Ultrasonography-guided canal decompression combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for stage III Kümmell's disease with neurological deficits: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty is the preferred procedure for stage I and II Kümmell's diseases (KDs), but there exist controversies on the operative option of stage III KD. This study aimed at exploring the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography-guided canal decompression (UG-CD) combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CA-PSF) for treating stage III KD with neurological deficit (ND). METHODS: Between September 2017 and December 2023, all patients who received the UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF for managing stage III KD with NDs were reviewed retrospectively with their demographic and operation data, and complications recorded. Besides, the scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), together with imaging data including the kyphotic Cobb angle (KCA), wedge angle (WA), spinal canal area (SCA) at the narrowest level as well as anterior (AHR) and middle (MHR) height ratios were measured and compared between pre- and post-operation. RESULTS: A total of eleven patients with a mean age of 70.09 ± 2.98 years old were included in our study with their surgical time, hospitalization length, blood loss, and follow-up time being 150.91 ± 17.94 min, 202.09 ± 39.95 ml, 8.18 ± 1.17 days, and 16.91 ± 4.09 months, respectively. During the final follow-up, the KCA, WA, VAS scores, ODI scores, AHR, MHR, and SCA were significantly improved (P < 0.01). Intraoperatively, one case suffered a transient decrease in the motor evoked potential. Another case experienced a cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively that was then successfully treated. CONCLUSION: UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF could be a feasible procedure for safely and effectively handling stage III KD with NDs.

The incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: In cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF), epidural cement leakage (CL) is a frequently reported complication with the potential for neural injury, especially when it is extensive. To date, there has been no reports discussing basivertebral foramen morphology and pedicle screw placement, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of extensive epidural CL. Thus, this study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural CL in osteoporotic patients with CAPSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was utilized to characterize basivertebral foramen morphology. Following CAPSF, the severity of epidural CL, the implantation position of pedicle screw and cement extension within the vertebral body were determined by postoperative CT. In this study, significant risk factors for extensive epidural CL were identified through logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive epidural CL. Nine patients (involving 19 screws) had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for patients with extensive epidural CL were decreased BMD and increased number of augmented screws. Significant predictors for extensive epidural CL were a magistral type of basivertebral foramen, more volume of cement injected, solid screw, a shallower screw implantation, and the smaller distance between the tip of the screw and the midline of vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Extensive epidural CL risk was significant in CAPSF when a magistral basivertebral foramen was present; solid screws and more volume of cement were used; and screw tip was implanted shallower or closer to the midline.

Comparison of cement-augmented pedicle screw and conventional pedicle screw for the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and clinical efficacy between using cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) and conventional pedicle screws (CPS) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis. Management of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis undergoing spine surgery is challenging. The clinical efficacy and potential complications of the mid-term performance of the CAPS technique in the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis remain to be evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 131 lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis who were treated with screw fixation from May 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the type of screw used: (I) the CAPS group (n = 85); and (II) the CPS group (n = 46). Relevant data were compared between two groups, including the demographics data, clinical results and complications. RESULTS: The difference in the VAS, ODI and JOA scores at three and 6 months after the operation between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At 12 months after surgery and the final follow-up, a significant difference in the fusion rate was found between the two groups (P < 0.05). Four cemented screws loosening were observed in the CAPS group (loosening rate 4/384, 1.04%) and 15 screws loosening were observed in the CPS group (loosening rate 15/214, 7.01%). In the CAPS group, a total of 384 augmented screws were used, and cement leakage was observed in 25 screws (25/384, 6.51%), but no obvious clinical symptoms or serious complications were observed. Adjacent vertebral fractures occurred in six patients in the CAPS group and one in the CPS group. CONCLUSIONS: CAPS technique is an effective strategy for the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis, with a higher fusion rate and lower screw loosening rate than CPS.

Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review.

Fixation using cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) is being increasingly performed. However, CAPS-associated cement leakage is a critical problem that can lead to cardiopulmonary cement embolism (CPCE). This narrative review aimed to explore the incidence of and risk factors and treatment strategies for CPCE and cement leakage-related complications after CAPS fixation. Data were extracted from each article, including characteristics of CPCE after CAPS fixation (incidence, location, diagnostic method and criteria, treatment, and outcome and prognosis). Overall, 28 case series and 14 case reports that met the inclusion criteria were included. Of the 1974 cases included in the review, CPCE was noted in 123, symptomatic CPCE in 35, and death in six, respectively. The frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation were 6% (range: 0-28.6%) and 1.3% (range: 0-26%), respectively. The range of frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation may have been wide because the definition of CPCE and data collection methods differed among the reports analyzed. Since PCE due to large cement emboli may be primarily related to the surgical technique, improved technique, such as minimizing the number of CAPSs by injecting low-volume high-viscosity cement at low velocity and pressure, and careful observation of cement leakage during CAPS insertion may reduce PCE associated with cement leakage. Spinal surgeons should pay more attention to the occurrence of CPCE during and after CAPS insertion, which can cause serious complications in some patients.

Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease.

BACKGROUND: The increase of augmented level and bone cement dose are accompanied by the rising incidence of cement leakage (CL) of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI). But the effect and potential risks of the application of CAPSI to osteoporotic lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) have not been studied in the case of multilevel fixation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and potential complications of using multilevel CAPSI for patients with osteoporotic LDD. METHODS: A total of 93 patients with multilevel LDD were divided into the CAPSI group (46 subjects) and the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group (47 subjects), including 75 cases for three levels and 18 cases for four levels. Relevant data were compared between two groups, including baseline data, clinical results, and complications. RESULTS: In the CAPSI group, a total of 336 augmented screws was placed bilaterally. The CL was observed in 116 screws (34.52%). Three cemented screws (0.89%) were found loosened during the follow-up and the overall fusion rate was 93.47%. For perioperative complications, two patients (4.35%) experienced pulmonary cement embolism (PCE), one patient augmented vertebral fracture, and three patients (6.52%) wound infection. And in the CPS group, thirty-three screws (8.46%) suffered loosening in cranial and caudal vertebra with a fusion rate of 91.49%. The operation time and hospital stay of CAPSI group were longer than the CPS group, but CAPSI group has a lower screw loosening percentage (P<0. 05). And in terms of blood loss, perioperative complications, fusion rate, and VAS and ODI scores at the follow-up times, there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with osteoporotic LDD underwent multilevel CPS fixation have a higher rate of screw loosening in the cranial and caudal vertebra. The application of cemented pedicle screws for multilevel LDD can achieve better stability and less screw loosening, but it also accompanied by longer operating time, higher incidence of CL, PCE and wound infections. Selective cement augmentation of cranial and caudal pedicle screws may be a worthy strategy to decrease the complications.

The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: a retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, type and risk factors of cement leakage (CL) with cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) in degenerative lumbosacral disease. METHODS: Two hundred and two patients using a total of 950 cement-augmented screws were enrolled. CL was classified into three types: type S: leakage via segmental veins; type B: leakage via basivertebral veins; and type I: leakage via pedicle screw instrumentation to paravertebral soft tissue. The age, gender, operation stage (primary or later stage), body mass index, bone mineral density, the number and type of augmented screw, the position of the tip of screw (lateral or internal part of vertebral body), the position of screw (left or right side), the volume of bone cement, location of the augmented vertebra (lumbar or sacrum), the type of CL and complications were recorded. Binary logistic regression correlation was used to analyze risk factors of veins leakage (type S and type B). RESULTS: The CL was observed in 165 patients (81.68%) and 335 screws (35.26%), leakage types of S, B and I were seen in 255 (76.12%), 77 (22.99%), and 30 (8.96%) of screws, respectively. Besides, double or multiple routes of leakage were seen in 27 screws. Number of augmented screw was a risk factor for vein leakage (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.44-0.77; P = 0.000). Furthermore, the doses of cement (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.61-0.99; P = 0.038) and the position of screw (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.29-0.53; P = 0.000) were identified as risk factors for type S, and the doses of bone cement (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.54; P = 0.000) and the position of the tip of screw (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.04-0.13; P = 0.000) were risk factors for type B. CONCLUSIONS: CAPSI bears a high risk of asymptomatic CL, with a higher rate of leakage into segmental veins and basivertebral veins. As is known, more augmented screws and larger doses of cement are risk factors for veins leakage (type S and type B), while the tip of screw approaching to the midline of the vertebral body is another risk factor to type B. Thus, the CL could be reduced by the amelioration of operative techniques and procedures. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine - A case report.

Background: Few studies discuss the complication of pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) due to cement augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) of the thoracolumbar spine. Case Description: A 62 female with a history of multiple myeloma and Sjogren's syndrome on chronic steroids developed an osteoporotic L1 compression fracture and underwent posterior stabilization with a T10-L4 CAPSI. However, postoperatively, the patient developed a surgical site infection and a PCE, resulting in severe respiratory compromise and death 1 month later. Conclusion: When performing a T10-L4 thoracolumbar CAPSI (i.e., augmented pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine) to address an L1 osteoporotic compression fracture, a 62 year old patient developed a life ending multi organ deficiency due to sepsis together with a PCE.

Anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen with a magistral form in vertebral bodies of T10~L5 and its clinical significance for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There are no reports discussing anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen (BVF) in the osteoporotic vertebral body, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of epidural cement leakage (ECL) after cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF). METHODS: 371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to determine the frequency, width, height, and depth of magistral BVF in T10~L5. Additionally, we measured the distance between BVF and the left/right borders of vertebral body as well as the distance between BVF and upper/lower endplates. Following CAPSF, the severity of ECL and the position of pedicle screws were determined by postoperative CT. Finally, significant risk factors for extensive ECL were identified through binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 2968 vertebral bodies ranging from T10 to L5, 801 (42.2%) had a magistral BVF. From T10 to L5, the frequency of magistral BVF appeared to gradually increase. The magistral BVF was much closer to the upper endplate and the depth accounted for about a quarter of anteroposterior diameter of vertebral body. Overall, there were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive ECL, nine of whom had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for extensive ECL were the magistral BVF (OR = 8.62, P < 0.001), more volume of cement injected (OR = 1.57, P = 0.031), reduced distance from screw tip to vertebral midline (OR = 0.76, P = 0.003) and vertebral posterior wall (OR = 0.77, P < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: When planning a CAPSF procedure, it is important to consider anatomical distribution of BVF and improve screw implantation methods.

Efficacy of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for osteoporotic mid-thoracic vertebral fractures.

Background: Osteoporotic mid-thoracic vertebral fractures (OmTVF), often result in severe pain, and neurological deficits secondary to cord compression. Cement-augmented pedicle screw (CaPS) fixation with posterior spinal decompression (PSD) offers simultaneous decompression with stabilization of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods: The study involved 32 patients (2022-2023) with T8-T10 osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures resulting in cord compression. All patients underwent CaPS surgery with PSD. Pain reduction was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and outcomes with the Oswestry Disability Index, and the American Spinal Injury Association Grades. The local kyphotic angle was also tracked with computed tomography studies performed 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively. Results: The average pre-operative VAS score was 8.56 mm; this decreased at 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively to 2.72 mm, 2.03 mm, and 1.44 mm, respectively. In addition, 31 of 32 patients fully recovered within 6 postoperative months. Conclusion: For 31 of 32 patients with T8-T10 osteoporotic vertebral fractures, CaPS fixation with PSD successfully alleviated pain and resulted in significant post-operative neurological recovery.

Risk factor analysis of bone cement leakage for polymethylmethacrylate-augmented cannulated pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders.

Objective: To investigate the risk factors of cement leakage (CL) for polymethylmethacrylate-augmented cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) in spinal degenerative diseases and provided technical guidance for clinical surgery. Methods: This study enrolled 276 patients with spinal degenerative disease and osteoporosis who were augmented using CPSs (835 screws in total) from May 2011 to June 2018 in our hospital. The patients' age, sex, bone mineral density (BMD), diagnosis, augmented positions, number of CPS implanted, and CL during surgery were recorded. CL was observed by postoperative computed tomography (CT) and was classified by Yeom typing. Results: A total of 74 (74/835, 8.9%) CPSs in 64 patients leaked (64/276, 23.2%). CL was significantly correlated with the number and position of screws (P < 0.05), but not with sex, age, and BMD (P > 0.05). The position, number of CPSs, fracture, degenerative scoliosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and revision surgery were risk factors for CL (P < 0.05). Augmentation of the thoracic vertebral body, fracture, and ankylosing spondylitis were independent risk factors for Type S. Augmentation of the lumbar vertebral body, lumbar disc herniation, and lumbar spondylolisthesis were independent risk factors for Type B (P < 0.05). Conclusions: CL has a high incidence in clinical practice. High-risk factors for leakage should be addressed to avoid serious complications. Particularly, it is necessary to develop alternative solutions once CPSs can't be used in surgery caused by CL.

Minimally Invasive Approach for Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH)-Related Vertebral Fractures: A Case Report on Combining Vertebral Cement Augmentation and Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)-related vertebral fractures often require surgical intervention due to associated spinal instability and neurological deficits. This study presents a minimally invasive approach that utilizes vertebral cement augmentation and cement-augmented pedicle screw (PS) instrumentation to manage DISH-related vertebral fractures. We present an 87-year-old male patient with a T11 vertebral fracture associated with DISH. Despite the patient's advanced age and comorbidities, he underwent a successful surgical procedure, achieving relatively short-segment fixation by combining vertebral cement augmentation and cement-augmented PS instrumentation. After the surgery, the patient's lower back pain subsided, facilitating a return to normal activities. Radiographic evaluation at the six-month postoperative stage confirmed the maintenance of vertebral body reduction with no indications of implant failure. In DISH-associated vertebral fractures, the combined application of vertebral cement augmentation and cement-augmented PS instrumentation offers a minimally invasive solution that expedites fracture stabilization and enhances patient outcomes. This approach offers the potential for effective fracture stabilization and a significant reduction in postoperative complications, holding promise for managing challenging cases in this patient population.

Intracardiac, pulmonary cement embolism in a 67-year-old female after cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of Intracardiac, pulmonary, and intravenous cement embolism after cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in treating spondylolisthesis underlying osteoporotic bone, which was successfully managed by conservative treatment. We describe the treatment and outcome of the patient, hoping to shed light on the management of bone cement embolism. CASE SUMMARY: A 67-year-old female suffered from progressive low back pain and numbness in lower extremities for 30 years. She was diagnosed with L4 and L5 spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and osteoporosis. The patient underwent spinal canal decompression, an interbody fusion of L4/5 and L5/S1, cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in L4-L5 segments, and regular pedicle screw in S1 segments. Three days postoperatively, a sudden drop in oxygen saturation occurred. Computerized tomography scan confirmed Intracardiac, pulmonary, and intravenous embolism. The patient was treated conservatively by continuous low-flow oxygen inhalation, anti-coagulation, and antibiotic therapy for 1 mo and continued anticoagulation treatment for 6 mo. The patient showed no further symptoms in a 30-mo follow-up. CONCLUSION: Intracardiac, pulmonary cement embolism after cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation is extremely rare. Careful clinical and radiographic evaluation is required in multiple sites of bone cement embolism. Conservative treatment may be a primary consideration in scattered emboli without life-threatening conditions, but a clinical decision should be made on an individualized basis.

Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). METHODS: A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. RESULTS: The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. CONCLUSION: In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.

Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine.

BACKGROUND: Cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) of the thoracolumbar spine is indicated in osteoporosis or osteopenia to improve pullout strength and biomechanical stability of pedicle screws (PS). Only a few studies report on the incidence of pulmonary cement embolism or other complications associated with CAPSI. PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the rate of CAPSI-associated complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent CAPSI due to spinal tumors or degenerative spine disease. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cement leakage, pulmonary cement embolism (PCE), mortality rate. METHODS: Our clinical database was reviewed for patients who underwent CAPSI between January 2012 and June 2015. A total of 165 patients (mean age 71±11.2; range: 46 to 93 years; m=62, f=103) were included. Indications were osteoporotic fractures (n=40), spinal metastases (n=57), degenerative (n=49) or infectious spine disease (n=5), and traumatic vertebral fractures (n=14) with an associated osteoporosis. Every patient received between 2 and 21 (mean 8±3.3) cement-augmented pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine. Both intraoperative cement leakage in prevertebral veins, the inferior vena cava, and/or pulmonary arteries, and leakage detected on postoperative imaging were evaluated. We assessed the incidence of clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic events. RESULTS: In 29 of 31 patients with intraoperative suspicion of cement leakage into prevertebral veins or the inferior vena cava on lateral fluoroscopy, which were without hemodynamic relevance, cement extrusion was confirmed on postoperative X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scan. In three of eight patients with suspicion of PCE, PCE was verified on thoracic CT. Four patients experienced life-threatening intraoperative hemodynamic reactions, either due to cement embolism (n=2; 1.2%) or anaphylactic shock (n=2; 1.2%) with need for intraoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation in three cases. Two patients died due to fulminant PCE. Three patients with dyspnea 1 day after surgery were also confirmed with PCE on chest CT. In five patients, an asymptomatic PCE was found incidentally on postoperative imaging. In addition, 68 patients with cement leakage into prevertebral veins or the ascending cava vein were found incidentally on postoperative spine X-ray or CT. Two of 10 patients with intraspinal epidural cement leakage required revision surgery. One hundred ten of 165 patients (66.7%) had clinically asymptomatic cement leakage. Thirteen patients had PCE (7.9%), of whom five (3.0%) were symptomatic. Two patients experienced intraoperative cement-induced anaphylaxis (1.2%). The overall symptomatic complication rate was 5.5% (n=9). The 30-day mortality rate was 1.8% (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: CAPSI bears a high risk of asymptomatic cement leakage. The risk for associated severe complications was also relatively high and probably underestimated considering the retrospective nature of the present study. A strict indication for cement augmentation, especially in patients with cardiac predisposition, should be the consequence. We doubt that technical aspects of cement application and/or different types of cement are capable of reducing the risk of these complications substantially.