RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between neighborhood income and burden of hospitalizations for children with short bowel syndrome (SBS). STUDY DESIGN: We used the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database to evaluate associations between neighborhood income and hospital readmissions, readmissions for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), and hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients <18 years with SBS hospitalized between January 1, 2006, and October 1, 2015. We analyzed readmissions with recurrent event analysis and analyzed LOS with linear mixed effects modeling. We used a conceptual model to guide our multivariable analyses, adjusting for race, ethnicity, and insurance status. RESULTS: We included 4289 children with 16â347 hospitalizations from 43 institutions. Fifty-seven percent of the children were male, 21% were Black, 19% were Hispanic, and 67% had public insurance. In univariable analysis, children from low-income neighborhoods had a 38% increased risk for all-cause hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR] 1.38, 95% CI 1.10-1.72, P = .01), an 83% increased risk for CLABSI hospitalizations (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.37-2.44, P < .001), and increased hospital LOS (ß 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-0.29, P = .04). In multivariable analysis, the association between low-income neighborhoods and elevated risk for CLABSI hospitalizations persisted (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.23-2.35, P < .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Children with SBS from low-income neighborhoods are at increased risk for hospitalizations due to CLABSI. Examination of specific household- and neighborhood-level factors contributing to this disparity may inform equity-based interventions.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Intestino Curto , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/terapia , Renda , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: Bacteremia episodes from 2020 to 2022 from a prospective cohort of pediatric oncology patients with a central venous catheter were included. Episodes were classified by three medical experts following the CLABSI criteria as either a CLABSI or non-CLABSI (i.e., contamination, other infection source, or mucosal barrier injury-laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI)). Subsequently, they were asked if and why they (dis)agreed with this diagnosis following the criteria. The primary outcome was the percentage of episodes where the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis given following the CLABSI criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 84 bacteremia episodes in 71 patients were evaluated. Following the CLABSI criteria, 34 (40%) episodes were classified as CLABSIs and 50 (60%) as non-CLABSIs. In 11 (13%) cases the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis following the CLABSI criteria. The discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and clinical diagnosis was significant; McNemar's test p < .01. Disagreement by the experts with the CLABSI criteria mostly occurred when the experts found an MBI-LCBI a more plausible cause of the bacteremia than a CLABSI due to the presence of a gram negative bacteremia (Pseudomonas aeruginosa n = 3) and/or mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and the evaluation of the experts was observed. Adding Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an MBI pathogen and incorporating the presence of mucositis in the MBI-LCBI criteria, might increase the applicability.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Mucosite , Neoplasias , Sepse , Criança , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in pediatric oncology. Few studies have had interventions directed toward caregivers managing central lines (CL) at home to reduce ambulatory CLABSI rates. We aimed to reduce and sustain our ambulatory CLABSI rate by 25% within 3 years of the start of a quality improvement intervention. PROCEDURE: Plan-do-study-act cycles were implemented beginning April 2016. The main intervention was a family-centered CL care skill development curriculum for external CLs. Training began upon hospital CL insertion, followed by an ambulatory teach-back program to achieve home caregiver CL care independence. Other changes included: standardizing ambulatory nurse CL care practice (audits, a train the nurse trainer process, and workshops for independent home care agencies); developing aids for trainers and caregivers; providing supplies for clean surfaces; wide dissemination of the program; and minimizing opportunities of CLABSI (e.g., standardizing timing of CL removal). The outcome measure was the ambulatory CLABSI rate (excluding mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection), compared pre intervention (January 2015 to March 2016) to post intervention, including 2 years of sustainability (April 2016 to June 2023), using statistical process control charts. We estimated the total number of CLABSI and associated healthcare charges prevented. RESULTS: The ambulatory CLABSI rate decreased by 52% from 0.25 to 0.12 per 1000 CL days post intervention, achieved within 27 months; 117 CLABSI were prevented, with $4.2 million hospital charges and 702 hospital days avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Focusing efforts on home caregivers CL care may lead to reduction in pediatric oncology ambulatory CLABSI rates.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Feminino , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Criança , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Melhoria de Qualidade , Lactente , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Cuidadores/educaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) obtained from a central venous catheter (CVC) is often used to approximate oxygen delivery in critically ill patients. Despite their importance in administering medications and monitoring oxygen delivery, the use of CVCs can be associated with significant complications. Midline catheters are inserted via a peripheral vein above the antecubital fossa and provide a safe alternative to CVCs. This study aimed to determine the equivalence of ScvO2 and midline catheter oxygen saturation (SmO2) in critically ill patients. METHODS: This was a single-center observational study of critically ill adult patients who had concurrently placed CVCs (internal jugular and subclavian) and midline catheters as part of standard ICU care. Venous oxygen saturation and lactate levels were measured from both catheters using the Abbott point-of-care i-STAT analyzer. Demographic and ICU admission data were collected. Continuous variables were compared using the paired t-test. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the linear correlation between ScvO2 and SmO2. The systematic error (bias) was calculated using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities for different values of SmO2 to predict ScvO2. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (n = 48) were enrolled in the study. The mean ScvO2 and SmO2 were 65.5% +/- 11.2% and 62.7% +/- 17.6% respectively (p = 0.1197). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between ScvO2 and SmO2 was 2.8% +/- 12.3% with 95% limits of agreement of -21.3% to 26.9%. More than 60% of the ScvO2 and SmO2 values diverged by ≥ 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the mean SmO2 and ScvO2 was not statistically significant and the mean bias between SmO2 and ScvO2 is low. Despite this, the substantially large standard deviation and limits of agreement preclude the use of SmO2 as a direct surrogate of ScvO2.
RESUMO
Hospitalist-run procedure teams enable expedited care in the inpatient setting. However, wait times for outpatient interventional radiology (IR) are long at our institution. Our study thus aims to compare the safety and wait times between procedural teams and IR placement of outpatient temporary hemodialysis catheters (THDC) for patients undergoing Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy apheresis. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients receiving outpatient THDC for CAR-T therapy from August 2019 until November 2022. During our study period, only 7 of the central lines were placed by IR, while 75 were placed by the procedure service. The average wait time from CAR-T consenting to procedure was 8.9 days for the procedure service and 14.7 days for IR. The 30 day minor complication rate was low - 2.7% in the procedure group, and 0% in the IR group. No major complications were noted in either group.
Assuntos
Médicos Hospitalares , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , AdultoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Candidaemia is a potentially life-threatening emergency in the intensive care units (ICUs). Surveillance using common protocols in a large network of hospitals would give meaningful estimates of the burden of candidaemia and central line associated candidaemia in low resource settings. We undertook this study to understand the burden and epidemiology of candidaemia in multiple ICUs of India, leveraging the previously established healthcare-associated infections (HAI) surveillance network. Our aim was also to assess the impact that the pandemic of COVID-19 had on the rates and associated mortality of candidaemia. METHODS: This study included adult patients from 67 Indian ICUs in the AIIMS-HAI surveillance network that conducted BSI surveillance in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ICUs during and before the COVID-19 pandemic periods. Hospitals identified healthcare-associated candidaemia and central line associated candidaemia and reported clinical and microbiological data to the network as per established and previously published protocols. RESULTS: A total of 401,601 patient days and 126,051 central line days were reported during the study period. A total of 377 events of candidaemia were recorded. The overall rate of candidaemia in our network was 0.93/1000 patient days. The rate of candidaemia in COVID-19 ICUs (2.52/1000 patient days) was significantly higher than in non-COVID-19 ICUs (1.05/patient days) during the pandemic period. The rate of central line associated candidaemia in COVID-19 ICUs (4.53/1000 central line days) was also significantly higher than in non-COVID-19 ICUs (1.73/1000 central line days) during the pandemic period. Mortality in COVID-19 ICUs associated with candidaemia (61%) was higher than that in non-COVID-19 ICUs (41%). A total of 435 Candida spp. were isolated. C. tropicalis (26.7%) was the most common species. C. auris accounted for 17.5% of all isolates and had a high mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients in ICUs with COVID-19 infections have a much higher risk of candidaemia, CLAC and its associated mortality. Network level data helps in understanding the true burden of candidaemia and will help in framing infection control policies for the country.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Candidemia , Infecção Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Candidemia/epidemiologia , Índia/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , PandemiasRESUMO
PURPOSE: This letter evaluated the impact of different management strategies, specifically the presence or absence of therapeutic anticoagulation, on clinical outcomes for central venous catheter (CVC)-associated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in cancer patients. METHODS: One-hundred ninety-eight adult cancer patients with a confirmed CVC-associated DVT diagnosis from February 2013 and February 2021 were included. RESULTS: Incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) was similar between patients who received therapeutic anticoagulation and those who did not (14% vs 16%, p = 0.807). In addition, therapeutic anticoagulation did not significantly alter the incidence of grade 3 and above bleeding events despite most patients having hematologic malignancies (9% vs 8%, p = 0.826). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Therapeutic anticoagulation was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of recurrent VTE or increase the incidence of bleeding in adult cancer patients following a CVC-associated DVT diagnosis.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a novel wire-guided scalpel (Guideblade) to create a precise dermatotomy incision for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized interventional study. SETTING: Stanford University, single-center teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiac and vascular surgical patients (n = 100) with planned CVC insertion for operation. INTERVENTIONS: A wire-guided scalpel was used during CVC insertion. RESULTS: A total of 188 CVCs were performed successfully with a wire-guided scalpel without the need for additional equipment in 100 patients, and 94% of CVCs were accomplished with only a single dermatotomy attempt. "No bleeding" or "minimal bleeding" at the insertion site was observed in 90% of patients 30 minutes after insertion and 80.7% at the conclusion of surgery. CONCLUSION: The wire-guided scalpel was effective in performing dermatotomy for CVC with a 100% success rate and a very high first-attempt rate. The wire-guided scalpel may decrease bleeding at the CVC insertion site.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pre-procedural antisepsis is a critical component of hospital-acquired infection prevention in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, broadly utilized topical antiseptic agents pose an elevated risk of disruption to neonatal skin integrity, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review of the literature sought to assess and characterize the predisposing risk factors for and types of neonatal skin injury from topical antiseptic agents. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library was conducted, including academic literature providing data on neonatal skin injuries related to topical antisepsis in the NICU. RESULTS: A total of 19 articles (99 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Of the available data, most reported skin injuries were described in extremely preterm (98.1%) and very low birth weight (98.4%) infants. The majority of reported adverse cutaneous events were attributed to chlorhexidine preparations (74.8%), followed by octenidine (18.2%), povidone-iodine (6.1%), and isopropyl alcohol (2.0%). Erythema (40.1%), skin breakdown (23.4%), and chemical burns (17.5%) were the skin reactions reported most frequently, followed by skin irritation (8.3%), and skin necrosis (2.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that both extremely preterm and very low birth weight infants are particularly susceptible to skin toxicities from pre-procedural antiseptic preparations. These data underscore the need for future research to support the development of guidelines which minimize iatrogenic cutaneous injuries in the neonatal population, specifically for the care of infants under 2 months of age, for whom current recommendations are lacking due to a paucity of data.
RESUMO
Bacteremia can be life-threatening, and highly medicalized patients, such as those with complex congenital heart disease, are at high risk. Infectious diseases (ID) consultation is associated with improved outcomes in bacteremia. We noted an opportunity for improvement in management of positive blood cultures in our cardiac care unit (CCU). We completed a quality improvement project that included a single plan-do-study-act cycle consisting of a policy of routine ID consultation for all positive blood cultures events in the CCU. Our outcome measure of interest was percentage of appropriately managed blood culture events, the process measure was percentage of blood culture events for which the ID service was formally consulted, and the balancing measure was number of individual patients for whom the ID service was formally consulted. Appropriate antimicrobial management was determined via chart review by an ID physician. Data were analyzed via run chart and simple statistics. Following the intervention, the rate of appropriately managed positive blood culture events increased from a baseline of 86% to 98%, and the rate of ID consultation for these events increased from 75% to 98%. A shift was noted in run charts for both the outcome and process measures. There was an increase in patients for whom the ID service was consulted throughout the entire study period. We successfully implemented mandatory ID consultations in a CCU to increase proportion of appropriately managed blood cultures. While this intervention cannot be universally applied, others may find it useful in selected scenarios.
RESUMO
Paediatric patients with complex or acute conditions may require a central venous access device, however, almost one-third of these devices have associated complications (e.g. infections). Implementation of evidence-based practices regarding central venous access devices can reduce and potentially prevent complications. AIMS: This scoping review aimed to explore recent interventional research in CVAD management through an implementation lens. DESIGN: This scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Studies were included if they were written in English, published in 2012 to July 2023, involved children and were relevant to the study aims. Risk of bias was appraised by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. DATA SOURCES: Searches were undertaken in EMBASE, CINAHL (Ebsco), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). RESULTS: Of the 1769 studies identified in a systematic search, 46 studies were included. Studies mostly focused on health professionals and central venous access device maintenance and had quantitative pre-post study designs. Adherence to implementation frameworks was lacking, with many studies employing quality improvement approaches. Implementation strategies were typically multipronged, using health-professional education, bundles and working groups. Bundle compliance and reductions in central line-associated bloodstream infections were the most featured outcomes, with most studies primarily focusing on effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSION: Translation of evidence-based practices to the clinical setting is difficult and current adoption of implementation frameworks (apart from 'quality improvement') is limited. Implementation strategies are diverse and dependent on the local context, and study outcomes typically focus on the effectiveness of the physical intervention, rather than measuring the implementation effort itself. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENTS: Future intervention research requires a more uniform and deliberate application of implementation frameworks and strategies. IMPACT: Greater exploration of relationships between frameworks and strategies and implementation and service outcomes is required to increase understanding of their role in maximizing resources to improve health care. Adhered to best reporting guidelines as per PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
RESUMO
Cerebral air embolism after removal of central venous catheter (CVC) is a rare complication but can lead to fatal outcomes. We report a rare case of both cerebral venous and arterial embolism occurring in a patient with underlying scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) and pulmonary hypertension following removal of percutaneous introducer sheath for pulmonary artery catheterization. We discuss the mechanisms, pathophysiology, management and prevention of cerebral air embolism.
Assuntos
Embolia Aérea , Embolia Intracraniana , Humanos , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Embolia Aérea/diagnóstico , Embolia Intracraniana/etiologia , Embolia Intracraniana/diagnóstico , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/etiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/terapia , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the extent of knowledge and application of central line bundles in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital for the purpose of avoiding central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). This assessment was conducted through the use of a questionnaire. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU, involving doctors and nurses. The study was observational in nature. The study employed a methodical validated questionnaire to evaluate the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of central line bundles for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). The questionnaire was designed using preexisting awareness surveillance systems, infection control measures, and patient care practices that were specifically relevant to CLABSIs in the ICU. The data were analyzed utilizing SPSS. Results: The research involved a total of 93 healthcare professionals, consisting of 67 physicians and 26 nurses. The mean knowledge score among participants was 82%, with higher scores reported in individuals who had training in central line bundles. Healthcare professionals exhibited robust compliance with hand cleanliness, antiseptic skin preparation prior to insertion, aseptic draping of the patient, utilization of utmost sterile barriers, verification of central venous catheter (CVC) tip placement using chest X-ray or fluoroscopy, and preservation of a sterile environment. Conclusion: The study emphasized the significance of training in enhancing understanding and adherence to central line bundling protocols in ICUs. Participants exhibited a high level of knowledge and commitment to recommended practices, indicating that this training can have a favorable effect on CLABSI rates. How to cite this article: Singh S, Sharma A, Dhawan M, Sharma SP. Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):847-853.
RESUMO
Mycolicibacterium neoaurum is a rapidly growing mycobacterium and an emerging cause of human infections. M. neoaurum infections are uncommon but likely underreported, and our understanding of the disease spectrum and optimum management is incomplete. We summarize demographic and clinical characteristics of a case of catheter-related M. neoaurum bacteremia in a child with leukemia and those of 36 previously reported episodes of M. neoaurum infection. Most infections occurred in young to middle-aged adults with serious underlying medical conditions and commonly involved medical devices. Overall, infections were not associated with severe illness or death. In contrast to other mycobacteria species, M. neoaurum was generally susceptible to multiple antimicrobial drugs and responded promptly to treatment, and infections were associated with good outcomes after relatively short therapy duration and device removal. Delays in identification and susceptibility testing were common. We recommend using combination antimicrobial drug therapy and removal of infected devices to eradicate infection.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Mycobacteriaceae , Infecções por Mycobacterium , Mycobacterium , Criança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção à Saúde , Infecções por Mycobacterium/microbiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Among neonates with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), we aimed to describe the frequency of central-line use, indications for insertion, and incidence of confirmed and suspected sepsis, including antibiotic treatment over a 10-year surveillance period. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All neonates with HDFN admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in this retrospective, cohort study. Annual proportions of infants with a central-line and central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates (per 1000 central-line days and per 100 infants) were evaluated. Numbers of confirmed and suspected early- and late-onset sepsis episodes were assessed over the entire study period. RESULTS: Of the 260 included infants, 25 (9.6%) were evaluated for suspected sepsis, with 16 (6.2%) having ≥1 confirmed sepsis episode. A total of 123 central-lines were placed in 98 (37.7%) neonates, with impending exchange transfusion (ET) being the most frequent indication. Of the 34 (34.7%) neonates in whom a central-line was placed due to impending ET, 11 (32.4%) received no ET. Overall CLABSI incidence was 13.58 per 1000 central-line days. Neonates with a central-line had a higher risk for confirmed late-onset infection (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.20) and sepsis work-up (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17) compared to infants without a central-line. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis incidence among neonates with HDFN remains high, in particular in those with a central-line. Considering the substantial proportion of neonates with a central-line without eventual ET, central-line placement should be delayed until the likelihood of ET is high.
Assuntos
Eritroblastose Fetal , Sepse Neonatal , Sepse , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Feminino , Humanos , Sepse Neonatal/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Sepse/epidemiologia , Eritroblastose Fetal/epidemiologia , FetoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The burden of central line-associated bloodstream infections is significant and has negative implications for healthcare, increasing morbidity and mortality risks, increasing inpatient hospital stays, and increasing the cost of hospitalization. Efforts to reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections have utilized quality improvement projects that implement, measure, and monitor outcomes. However, variations in location, healthcare organization, patient risks, and practice gaps are key to the success of interventions and approaches. This study aims to evaluate interventions of a quality improvement project on the reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infection rates at a university teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a quality improvement project that was implemented using the Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement cycle. Active surveillance of processes and outcomes was performed in the critical care areas; compliance to central line care bundles, and central line-associated bloodstream infections. Interrupted time series was used to analyze trends pre and post-intervention and regression modeling to estimate data segments preceding and succeeding the interventions. RESULTS: There were 350 central line insertions, 3912 catheter days, and 20 central line-associated bloodstream infection events during the intervention period. Compliance with central line care bundles was at 94%. There was a trend in the reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infections by 18% that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.252). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement projects to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections face challenges and complexities associated with implementing interventions in real-world healthcare settings. There is a great need to continuously monitor, evaluate, readjust, and adapt interventions to achieve desired results, sustain improvements in patient outcomes, and investigate reasons for non-adherence as keys to achieving desired outcomes.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Infecção Hospitalar , Sepse , Humanos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/complicações , Melhoria de Qualidade , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Hospitais de Ensino , Sepse/complicaçõesRESUMO
Burn patients are at high risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). However, the diagnosis of such infections is complex, resource-intensive, and often delayed. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of CLABSI and develop a prediction model for the infection in burn patients. The study analysed the infection profiles, clinical epidemiology, and central venous catheter (CVC) management of patients in a large burn centre in China from January 2018 to December 2021. In total, 222 burn patients with a cumulative 630 CVCs and 5,431 line-days were included. The CLABSI rate was 23.02 CVCs per 1000 line-days. The three most common bacterial species were Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 76.09% of isolates were multidrug resistant. Compared with a non-CLABSI cohort, CLABSI patients were significantly older, with more severe burns, more CVC insertion times, and longer total line-days, as well as higher mortality. Regression analysis found longer line-days, more catheterisation times, and higher burn wounds index to be independent risk factors for CLABSI. A novel nomogram based on three risk factors was constructed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) value of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.782-0.898) with a mean absolute error of calibration curve of 0.023. The nomogram showed excellent predictive ability and clinical applicability, and provided a simple, practical, and quantitative strategy to predict CLABSI in burn patients.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Queimaduras , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Humanos , Bacteriemia/complicações , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Queimaduras/complicações , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/microbiologia , Nomogramas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of resistant hospital infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) increases mortality and antibiotic resistance. COVID-19 pandemic may have unintended impact on nosocomial infections (NI) and the prevalence of resistant microorganism. METHODOLOGY: The present non-interventional study was performed by a pre and a post survey each lasting 8 months before (March-October 2019) and after (March-October 2020) the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in three ICU's, not allocated to COVID-19 patients, in Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. The rates of the following nosocomial infections were compared at pre- and post-pandemic period: ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and incidence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) pathogens. RESULTS: Pre-pandemic and pandemic incidence of VAP was 23.5 and 17.2 cases per 1000 device-days, respectively; an absolute decrease of 27%. The main reason for the decrease in the rate of VAP during the pandemic was a significant decrease in the rate of VAP caused by Acinetobacter baumannii; from 39 to 17% in total VAP episodes. The rate of VAP associated with other microorganisms remained relatively unchanged from 14.2 cases in pre-pandemic period to 14.3 cases per 1000 MV-days during the pandemic (P = 0.801). Pre-pandemic incidence of CLABSI was 7.3 cases and, in pandemic period, was 6.5 cases per 1000 device-days (IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.43-1.73, P = 0.703). Pre-pandemic incidence of CAUTI was 2 and in pandemic period, was 1.4 cases per 1000 device-days (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.22-1.98, P = 0.469). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed a decrease in the incidence of VAP in critically ill non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic, especially regarding Acinetobacter baumannii.
Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii , COVID-19 , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Hospitais de Ensino , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , CatéteresRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US)-guided durable tunneled femoral central venous catheters (TF-CVCs) are a safe central venous access option in infants and neonates. Studies have shown, however, that femoral central venous access has the potential for high central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates with a significant increase in risk for line-related thrombosis. Our aims were to describe the bedside insertion technique and evaluate the safety and complication rates of TF-CVCs in high-risk, young, pediatric cardiac intensive-care unit (PCICU) population. DESIGN: A retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: University affiliated, tertiary-care hospital, PCICU. PATIENTS: All PCICU patients that underwent bedside TF-CVC insertion were enrolled. Data was collected from the electronic medical record system. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During April 2016 to October 2021, 103 TF-CVC lines were inserted into 94 pediatric cardiac critical care patients, at the bedside. Patients' characteristics were median (IQR) age of 47.5 days (22.6, 120.5), weight 3.3 kg (2.9, 4.3), 33% prevalence of genetic anomalies, need for ECMO support in 20.4%, and STAT category 4-5 in 53.4%. All procedures were performed by intensivists. There were no immediate procedure-related complications. TF-CVCs were inserted on average on post-operative day (POD) 14, median line indwell duration was 25 days (16.3, 42.3) and total TF-CVC dwell duration for the entire cohort of 3442.7 days. During the study period eight CLABSI events were recorded (2.3/1000 line-days). Line obstruction rate was 1.16/1000 line-days and six lines were dislodged in the intermediate-care unit. There was no symptomatic line-related thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: We show that US-guided durable tunneled femoral central venous catheter (TF-CVC) insertion by an intensivist at the bedside is a technically feasible and safe prolonged central venous access option in critically ill, high-risk infants and neonates in the PCICU.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva PediátricaRESUMO
Central vascular access is frequently required for preterm infants. Confirmation of positioning of central line is typically on chest and abdominal radiographs; POCUS is a relatively novel diagnostic method. Misdiagnosis is the main concern limiting use of this modality. The aim of this study is to validate our standard protocol accuracy in locating the central catheter position by correlating catheter position as determined by POCUS with radiographs. Premature babies < or equal to 30 weeks gestation who had peripheral central lines or surgical lines were enrolled. Confirmation of line position by radiographs was compared to images obtained through a specific US protocol technique. The operator of US exam was blinded to the radiograph findings. All images were reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to the radiograph findings. 35 central line placements were assessed. 22 lines were inserted in the UL, and 13 were inserted in the LL with a total of 91 ultrasound scans and radiographs. The position of the line was interpreted as normal in 79/91 scans with interpreter reliability of [Formula: see text]=0.778 (p < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.96, and positive predictive value of 0.77 and negative predictive value of 0.97. There was no significant difference between the ultrasound interpretation and the radiograph interpretation of UL and LL. Conclusion: The protocol of POCUS that we propose is a reliable tool for assessing the central line positions in preterm infants. What is Known: ⢠POCUS is a reliable tool assessing the central line positions in preterm infants. What is New: ⢠The protocol of POCUS that we propose is a reliable tool for assessing the central line positions in preterm infants.