Does Aspirin Use Reduce the Risk for Ovarian Cancer?

Ovarian cancer is an aggressive malignancy and the leading cause of death among gynecologic cancers. Researchers have evaluated prophylactic medications that potentially avert the manifestation of ovarian cancer, but currently, there are no reliable screening measures for this disease. Nevertheless, the largest study involving aspirin use and ovarian cancer reported a substantive risk reduction from enduring aspirin use. Since there are countervailing data to impugn the potential benefits of aspirin use in staving off ovarian cancer, further research should scrutinize the use of this medication as a prophylactic intervention, especially in women who are at higher risk for developing the disease.

Risk factors predicting a higher grade of subarachnoid haemorrhage in small ruptured intracranial aneurysm (< 5 mm).

AIM: To identify the risk factors for clinical and radiographic grades of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in small (< 5 mm) intracranial aneurysms (SIAs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with SIAs treated in our centre between February 2009 and June 2018. The clinical status was graded using the Hunt and Hess (H&H) score and the radiological severity of SAH was graded by Fisher grades (FG). The risk factors were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients with ruptured SIAs (< 5 mm) were included. In univariate analysis, smoking (P = 0.007), alcohol use (P = 0.048), aspirin use (P = 0.001), and higher size ratio (SR) (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher H&H grade (3-5) in SIAs; and smoking (P = 0.019), aspirin use (P = 0.031), inflow angle < 90 degrees (P = 0.011), and aneurysm size (P = 0.039) were significantly associated with a higher FG score (3-4). In the adjusted multivariate analysis, previous SAH (OR, 12.245, 95% CI, 2.261-66.334, P = 0.004), aspirin use (OR, 4.677, 95% CI, 1.392-15.718, P = 0.013), alcohol use (OR, 3.392, 95% CI, 1.146-10.045, P = 0.027), inflow angle < 90 (OR, 3.881, 95% CI, 1.273-11.831, P = 0.017), and higher SR (OR, 6.611, 95% CI, 2.235-19.560, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for a higher H&H grade in ruptured SIAs; smoking (OR, 2.157, 95% CI, 1.061-4.384, P = 0.034), and inflow angle < 90 degrees (OR, 2.603, 95% CI, 1.324-5.115, P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for a higher FG (3-4). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that inflow angle < 90 degrees and size ratio, but not absolute size, may highly predict poorer grade of SAH in SRA. Aspirin use, previous SAH, and alcohol use were significantly associated with a higher H&H grade in ruptured SIAs, and smoking was a significant predictor of poorer FG.

Use of aspirin in cardiovascular disease prevention-the role of online information search.

OBJECTIVES: This study intends to examine influences of online information search on the use of aspirin in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) prevention among the applicable adult population in the United States. METHODS: We used data of 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Our study sample is limited to adults age 40 or older to be consistent with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation (AHA/ACCF) guidelines for aspirin use. Linear probability models were used to test the association between patient's aspirin use behaviors and the variables of interest in four separate models. RESULTS: Our results show that the use of aspirin for CVD prevention was associated with online health information seeking in different ways. When patients received doctors' advice to use aspirin, online information seeking has a negative influence, depending on whether the individual has CVD risk factors. However, for patients without recommendations from providers, the effects of online information seeking on self-initiated aspirin use depend on the different types of preventions (primary vs. secondary) and CVD risk factors. CONCLUSION: Overall, online health information might lead to both overuse and underuse of aspirin in CVD preventions. Findings in this study may lead to decision-making that is not consistent with advice from healthcare professionals and/or established clinical guidelines.

Regular aspirin use among a sample of American Indians/Alaskan Natives in the Upper Midwest region of the United States.

Despite high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors among American Indian or Alaska Native adults (AI/AN), there is little information on aspirin use in this population. This survey-based study seeks to understand prevalence of aspirin use in a sample of AI/AN adults in the Upper Midwestern United States. In-person and telephone based surveys were conducted querying self-reported CVD and CVD risk factors, aspirin use, and aspirin related discussion with clinicians. A total of 237 AI/AN participants were included: mean age (SD) was 60.8 (8.4) years; 143 (60 %) were women; 59 (25 %) reported CVD history. CVD risk factors were common particularly smoking (37 %) and diabetes (37 %). Aspirin use was much higher among those with CVD (secondary prevention, 76 %) than those without (primary prevention, 33 %). Primary prevention aspirin use was significantly associated with age and all CVD risk factors in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for demographics and CVD risk factors, only age (aRR 1.13 per 5 years, 95 % CI 1.02, 1.25) and diabetes (aRR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.52, 3.92) remained significantly associated with aspirin. Regardless of CVD status, a higher proportion of those taking aspirin reported a conversation about aspirin with their doctor compared to those not taking aspirin. Among participants with no CVD, those who had such a conversation were 2.6 times more likely to use aspirin than those who did not have a conversation (aRR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.58, 4.44). The findings of this study emphasize the importance of the patient-provider relationship for preventive therapy.

Acetylsalicylic Acid Effect in Colorectal Cancer Taking into Account the Role of Tobacco, Alcohol and Excess Weight.

Excess weight, smoking and risky drinking are preventable risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, several studies have reported a protective association between aspirin and the risk of CRC. This article looks deeper into the relationships between risk factors and aspirin use with the risk of developing CRC. We performed a retrospective cohort study of CRC risk factors and aspirin use in persons aged >50 years in Lleida province. The participants were inhabitants with some medication prescribed between 2007 and 2016 that were linked to the Population-Based Cancer Registry to detect CRC diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. Risk factors and aspirin use were studied using the adjusted HR (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a Cox proportional hazard model. We included 154,715 inhabitants of Lleida (Spain) aged >50 years. Of patients with CRC, 62% were male (HR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.6-2.2), 39.5% were overweight (HR = 2.8; 95% CI: 2.3-3.4) and 47.3% were obese (HR = 3.0; 95% CI: 2.6-3.6). Cox regression showed an association between aspirin and CRC (aHR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.6-0.8), confirming a protective effect against CRC and an association between the risk of CRC and excess weight (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.7), smoking (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.3-1.7) and risky drinking (aHR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.0). Our results show that aspirin use decreased the risk of CRC and corroborate the relationship between overweight, smoking and risky drinking and the risk of CRC.

Pharmacological and Endoscopic Interventions for Prophylaxis of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Background: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) represents the most common serious complication after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) are the prophylactic interventions with more evidence and efficacy; however, PEP still represents a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Chronic statin use has been proposed as a prophylactic method that could be cheap and relatively safe. However, the evidence is conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic and pharmacological interventions including chronic statin and aspirin use, on the development of PEP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing ERCP at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County in Chicago from January 2015 to March 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 681 ERCPs were included in the study. Twelve (1.76%) developed PEP. Univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses did not show any association between chronic statin or aspirin use and PEP. PDS and rectal indomethacin were protective in patients undergoing pancreatic duct injection. Pancreatic duct injection, female sex, and younger age were associated with a higher risk. History of papillotomy was associated with lower risk only in the univariate analysis (all P values < 0.05). Conclusion: Chronic use of statins and aspirin appears to add no additional benefit to prevent ERCP pancreatitis. Rectal NSAIDs, and PDS after appropriate patient selection continue to be the main prophylactic measures. The lower incidence at our center compared with the reported data can be explained by the high rates of rectal indomethacin and PDS, the use of noninvasive diagnostic modalities for patient selection, and the expertise of the endoscopists.

Aspirin use is associated with increased risk for incident heart failure: a patient-level pooled analysis.

AIMS: Recent trials evaluating the effect of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease showed little or no benefit. However, the role of aspirin on the risk of incident heart failure (HF) remains elusive. This study aimed to evaluate the role of aspirin use on HF incidence in primary and secondary prevention and whether aspirin use increases the risk of incident HF in patients at risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 30 827 patients at risk for HF enrolled in six observational studies were analysed [women 33.9%, mean age (±standard deviation) 66.8 ± 9.2 years]. Cardiovascular risk factors and aspirin use were recorded at baseline, and patients were followed up for the first incident of fatal or non-fatal HF. The association of incident HF with aspirin use was assessed using multivariable-adjusted proportional hazard regression, which accounted for study and cardiovascular risk factors. Over 5.3 years (median; 5th-95th percentile interval, 2.1-11.7 years), 1330 patients experienced HF. The fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) associated with aspirin use was 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.41; P ≤ 0.001]. Further, in a propensity-score-matched analysis, the HR was 1.26 (95% CI 1.10-1.44; P ≤ 0.001). In 22 690 patients (73.6%) without history of cardiovascular disease, the HR was 1.27 (95% CI 1.10-1.46; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients, at risk, aspirin use was associated with incident HF, independent of other risk factors. In the absence of conclusive trial evidence, our observations suggest that aspirins should be prescribed with caution in patients at risk of HF or having HF.

Aspirin use in patients with diagnosed diabetes in the United States and China: Nationally representative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological data on the use of aspirin in diabetic patients is very limited. The main purpose of this study is to examine the current status of aspirin use in the United States (US) and China in large representative populations. METHODS: Data came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and China Hypertension Survey (CHS), two nationally representative cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: The percentage of aspirin use was 73.8% in US diabetic patients with ASCVD, and the percentage of aspirin use in diabetic patients with high ASCVD risk was marginally higher in men (p = .052), 54.5% in men and 37.1% in women. The percentages of aspirin use in diabetic patients with intermediate and low ASCVD risk were 55.1% and 35.0%, respectively. In China, the percentage of aspirin use in diabetic patients with ASCVD was 53.5%, and were 14.3%, 9.7%, and 3.2% among diabetic patients with high, intermediate, and low ASCVD risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the percentage of aspirin use in primary prevention in US diabetic patients in men was higher than in women, and this percentage for primary and secondary prevention in US patients was higher than that in Chinese patients.

Superior Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer, Regular Aspirin Use, and Combined Wild-Type PIK3CA and KRAS-Mutated Tumors.

The impact of aspirin use after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is unknown. Among others, PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha) mutational status was proposed as a molecular biomarker for the response to adjuvant aspirin therapy. However, prognostic data on aspirin use after a colorectal cancer diagnosis in relation to KRAS mutational status is limited. In a single-center retrospective study, we obtained KRAS and PIK3CA mutational status in a cohort of 153 patients with a first diagnosis of colorectal cancer receiving tumor surgery with curative intent. PIK3CA mutational status was determined by pyrosequencing, and KRAS mutational status was determined by next-generation sequencing. Clinicopathological data and survival data were assessed using patient records and reporting registers. We observed a significant 10-year overall survival benefit in patients with aspirin use and combined wild-type PIK3CA and mutated-KRAS tumors (HR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.17-0.87; p = 0.02), but not in patients without aspirin use. Our data indicate a benefit of aspirin usage particularly for patients with combined wild-type PIK3CA and mutated-KRAS tumor characteristics.

Aspirin use and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of aspirin has been linked to a reduced risk of cancer at several sites, such as the breast, prostate, and colorectum. However, the evidence for this chemopreventive effect from aspirin use on endometrial cancer is conflicting, and whether an association exists is an open question. METHODS: After carrying out a database search of articles published up to December 2019, we identified 7 case-control studies and 11 cohort studies, including a total of 14,766 endometrial cancer cases. We pooled the odds ratios (ORs) in case-control studies and risk ratios (RRs) in cohort studies, and then conducted subgroup analysis based on factors such as the frequency and duration of aspirin use, and obesity. RESULTS: In the overall meta-analysis, we found a significant inverse association between any aspirin use and the risk of endometrial cancer both in case-control studied [pooled ORs =0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.98] and cohort studies (pooled RRs =0.86, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99). In the subgroup analysis, a negative association was observed between the maximal frequency of aspirin use and the endometrial cancer risk (pooled ORs/RRs: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.95), but no correlations were observed based on the longest duration of aspirin use or obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the use of aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer, and the reduced risk was closely related to the high-frequency of use. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm these findings.

Age-specific differences in patient reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Medical expenditure panel survey 2006-2015.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in younger adults has increased over the past decade. However, it is less well established whether patient reported outcomes differ between younger and older adults with ASCVD. We sought to evaluate age-specific differences in patient reported outcomes among adults with ASCVD. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional survey study. We used data from the 2006-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative sample of the United States population. Adults ≥18 years with a diagnosis of ASCVD, ascertained by ICD9 codes or self-reported data, were included. Logistic regression was used to compare self-reported patient-clinician communication, patient satisfaction, perception of health, emergency department (ED) visits, and use of preventive medications (aspirin and statins) by age category [Young: 18-44, Middle: 45-64, Older: ≥65 years]. We used two-part econometric modeling to evaluate age-specific annual healthcare expenditure. RESULTS: There were 21,353 participants included. Over 9000 (42.6%-weighted) of the participants were young or middle aged, representing ~9.9 million adults aged <65 years with ASCVD nationwide. Compared with older adults, middle-aged and young adults with ASCVD were more likely to report poor patient-clinician communication [OR 1.73 (95% CI 1.28-2.33) and 2.49 (1.76-3.51), respectively], poor healthcare satisfaction, and poor perception of health status, have increased ED utilization and were also less likely to be using aspirin and statins. The mean annual healthcare expenditure was highest among middle-aged adults [$10,798 (95% CI, $10,012 to $11,583)]. CONCLUSION: Compared with older adults, younger adults with ASCVD were more likely to report poor patient experience and poor health status and less likely to be using preventive medications. More effort needs to be geared towards understanding the age-specific differences in healthcare quality and delivery to improve outcomes among high-risk young adults with ASCVD.

Prestroke Aspirin Use is Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Atherothrombosis, Small Artery Disease, and Cardioembolic Stroke.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of prestroke aspirin (PA) use on initial stroke severity, early neurologic deterioration (END), stroke recurrence, hemorrhagic transformation (HT), and functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke (IS). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study. The acute IS patients with atherothrombosis (AT), small artery disease (SAD), or cardioembolic (CE) stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset were identified. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission, clinical outcomes (END, recurrent ischemic stroke [RIS], myocardial infarction [MI], death, and hemorrhagic episodes), and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores) at three months after admission were compared between PA users and nonusers. RESULTS: Among the 1,862 patients, 401 (21.5%) reported PA use. The PA users had a significantly lower initial NIHSS score than the non-PA users. The effect was evident in AT stroke, but not in other subtypes. PA use was independently associated with the decreased risk of END. PA use increased the risk of HT; however, it was only associated with increased risk for asymptomatic HT, not for symptomatic HT. PA use was associated with better functional outcomes (mRS scores ≤2 points) irrespective of stroke subtypes at three months after admission, despite the increased risk of HT. CONCLUSIONS: PA use may reduce initial stroke severity in AT stroke and the risk of END, and can improve functional outcome at three months irrespective of stroke subtypes.

Regular aspirin use and nasopharyngeal cancer risk: A case-control study in Italy.

Regular aspirin use has been associated to decreased risk of several cancers, but evidence on nasopharyngeal carcinoma is scanty. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study in Italy, enrolling 198 Caucasian patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Controls were 592 cancer-free Caucasian patients admitted to the same catchment areas as cases; controls were frequency matched according to sex, age, and area of residence. Regular aspirin use was defined as taking at least one aspirin a week for at least 6 months. Three cases (1.5%) and 27 controls (4.5%) reported regular aspirin use (odds ratio=0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.87). The median duration of consumption was 15 months among cases and 60 months among controls. Although study findings should be considered with caution due to limited sample size, they provide further evidence on the protective effect of aspirin use in head and neck cancers.