intermediate care unit. The protocol was successfully executed over three cycles until tumor progression mandated a modification in systemic treatment. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of successful desensitization to etoposide phosphate in a patient who experienced cardiac arrest during a hypersensitivity reaction. Although protocols of varying lengths have been published, we emphasize the importance of individualizing each protocol to fit the severity of the reaction and the resources and experience of each unit.

Neutrophil phenotypes in bronchial airways differentiate single from dual responding allergic asthmatics.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic asthmatics with both an early (EAR) and a late allergic reaction (LAR) following allergen exposure are termed 'dual responders' (DR), while 'single responders' (SR) only have an EAR. Mechanisms that differentiate DR from SR are largely unknown, particularly regarding the role and phenotypes of neutrophils. Therefore, we aimed to study neutrophils in DR and SR asthmatics. METHODS: Thirty-four allergic asthmatics underwent an inhaled allergen challenge, samples were collected before and up to 24 h post-challenge. Cell differentials were counted from bronchial lavage, alveolar lavage and blood; and tissue neutrophils were quantified in immune-stained bronchial biopsies. Lavage neutrophil nuclei lobe segmentation was used to classify active (1-4 lobes) from suppressive neutrophils (≥5 lobes). Levels of transmigration markers: soluble (s)CD62L and interleukin-1Ra, and activity markers: neutrophil elastase (NE), DNA-histone complex and dsDNA were measured in lavage fluid and plasma. RESULTS: Compared with SR at baseline, DR had more neutrophils in their bronchial airways at baseline, both in the lavage (p = .0031) and biopsies (p = .026) and elevated bronchial neutrophils correlated with less antitransmigratory IL-1Ra levels (r = -0.64). DR airways had less suppressive neutrophils and more 3-lobed (active) neutrophils (p = .029) that correlated with more bronchial lavage histone (p = .020) and more plasma NE (p = .0016). Post-challenge, DR released neutrophil extracellular trap factors in the blood earlier and had less pro-transmigratory sCD62L during the late phase (p = .0076) than in SR. CONCLUSION: DR have a more active airway neutrophil phenotype at baseline and a distinct neutrophil response to allergen challenge that may contribute to the development of an LAR. Therefore, neutrophil activity should be considered during targeted diagnosis and bio-therapeutic development for DR.

A review on polyphenols and their potential application to reduce food allergenicity.

This review summarized recent studies about the effects of polyphenols on the allergenicity of allergenic proteins, involving epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, proanthocyanidins, quercetin, ferulic acid and rosmarinic acid, etc. Besides, the mechanism of polyphenols for reducing allergenicity was discussed and concluded. It was found that polyphenols could noncovalently (mainly hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding) and covalently (mainly alkaline, free-radical grafting, and enzymatic method) react with allergens to induce the structural changes, resulting in the masking or/and destruction of epitopes and the reduction of allergenicity. Oral administration in murine models showed that the allergic reaction might be suppressed by regulating immune cell function, changing the levels of cytokines, suppressing of MAPK, NF-κb and allergens-presentation pathway and improving intestine function, etc. The outcome of reduced allergenicity and suppressed allergic reaction was affected by many factors such as polyphenol types, polyphenol concentration, allergen types, pH, oral timing and dosage. Moreover, the physicochemical and functional properties of allergenic proteins were improved after treatment with polyphenols. Therefore, polyphenols have the potential to produce hypoallergenic food. Further studies should focus on active concentrations and bioavailability of polyphenols, confirming optimal intake and hypoallergenic of polyphenols based on clinical trials.

Clinical predictors of endotracheal intubation in patients presenting to the emergency department with angioedema.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to identify predictors of airway compromise among patients presenting to the emergency department with angioedema in order to develop and validate a risk score to augment clinician gestalt regarding need for intubation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of emergency department patients with a diagnosis of angioedema. After data extraction they were randomly divided into a training and test set. The training set was used to identify factors associated with intubation and to develop a model and risk score to predict intubation. The model and risk score were then applied to the test set. RESULTS: A total of 594 patients were included. Past medical history of hypertension, presence of shortness of breath, drooling, and anterior tongue or pharyngeal swelling were independent predictors included in our final model and risk score. The Area Under the Curve for the Receiver Operator Characteristic curve was 87.55% (83.42%-91.69%) for the training set and 86.1% (77.62%-94.60%) for the test set. CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring algorithm may aid in predicting angioedema patients at high and low risk for intubation. External validation of this score is necessary before wide-spread adoption of this decision aid.

Screening potential anaphylactoid components in vinpocetine injection using a high expression Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2 cell membrane chromatography.

Vinpocetine injection is often used in clinical treatment of acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, it was reported that vinpocetine injection caused allergic reactions in clinical use; therefore, its safety needs urgent attention. Until now, research on its sensitization is rarely reported. Here, the components contained in three vinpocetine injections were examined. It was found that besides vinpocetine, the synthetic raw material vincamine, the excipients benzyl alcohol and ethyl p-toluenesulfonate, and the impurities A, B, C, and D, which are excipients specified in the European Pharmacopoeia, were also present in them. Then the Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2)-HEK293 cell membrane chromatography was used to investigate the affinity of them with MRGPRX2 and found that vinpocetine, vincamine, and impurities A, B, C, and D bind to MRGPRX2. Afterwards, these compounds were further used to investigate the local sensitization ability in vivo. The results showed that vinpocetine, vincamine, and impurity C could induce swelling of the paw and decrease body temperature in mice, but only impurity C could cause local skin mast cell degranulation and serum histamine release increase. In vitro, the results also indicated that impurity C could increase intracellular [Ca2+ ] in MRGPRX2-HEK293 cells, whereas vinpocetine and vincamine did not. Therefore, the impurity C was the potential anaphylactoid component in vinpocetine injection, which may be one of the reasons for the occurrence of allergic reactions in the clinical use of vinpocetine injection. This work provides evidence on the sensitization of impurity C and also contributes to promoting the clinical safety of vinpocetine injection.

Frequency of allergic reactions in egg allergic patients after receiving the yellow fever vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Immunization with live attenuated viral yellow fever vaccine (YFV) grants effective immunity in most cases, and is recommended and prioritized for residents and travelers of endemic countries. YFV is seldom administered to egg-allergic patients (EAP) since it is cultivated in embryonated chicken eggs and may contain residual egg proteins, being a problem for egg-allergic residents and travelers of endemic countries. OBJECTIVE: Describe the frequency of allergic reactions after YFV administration in confirmed EAP from an allergy outpatient center in Bogotá, Colombia. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2019. EAP whose allergy was confirmed with a positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) and/or egg protein-specific IgE levels who hadn't received the YFV were included. Every patient had an SPT, severe EAP, and an additional Intradermal Test (IDT) done with the vaccine. If the vaccine SPT and IDT were negative, the YFV was administered as a single dose; if either were positive, the YFV was administered in graded doses. Statistical analysis was done in Stata16MP. RESULTS: Seventy one patients were included, 24 (33.8%) of those had a history of egg anaphylaxis. All patients had negative YFV SPTs, and two of the five YVF IDTs were positive. Two patients, with previous egg-anaphylaxis, presented allergic reactions to the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: YFV did not trigger allergic reactions in EAP without history of egg-anaphylaxis. With further research, safe single-dose vaccination to this population could be considered; however, patients with previous egg-anaphylaxis should be evaluated by an allergist before vaccination.

Evolution of laboratory parameters in patients with lipid transfer protein syndrome after 3 years of immunotherapy.

Lipid transfer protein (LTP) syndrome is an increasingly prevailing disease, especially in the young population, with severely affected quality of life. Since 2013, a specific treatment, called sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), with peach extract (SLIT-peach®) has been used, but with no long-term effectiveness studies. The main objective of the present study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of SLIT-peach® and to relate the clinical evolution of patients. This was an ambispective study conducted for 3 years. A total of 25 patients with LTP syndrome were selected and treated with SLIT-peach®. They underwent a provocation test in the first year with reintroduced foods that had produced symptoms in the past. Analytical determination of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) to peach (Pru p 3) was performed at the beginning of treatment, at the first year of initiation, and at the end of treatment. These data were compared with the control group comprising 14 patients with LTP syndrome without treatment. A statistically significant decrease in specific IgE to Pru p 3 at the end of the treatment and an increase in specific IgG4 to Pru p 3 1 year after treatment initiation were observed in the active group in relation to tolerance to foods with LTPs. These results indicate that food tolerance begins after the first year and is maintained after the end of 3 years of treatment. In conclusion, treatment with SLIT-peach® for 3 years is effective for patients with LTP syndrome, preventing the evolution of the disease, allowing patients to restart a diet with plant foods, and improving their quality of life.

Hydroxysafflor yellow A attenuates allergic response of ovalbumin induced allergic rhinitis via Nrf2/HO-1 and inflammatory signaling pathways.

Allergic reaction is the most common nasal conditions worldwide and it will remain throughout life. The symptoms of an allergic reaction include sneezing, itching, hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, and a runny nose. Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYA) is a flavonoid compound which is the active phyto-constituent of flower of Carthamus tinctorius L., and exhibited the various medicinal activities like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular protective effects. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and mode of action of HYA against the allergic rhinitis induced by ovalbumin in mice. HYA was given orally to the Swiss BALB/s mice once daily, 1 h before, they were challenged with ovalbumin (OVA) via intranasal administration, after that the mice were sensitized via intraperitoneal injection of OVA. Allergic nasal symptoms, body weight, spleen weight, OVA-specific immunoglobulins, inflammatory cytokines, Th17 cytokines and Th17 transcription factors also estimated. HYA had a significant (p < .001) effect on body weight and reduced spleen weight. It effectively decreased the nasal symptoms of allergy such as sneezing, rubbing, and redness. HYA significantly reduced the level of malonaldehyde (MDA) and improved levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT) and glutathione (GSH). It also remarkably decreased the levels of Th2 cytokines and Th17 transcription factors like RAR-related orphan receptor gamma (ROR-γ), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and phosphor signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (p-STAT3), while increasing levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). The treatment with HYA improved the lung histology in mice with allergic rhinitis. The results suggest that HYA may have therapeutic potential against ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis in mice, by altering the Th17/Treg balance and improving the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.

Biphasic Allergic Reactions at a Dutch Emergency Department: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: A biphasic allergic reaction develops in 0.4-20% of patients with an allergic reaction, but the incidence of severe biphasic reactions is unknown OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the incidence and time of onset of clinically relevant biphasic reactions in a Dutch emergency department (ED) cohort. Furthermore, the characteristics of patients with a biphasic reaction and the mean observation time after an allergy-related ED visit were assessed. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. We collected data from clinical records of adult patients presenting with an allergic reaction to the ED between January 2015 and December 2019. We defined clinically relevant biphasic reactions as biphasic reactions in which the criteria for anaphylaxis were met. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Eight patients (1.4%) developed a biphasic reaction, of which 1 (0.2% of the total inclusions) was clinically relevant. In the subgroup of patients with an anaphylactic reaction (n = 258), those percentages were 2.3% and 0.4%, respectively. The mean time between the initial allergic reaction and the biphasic allergic reaction was 25.4 h (95% CI 13.2-37.6 h). The single clinically relevant biphasic reaction occurred 30 h after the initial reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of clinically relevant biphasic reactions in our cohort was low, with a mean time between the initial allergic reaction and the biphasic reaction of > 24 h. Based on these single-center retrospective data, routine inpatient monitoring for several hours does not seem warranted for all patients.

Anaphylactic reaction to carboplatin diagnosed by skin testing-a reliable tool in platinum-based immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions.

Immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) to carboplatin (CA) are most commonly reported in ovarian cancer patients. A 54-year-old woman with stage IV melanoma suffering from metastasis in the entire right lower extremity was presented to our allergy outpatient clinic for diagnostic work-up due to an anaphylactic reaction with palmoplantar erythema, conjunctivitis along with facial erythema, and an incipient decrease in blood pressure during a chemotherapy regimen with dacarbazine and carboplatin upon re-administration. A subsequently carried out allergological work-up with skin testing (ST) revealed CA to be the culprit drug, whereas cisplatin (CI) was confirmed to be a safe alternative for the patient for following treatments. Here, we report a case of an IHR to carboplatin in a melanoma patient, with CI serving as a safe alternative diagnosed by skin testing.

CoronaVac/Sinovac COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions and Second-Dose Vaccine Administration: Tertiary Allergy Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global health crisis. To prevent the disease, the Ministry of Health of Turkey gained approval for the CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use as the first-line. This study aimed to evaluate patients who developed hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) due to the CoronoVac vaccine and to share our experience of administering the second dose of vaccine to these patients. METHODS: The study group included the patients who presented to the Ege University Allergy and Immunology Division between January and May 2021. Demographic data, atopic status, allergic reactions to the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and the route of second-dose vaccine administrations were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients (four healthcare professionals), 6 (86%) of whom were women, with an average age of 53.4 years, were included in the study. The rate of allergic reactions among Ege University health workers was 0.036% (2/5,558). Six of our patients had a history of additional allergic diseases and comorbid diseases. None had any allergic reactions to previous vaccinations and latex allergy. Reactions developed commonly on the skin, as generalized urticaria/angioedema and pruritus. The severity of the reactions was evaluated as mild in 2, moderate in 3, and severe in 2 cases. The second-dose CoronaVac was safely administered by using a gradually increase dose in a total of 6 patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with HRs due to Sinovac in the first dose, the second dose can be safely performed using a gradually increased dose.

Long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate induced severe cutaneous allergic reaction in a patient with first episode delusional disorder tolerating oral paliperidone regimen: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Paliperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic agent that is effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder as well as an adjunct to mood stabilizers and antidepressants for bipolar and depressive disorders. Paliperidone is available in both oral and injection forms. Here we report an unexpected case of cutaneous allergic reaction induced by paliperidone long-acting injection (LAI) following oral tolerance. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old man with first episode delusional disorder was treated with paliperidone tablets with tolerance. On day seven he received the paliperidone LAI and developed an allergic reaction in minutes including flushing of the face, widespread urticaria with mild airway constriction. The allergic symptoms were relived following the administration of antihistamine within several minutes. CONCLUSION: The allergic reaction that occurred post administration of the paliperidone LAI but not the oral tablets suggest it is likely due to the excipients in the formulation of the LAI rather than paliperidone itself. This case highlights the necessity of monitoring allergic reactions in psychiatric patients when converting from oral to LAI format of paliperidone.

Auriculotemporal Frey syndrome not associated with surgery or diabetes: systematic review.

Patients who undergo salivary gland, neck, or facelift surgery or suffer from diabetes mellitus often develop Frey syndrome (also known as auriculotemporal syndrome or gustatory sweating). Frey syndrome has been occasionally reported to occur in subjects without history of surgery or diabetes but this variant of Frey syndrome has not been systematically investigated. We searched for original articles of Frey syndrome unrelated to surgery or diabetes without date and language restriction. Article selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Our systematic review included 76 reports describing 121 individual cases (67 males and 54 females) of Frey syndrome not associated with surgery or diabetes. The age at onset of symptoms was ≤ 18 years in 113 (93%) cases. The time to diagnosis was 12 months or more in 55 (45%) cases. On the other hand, an allergy evaluation was performed in half of the cases. A possible cause for Frey syndrome was detected in 85 (70%) cases, most frequently history of forceps birth (N = 63; 52%). The majority of the remaining 22 cases occurred after a blunt face trauma, following an auriculotemporal nerve neuritis or in association with a neurocutaneous syndrome. The cause underlying Frey syndrome was unknown in 36 cases.   Conclusion: Frey syndrome not associated with surgery or diabetes almost exclusively affects subjects in pediatric age and is uncommon and underrecognized. Most cases occur after forceps birth. There is a need to expand awareness of this pseudo-allergic reaction among pediatricians and allergists. What is Known: • Pre-auricular reddening, sweating, and warmth in response to mastication or a salivary stimulus characterize Frey syndrome. • It usually occurs after salivary gland surgery and in diabetes. What is New: • In children, Frey syndrome is rare, and most cases occur after a forceps-assisted birth. • In childhood, this condition is often erroneously attributed to food allergy.

Pfizer/BioNtech BNT162b2: adverse events and insights from an Australian mass vaccination clinic for COVID-19.

The Pfizer/BioNtech BNT162b2 is a major vaccine used in the Australian COVID-19 immunisation programme. We report on BNT162b2 safety in the observation period in a dedicated vaccination clinic linked to a quaternary teaching hospital. We performed a retrospective review of medical records for 57 842 vaccinations, and describe the model of care and adverse event rate at the clinic during its first 2 months of operation. A total of 243 adverse events following immunisation (0.42% of total vaccine doses) were recorded in the immediate observation period post-vaccination, which were predominantly immunisation stress-related responses. Of the 110 patients who experienced an adverse event with their first dose of the vaccine, 90% returned for their second dose of the vaccine, with 87% not reporting any further adverse reaction with the subsequent dose. Nineteen (0.03% of total doses) people were reviewed for an allergic reaction, of which 10 (53%) reported a history of prior allergies. A female predominance was present in both total adverse reactions (70%) and allergic vaccine reactions (79%). Only two patients experienced anaphylaxis (0.003% of total doses), in keeping with low rates of adverse reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine in the current literature. Overall, the present study reinforces the safety of BNT162b2 in the Australian population, describes vaccination completion rates after adverse events and identifies predisposing factors for rare allergic reactions to the vaccine.

Resolution of severe eosinophilic peritonitis in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis by changing from Dianeal peritoneal dialysis solution to Stay-Safe Balance solution: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic peritonitis is a well-known complication at the initiation of peritoneal dialysis. It is often due to an allergic reaction to peritoneal dialysis solution or sometimes to the peritoneal dialysis catheter itself. Most cases are self-limiting with expected spontaneous resolution within a few weeks. Treatment is necessary for severe or persistent cases. However, the optimal treatment has not yet been defined. There have been only a few case reports on the use of anti-histamines and/or steroids for the treatment of eosinophilic peritonitis. We reported a case of severe eosinophilic peritonitis successfully treated by switching the brand of peritoneal dialysis fluid (same glucose concentration). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case employing such a treatment strategy. CASE PRESENTATION: An eighty-two-year-old man with end-stage renal failure was started on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with Dianeal® (Baxter) peritoneal dialysis solution. He developed eosinophilic peritonitis 19 days after initiation of peritoneal dialysis. Infectious causes were ruled out by bacterial, fungal and tuberculosis smears and cultures. In view of the persistent and severe symptoms, we intervened by switching from Dianeal® (Baxter) peritoneal dialysis solution to Stay-Safe Balance® (Fresenius) solution with the same glucose concentration. His eosinophilic peritonitis resolved 5 days after switching the peritoneal dialysis solution. CONCLUSION: In severe or persistent cases of eosinophilic peritonitis requiring treatment, other than the use of steroids and anti-histamines, switching to a different brand of peritoneal dialysis solution can be considered.

Tolerance and complications of therapeutic plasma exchange by centrifugation: A single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) constitutes an important therapy for hematological, neurological, immunological, and nephrological diseases. Most studies have focused on efficacy, whereas tolerance and complications during sessions have been less well studied and not recently. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective study of all patients who underwent TPE between 2011 and 2018. TPE sessions using the centrifugation technique were performed by dedicated trained nurses. Specific side effects were identified through surveillance forms completed contemporaneously. The primary outcome was the rate of all-type adverse effects that occurred during the TPE sessions. RESULTS: In total, 1895 TPE sessions performed on 185 patients were analyzed. At least one adverse effect was reported for 805 sessions (42.5% [29.9%-70.1%]), corresponding to 171 patients (92.4% [87.6%-95.8%]). Hypotension occurred during 288 sessions (15.2%), was asymptomatic in 95.8% of cases, and more frequent with the use of 4% albumin than fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (19.8 vs 8.9%, P <.0001). Hypocalcemia occurred during 370 sessions (19.6%) and was more frequent with the use of FFP than with the use of albumin alone (FFP alone: 28.0%, albumin + FFP: 26%, albumin alone: 11.7%; P <.0001). Allergic reactions occurred during 56 sessions (3%), exclusively with FFP. Severe adverse effects were reported for 0.3% of sessions and 5.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: TPE is a safe therapy when performed by a trained team. Adverse effects were frequent but mostly not serious. The replacement fluid was the main determinant of the occurrence of complications. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03888417).