Five-year follow-up of patients who underwent everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate very long-term results after unrestricted everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) implantation. BACKGROUND: Previous randomized studies mainly included selected patients differing from those seen during daily routine and long-term data from all-comers registries are sparse. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing BRS implantation were included in this observational, single center study. Clinical follow-up was conducted up to 5 years. Endpoint of interest was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF), including target-vessel myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization and cardiac death. Furthermore, ARC-defined scaffold thrombosis (ScT) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with a median age of 64 (55 - 72) years were analyzed, of which 59.6% presented an acute coronary syndrome. A total of 183 mainly complex lesions (55.8%) were treated. At 5 years, the rate for TLF was 21.6%. Definite or probable ScT rate was 4.1%. The rate of ScT within the first year was 2.8% and afterwards 1.2%. Notably, no ScT was seen later than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although this real-world registry displays high rates of clinical events during long-term follow-up, no ScT was seen after 2 years.

Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the Xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease-AIDA trial substudy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) might represent a specific subgroup, in which bioresorbable scaffold implantation in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), might lead to better outcomes when compared to conventional treatment with metallic drug eluting stents. In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the Amsterdam Investigator-Initiated Absorb Strategy All-Comers (AIDA) trial, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) versus Xience everolimus eluting stent (EES) treated patients presenting either with or without ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: We classified AIDA patients on the basis of clinical presentation of ACS or of no-ACS. The rate of the 2-year primary endpoint of target vessel failure (TVF) was similar after treatment with Absorb BVS or Xience EES in ACS patients (10.2% versus 9.0% respectively; P = 0.49) and in no-ACS patients (11.7% versus 10.7%, respectively; P = 0.67) Definite or probable device thrombosis occurred more frequently with Absorb BVS compared to Xience EES in ACS patients (4.3% versus 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.03) as well as in no-ACS patients (2.4% versus 0.2%, respectively; P = 0.002). There were no statistically significant interactions between clinical presentation and randomized device modality for TVF (P = 0.80) and for the endpoint of definite or probable device thrombosis (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: In the AIDA trial, the 2-year outcomes of PCI with Absorb BVS versus Xience EES were consistent in ACS and no-ACS patients: similar rates for TVF and consistently higher rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis under Absorb BVS versus Xience EES. There were no statistically significant interactions between clinical presentation and randomized device modality.

Preclinical comparative assessment of a dedicated pediatric poly-L-lactic-acid-based bioresorbable scaffold with a low-profile bare metal stent.

BACKGROUND: Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (PBBS) have been assessed for coronary revascularization with mixed outcomes. Few studies have targeted pediatric-specific scaffolds. We sought to assess safety, efficacy, and short-term performance of a dedicated drug-free PBBS pediatric scaffold compared to a standard low-profile bare metal stent (BMS) in central and peripheral arteries of weaned piglets. METHODS: Forty-two devices (22 Elixir poly-L-lactic-acid-based pediatric bioresorbable scaffolds [BRS] [6 × 18 mm] and 20 control BMS Cook Formula 418 [6 × 20 mm]) were implanted in the descending aorta and pulmonary arteries (PAs) of 14 female Yucatan piglets. Quantitative measurements were collected on the day of device deployment and 30 and 90 days postimplantation to compare device patency and integrity. RESULTS: The BRS has a comparable safety profile to the BMS in the acute setting. Late lumen loss (LLL) and percent diameter stenosis (%DS) were not significantly different between BRS and BMS in the PA at 30 days. LLL and %DS were greater for BRS versus BMS in the aorta at 30 days postimplantation (LLL difference: 0.96 ± 0.26; %DS difference: 16.15 ± 4.51; p < .05). At 90 days, %DS in the aortic BRS was less, and PA BRS LLL was also less than BMS. Histomorphometric data showed greater intimal proliferation and area stenosis in the BRS at all time points and in all vessels. CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated PBBS pediatric BRS has a favorable safety profile in the acute/subacute setting and demonstrates characteristics that are consistent with adult BRSs.

Novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable coronary scaffold upsized up to 0.8 mm beyond nominal diameter: An OCT and histopathology study in porcine coronary artery model.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties and healing pattern of novel sirolimus-eluting, ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous poly-L-lactic acid bioresorbable scaffolds (S-BRS) that have been postdilated by 0.55 and 0.8 mm beyond the nominal diameters within the pressure-diameter compliance chart range. BACKGROUND: Due to the inherent limitations of bioabsorbable polymeric materials, overexpansion/upsizing may be very limited for some BRS such as the benchmark Absorb BVS. The unique biomechanical properties of the novel S-BRS may allow it to be safely upsized. METHODS AND RESULTS: 12 coronary arteries of 4 healthy Yucatan mini-swine underwent implantation of a novel S-BRS. Upsizing by postdilation was performed up to 0.55mm (PLUS 0.55, n = 6) or 0.8 mm (PLUS 0.8, n = 6) in a manner maintaining consistent 1:1.1 stent-to-artery, thus ensuring not only the overexpansion of the scaffold but consistent level of arterial injury. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up was performed at 28 and 90-days follow-up. There was no statistical difference between the tested groups in terms of acute recoil. OCT analysis after 28 days showed numerically lower levels of neointimal formation in PLUS 0.8 compared to PLUS 0.55 group. These results were sustained at 90-days follow-up. There was no difference in late recoil between studied groups. No scaffold discontinuation, deformation or overlapping of the struts were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Overexpansion up to 0.8 mm of novel, high strength S-BRS is not associated with worse angiographic outcomes, neointimal formation or biomechanical issues such as scaffold discontinuation, deformation or overlapping of the struts, neither acutely nor chronically. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.

OBJECTIVES: to compare the occurrence of clinical events in diabetics treated with the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) versus everolimus-eluting metal stents (EES; XIENCE V; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) BACKGROUND: There are limited data dedicated to clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) at 2-year horizon. METHODS: The present study included 812 patients in the ABSORB EXTEND study in which a total of 215 diabetic patients were treated with Absorb BVS. In addition, 882 diabetic patients treated with EES in pooled data from the SPIRIT clinical program (SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III and SPIRIT IV trials) were used for comparison by applying propensity score matching using 29 different variables. The primary endpoint was ischemia driven major adverse cardiac events (ID-MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). RESULTS: After 2 years, the ID-MACE rate was 6.5% in the Absorb BVS vs. 8.9% in the Xience group (P = 0.40). There was no difference for MACE components or definite/probable device thrombosis (HR: 1.43 [0.24,8.58]; P = 0.69). The occurrence of MACE was not different for both diabetic status (insulin- and non-insulin-requiring diabetes) in all time points up to the 2-year follow-up for the Absorb and Xience groups. CONCLUSION: In this largest ever patient-level pooled comparison on the treatment of diabetic patients with BRS out to two years, individuals with diabetes treated with the Absorb BVS had a similar rate of MACE as compared with diabetics treated with the Xience EES. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

First in human evaluation of the vascular biocompatibility and biomechanical performance of a novel ultra high molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable scaffold in the absence of anti-proliferative drugs: Two-year imaging results in humans.

OBJECTIVES: In this first-in-human study, we prospectively studied the vascular compatibility and mechanical performance of a novel bare ultra-high molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable scaffold (BRS, FORTITUDE®, Amaranth Medical, Mountain View, California) up to two years after implantation using multimodality imaging techniques. BACKGROUND: The vascular biocompatibility of polymers used in BRS has not been fully characterized in the absence of anti-proliferative drugs. METHODS: A total of 10 patients undergoing single scaffold implantation were included in the final analysis and were followed up using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 2-years. All devices were implanted under angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. Angiographic and IVUS follow up was performed at 6 months. Additionally, angiography and OCT imaging were performed at 2-years. RESULTS: At 6 months, mean intra-scaffold angiographic MLD slightly decreased from baseline procedural values. However, at 2 years, mean angiographic MLD increased (post procedure; 2.9 [2.7, 3.1] mm vs. 6 months; 2.1 [1.6, 2.5] vs. 2 years; 2.4 [2.1, 2.6], P = .001). Also, angiographic percent diameter stenosis decreased and late lumen gain increased between 6 months and 2 years follow up. Mean neointimal hyperplasia volume assessed by IVUS at 6 months was 26% [15.2, 29.3]. At 2 years OCT follow up neointimal hyperplasia volume was 24.2% [19.4, 28.9]. No presence of neoatherosclerosis was identified in any of the analyzed cases. CONCLUSION: At 2 years, this novel PLLA-based BRS induced expansive vascular remodeling from 6 to 24 months, a biological phenomenon that appears to be independent of the presence of anti-proliferative drugs.

The CLOSER trial: a multi-center study on the clinical safety and effectiveness of CloserTM VSS, a novel resorbable transfemoral vascular access sealing system.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Closer Vascular Sealing System (VSS) against prespecified performance goals (PGs) in sealing femoral arterial access following 5-7 Fr procedures. BACKGROUND: Inconsistent safety profiles, costs and learning curves of earlier generation vascular closure devices have limited their widespread use following transfemoral procedures. METHODS: In this prospective single-arm, multi-center trial, we compared the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing 5-7 Fr transfemoral diagnostic or interventional procedures and access sites managed with Closer VSS against pre-specified PGs. The primary endpoints were time to hemostasis (TTH) and 30-day access site closure-related major complications; secondary endpoints included time to ambulation (TTA), time to discharge eligibility (TTDE), time to discharge (TTD), 30-day access site minor complications, procedure and device success. RESULTS: A total of 220 subjects (49.5% interventional) were enrolled. The mean TTH was 1.78 ± 7.81 min in the intention to treat and 0.98 ± 3.71 min in the per protocol cohort. Median TTH was 0 min with immediate hemostasis achieved in 80.5% of subjects, mean TTA was 2.50 ± 1.05 hr, and mean TTDE was 2.83 ± 1.54 hr. Thirty-day follow-up was completed on 219 subjects. There were no access site closure-related major complications, minor complication rate was 0.0% for diagnostic and 2.75% for interventional procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing 5-7 Fr transfemoral diagnostic and interventional procedures, the CLOSER Trial met both its primary effectiveness and safety PGs. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in the majority of patients without major complication.

First reported case of magnesium-made bioresorbable scaffold to treat spontaneous left anterior descending coronary artery dissection.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Although its treatment is still debated, use of Bioreasorbable Scaffold was recently advocated as an attractive option in this setting. We report the first case, to our knowledge, of a new magnesium-made Bioresorbable Scaffold implantation in a young woman presenting with Non-ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction and a rapid worsening SCAD.

Expanded clinical use of everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are currently available on the performance of everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) for treatment of complex coronary lesions representative of daily practice. METHODS: This is a prospective, mono-center, single-arm study, reporting data after BVS implantation in patients presenting with stable, unstable angina, or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction caused by de novo stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries. No restrictions were applied to lesion complexity. Procedural results and 12-month clinical outcomes were reported. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients have been evaluated in the present study, with 249 treated coronary lesions. Device Success per lesion was 99.2%. A total of 119 calcified lesions were treated. Comparable results were observed among severe, moderate and noncalcified lesions in term of %diameter stenosis (%DS) (20.3 ± 10.5%, 17.8 ± 7.7%, 16.8 ± 8.6%; P = 0.112) and acute gain (1.36 ± 0.41 mm, 1.48 ± 0.44 mm, 1.56 ± 0.54 mm; P = 0.109). In bifurcations (54 lesions), side-branch ballooning after main vessel treatment was often performed (33.3%) with low rate of side-branch impairment (9.3%). A total of 29 cases with coronary total occlusions were treated. After BVS implantation %DS was not different from other lesion types (17.2 ± 9.4%, vs. 17.7 ± 8.6%; P = 0.780). At one year, all-cause mortality was reported in three cases. The rate of target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization was 3.3%. The rate of definite scaffold thrombosis was 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of the everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in an expanded range of coronary lesion types and clinical presentations was observed to be feasible with promising angiographic results and mid-term clinical outcomes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The unmet needs: How future technologies will address current limitations of bioresorbable scaffold technology.

First-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS), represented by the three marked-approved devices (Absorb BVS 1.1, DESolve NX, and DREAMS) have demonstrated, in low to moderate angiographic scenarios, similar efficacy to current generation metallic drug-eluting stents. However, a trend toward more device thrombosis have been observed, especially when the scaffolds are used in off-label situations. Among the main shortcomings of this novel technology, we highlight: (1) Increased strut thickness (≥150 µm) and crossing profile; (2) low resistance to overexpansion; (3) lack of radiopacity, and; (4) special storage requirements. In order to overcome these limitations and improve their acute performance and midterm safety, a dozen of novel BRS are currently under research, in different stages of development. In the present review, we address three of these new technologies, pointing out their innovative features and initial clinical results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

First US experience following FDA approval of the ABBOTT vascular bioresorbable vascular scaffold for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Drug eluting stents are considered the "gold standard" for the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. Recent publications have suggested that a reasonable alternative, in well selected cases, may be the ABSORBTM bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) stent. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stents in routine clinical practice: Results of the ISAR-ABSORB registry.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze angiographic and clinical results of patients undergoing BRS implantation in a real-world setting. BACKGROUND: Angiographic and clinical outcome data from patients undergoing implantation of drug-eluting bioresorbable stents (BRS) in routine clinical practice is scant. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing implantation of everolimus-eluting BRS at two high-volume centers in Munich, Germany were enrolled. Data were collected prospectively. All patients were scheduled for angiographic surveillance 6-8 months after stent implantation. Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was performed in a core laboratory. Clinical follow-up was performed to 12 months and events were adjudicated by independent assessors. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients were studied. Mean age was 66.6 ± 10.9 years, 31.5% had diabetes mellitus, 76.1% had multivessel disease, and 39.0% presented with acute coronary syndrome; 49.0% of lesions were AHA/ACC type B2/C, 13.1% had treatment of bifurcation lesions. Mean reference vessel diameter was 2.89 ± 0.46 mm. At angiographic follow-up in-stent late loss was 0.26 ± 0.51 mm, in-segment diameter stenosis was 27.5 ± 16.1, and binary angiographic restenosis was 7.5%. At 12 months, the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization was 13.1%. Definite stent thrombosis occurred in 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of everolimus-eluting BRS in routine clinical practice is associated with high antirestenotic efficacy in patients undergoing angiographic surveillance. Overall clinical outcomes at 12 months are satisfactory though stent thrombosis rates are not insignificant. Further study with longer term follow-up and larger numbers of treated patients is required before we can be sure of the role of these devices in clinical practice.

Bench and initial preclinical results of a novel 8 mm diameter double opposed helical biodegradable stent.

BACKGROUND: Metallic endovascular stents are utilized off-label in congenital heart disease. Biodegradable stents (BDS) offer potential advantages in a growing child. We have previously reported double opposed helical (DH) BDS up to 6 mm diameter (DH-6). The objectives are to investigate the bench characteristics of larger 8 mm diameter BDS (DH-8) manufactured with increasing strut thicknesses and the inflammatory profile in a porcine model. METHODS: DH-8 were manufactured with strut thicknesses 0.10, 0.12, and 0.18 mm and mechanical testing performed. Stents were deployed into the infrarenal descending aorta (DAO) of nine minipigs. At insertion (nonsurvival = 2), 1 week (n = 2), 1 month (n = 2), and 9 months (n = 3) follow-up angiography, intravascular ultrasound and histopathology were performed. RESULTS: There was superior recoil and collapse pressure with increasing strut thickness, with 0.18 mm having 1.0% elastic recoil and collapse pressure 0.75 Atmospheres. There was good wall apposition at insertion with 5 BDS (4 DH-8 and 1 DH-6) but suboptimal in 4 as the minipigs infrarenal DAO were >8 mm (deployed at iliac bifurcation). Structural integrity was maintained in 8 BDS with 1 DH-8 collapsed at 9 months, secondary to strut damage at insertion. No thrombosis was seen. There was mild inflammation and neointimal proliferation at 1 week and 1 month, but a moderate inflammatory response at 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: DH-8 with increased strut thickness had acceptable mechanical properties at the cost of an increased inflammatory response. Miniaturization to improve delivery and further investigation on the long-term inflammatory profile of thicker struts, including through degradation, is needed. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in a diabetic all-comers population.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with aggressive atherosclerosis, leading to an increased risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) are a new technology for the treatment of coronary lesions that might be beneficial due to their dissolving character, especially in diabetic patients. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate feasibility and mid-term clinical outcome of the implantation of PLLA-based, everolimus-eluting BRS for the treatment of coronary lesions in a diabetic all-comers population. METHODS: All patients of an all-comers registry with diabetes eligible for BRS implantation were included. Outcome parameters were target vessel failure (TVF), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including target lesion revascularization (TLR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction. Follow-up was conducted via telephone and/or office visit. RESULTS: A total of 120 diabetic patients were included. Of all diabetics, 35.0% had insulin-dependent diabetes, and all other patients were treated with oral antidiabetics or dietary modification. The median age was 67 (59-72) years and 26.7% were female. Patients underwent coronary angiography due to acute coronary syndrome in 50.8%. Of 127 lesions, 60.6% were B2/C lesions according to ACC/AHA classification. The 6-month rates of TVF, TLR, and MACE were 8.9, 2.7, and 8.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This evaluation confirms reasonable clinical outcome of bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in a high-risk diabetic population with predominately complex lesions during daily clinical practice. Nevertheless, long-term data are required for final evaluation.