Pulsed dye laser and adjuvant topical therapies for the treatment of port-wine stains: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The current gold standard treatment for port-wine stains (PWS) is pulsed dye laser (PDL). However, multiple treatment sessions may be necessary and complete resolution is often not achieved. Neoangiogenesis can occur soon after treatment and is thought to be a major factor contributing to treatment failure. Adjuvant antiangiogenic topical therapies may therefore improve the efficacy of pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov using "port-wine stain," "nevus flammeus," "capillary malformation," "sturge weber," and "pulsed dye laser" as keywords and medical subject heading (MeSH) terms. Articles were included if they (1) were a randomized controlled trial (RCT); (2) studied patients with PWS; and (3) investigated topical adjuvant therapies with PDL. Bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomized Controlled Trial Standard Checklist. RESULTS: 1835 studies were identified, with six studies meeting inclusion criteria. The total number of patients studied was 103 (range: 9-23), with 8-36 week follow-up. The average age ranged from 11 to 33.5 years old. Three studies examined adjuvant topical sirolimus (n = 52), two examined timolol (n = 29), and one studied imiquimod (n = 22). Two of three RCTs reported no improvement through colorimetric analysis with topical sirolimus; however, one of these studies did show a significant improvement through Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score. The last sirolimus study showed significant improvement through digital photographic image scoring (DPIA). Studies examining topical timolol reported no change in PWS appearance compared to placebo. The addition of 5% adjuvant imiquimod cream did lead to significant improvement. A variety of outcome measures were used. Imiquimod and sirolimus led to mild cutaneous adverse events, while timolol caused no side effects. None of the adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. Study quality was moderate in three, high in two, and low in one. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of adjuvant topical therapy was unclear. Limitations included variation in concentration and duration of adjuvant therapies, differences in follow-up time, and inconsistent outcome measure reporting. Given their potential clinical promise, larger prospective studies examining topical adjuvant therapies should be considered.

Overall survival and updated progression-free survival outcomes in a randomized phase II study of combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an oral anti-angiogenic. In the primary analysis of this phase II study, combination cediranib/olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This updated analysis was conducted to characterize overall survival (OS) and update PFS outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety patients were enrolled to this randomized, open-label, phase II study between October 2011 and June 2013 across nine United States-based academic centers. Data cut-off was 21 December 2016, with a median follow-up of 46 months. Participants had relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer of high-grade serous or endometrioid histology or had a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Participants were randomized to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily until disease progression. RESULTS: In this updated analysis, median PFS remained significantly longer with cediranib/olaparib compared with olaparib alone (16.5 versus 8.2 months, hazard ratio 0.50; P = 0.007). Subset analyses within stratum defined by BRCA status demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (23.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.002) and OS (37.8 versus 23.0 months, P = 0.047) in gBRCA wild-type/unknown patients, although OS was not statistically different in the overall study population (44.2 versus 33.3 months, hazard ratio 0.64; P = 0.11). PFS and OS appeared similar between the two arms in gBRCAm patients. The most common CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events with cediranib/olaparib remained fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Combination cediranib/olaparib significantly extends PFS compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Subset analyses suggest this margin of benefit is driven by PFS prolongation in patients without gBRCAm. OS was also significantly increased by the cediranib/olaparib combination in this subset of patients. Additional studies of this combination are ongoing and should incorporate analyses based upon BRCA status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT0111648.

Combined Ang-2 and VEGF serum levels: holding hands as a new integral biomarker in non-small-cell lung cancers.

AIM: Evaluate if serum levels of VEGF and Ang-2 are correlated in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and its implications in the diagnostic and prognostic of the disease. PATIENTS & METHODS: Unselected cohort of 145 NSCLC patients and 30 control individuals. The serum levels of Ang-2 and VEGF of each patient were measured by ELISA prior to treatment. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of Ang-2 and VEGF are correlated (p < 0.0001). High serum levels of Ang-2 and VEGF isolated and both combined (high(Ang-2/VEGF)) correlate with likelihood of presenting NSCLC (p = 0.016; p = 0.003; p < 0.0001, respectively). Serum levels of Ang-2 and high(Ang-2/VEGF) but not VEGF alone are independent prognostic factors (p = 0.001; p = 0.619; p = 0.005). High(Ang-2/VEGF) serum levels could be exploited as a new valuable integral biomarker in NSCLC.

Recovery of Therapeutically Ablated Engineered Blood-Vessel Networks on a Plug-and-Play Platform.

Limiting the availability of key angiogenesis-promoting factors is a successful strategy to ablate tumor-supplying blood vessels or to reduce excessive vasculature in diabetic retinopathy. However, the efficacy of such anti-angiogenic therapies (AATs) varies with tumor type, and regrowth of vessels is observed upon termination of treatment. The ability to understand and develop AATs remains limited by a lack of robust in vitro systems for modeling the recovery of vascular networks. Here, complex 3D micro-capillary networks are engineered by sequentially seeding human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (ECs) on a previously established, synthetic plug-and-play hydrogel platform. In the tightly interconnected vascular networks that form this way, the two cell types share a basement membrane-like layer and can be maintained for several days of co-culture. Pre-formed networks degrade in the presence of bevacizumab. Upon treatment termination, vessel structures grow back to their original positions after replenishment with new ECs, which also integrate into unperturbed established networks. The data suggest that this plug-and-play platform enables the screening of drugs with blood-vessel inhibiting functions. It is believed that this platform could be of particular interest in studying resistance or recovery mechanisms to AAT treatment.

Single-cell transcriptomics reveals antigen-presenting capacity and therapeutic resistance potential of immunomodulatory endothelial cells in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of tumor endothelial cells (TECs) hinders the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies (AATs). Only a small percentage of angiogenic TECs are considered effective targets for AATs. Immunomodulatory ECs (IMECs), as a newly focused functional subgroup of endothelial cells (ECs), are being evaluated for their ability to regulate tumor immune balance and influence existing AATs. METHODS: Based on single-cell transcriptome data from colorectal cancer in a publicly available database, we conducted a wide array of bioinformatic approaches to study EC subsets that meet the IMECs definition. Our investigation encompassed the gene expression signatures of these subsets, cellular composition differences, cell-cell interactions. RESULTS: Two subsets that meet the IMECs definition were found in tumors and para-cancerous tissues. Combined with the results of gene ontological analysis and interaction with CD4+ T cells, we found that IMECs can present MHC-II antigens to mature CD4+ T cells. There were differences in the level of interaction between IMECs and different types of mature CD4+ T cell subsets. In addition, IMEC subsets had different expression levels of angiogenesis related genes. The angiogenesis score of IMECs decreased after patients received immunotherapy. IMEC subsets do not depend on a single proangiogenic receptor and are involved in regulating angiogenesis, which may reduce the efficacy of AATs. The adverse effects of specific IMEC subsets on AATs were validated in the RNA-seq dataset of the bevacizumab treatment group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests the potential MHC-II antigen presentation capacity of IMECs and the enhanced angiogenesis characteristics within tumors. The function of IMECs in the vascular network may have a potentially adverse effect on AATs. Controlling the functional properties of IMECs may be a new angle for tumor therapy.

PDGFRα expression as a novel therapeutic marker in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

AIMS: To evaluate the biological significance of dense vascular networks associated with low-grade NENs, we assessed the impact of PDGFRα tissue expression in 77 GEP/NEN patients, associating PDGFRα expression with the morphological characterization in low-grade tumors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Paraffin-embedded specimens of 77 GEP- NEN tissues, collected from January 2006 to March 2018, were evaluated for PDGFRα tissue expression and correlations with clinicopathological characteristics. PDGFRα tissue expression was significantly correlated with grade and the NEN growth pattern (p < 0.001) but not with gender, primary site or lymph nodes metastatic status. PDGFRα staining was mainly localized in the vascular pole of the neuroendocrine cells and in Enterochromaffin (EC) cells. In particular PDGFRα tissue expression was significantly more expressed in G2 (p < 0.001) than G1 and G3 cases (p 0.004; p < 0.0002;) and correlated with an insular growth pattern. PDGFRα tissue expression was associated with the Ki67 index and we found a significant negative trend of association with the Ki67 proliferation index (P < 0.001): thus PDGFRα expression is referred to morphological and not to proliferative data. CONCLUSIONS: PDGFRα represents an effective target for new anti-angiogenic treatment in WD- GEP-NENs, in particular in G2 cases, and in G3 cases only when there is a mixed insular-acinar pattern. In this context, it is important to carefully delineate those tumors that might better respond to this type of treatment alone or in combination. Further investigation of the relationship between PD-L1 and PDGFRa is warranted, and may contribute to optimize the therapeutic approach in patients with GEP-NENs.

miRNA Targeting Angiogenesis as a Potential Therapeutic Approach in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancers.

Angiogenesis refers to the formation of recent blood vessels, which is one of the characteristics of cancer progression and it has been deliberated as a putative target to the treatment of many kinds of cancers. The VEGF signaling substrate is very important for angiogenesis and is commonly high-regulated in tumors. As a result, this molecule has attracted the attention of most of the researchers to develop antiangiogenic therapies. We have presented that VEGF blockage in neoadjuvant setting via bevacizumab, aflibercept and sunitinib not only has revealed some promising benefits but also has shown a large negative outcome in the adjuvant trials. However, at an advanced stage of tumors, suppression of VEGF alone is inadequate to stop advancement, encouraging drug resistance, and probably enhancing metastasis and invasion in the tumor microenvironment, thereby suggesting the therapeutic potential of targeting angiogenic pathways in gastrointestinal cancers.

Antiangiogenics and immunotherapies in cervical cancer: an update and future's view.

Despite availability of primary and secondary prevention measures, cervical cancer (CC) persists as one of the most common cancers among women around the world, and more than 70% of cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of CC, around 15-61% of patients develop a recurrence in lymph nodes or distant sites within the first 2 years of completing treatment and the prognosis for these patients remains poor. During the last decades, in an attempt to improve the outcome in these patients, novel agents as combination therapy that target known dysfunctional molecular pathways have been developed with the most attention to the inhibitors of the angiogenesis process. One therapeutic target is the vascular endothelial growth factor, which has been shown to play a key role in tumor angiogenesis, not only for growth of new tissue but also in tumor proliferation. Bevacizumab is recognized as a potent antiangiogenic agent in ovarian cancer but has also demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in recurrent CC. Moreover, other antiangiogenic agents were recently under study including: sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, cediranib and nintedanib with interesting preliminary results. Moreover, over the last few years there has been increasing interest in cellular immunotherapy as a strategy to harness the immune system to fight tumors. This article focuses on recent discoveries about antiangiogenic agents and immunotherapies in the treatment of CC highlighting on future's view.

Antiangiogenic therapies in ovarian cancer.

Angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in normal ovarian physiology as well as in the formation and progression of ovarian cancer. Several well-designed phase II and III trials studied the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents in advanced ovarian cancer. The results of these trials demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival when antiangiogenic agents were used as a maintenance therapy. To date, no effect on overall survival could be ascertained. The most widely studied antiangiogenic agent, bevacizumab - a monoclonal humanized antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor - was effective in all phases of the disease (first-line therapy, platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence). These results led to regulatory approval in many countries including the European Union. Other anti-VEGF agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors have not shown increased activity but increased toxicity relative to bevacizumab. Agents targeting angiopoietin-1 and -2 are in development and new combinations with PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are studied. This review summarizes the current data and knowledge on the clinical use of antiangiogenic agents in advanced ovarian cancer.

Classical and non-classical proangiogenic factors as a target of antiangiogenic therapy in tumor microenvironment.

Angiogenesis is sustained by classical and non-classical proangiogenic factors (PFs) acting in tumor microenvironment and these factors are also potential targets of antiangiogenic therapies. All PFs induce the overexpression of several signaling pathways that lead to migration and proliferation of endothelial cells contributing to tumor angiogenesis and survival of cancer cells. In this review, we have analyzed each PF with its specific receptor/s and we have summarized the available antiangiogenic drugs (e.g. monoclonal antibodies) targeting these PFs, some of these agents have already been approved, others are currently in development for the treatment of several human malignancies.

Biomarkers of evasive resistance predict disease progression in cancer patients treated with antiangiogenic therapies.

Numerous antiangiogenic agents are approved for the treatment of oncological diseases. However, almost all patients develop evasive resistance mechanisms against antiangiogenic therapies. Currently no predictive biomarker for therapy resistance or response has been established. Therefore, the aim of our study was to identify biomarkers predicting the development of therapy resistance in patients with hepatocellular cancer (n = 11), renal cell cancer (n = 7) and non-small cell lung cancer (n = 2). Thereby we measured levels of angiogenic growth factors, tumor perfusion, circulating endothelial cells (CEC), circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEP) and tumor endothelial markers (TEM) in patients during the course of therapy with antiangiogenic agents, and correlated them with the time to antiangiogenic progression (aTTP). Importantly, at disease progression, we observed an increase of proangiogenic factors, upregulation of CEC/CEP levels and downregulation of TEMs, such as Robo4 and endothelial cell-specific chemotaxis regulator (ECSCR), reflecting the formation of torturous tumor vessels. Increased TEM expression levels tended to correlate with prolonged aTTP (ECSCR high = 275 days vs. ECSCR low = 92.5 days; p = 0.07 and for Robo4 high = 387 days vs. Robo4 low = 90.0 days; p = 0.08). This indicates that loss of vascular stabilization factors aggravates the development of antiangiogenic resistance. Thus, our observations confirm that CEP/CEC populations, proangiogenic cytokines and TEMs contribute to evasive resistance in antiangiogenic treated patients. Higher TEM expression during disease progression may have clinical and pathophysiological implications, however, validation of our results is warranted for further biomarker development.

State of the art biological therapies in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies with a five-year survival rate of approximately 5%. Several target agents have been tested in PDAC, but almost all have failed to demonstrate efficacy in late phase clinical trials, despite the better understanding of PDAC molecular biology generated by large cancer sequencing initiatives in the past decade. Eroltinib (a small-molecule tyrosine-kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor) plus gemcitabine is the only schedule with a biological agent approved for advanced pancreatic cancer, but it has resulted in a very modest survival benefit in unselected patients. In our work, we report a summary of the main clinical trials (closed and ongoing) that refer to biological therapy evaluation in pancreatic cancer treatment.

Evaluation of antiangiogenic efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Biomarkers and functional imaging.

Many years after therapeutic wilderness, sorafenib finally showed a clinical benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. After the primary general enthusiasm worldwide, some disappointments emerged particularly since no new treatment could exceed or at least match sorafenib in this setting. Without these new drugs, research focused on optimizing care of patients treated with sorafenib. One challenging research approach deals with identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers of sorafenib in this population. The task still seems difficult; however appropriate investigations could resolve this dilemma, as observed for some malignancies where other drugs were used.

Progress of clinical research on targeted therapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

The combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy is an important approach in the application of targeted therapy in clinical practice, and represents an important opportunity for the development of radiotherapy itself. Numerous agents, including epidermal growth factor receptor, monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antiangiogenic therapies, have been used for targeted therapy. A number of studies of radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung carcinoma have been completed or are ongoing. This paper briefly summarizes the drugs involved and the important related clinical research, and indicates that considerable progress has been made with the joint efforts of the two disciplines. Many issues, including drug selection, identification of populations most likely to benefit, timing of administration of medication, and side effects of treatment require further investigation. However, further fundamental research and accumulation of clinical data will provide a more comprehensive understanding of these therapies. Targeted therapy in combination with radiotherapy has a bright future.