Chronoradiobiology of Breast Cancer: The Time Is Now to Link Circadian Rhythm and Radiation Biology.

Circadian disruption has been linked to cancer development, progression, and radiation response. Clinical evidence to date shows that circadian genetic variation and time of treatment affect radiation response and toxicity for women with breast cancer. At the molecular level, there is interplay between circadian clock regulators such as PER1, which mediates ATM and p53-mediated cell cycle gating and apoptosis. These molecular alterations may govern aggressive cancer phenotypes, outcomes, and radiation response. Exploiting the various circadian clock mechanisms may enhance the therapeutic index of radiation by decreasing toxicity, increasing disease control, and improving outcomes. We will review the body's natural circadian rhythms and clock gene-regulation while exploring preclinical and clinical evidence that implicates chronobiological disruptions in the etiology of breast cancer. We will discuss radiobiological principles and the circadian regulation of DNA damage responses. Lastly, we will present potential rational therapeutic approaches that target circadian pathways to improve outcomes in breast cancer. Understanding the implications of optimal timing in cancer treatment and exploring ways to entrain circadian biology with light, diet, and chronobiological agents like melatonin may provide an avenue for enhancing the therapeutic index of radiotherapy.

Impact of the radiotherapy rhythm on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The role of chronoradiobiology in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been fully elucidated. We sought to investigate the impact of radiotherapy rhythm on the survival outcomes of individuals to explore a chronomodulated radiation strategy to improve prognosis of NPC. METHODS: A cohort comprising non-metastatic NPC patients subjected to intensity-modulated radiotherapy at Fujian Cancer Hospital between Jan. 2016 and Dec. 2019 was assembled. Rhythmic fluctuation of radiotherapy (RFRT) was quantified based on the temporal distribution of radiation delivery. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to explore the impact of radiotherapy rhythm on all-cause mortality. The maximally selected rank statistics method was employed to discern an optimal cutoff. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of observed associations. RESULTS: Our analysis encompassed 2245 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 55 months, during which 315 individuals succumbed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis unveiled a significant correlation between prolonged RFRT and heightened mortality risk in NPC patients (HR, 1.17, 95% CI, 1.07-1.27, p < .001), a relationship robust to comprehensive adjustment for confounding variables. A cutoff value of 3 h was selected for potential clinical application, beyond which patients exhibited markedly poorer survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses consistently underscored the directional consistency of observed effects. CONCLUSION: Our study sheds light on the potential advantages of scheduling radiotherapy sessions at consistent times. These findings have implications for optimizing radiotherapy schedules and warrant further investigation into personalized chronotherapy approaches in NPC management.

Can chronoradiotherapy offer benefits to cervical cancer patients? A scoping review.

The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence and evaluate the effectiveness of chronoradiotherapy interventions in cervical cancer patients. This scoping review was performed by searching in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Wenpu, and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) databases. Databases were searched for studies published in English or Chinese from inception to 21 May 2021, and reference lists of relevant reports were scanned. Two investigators independently screened eligible studies in accordance with predetermined eligibility criteria and extracted data. The included studies were summarized and analyzed. Five studies including a total of 422 patients with cervical cancer were included in the scoping review; four studies were Chinese, and one was Indian. Main themes identified included the efficiency of chronoradiotherapy and relevant toxic and side effects, including diarrhea toxicity, hematologic toxicity, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal mucositis, and skin reactions. Administration of radiotherapy at different times of the day resulted in similar efficacy. However, the toxic side effects of morning radiotherapy (MR) and evening radiotherapy (ER) differed, with radiotherapy in the evening leading to more severe hematologic toxicity and myelosuppression. There were conflicting conclusions about gastrointestinal reactions with chronoradiotherapy, and further studies are needed. Radiation responses may be associated with circadian genes, through the influence of cell cycles and apoptosis.

The effect of chronoradiotherapy on cervical cancer patients: A multicenter randomized controlled study.

Objectives: To investigate the short-term efficacy and radiotoxicity 3.543of chronoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. We also examined the overall symptom score and quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent morning radiotherapy and evening radiotherapy. Methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of morning radiotherapy (9:00-11:00 AM) with evening radiotherapy (7:00-9:00 PM) in cervical cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. From November 2021 to June 2022, 114 cervical cancer patients admitted to eight cancer center hospitals in Tianjin, Chongqing, Hubei, Shanxi, Shandong, Shaanxi, Hebei, and Cangzhou were randomly divided into the morning radiotherapy group (MG; N = 61) and the evening radiotherapy group (EG; N = 53). The short-term efficacy of radiotherapy on cervical cancer patients at different time points and the occurrence of radiotoxicity were explored after patients had undergone radiotherapy. Results: The total effective response (partial remission [PR] + complete remission [CR]) rate was similar across the two groups (93.5% vs. 96.3%, p > 0.05). However, the incidence of bone marrow suppression and intestinal reaction in the two groups were significantly different (p < 0.05). The patients in the MG had significantly higher Anderson symptom scores than patients in the EG (21.64 ± 7.916 vs. 18.53 ± 4.098, p < 0.05). In terms of physical activity, functional status, and overall QOL, the MG had significantly lower scores than the EG (p < 0.05). No other measures showed a significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: The radiotherapy effect of the MG was consistent with that of the EG. The incidence of radiation enteritis and radiation diarrhea in the MG was significantly higher than that in the EG; however, bone marrow suppression and blood toxicity in the EG were more serious than in the MG. Because of the small sample size of the study, we only examined the short-term efficacy of radiotherapy. Therefore, further clinical trials are needed to verify the efficacy and side effects of chronoradiotherapy. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx, Registration Number: ChiCTR2100047140.

Is it Time to Change Radiotherapy: The Dawning of Chronoradiotherapy?

A minority of radiotherapy patients experience adverse reactions as a result of the inevitable irradiation of the surrounding healthy tissue. These reactions range in severity and affect the patient's quality of life, as well as being dose-limiting. If the patients most at risk of toxicity could be identified before radiotherapy, the treatment pathway, radiation dose or fractionation could be altered to reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Previous research is described on how chemotherapy treatments could be improved through the delivery of drugs at specific times of the day ('chronomodulation') based on the circadian rhythm. More recently time-of-day effects have been investigated for radiotherapy, yielding complex results, but with some promise for genetic prediction of the optimal time for treatment. This would allow an almost cost-free modification to treatment that would reduce toxicity. Despite the increasing evidence for 'chronotherapy' for treating cancer, little work has looked into the potential mechanisms underlying the time-of-day effect, which potentially include differences in inflammation, cell cycle or hormones. This overview discusses the main findings from chronotherapy so far and comments on why elucidating the biological mechanisms relating radiotherapy toxicity to the circadian cycle warrants further investigation.