Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) and arterial reconstruction: Techniques and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic complications are still prevalent after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) despite the use of preoperative arterial embolization. We described our institutional experience with arterial reconstruction during DP-CAR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed short- and long-term outcomes of all DP-CAR performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1, 1995 and March 30, 2020. Outcomes were compared according to the presence of arterial reconstruction. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive DP-CARs were reviewed. Most patients underwent induction chemotherapy (85%) based on FOLFIRINOX protocol (80.3%). The hepatic artery was reconstructed in 50 patients (83.3%). The left gastric artery was reconstructed in 4 and preserved in 14 patients. A venous resection was associated during 44 DP-CARs (36 segmental venous resections/8 lateral venous resections). Ninety days mortality was 5.0% with 48.3% (n = 29) overall rate of morbidity. Postoperative outcomes in term of mortality, morbidity, and ischemic events between patients with and without arterial reconstruction were similar despite a higher rate of venous resection (81% vs. 40%; p = 0.005) and more complex cases (Mayo clinic DP-CARs class 1B, 2A, and 3A) in the reconstructed group. CONCLUSION: Arterial reconstruction represents a safe surgical option during DP-CAR to lessen postoperative ischemic events. This technique, reserved to high volume centers expert in vascular resection during pancreatectomy, deserves further comparison with standard technique in a larger setting.

[Distal pancreatectomy with resection of the celiac trunk, right or left hepatic artery without arterial reconstruction (extended DP-CAR)]. / Distal'naya rezektsiya podzheludochnoi zhelezy s rezektsiei chrevnogo stvola vmeste s pravoi ili levoi pechenochnoi arteriei bez arterial'noi rekonstruktsii (rasshirennaya DP-CAR).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and postoperative outcomes of DP-CAR with resection of one of the lobar hepatic arteries without arterial reconstruction (extended DP-CAR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Perioperative data and survival after 7 extended DP-CARs R0 were retrospectively analyzed. Arterial blood flow in the liver was assessed using intraoperative ultrasound and postoperative CT angiography. RESULTS: Among 40 DP-CARs, resection of left or right hepatic artery was performed in 7 cases of aberrant anatomy including 1 case of portal vein resection. Mortality and ischemic complications were not observed. The main source of blood supply to the «devascularized¼ liver lobe was interlobar communicating artery or the arcade of the lesser curvature of the stomach. Incidence of pancreatic fistula was 44%, mean blood loss - 230 (100-650) ml, surgery time - 259 (195-310) min, mean hospital-stay - 14 (9-26) days. Median survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was 25 months after combined treatment. Three patients died after 26, 28 and 77 months. Other patients are alive without progression for 109, 24, 23 and 12 months after therapy onset. CONCLUSION: Extended DP-CAR is advisable and safe procedure if reliable intraoperative control of liver and stomach blood supply is ensured.

[Pure laparoscopic DP-CAR procedure with portal vein resection]. / Polnost'yu laparoskopicheskaya dp-car s rezektsiei vorotnoi veny (klinicheskoe nablyudenie).

OBJECTIVE: To improve short- and long-term outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic body-tail cancer followed by major vessels invasion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A case report of pure laparoscopic DP-CAR procedure with portal vein resection for locally advanced pancreatic body-tail cancer followed by severe abdominal pain in a 49-year-old patient is presented. RESULTS: Liver or stomach ischemia was not observed. Portal wall resection wasn't associated with any complication and resulted R0-resection. Postoperative period was complicated by Grade B pancreatic fistula. Preoperative abdominal pain completely disappeared after surgery. Surgery time was 330 min, intraoperative blood loss - 300 ml. The patient is currently undergoing FOLFIRINOX adjuvant chemotherapy. CT in 90 days after surgery confirmed no progression of disease or liver/stomach blood supply congestion. CONCLUSION: Modern technologies provide the opportunity to perform pure laparoscopic advanced surgical procedures with major vessels resection. Pure laparoscopic DP-CAR procedure with portal vein resection is effective and safe procedure that can be performed with all principles of open surgery and is associated with acceptable short- and long-term results.

Distal Pancreatectomy with and without Celiac Axis Resection for Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) has been used for selected patients with pancreatic cancer infiltrating the celiac axis. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between DP-CAR and distal pancreatectomy alone (DP) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Patients undergoing DP-CAR from 2013 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic features, post-operative morbidity, and survival outcomes were compared with patients undergoing DP after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-two DP-CAR and thirty-four DP patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified. There were no differences in comorbidities or CA19-9 levels. OR time was longer for DP-CAR (304 vs. 240 min, p = 0.007), but there was no difference in the transfusion rate (22.7% vs. 14.7%). Vascular reconstruction was more common in DP-CAR (18.2% vs. 0% arterial, p = 0.05; 40.9% vs. 12.5% venous, p = 0.04). There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between the two groups. Although there was a trend towards larger tumors in DP-CAR (5.1 cm vs. 3.8 cm, p = 0.057), the overall survival from the initiation of treatment (32 vs. 28 months, p = 0.43) and surgery (30 vs. 24 months, p = 0.43) were similar. DISCUSSION: DP-CAR is associated with similar survival and morbidity compared to DP patients requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy and should be pursued in appropriately selected patients.

Modified Appleby procedure for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A primer for the radiologist.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most prevalent pancreatic neoplasm accounting for more than 90% of pancreatic malignancies. Surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy remains the only available curative strategy for patients with PDAC. Despite improvements in both chemotherapy regimen and surgical care, body/neck PDAC still conveys a poor prognosis because of the vicinity of major vascular structures, including celiac trunk, which favors insidious disease spread at the time of diagnosis. Body/neck PDAC involving the celiac trunk is considered locally advanced PDAC in most guidelines and therefore not eligible for upfront resection. However, a more aggressive surgical approach (i.e., distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and en-bloc celiac trunk resection [DP-CAR]) was recently proposed to offer hope for cure in selected patients with locally advanced body/neck PDAC responsive to induction therapy at the cost of higher morbidity. The so-called "modified Appleby procedure" is highly demanding and requires optimal preoperative staging as well as appropriate patient preparation for surgery (i.e., preoperative arterial embolization). Herein, we review current evidence regarding DP-CAR indications and outcomes as well as the critical role of diagnostic and interventional radiology in patient preparation before DP-CAR, and early identification and management of DP-CAR complications.

Hemodynamic, Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of 40 Distal Pancreatectomies with Celiac and Left Gastric Arteries Resection (DP CAR) without Arterial Reconstructions and Preoperative Embolization.

DPCAR's short- and long-term outcomes are highly diverse, while the causes and prevention of ischemic complications are unclear. To assess oncological, surgical, and hemodynamic outcomes of 40 consecutive DPCARs for pancreatic (n37) and gastric tumors (n3) (2009−2021), retrospective analyses of mortality, morbidity, survival, and hemodynamic consequences after DPCAR were undertaken using case history data, IOUS, and pre- and postoperative CT measurements. In postoperative complications (42.5%), the pancreatic fistula was the most frequent event (27%), 90-day mortality was 7.5. With 27 months median follow-up, median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for PDAC were 29 and 18 months, respectively; with 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the OS were 90, 60, and 28%, with an R0-resection rate of 92.5%. Liver and gastric ischemia developed in 0 and 5 (12.5%) cases. Comparison of clinical and vascular geometry data revealed fast adaptation of collateral circulation, insignificant changes in proper hepatic artery diameter, and high risk of ischemic gastropathy if the preoperative diameter of pancreaticoduodenal artery was <2 mm. DP CAR can be performed with acceptable morbidity and survival. OS and RFS in this super-selective cohort were compared to those for resectable cancer. The changes in the postoperative arterial geometry could explain the causes of ischemic complications and determine directions for their prevention.

Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection-with Posterior Ramps Approach-for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Celiac Trunk Infiltration (Modified Appleby Procedure) (with Video).

With the advent of FOLFIRINOX and neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the surgical indications for adenocarcinoma have expanded. Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas of the body/tail with infiltration of the celiac trunk which have a good clinical, biological, and radiological response to neoadjuvant treatment may therefore be eligible for caudal pancreatectomy with resection of the celiac trunk (modified Appleby procedure). In addition to rigorous patient selection and surgical expertise, this procedure also requires experience in interventional radiology.

Is there a Role for the Appleby Procedure in 2020? Results from a Matched-Pair-Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) of the pancreatic body involving the celiac axis requires specialized treatment, including a subtotal distal pancreatectomy (SDP) with resection of the celiac axis (Appleby procedure). This study aimed to examine the value of the Appleby procedure, in current individualized treatment approaches, and to define its possible therapeutic impact for patients with LAPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 consecutive patients who underwent SDP with resection of the celiac axis between January 2005 and December 2018 were identified from a prospectively collected database and were matched with 20 patients experiencing SDP without resection of the celiac axis. Both perioperative parameters, as well as the overall postoperative course, were evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of perioperative complications in both groups was comparable (p=0.744). The rate of severe type C postoperative pancreatic haemorrhages (PPH) was significantly lower in patients with resection of the celiac axis compared to those without (p=0.035). CONCLUSION: The Appleby procedure may be considered as a safe and feasible treatment option with favorably fewer postoperative severe bleeding complications. Besides surgical expertise, such procedures, however, require an experienced interventional radiologist and should thus only be performed in high-volume centers.

Combining Appleby with RAMPS - Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Celiac Trunk Resection.

BACKGROUND: Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) minimizes the risk of a positive retroperitoneal margin and maximizes lymph node harvest in distal pancreatic cancers.1-7 In those with celiac trunk involvement, resection of the celiac trunk (modified Appleby procedure) is a surgical option in which postoperative liver perfusion relies on blood flow via superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA).8, 9 PATIENT: A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with a 3.8 × 2.5 cm pancreatic body adenocarcinoma abutting the celiac trunk. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was initiated with a uniquely good response. TECHNIQUE: Prior to surgery, a novel preoperative 3D simulation technique accounting for organ displacement during pneumoperitoneum with the goal of optimizing port placement and surgical decision making was employed. At surgery, a RAMPS procedure was performed with the renal vessels and adrenal gland being dissected first (reversed from typical open approach). Following dissection along the SMA towards the celiac axis, desmoplastic reaction enveloping the celiac trunk necessitated its resection. Arterial liver perfusion was confirmed with intraoperative ultrasound. CONCLUSION: L-RAMPS and modified Appleby procedure is a curative option for patients with distal pancreatic cancers that invade the celiac trunk and in whom the tumor biology is well controlled. A preplanned approach with 3D reconstruction accounting for organ displacement due to pneumoperitoneum optimizes surgical decision making and port placement for visual alignment caudally along the SMA.

Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection does not improve the R0 rate or median survival time of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer frequently results in celiac artery invasion, resulting in an unresectable disease that generally has a median survival period of 6-11 months. Efforts to achieve curative resection of such tumors have been made by conducting distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) in some patients, but the long-term outcome data associated with this approach or its overall value remain to be clarified. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the clinical efficacy of the DP-CAR treatment of unresectable tumors of the pancreatic body or tail (registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019129612). The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant retrospective studies pertaining to such treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 12 retrospective cohort analyses incorporating 213 total DP-CAR cases and 911 DP cases were incorporated into the present meta-analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that relative to DP, DP-CAR was related to a longer operative duration [mean difference (MD) -73.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): -112.99 to -34.38, P=0.0002] and higher blood transfusion rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.87; P=0.03]. DP-CAR was also linked to increased rates of PV resection (OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.39; P<0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.93, P=0.03). In contrast, R0 resection rates were higher in the DP group (OR 2.79, 95% CI: 1.90 to 4.09, P<0.001), and these patients also had a significantly improved prognosis (median survival time, 27.0 vs. 17.7 months; P<0.01) relative to the DP-CAR group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that DP-CAR is not an effective means of improving R0 rates. However, available studies suggest that it is nonetheless a potentially valuable treatment option for pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis involvement, and it is associated with a reasonable median survival duration of 17.7 months.

Perioperative CT angiography assessment of locally advanced distal pancreatic carcinoma to evaluate feasibility of the modified Appleby procedure.

PURPOSE: To study the perioperative CT angiography (CTA) findings of modified Appleby procedure candidates for the surgical feasibility in patients with locally advanced distal pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and to assess CTA performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated CTA of patients with distal LAPC who underwent modified Appleby procedure between March 2004 and October 2017. Preoperative CT scans performed within up to three months prior to the surgery and postoperative scans, at least one of which was within one month of surgery, were reviewed. Data was collected reporting tumor size, relation to vessels, changes from neoadjuvant chemoradiation, modifications to the surgery and complications. The CTA findings were correlated with operative notes and surgical pathology. Statistical analysis was performed using binary classification method to evaluate CTA performance. RESULTS: Consecutive 20 patients underwent modified Appleby procedure in the study period. In 18/20 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, mean pancreatic mass size significantly reduced from 4.58 + 1.17 cm to 3.55 + 0.84 cm (p = 0.002). The celiac axis (CA) was encased in all, whereas none of the patients had encasement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or involvement of gastroduodenal artery (GDA). The CTA had 88.89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy for evaluating the arterial involvement. CONCLUSION: Distal LAPC patients, in particular those who have significant size reduction after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, with encasement of CA and without encasement of SMA and GDA can undergo a technically successful modified Appleby procedure. CTA offers accurate and valuable perioperative assessment of the surgical candidates.

Radiologic evaluation of patients undergoing the modified Appleby procedure for locally advanced pancreatic neoplasms: a case series.

PURPOSE: Despite advances in medical and surgical care, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most locally aggressive neoplastic processes in the abdomen. Unfortunately, most pancreatic adenocarcinomas present late and are unresectable at time of diagnosis. The modified Appleby procedure is a surgical option in patients with locally advanced pancreatic neoplasms of the body and tail with vascular invasion of the celiac trunk. To our knowledge, no radiologic journal has previously reported on the pre-operative evaluation or postoperative imaging findings of such patients. METHODS: We report herein three patients who underwent the modified Appleby procedure, each with a unique complication, in an attempt to illustrate common pitfalls of interpretation in these advanced cases. RESULTS: Our case series emphasizes the importance of pre-operative radiologic assessment of variant arterial anatomy, knowledge of pre- and intraoperative procedures and appearances, and familiarity with potential postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough understanding of the important aspects of the pre-surgical anatomy, as well as possible post-surgical complications, is the key to the radiologist being a useful participant in the clinical care of these patients.

Enhanced Vascular Collateralization Through the Pancreaticoduodenal Arcade Secondary to Median Arcuate Ligament Compression of the Celiac Axis in the Setting of Pancreatic Body Adenocarcinoma: The Ideal Scenario for the Modified Appleby Procedure.

Background: A modified Appleby procedure for pancreatic body tumors relies upon collateral vessels maintaining blood flow to the proper hepatic artery (PHA) through the pancreaticoduodenal arcade (PDA) off of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Compression of the celiac axis by the median arcuate ligament (MAL) promotes the expansion of collateral vessels without preoperative intervention. Case Presentation: A 51-year-old male with asymptomatic compression of the celiac artery presented with new onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. He underwent imaging that demonstrated a locally advanced pancreatic body tumor that encased the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein confluence and involved the common hepatic artery. He had an adequate response to neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and underwent an uncomplicated modified Appleby procedure with a margin negative resection. Hepatic blood flow was adequate through the PHA as a result of collateralization of blood flow through the PDA off the SMA. The enhanced collateralization appeared to have occurred secondary to compression of the celiac axis by the MAL. Conclusions: Herein we present a unique case in which improved collateral blood flow through the PDA and the gastroduodenal artery to the PHA occurred due to celiac artery compression by the MAL. This vascular anomaly fortuitously improved the ability to achieve an R0 resection of a locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body of the pancreas by a modified Appleby procedure.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Appleby Procedure for Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Background: Acinar cell carcinoma is a rare form of pancreatic cancer, accounting for 1-2% of all cases of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms in adults. Due to its rarity, no randomized controlled trials have been performed to determine the optimal treatment options. As such, high-quality case reports and case series are needed to help guide clinicians in the management of this deadly disease. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old Caucasian male presenting with abdominal pain and weight loss was diagnosed with stage III acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreatic body with celiac axis involvement. Although initially deemed unresectable, the patient responded favorably to nine cycles of 5-fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The tumor was successfully resected through distal pancreatectomy with en bloc splenectomy and en bloc celiac artery resection (Appleby procedure). Final pathology analysis showed negative resection margins and complete chemotherapeutic response within the pancreas, with residual tumor cells detected in only a single peripancreatic lymph node. Conclusion: 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy may be a promising option for the neoadjuvant treatment of locally unresectable acinar cell carcinoma. With sufficient expertise, negative surgical resection margins are possible even with vascular involvement. Due to the generally poor prognosis associated with acinar cell carcinoma, such aggressive treatment measures are warranted.

Modified Appleby Procedure with Arterial Reconstruction for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Literature Review and Report of Three Unusual Cases.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic body and tail ductal adenocarcinomas are often diagnosed with local vascular invasion of the celiac axis (CA) and its various branches. With such involvement, these tumors have traditionally been considered unresectable. The modified Appleby procedure allows for margin negative resection of some such locally advanced tumors. This procedure involves distal pancreatectomy with en bloc splenectomy and CA resection and relies on the presence of collateral arterial circulation via an intact pancreaticoduodenal arcade and the gastroduodenal artery to maintain prograde hepatic arterial perfusion. When the resultant collateral circulation is inadequate to provide sufficient hepatic and gastric arterial inflow, arterial reconstruction (AR) is necessary to "supercharge" the inflow. Herein, we review all reported cases of AR with modified Appleby procedures that we have identified in the literature, and we report our experience of three recent cases with arterial reconstruction including two cases with arterial bypasses not requiring interposition grafting. METHODS: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes from our Institutional Review Board-approved database of pancreatic resections at the Thomas Jefferson University were reviewed. Additionally, PubMed search for cases of distal or total pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and concurrent AR was performed. RESULTS: From the literature, 12 reports involving 28 patients were identified of distal and total pancreatectomy with AR after CA resection. The most common AR in the literature, performed in 12 patients, was a bypass from the aorta to the common hepatic artery (CHA) using a variety of interposition conduits. In our institutional experience, patient #1 had a primary side-to-end aorto-CHA bypass, patient #2 had a primary end-to-end bypass of the transected distal CHA to the left gastric artery in the setting a replaced left hepatic artery, and patient #3 required an aortic to proper hepatic artery bypass with saphenous vein graft and portal venous reconstruction. All patients recovered from their operations without ischemic complications, and they are currently 16, 15, and 13 months post-op, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for resectability in patients with locally advanced pancreatic body and tail neoplasms are expanding due to increasing experience with AR in the setting of the modified Appleby procedure. When performing AR, primary arterial re-anastomosis may be considered preferable to interposition grafting as it decreases the potential for the infectious and thrombotic complications associated with conduits and it reduces the number of vascular anastomoses from two to one. Consideration must also be given to normal variant anatomy of the hepatic circulation during operative planning as the origin of the left gastric artery is resected with the CA. The modified Appleby procedure with AR, when used in appropriately selected patients, offers the potential for safe, margin negative resection of locally advanced pancreatic body and tail tumors.

Tumor Biology: Is It Time to Redefine Unresectability? An Extraordinary Case of Gastroesophageal Junctional Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Disease assessment based on measurements of size and anatomic involvement have historically been central to surgical strategy. We propose this to be an outdated concept, which should be replaced by a deeper understanding of tumor biology and careful treatment planning. Report of case: A 34-year-old male was diagnosed with a Siewert Type 3 locally advanced cancer of the gastroesophageal junction, involving the coeliac axis and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). He was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation, and then proceeded to surgery, at which time the tumor was judged unresectable. After extensive planning, a further surgery was attempted - an extended gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy, left hepatectomy, and splenectomy were performed. Additionally, the coeliac axis and the SMA were excised, followed by reconstruction of the hepatic artery and the SMA with grafts. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered, and the patient is recurrence-free after five years follow-up. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of the distinction between resectability and operability, and that patient treatment should be tailored and individualised based on the response to treatment, comorbidities, and underlying tumor biology.

Common celiacomesenteric trunk: a rare anatomic variation / Tronco único celíaco-mesentérico: uma variante anatômica rara

Common celiacomesenteric trunk, with the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries having a common origin from the aorta, is the least frequently reported anatomic variation of all abdominal vascular anomalies. Knowledge of variations concerning the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery are of great importance for both surgical approaches and angiographic examinations. Clinicians should keep in mind these variations to avoid complications.

O tronco único celíaco-mesentérico, com as artérias celíaca e mesentérica superior tendo uma origem comum a partir da aorta, é a variante anatômica menos reportada dentre todas as anomalias vasculares abdominais. Conhecer as variantes do tronco celíaco e da artéria mesentérica superior é de grande importância tanto para abordagens cirúrgicas quanto para exames angiográficos. É importante que os médicos tenham em mente essas variantes a fim de evitar complicações.