Molecular subtypes of breast cancer predicting clinical benefits of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a propensity-score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Based on the molecular expression of cancer cells, molecular subtypes of breast cancer have been applied to classify patients for predicting clinical outcomes and prognosis. However, further evidence is needed regarding the influence of molecular subtypes on the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), particularly in a population-based context. Hence, the present study employed a propensity-score-matched cohort design to investigate the potential role of molecular subtypes in stratifying patient outcomes for post-BCS RT and to identify the specific clinical benefits that may emerge. METHODS: From 2006 to 2019, the present study included 59,502 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Propensity scores were utilized to match confounding variables between patients with and without RT within each subtype of breast cancer, namely luminal A, luminal B/HER2-negative, luminal B/HER2-positive, basal-like, and HER2-enriched ones. Several clinical outcomes were assessed, in terms of local recurrence (LR), regional recurrence (RR), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After post-BCS RT, patients with luminal A and luminal B/HER2-positive breast cancers exhibited a decrease in LR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.18, p < 0.0001; and, 0.24, p = 0.0049, respectively). Furthermore, reduced RR and improved DFS were observed in patients with luminal A (aHR = 0.15, p = 0.0004; and 0.29, p < 0.0001), luminal B/HER2-negative (aHR = 0.06, p = 0.0093; and, 0.46, p = 0.028), and luminal B/HER2-positive (aHR = 0.14, p = 0.01; and, 0.38, p < 0.0001) breast cancers. Notably, OS benefits were found in patients with luminal A (aHR = 0.62, p = 0.002), luminal B/HER2-negative (aHR = 0.30, p < 0.0001), basal-like (aHR = 0.40, p < 0.0001), and HER2-enriched (aHR = 0.50, p = 0.03), but not luminal B/HER2-positive diseases. Remarkably, when considering DM, luminal A patients who received RT demonstrated a lower cumulative incidence of DM than those without RT (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with luminal A breast cancer who undergo BCS, RT could decrease the likelihood of tumor metastasis. After RT, the tumor's hormone receptor status may predict tumor control regarding LR, RR, and DFS. Besides, the HER2 status of luminal breast cancer patients may serve as an additional predictor of OS after post-BCS RT. However, further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

Single-port three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic-assisted breast surgery-preliminary results and patient-reported satisfaction in 145 breast cancer and gynecomastia cases.

BACKGROUND: Minimal-accessed (robotic and endoscopic) breast cancer surgery is increasingly performed due to better cosmetic results and acceptable oncological outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate the clinical safety and patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction of single-port three-dimensional endoscopic-assisted breast surgery (S-P 3D EABS), which is our new endoscopic surgical innovation, in both malignant and benign breast conditions. METHODS: Patients who underwent S-P 3D EABS from 1 August 2018 to 31 July 2022 in a single institution were enrolled. Clinical outcomes of this procedure were retrospectively reviewed, and the patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire and reported herein. RESULTS: During the study period, 145 patients underwent 164 procedures of S-P 3D EABS. One hundred fifty (91.5%) procedures were endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (S-P 3D E-NSM; 117 therapeutic procedures for breast cancer, 13 prophylactic mastectomies, 20 procedures for gynecomastia). Fourteen (8.5%) procedures of endoscopic-assisted breast-conserving surgery (S-P 3D E-BCS) were performed (12 S-P 3D E-BCS, 2 S-P 3D E-BCS with 3D videoscope-assisted partial breast reconstruction, which was 1 case of latissimus dorsi flap and 1 case of omental flap). The mean operative time was 245 ± 110 min in S-P 3D E-NSM and 260 ± 142 min in S-P 3D E-BCS. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 49.7 ± 46.9 ml in S-P 3D E-NSM and 32.8 ± 17.5 ml in S-P 3D E-BCS. Subnipple biopsy showed positive malignancy in 3 (2.6%) S-P 3D E-NSM patients. None of the S-P 3D E-BCS patients found margin involvement; however, 3 (2.6%) reported margin involvement in S-P 3D E-NSM patients. Thirty-two complications were found (24.6%): 7 (5.3%) transient nipple-areolar complex (NAC) ischemia, 7 (5.3%) partial NAC necrosis, 1 (0.7%) total NAC necrosis, and 1 (0.7%) implant loss. During the mean follow-up time of 34 months, there were 2 (1.5%) patients with locoregional recurrence, 9 (6.9%) distant metastasis, and 2 (1.5%) mortality. 78.6% (77/98) of patients answering the cosmetic-evaluated questionnaire reported good and excellent overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: S-P 3D EABS is a novel surgical innovation, which is able to perform safely in either malignant or benign breast conditions and offer promising cosmetic results.

Adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early stage breast cancer : Results from a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To report early toxicity and 5­year clinical outcomes of adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 467 patients including 406 invasive breast cancer and 61 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were enrolled in a single institutional phase II trial. All patients underwent IMRT-SIB treatment to irradiate the whole breast and the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 45 and 60 Gy, respectively, delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The grade of maximum acute skin toxicity during treatment was recorded. Lung toxicity was noted within 6 months and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded at the 12 month follow-up after the end of radiotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 5.46 years. Median age was 46 years old (range 22-70 years old). No patient with DCIS had a local recurrence or distant metastasis. Among 406 patients with invasive breast cancer, the unadjusted 5­year actuarial rate of locoregional control was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.5-100), and distant metastasis-free survival 98.7% (95% CI 97.4-100), respectively. Acute skin toxicity was recorded at grade 0-1 in 76.5% of patients, and grade 2 in 23.5% of patients. None of these patients had grade 3 or more than grade 3 skin toxicity. Grade 1 pneumonitis was found in 25.3% of patients. Assessment of patient reported cosmetic outcomes at the 12 month follow-up showed good or excellent outcome in 86.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inversely planned IMRT-SIB as part of breast-conserving therapy results in optimal 5­year tumor control and minor early toxicities.

Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the differences in the rates and predictive factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer. And, we evaluated the impact of IBTR on overall survival and distant metastasis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 322 consecutive patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS between 2004 and 2010. We evaluated the rates of IBTR of DCIS and invasive breast cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors for IBTR, and survival rates were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 57 months, 5 (10%) out of 50 DCIS patients and 14 (5.1%) out of 272 invasive cancer patients had developed IBTR. Factors associated with IBTR on univariate and multivariate analyses were positive resection margin status in DCIS and omission of radiotherapy in invasive cancer, respectively. The hormone receptor negativity was strong independent predictive factors for IBTR in both DCIS and invasive breast cancer. Although the differences of survival curve did not reach statistical significance, the 5-year overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival of invasive cancer patients who suffered IBTR were inferior to those without (84 vs. 98% and 63.3 vs. 96.5%, respectively). Advanced initial stage, lymph node metastasis and experience of IBTR were associated with poor overall survival and distant metastasis on univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The hormone receptor negativity was revealed as independent predictive factor for IBTR after BCS in both DCIS and invasive cancer. Experience of IBTR was independent prognostic factor for poor overall outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer. Aggressive local control and adjuvant therapy should be made in hormone receptor-negative patients who receive treatment with BCS.

Patterns of locoregional treatment for nonmetastatic breast cancer by patient and health system factors.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine local definitive therapy for nonmetastatic breast cancer with the Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer (POCBP) study of the National Program of Cancer Registries (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). METHODS: POCBP medical record data were re-abstracted in 7 state/regional registry systems (Georgia, North Carolina, Kentucky, Louisiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and California) to verify data quality and assess treatment patterns in the population. National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice treatment guidelines were aligned with American Joint Committee on Cancer staging at diagnosis to appraise care. RESULTS: Six thousand five hundred five of 9142 patients with registry-confirmed breast cancer were coded as having primary disease with stage 0 to IIIA tumors and were included in the study. Approximately 88% received guideline-concordant locoregional treatment. However, this outcome varied by age group: 92% of women < age 50 versus 80% of women ≥ age 70 years old received guideline care (P < 0.01). Characteristics that best discriminated receipt (no/yes) of guideline-concordant care in receiver operating curve analyses were the receipt of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy (C = 0.70), patient age (C = 0.62), a greater tumor stage (C = 0.60), public insurance (C = 0.58), and the presence of at least mild comorbidity (C = 0.55). Radiation therapy (RT) after BCS was the most omitted treatment component causing nonconcordance in the study population. In multivariate regression, the effects of the treatment facility, ductal carcinoma in situ, race, and comorbidity on nonconcordant care differed by age group. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of underuse of standard therapies for breast cancer vary by age group and BCS use, with which there is a risk of omission of RT.

Breast surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

For patients with operable breast cancer, neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) can be used to downstage the primary tumor in the breast and to facilitate breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with large tumors who desire breast conservation. Rates of breast pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are highest in patients with triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive (HER2+) disease; however, achieving pCR is not necessary for successful downstaging and avoidance of mastectomy, and rates of conversion to BCS-eligibility are high across all receptor subtypes. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) can be used instead of NAC in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer to downstage the breast, particularly when the patient has no clear indication for systemic chemotherapy, but desires breast conservation. In patients treated with NET, rates of conversion to BCS-eligibility are similar to rates observed with NAC. The oncologic safety of BCS after NAC and NET has been established in prospective trials, and local recurrence (LR) rates are acceptably low provided negative surgical margins can be obtained. Investigation is under way to determine the feasibility and safety of omitting breast surgery in patients with responsive subtypes who have no residual invasive or in situ disease identified on post-treatment tumor bed biopsies; however, the significant risk of missing residual disease-which may impact selection of adjuvant systemic therapy-may preclude future adoption of this approach.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identify feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) stands as the favored modality for treating early-stage breast cancer. Accurately forecasting the feasibility of BCS preoperatively can aid in surgical planning and reduce the rate of switching of surgical methods and reoperation. The objective of this study is to identify the radiomics features and preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics that are linked with positive margins following BCS in patients with breast cancer, with the ultimate aim of creating a predictive model for the feasibility of BCS. Methods: This study included a cohort of 221 pretreatment MRI images obtained from patients with breast cancer. A total of seven MRI semantic features and 1,561 radiomics features of lesions were extracted. The feature subset was determined by eliminating redundancy and correlation based on the features of the training set. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was then trained with this subset to classify the final BCS positive and negative margins and subsequently validated using the test set. Results: Seven features were significant in the discrimination of cases achieving positive and negative margins. The radiomics signature achieved area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.760 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.630, 0.891], 0.712 (95% CI: 0.569, 0.829), 0.882 (95% CI: 0.623, 0.979) and 0.629 (95% CI: 0.449, 0.780) in the test set, respectively. The combined model of radiomics signature and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) demonstrated an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.759 (95% CI: 0.628, 0.890), 0.654 (95% CI: 0.509, 0.780), 0.679 (95% CI: 0.476, 0.834) and 0.625 (95% CI: 0.408, 0.804). Conclusions: The combination of preoperative MRI radiomics features can well predict the success of breast conserving surgery.

Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.

Background and Objective: With an increasing number of non-palpable breast lesions detected due to improved screening, accurate localization of these lesions for surgery is crucial. This literature review explores the evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions, highlighting the translational journey from concept to clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until September 2023 was conducted. Key Content and Findings: Multiple methods have been developed throughout the past few decades. (I) Wire-guided localization (WGL) introduced in 1966, has become a reliable method for localization. Its simplicity and cost-effectiveness are its key advantages, but challenges include logistical constraints, patient discomfort, and potential wire migration. (II) Intraoperative ultrasound localization (IOUS) has shown promise in ensuring complete lesion removal with higher negative margin rates. However, its utility is limited to lesions visible on ultrasound (US) imaging. (III) Breast biopsy marker localization: the use of markers has improved the precision of localization without the need for wire. However, marker visibility remains a challenge despite improvements in their design. (IV) Radioactive techniques: radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) offer flexibility in scheduling and improved patient comfort. However, they require close multidisciplinary collaboration and specific equipment due to radioactive concerns. (V) Other wireless non-radioactive techniques: wireless non-radioactive techniques have been developed in recent three decades to provide flexible and patient-friendly alternatives. It includes magnetic seed localization, radar techniques, and radiofrequency techniques. Their usage has been gaining popularity due to their safety profile and allowance of more flexible scheduling. However, their high cost and need for additional training remain a barrier to a wider adoption. Conclusions: The evolution of breast lesion localization methods has progressed to more patient-friendly techniques, each with its unique advantages and limitations. Future research on patient-reported outcomes, cosmetic outcomes, breast biopsy markers and integration of augmented reality with breast lesion localization are needed.

Impact of surgical types on overall survival in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: an analysis based on the SEER database.

Background: Breast cancer, as one of the most common malignancies among women globally, presents a concerning incidence rate, underscoring the importance of addressing the treatment of its precursor lesion, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Treatment decisions for DCIS, involving the balance between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy, remain an area requiring further investigation. This study aimed to compare influence of different surgical types on overall survival (OS) of patients with DCIS and identify specific subgroups with improved OS to develop an effective survival nomogram for patients. Methods: Patient data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for DCIS cohort from 2010 to 2020 were retrieved. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves were utilized to compare prognostic OS of patients with different surgical methods. Cox regression analysis was employed to determine prognostic factors and establish a nomogram to predict 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates. The model was confirmed by Concordance Index (C-index), calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 71,675 patients with DCIS were included. Patients who underwent subcutaneous mastectomy (SM) demonstrated the best OS compared to other surgical types. Additionally, adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy in combination with surgery significantly improved OS compared to surgery alone. Among DCIS patients aged ≤74 years, those who underwent SM benefited the most in terms of OS, while in the age group of 63-74 years, patients who underwent BCS had significantly higher OS than those who underwent total (simple) mastectomy (TM)/modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Multiple factors were associated with improved OS in DCIS patients, and these factors were integrated into the nomogram to establish OS predictions. The C-index, calibration curves, and ROC curves indicated that the nomogram was suitable for assessing patient prognosis. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that SM treatment yielded the best survival rates for DCIS patients, providing important guidance for future surgical decision-making. Moreover, identifying multiple independent factors related to survival and establishing reliable survival nomograms can assist physicians in developing personalized treatment plans and prolonging patient survival.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based prognostic model for subsequent distant metastasis in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following breast-conserving surgery.

Background: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been considered a risk factor for distant metastasis (DM). Limited data are available regarding the subsequent outcomes after IBTR. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the clinical course after IBTR and develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based predictive model for subsequent DM. Methods: We retrospectively extracted quantitative features from MRI to construct a radiomics cohort, with all eligible patients undergoing preoperative MRI at time of primary tumor and IBTR between 2010 and 2018. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify factors associated with DM. Three models were constructed using different sets of clinicopathological, qualitative, and quantitative MRI features and compared. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of the optimal model. Results: Among the 183 patients who experienced IBTR, 47 who underwent MRI for both primary and recurrent tumors were enrolled. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the independent prognostic factors were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status [hazard ratio (HR) =5.40] and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) (HR =7.94) (all P values <0.01). Furthermore, four quantitative MRI features of recurrent tumors were selected through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. The combined model exhibited superior performance [concordance index (C-index) 0.77] compared to the clinicoradiological model (C-index 0.71; P=0.006) and radiomics model (C-index 0.70; and P=0.01). Furthermore, the combined model successfully categorized patients into low- and high-risk subgroups with distinct prognoses (P<0.001). Conclusions: The clinicopathological and MRI features of IBTR were associated with secondary events following surgery. Additionally, the MRI-based combined model exhibited the highest predictive efficacy. These findings could be helpful in risk stratification and tailoring follow-up strategies in patients with IBTR.

The potential of indocyanine green fluorescence detection in surgical cut margin of breast conserving surgery.

Background: Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is a cutting-edge technology that uses near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging to guide surgeons in surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye, which can be used for in vivo imaging of tumor cells. We aimed to explore the use of ICG fluorescence-guided technology as a rapid intraoperative margin assessment method for breast cancer surgery. In addition, we also compared the dose selection of ICG. Methods: This was a non-randomized prospective cohort study. Data were collected between August 2021 and October 2022 in the Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University. Upon specimen removal, tumor margins were immediately analyzed by ICG fluorescence detection and then sent to the pathology department for intraoperative frozen section analysis and subsequent routine pathological examination. Abnormal margin rates were calculated and compared using intraoperative frozen section analysis and under the guidance of ICG fluorescence. Results: The study included 69 cases of breast cancer patients who underwent tumor resection assisted by ICG fluorescence-guided technology, including 18 patients with a 0.5 mg/kg dose and 51 patients with a 1.0 mg/kg dose. According to the study findings, the ICG test achieved a sensitivity of 81.82% and a specificity of 75.82%. At a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, the sensitivity was 66.67% whereas the specificity was 93.33%. At the dose of 1 mg/kg, the sensitivity was 87.5%, and the specificity was 74.42%. Similarly, for intraoperative frozen section analysis, the sensitivity was 81.82%, but the specificity was enhanced to 94.83%. Positive surgical cut margin was not identified in 2/69 by ICG fluorescence and frozen section analysis respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity of ICG fluorescence detection is comparable to that of frozen section analysis, but the specificity is poor. The sensitivity increased and the specificity decreased at 1 mg/kg compared to the 0.5 mg/kg dose. ICG fluorescence can be used as a supplementary tool for frozen section analysis. These findings support further development and clinical performance assessment of ICG fluorescence.

Microsurgery in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.

Oncoplastic breast reconstruction has allowed for the optimization of oncologic and reconstructive outcomes after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Volume replacement procedures in oncoplastic reconstruction most commonly utilize regional pedicled flaps, though several studies have reported benefits to free tissue transfer for oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction in the immediate, delayed-immediate and delayed settings. Microvascular oncoplastic breast reconstruction is a useful technique in the appropriate patients with small-to-medium size breasts and larger tumor-to-breast ratios who desire to preserve breast size, those with a paucity of regional breast tissue and patients that wish to avoid chest wall and back scars. Several free flap options for partial breast reconstruction exist, including superficially-based abdominal flaps, medial thigh-based flaps, deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps and thoracodorsal artery-based flaps. However, special consideration should be given to preserving donor sites for potential future total autologous breast reconstruction with any flap choice that should be tailored to individual recurrence risk. Aesthetically placed incisions should take recipient vessel access into consideration which include the internal mammary vessels and perforators medially, and then intercostal, serratus branch and thoracodorsal vessels laterally. The utilization of a thin strip of lower abdominal tissue based on the superficial abdominal circulation allows for a well-concealed donor site with minimal morbidity and preservation of the abdominal donor site if future total autologous breast reconstruction is needed. Optimizing outcomes requires a team-based approach to appropriately design recipient and donor-site considerations while individualizing tumor and patient-specific plans.

A retrospective comparative cohort study of SEER database analysis of the prognostic value of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in patients with multifocal multicenter breast cancer.

Background: The prognosis of multifocal multicentric breast cancer (MIBC) was related to many factors, and there are different recommendations for surgical approaches. We compare the effects of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy on the survival of multifocal multicenter breast cancer female patients. Methods: A total of 38,164 female patients with pathologically confirmed multifocal multicenter invasive breast cancer from 2000 to 2018 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were extracted, and the effects of different factors on the survival of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a BCS group and a mastectomy group, and the differences of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Of the 38,164 patients included in the analysis, 14,533 (38.08%) underwent BCS and 23,631 (61.92%) underwent mastectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that age, grading, staging, number of lesions, radiotherapy, and BCS would affect the independent factors of BCSS and OS in patients. The median follow-up time was 108 months [interquartile range (IQR): 64-162 months). Multifactorial Cox proportional model analysis of prognostic risk showed that BCS reduced BCSS in patients older than 70 years [hazard ratio (HR): 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-1.53; P<0.001], stage I and II, positive hormone receptor (HR), all 2-3 lesions, no radiotherapy (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.33-1.6; P<0.001) and no chemotherapy (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.28-1.57; P<0.001); BCS also reduced OS in patients over 40 years of age, stages I, II, and IIIC, all molecular subtypes, all HR-positive or negative, 2-3 lesions, and no radiotherapy (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.31-1.46; P<0.001) and no chemotherapy (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.29-1.44; P<0.001) patients. Multivariate Cox regression showed that BCS is an adverse factor for BCSS [adjusted HR 1.2 (1.11-1.3), P<0.001] and OS [adjusted HR 1.24 (1.19-1.3), P<0.001]. Conclusions: In early, good prognosis, treatment-sensitive patients, there is no survival advantage for BCS and more BCSS and OS benefit for mastectomy patients.

Comparative effectiveness of nipple-sparing mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery on long-term prognosis in breast cancer.

Background: The frequency of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) surgery is presently increasing. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of long-term prognosis data on NSM. This study compared the long-standing prognosis of NSM in relation to breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: Population-level data for 438,588 female breast cancer patients treated with NSM or BCS and postoperative radiation from 2000 to 2018 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database; 321 patients from the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were also included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the influence of selection bias and confounding variables to make valid comparisons. The Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression were applied to analyze the data. Results: There were no significant differences in long-term survival rates between patients who underwent NSM and those who underwent BCS+radiotherapy (BCS+RT), as indicated by the lack of significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.566) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (p = 0.431). Cox regression indicated that NSM and BCS+RT had comparable prognostic values (p = 0.286) after adjusting for other clinicopathological characteristics. For OS and BCSS, subgroup analysis showed that the majority of patients achieved an analogous prognosis whether they underwent NSM or BCS. The groups had comparable recurrence-free survival (RFS), with no significant difference found (p = 0.873). Conclusions: This study offers valuable insights into the long-term safety and comparative effectiveness of NSM and BCS in the treatment of breast cancer. These findings can assist clinicians in making informed decisions on a case-by-case basis.

Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Tissues after Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on Mapping the Attenuation Coefficients in 3D Cross-Polarization Optical Coherence Tomography.

Intraoperative differentiation of tumorous from non-tumorous tissue can help in the assessment of resection margins in breast cancer and its response to therapy and, potentially, reduce the incidence of tumor recurrence. In this study, the calculation of the attenuation coefficient and its color-coded 2D distribution was performed for different breast cancer subtypes using spectral-domain CP OCT. A total of 68 freshly excised human breast specimens containing tumorous and surrounding non-tumorous tissues after BCS was studied. Immediately after obtaining structural 3D CP OCT images, en face color-coded attenuation coefficient maps were built in co-(Att(co)) and cross-(Att(cross)) polarization channels using a depth-resolved approach to calculating the values in each A-scan. We determined spatially localized signal attenuation in both channels and reported ranges of attenuation coefficients to five selected breast tissue regions (adipose tissue, non-tumorous fibrous connective tissue, hyalinized tumor stroma, low-density tumor cells in the fibrotic tumor stroma and high-density clusters of tumor cells). The Att(cross) coefficient exhibited a stronger gain contrast of studied tissues compared to the Att(co) coefficient (i.e., conventional attenuation coefficient) and, therefore, allowed improved differentiation of all breast tissue types. It has been shown that color-coded attenuation coefficient maps may be used to detect inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity of various breast cancer subtypes as well as to assess the effectiveness of therapy. For the first time, the optimal threshold values of the attenuation coefficients to differentiate tumorous from non-tumorous breast tissues were determined. Diagnostic testing values for Att(cross) coefficient were higher for differentiation of tumor cell areas and tumor stroma from non-tumorous fibrous connective tissue: diagnostic accuracy was 91-99%, sensitivity-96-98%, and specificity-87-99%. Att(co) coefficient is more suitable for the differentiation of tumor cell areas from adipose tissue: diagnostic accuracy was 83%, sensitivity-84%, and specificity-84%. Therefore, the present study provides a new diagnostic approach to the differentiation of breast cancer tissue types based on the assessment of the attenuation coefficient from real-time CP OCT data and has the potential to be used for further rapid and accurate intraoperative assessment of the resection margins during BCS.

Comparison of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy and mastectomy in the treatment of elderly patients with early breast cancer: A PSM and SEER database study.

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no research on which surgical method can lead to a better prognosis in elderly patients with early breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to establish a nomogram to predict the survival outcome of elderly patients with early breast cancer and to compare the prognosis of the breast-conserving surgery (BCS) group who did not receive postoperative radiotherapy and the mastectomy group through risk stratification. METHODS: This study included patients with early breast cancer aged ≥70 years from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (n = 20,520). The group was randomly divided into a development cohort (n = 14,363) and a validation cohort (n = 6157) according to a ratio of 7:3. Risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Present results were obtained by constructing nomograms and risk stratifications. Nomograms were evaluated by the concordance index and calibration curve. Kaplan-Meier curves were established based on BCSS and analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression results showed that age, race, pathological grade, T and N stages, and progesterone receptor (PR) status were independent risk factors for OS and BCSS in the BCS group and mastectomy group. Subsequently, they were incorporated into nomograms to predict 3- and 5-year OS and BCSS in patients after BCS and mastectomy. The concordance index was between 0.704 and 0.832, and the nomograms also showed good calibration. The results of risk stratification showed that there was no survival difference between the BCS group and the mastectomy group in the low-risk and high-risk groups. In the middle-risk group, BCS improved the BCSS of patients to a certain extent. CONCLUSION: This study constructed a well-performing nomogram and risk stratification model to assess the survival benefit of BCS without postoperative radiotherapy in elderly patients with early breast cancer. The results of the study can help clinicians analyze the prognosis of patients and the benefits of surgical methods individually.

Comparison of ultrasound guided surgery and radio-guided occult lesions localization (ROLL) for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.

Background: There is little literature comparing intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) with radio-guided occult lesions localization (ROLL) in nonpalpable invasive tumors in breast conserving surgery (BCS). There is a need to compare these two methods in terms of safety and efficacy. Methods: This is an observational cohort study. All patients treated with BCS for nonpalpable invasive breast cancer using IOUS from March 2016 to March 2020 were included and compared with a historical reference control group operated on using ROLL from March 2013 to March 2017. For each detection method, the ability to locate tumors intraoperatively, tumor and surgical specimen sizes, total resection volume (TRV), optimal resection volume, excess of healthy tissue resected (ETR), margin status, re-excision rate, surgical time, complications and costs were studied. Results: One hundred and fifty-eight were included, 83 with IOUS and 75 with ROLL. The mean tumor size is equivalent in both groups (11.88 mm IOUS vs. 12.29 mm ROLL, P=0.668). TRV is significantly lower with IOUS (24.92 vs. 60.32 cm3, P<0.001), and the ETR is also significantly lower in the IOUS group (21.74 vs. 58.37 cm3, P<0.001). The rate of positive margins did not differ (10.98% vs. 12.16%, P=1), nor did re-excision rate (10.98% vs. 8.11%, P=0.597). Complication rate did not differ (12.2% IOUS vs. 10.81% ROLL, P=0.808). Surgical time was shorter in IOUS (45.5 vs. 57 min, P>0.05). Conclusions: IOUS in BCS for nonpalpable invasive breast cancer is more accurate than ROLL because it decreases excision volumes with the same rate of free margins and re-excision. Also, IOUS is a more efficient and comfortable technique, and just as safe as ROLL.

Quality of life of breast cancer survivors: a comparison of breast conserving surgery versus total mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction: a prospective cohort study.

Quality of life after breast cancer surgery is frequently ignored during and after treatment in many cancer survivors. To enhance this aspect of patient's life should be the primary goal of every cancer treatment. Therefore, the present study aimed to highlight the quality of life and patients' satisfaction with their breast cosmesis following breast conserving surgery (BCS), total mastectomy with and without reconstruction. Material and methods: Data were collected prospectively from cancer patients who had undergone breast surgery at our institution from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021. The validated Breast-Q questionnaires were utilized for conducting patient interviews and mean scores between three cohorts were compared using one-way ANOVA test / Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Overall, 210 patients were recruited in which 70 patients (33.3%) had undergone BCS, 71 patients (33.8%) had total mastectomy only and 69 (32.9%) patients had total mastectomy with reconstruction. Physical well-being scores were consistent between the three groups while patients operated with total mastectomy with reconstructive surgery scored higher in sexual and psychosocial health measures as compared to patients of total mastectomy. However, BCS patients were the most satisfied with their cosmetic outcome following patients of total mastectomy with reconstruction and without reconstruction. Conclusion: Reconstruction postmastectomy has a positive impact on sexual and psychosocial well-being of survivors; however, those who had breast conservation were more satisfied with cosmetic outcome post-surgery as compared with mastectomy with or without reconstruction.

A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiation treatment is the favored alternative for mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. To allow for breast conservation in patients with large invasive tumors and poor response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) or patients with extensive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPBCS) techniques are introduced. OPBCS allows for breast conservation in a selective group of breast cancer patients who initially would have been treated with mastectomy due to the unfavorable tumor-to-breast ratio. With OPBCS, the oncological tumor excision is combined with plastic surgical breast conservation techniques without compromising oncological safety and maintaining aesthetic outcomes by preserving the shape of the breast. OPBCS should however not be applied to all breast cancer patients and the selection of patients who benefit from OPBCS and the timing of OPBCS are best discussed in a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Caution is required in patients with higher risk of positive margins [e.g., multifocal breast cancer, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), larger tumors and DCIS]. In these patients, delayed OPBCS is recommended to facilitate re-excision and maintain excellent breast conserving rates. Despite proven benefits in selected patients, the increase in the adoption of OPBCS is relatively low. This article provides a clinical perspective on OPBCS.

Preoperative MRI features predict failed breast-conserving surgery: construction of a predictive model.

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the preferred method for early breast cancer, and the accurate preoperative prediction of the feasibility of BCS can formulate the surgical plan and reduce the violation of the patient's will. The present study proposed to explore the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with failed BCS and constructed an MRI-based model to predict BCS. Methods: This retrospective study included patients between March 2015 and July 2016, who planned to undergo BCS, had preoperative MRI examination, and had at least 2 years of follow-up. A total of 30 patients with failed BCS were identified and matched with 90 patients with successful BCS (ratio 1:3) according to age, neoadjuvant therapy, and hormone receptor expression. The patients were divided into the training group for model construction and the testing group for model validation. The MRI features, including the site of the tumor, the lesion type, and the lesion and breast volume, were compared between failure and successful BCS groups. A multivariate logistic model for predicting failed BCS was constructed using independent factors associated with failed BCS from the training group and was evaluated in the testing group. The performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 45.7±10.3 years. A significantly more non-mass lesion and multifocality, the larger volume of lesion, and the ratio of lesion and breast volume were observed in failed BCS group compared to the successful BCS group. The ratio of lesion and breast volume and multifocality were independent factors associated with failed BCS, odds ratios were 1.044 (95% CI: 1.016-1.074) and 11.161 (95% CI: 1.739-71.652), respectively. An MRI-based model for predicting failed BCS was established, the area under the ROC curves in the training and testing group were 0.902 and 0.821, respectively. Conclusions: This model might help clinicians predict failed BCS preoperatively and make an accurate surgical strategy.