RESUMO
Levosimendan, a novel drug, a calcium-sensitizing inotrope, has emerged as a potential therapeutic modulator for heart failure (HF). This review appraises the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in managing HF, in different clinical settings. The study aims to examine the clinical outcomes reported in the selected trials to determine the effectiveness of levosimendan in improving key parameters related to HF. Seven relevant studies encompassing 1200 participants were identified from three databases. Inclusion criteria included clinical trials that investigated the therapeutic efficacy of levosimendan in the treatment of HF, and studies involving both adult and pediatric participants. Exclusion criteria involved studies with insufficient data, studies other than clinical trials, case reports, letters to the editor, conference papers, grey literature, and studies published in a language other than English. Upon evaluating the included studies, it was found that levosimendan shows improved hemodynamics and clinical efficacy in patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy. Levosimendan enhanced right ventricular (RV) function in patients with RV dysfunction after mitral valve (MV) surgeries and decreased the amount of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) in non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with elevated NT-proBNP, all without increasing the overall cost or duration of hospitalization. Despite variations in study designs and participant characteristics, evidence suggests levosimendan significantly improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and exercise tolerance measured by a six-minute walk distance. Notably, its safety profile appears favorable with minimal arrhythmic events and comparable rates of adverse effects to a placebo. This systematic review highlights levosimendan's promising potential for HF management, warranting further research to solidify its clinical role.
RESUMO
Levosimendan (LS) has been progressively used for the treatment of patients developing acute as well as chronic or advanced cardiac dysfunction. It has proven to be a better inotropic agent than its counterparts in terms of its ability to increase the cardiac output in an acutely or chronically decompensated heart without an increase in the myocardial oxygen demand. The purpose of this systematic review, which was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020, was to determine the efficacy and advantages of utilizing LS in patients with both acute and chronic heart failure. We collected and reviewed articles, including clinical trials, literature reviews, randomized and non-randomized control trials, case-control and cohort studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 1, 2012, and November 27, 2022. The databases that were used to collect these articles included Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. After applying appropriate filters, a total of 143 reports were identified from these four databases. They were further screened and subjected to quality assessment tools which finally yielded 21 studies that were included in this systematic review. This review provides strong evidence that the pharmacological properties and different mechanisms of action of LS give it an upper hand over other inotropic agents for its successful administration in patients with either acute or advanced cardiac failure, which consists of left as well as right ventricular failure, either individually or in combination.