RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Many patients with type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin gradually have inadequate glycemic control and switch to a basal-bolus regimen, which raises some concerns for weight gain and increased hypoglycemic risk. Switching to combination use of glp-1 agonist and basal insulin may be an alternative option. METHODS: After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, the patients receiving exenatide plus glargine (n = 90) had improved HbA1c control compared with those receiving aspart 70/30 (n = 90) (least squares mean change: â0.59 vs â0.13%; difference [95% CI]: â0.45 [â0.74 to â0.17]) in the full analysis set population. Weight decreased 3.5 kg with exenatide and decreased 0.4 kg with aspart 70/30 (P < .001). The insulin dose was reduced 10.7 units/day (95% CI, â12.2 to â9.2 units; P < .001) with exenatide, and increased 9.7 units/day (95% CI, 8.2 to 11.2 units; P < .001) with aspart 70/30. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse effects in the exenatide group (nausea [21%], vomiting [16%], diarrhea [13%]). The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in 2 groups (27% for exenatide and 38% for aspart 70/30; P = .1). CONCLUSION: In premixed human insulinâtreated patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control, switching to exenatide twice a day plus glargine was superior to aspart 70/30 twice a day for glycemic and weight control.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Metformina , Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Exenatida , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Controle Glicêmico , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes , Insulina , Insulina Aspart , Insulina GlarginaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Aims/Introduction: To clarify clinical characteristics related to optimal glycemic control achieved after adding once-daily pre-dinner biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) in Japanese type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients with oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under this regimen, we evaluated changes in HbA1c levels and daily self-monitoring blood glucose (BG) profiles, as well as the incidences of hypoglycemia and retinopathy progression. The patients adjusted BIAsp 30 dosages themselves every 3-4 days according to a pre-determined algorithm to achieve fasting BG levels of 101-120 mg/dL. HbA1c levels were expressed as Japan Diabetes Society values. RESULTS: Of 29 enrolled patients, 22 (HbA1c levels, 8.5 ± 1.5% [mean ± SD]) and 20 patients completed the 16- and 24-week follow-up, respectively. At 16 weeks 68.2 and 45.5%, and at 24 weeks 80.0 and 35% of patients had achieved HbA1c levels of <7.0 and <6.5%, respectively. The patients who had achieved optimal glycemic control, including daytime postprandial BG profiles after treatment, had lower post-breakfast BG excursions at baseline, shorter diabetes durations and younger age. No severe hypoglycemic episodes were recorded. Progression of retinopathy was observed in 3 of the 29 enrolled patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lower post-breakfast BG excursions, shorter diabetes duration and younger age in Japanese T2D patients with OAD failure might warrant optimal glycemic control with safety after adding once-daily pre-dinner BIAsp 30 initiating regimen. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00062.x, 2010).