A cross-sectional study of variations in schoolwork stress in academic upper secondary school classes in Mid-Norway.

AIMS: This paper investigates stress related to schoolwork among students in academic upper secondary schools. The research questions asked are: 1. To what degree does students' schoolwork stress vary between academic classes?; And 2. are perceptions of classroom goal orientation, academic achievement, sex and parental education related to schoolwork stress? METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was done in the final year of upper secondary school in 71 school classes from 13 schools. A total of 1955 students in academic education programs were invited to participate in the survey, and 1511 completed the survey; the response rate was 77%. The outcome measure was a composite measure of schoolwork stress (alpha = 0.81). Multilevel modeling was used to estimate school class-level effects. RESULTS: The mean value of schoolwork stress was 4.0, on a scale of 1 (very little schoolwork stress) to 6 (very high schoolwork stress). About half of the students reported a score of 4 or higher. The analysis showed that individual characteristics explained most of the variation in schoolwork stress. Girls experienced a much higher level of schoolwork stress than boys (mean values of 4.3 and 3.6, respectively). There was also a significant class-level effect, estimated to 6% of the variance. Students' perceptions of classroom goal orientation was also associated with schoolwork stress. CONCLUSIONS: The main contribution was the discovery of significant variations in schoolwork stress between school classes. We also found that higher mastery climate was linked to lower schoolwork stress, whereas higher performance climate was linked to higher schoolwork stress.

Switching anti-CGRP(R) monoclonal antibodies in multi-assessed non-responder patients and implications for ineffectiveness criteria: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A pharmacological class effect was initially proposed for monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway. However, preliminary evidence shows that switching patients who were non-responding to one monoclonal antibody to another could provide some benefit. Herein, we assess treatment response to an anti-calcitonin gene related peptide/receptor monoclonal antibody in patients who have failed to respond to anti-calcitonin gene related peptide/ligand monoclonal antibodies calcitonin gene related peptide/ligand monoclonal antibodies and vice versa. In addition, we select non-responders to the first anti- monoclonal antibody by three or five more stringent variables. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including outpatients treated consecutively with two anti-calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies. Ineffectiveness to the first monoclonal antibody was assessed using three (MIDAS score, monthly headache days, and analgesic monthly days) variables or five (monthly headache days, MIDAS score, analgesic monthly days, analgesic monthly number and HIT-6 score) variables in the same cohort of patients. The primary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in monthly headache days, response rate, and persistence in medication overuse at three months of treatment with the second anti-CGRP mAb. RESULTS: In patients selected by three variables, a sustained reduction in monthly headache days, analgesic monthly days, MIDAS and HIT-6 scores was observed at month-3 of treatment with the second monoclonal antibody. Ten (45.4%) patients achieved at least a ≥30% response rate. No difference was reported switching anti-CGRP mAb against ligand or receptor. In the patient subgroup selected by five variables, only HIT-6 was reduced from baseline at month-3. However, a trend toward a reduction in monthly headache days, analgesic monthly days, and MIDAS score was observed at month-3. CONCLUSIONS: Switching anti-calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies in selected patients might be an option to achieve or improve clinical benefit. More studies are required to establish the effectiveness of switching these treatments.

Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.

Beta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trials. Hypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rate. Beta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. This position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failure. Analogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertension. Beta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blocker first choices in clinical practice. Thus, beta-blockers should be regarded as relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice, particularly if characterised by a long half-life, highly selective beta-1 blocking activity and no intrinsic agonist properties.SUMMARYBeta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trialsHypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rateBeta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic propertiesThis position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failureAnalogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertensionBeta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blockers first choices in clinical practiceThese observations, in totality, inform our opinion that beta-blockers are relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice and this fact needs highlightingFurther, these arguments suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.

Sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors for prevention and treatment of cardiorenal complications of type 2 diabetes.

Hospitalization for major diabetes complications, including myocardial infarction, stroke, lower-extremity amputation, and end-stage kidney disease, is on the rise and represents a great health burden for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), in particular for older people. Newer glucose-lowering medications have generated some optimism on the possibility to influence the natural history of cardiorenal complications of T2D. This review summarizes work in the area of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) treatment and prevention of cardiorenal complications in patients with T2D (major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, kidney outcomes), with a particular emphasis on the effect of age, the role of primary versus secondary prevention and the possible extension of their cardiorenal benefits to the entire class of SGLT-2i.

Multivariate network meta-analysis incorporating class effects.

BACKGROUND: Network meta-analysis synthesises data from a number of clinical trials in order to assess the comparative efficacy of multiple healthcare interventions in similar patient populations. In situations where clinical trial data are heterogeneously reported i.e. data are missing for one or more outcomes of interest, synthesising such data can lead to disconnected networks of evidence, increased uncertainty, and potentially biased estimates which can have severe implications for decision-making. To overcome this issue, strength can be borrowed between outcomes of interest in multivariate network meta-analyses. Furthermore, in situations where there are relatively few trials informing each treatment comparison, there is a potential issue with the sparsity of data in the treatment networks, which can lead to substantial parameter uncertainty. A multivariate network meta-analysis approach can be further extended to borrow strength between interventions of the same class using hierarchical models. METHODS: We extend the trivariate network meta-analysis model to incorporate the exchangeability between treatment effects belonging to the same class of intervention to increase precision in treatment effect estimates. We further incorporate a missing data framework to estimate uncertainty in trials that did not report measures of variability in order to maximise the use of all available information for healthcare decision-making. The methods are applied to a motivating dataset in overactive bladder syndrome. The outcomes of interest were mean change from baseline in incontinence, voiding and urgency episodes. All models were fitted using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods in WinBUGS. RESULTS: All models (univariate, multivariate, and multivariate models incorporating class effects) produced similar point estimates for all treatment effects. Incorporating class effects in multivariate models often increased precision in treatment effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate network meta-analysis incorporating class effects allowed for the comparison of all interventions across all outcome measures to ameliorate the potential impact of outcome reporting bias, and further borrowed strength between interventions belonging to the same class of treatment to increase the precision in treatment effect estimates for healthcare policy and decision-making.

Class effect for SGLT-2 inhibitors: a tale of 9 drugs.

The definition of class effect for SGLT-2 inhibitors may be based on three concepts: a similar chemical structure, a similar mechanism of action and similar pharmacological effects. We have also assumed that a class effect does exist when an effect on a particular outcome is present and is significant for each drug within the class of SGLT-2 inhibitors. For major cardiovascular events (MACE), there is no class effect for SGLT-2 inhibitors, as the 7% reduction of MACE risk observed with dapagliflozin in the DECLARE trial was not significant; on the other hand, a class effect is evident for both heart failure and diabetic kidney disease, as in all four trials so far completed (EMPAREG-OUTCOME, CANVAS, DECLARE, CREDENCE) the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and progression of diabetic kidney disease was significantly reduced by all SGLT-2 inhibitors.

A critical appraisal on AIT in childhood asthma.

ABSTRACT: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment approved for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma and represents a suitable therapeutic option, especially in childhood, to modify the progression of respiratory allergic diseases. Starting from the previous "generic class effect" evaluation, as testified by the numerous meta analyses, AIT is now considered a product-specific pathogenic-oriented treatment. BACKGROUND: AIT was empirically proposed more than one century ago in the subcutaneous form (SCIT), but the IgE-mediated mechanism of allergy was elucidated only after 50 years of clinical use of the treatment. The sublingual administration (SLIT) was developed during the 1980 ties, to achieve an improvement in safety and convenience. While SCIT is approved in the United States for the treatment of asthmatic patients with more than 12 years, so far few trials evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of SLIT in children with allergic asthma, although the indications and some aspects remain unclear. Certainly, due to compliance problems, the age below 3 years may be reasonably considered a practical contraindication. CONCLUSIONS: Given that some specific AIT products are effective and approved as drugs (AIFA, EMA, FDA), the use in children is still debated. Some aspects still need robust confirm: (a) the safety of AIT in asthma; (b) the optimal regimen of administration; (c) the role of AIT as preventative treatment for asthma development.

Late onset neutropenia after rituximab and obinutuzumab treatment - characteristics of a class-effect toxicity.

Late onset neutropenia (LON) after rituximab is a previously described complication. We aimed to assess and characterize LON after obinutuzumab, a novel anti-CD20 antibody, in the real-world setting and compare it to LON after rituximab therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 330 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative neoplasms (rituximab-treated n = 283; obinutuzumab-treated n = 47). LON occurred in 23% patients with similar incidence in rituximab (n = 66, 23%) or obinutuzumab (n = 10, 21%) groups (p = 0.853). Patients treated for CLL and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) were at higher risk to develop LON (multivariate analysis: HR for CLL - 6.62 CI 95% 1.33-32.92; HR for PTLD 15.82 CI 95% 2.04-122.4). Febrile neutropenia was uncommon during LON and occurred in 15 patients (4.5%; rituximab (n = 14) and obinutuzumab (n = 1).These data suggest that LON after obinutuzumab treatment is as common as with rituximab. The similarities in LON after rituximab and obinutuzumab argue for a possible class effect for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies.

Immune interference (blunting) in the context of maternal immunization with Tdap-containing vaccines: is it a class effect?

INTRODUCTION: Maternal immunization with reduced antigen content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap)-containing vaccines has been recommended to prevent infant pertussis. However, maternal antibodies may interfere with infant responses to routine immunization with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP)-containing vaccines, raising concerns of suboptimal protection after infant vaccination. We performed a narrative literature review to assess whether blunting occurs regardless of the manufacturer of maternal and infant vaccines. Because internationally agreed correlates of protection are lacking, the clinical significance of blunting is not yet fully understood. We have reviewed the evidence available to date. AREAS COVERED: Thirteen studies that evaluated blunting after maternal immunization and infant primary/booster series were identified. Blunting was observed with various combinations of Tdap- and DTaP-containing vaccines for maternal and pediatric immunization. Studies assessing the effectiveness of maternal Tdap immunization beyond the primary infant immunization series in England and in the United States suggested no evidence of a clinically relevant blunting effect so far. EXPERT COMMENTARY: This review indicates that the phenomenon of blunting does not depend on the manufacturer/brand of the pertussis-containing vaccines used for immunizing mothers or children. Currently, there is no epidemiological evidence that children whose mothers received Tdap are at increased risk of pertussis after pediatric vaccinations, although longer follow-up is required.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-induced pleuropericarditis: A retrospective evaluation using data from VigiBase.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the causality of anti-TNFα agents-associated pleuropericarditis in VigiBase with a focus on its diverse types. METHODS: All variables contained in the pleuropericarditis reports were reviewed. Well-documented reports, vigiGrade completeness score ≥ 0.80 or with an informative narrative, were analyzed and with a focus on the clinical features of the cases. Bradford-Hill criteria were used in the case series assessment of causality. RESULTS: From 1968 up to 18 December 2019, there were 94 unique cases from 18 countries reporting pleuropericarditis with anti-TNFα agents as a suspected or interacting medicine. Among the 94 reports, 42 were identified as well-documented and further assessed for clinical features. Of the 42 cases, 39 were serious, including three fatal and seven life-threatening. In 35 cases, an anti-TNFα agent was the only suspected drug. Positive de- and re-challenge were reported in 95% and 17% of the 42 cases, respectively. The times to onset (TTO) varied greatly among individual cases, ranging from one month to 75 months (mean = 24 months). The most commonly involved anti-TNFα agents were adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept; and the mostly reported pleuropericarditis types were classified as autoimmune-related with (n = 17) or without (n = 15) co-reported drug-induced lupus (DIL), or infection-related (n = 8). While adalimumab was the most reported in the infection-related cases (7/8), infliximab was the most frequent in the autoimmune-related cases, in particular co-reported with DIL (9/17). There were four cases where the reaction occurred one to two months after the anti-TNFα agents (infliximab and adalimumab) were stopped. Based on the review of the case series using Bradford-Hill criteria the anti-TNFα agents associated pleuropericarditis are considered as a class effect. CONCLUSIONS: To clinically recognize and manage these potentially life-threatening serious cardiopulmonary complications, health care professionals should be aware of this possible risk. Meanwhile, attention should be paid to the clinical features of pleuropericarditis cases, since they may cause diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Considering the long elimination time, clinicians need to be reminded to remain vigilant for the adverse reactions even after discontinuing anti-TNFα therapy.

SGLT2 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Do they Differ or there is a Class Effect? New Insights from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and the CVD-REAL Study.

A new group of hypoglycemic drugs has been used to treat diabetes type 2. This group is active sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) or SGLT2 inhibitors. It has been shown that besides the treatment of diabetes, this drug class is responsible for the mildness of the cardiovascular events shown in patients with diabetes type 2. However, there is an intriguing question regarding the range of SGLT2 inhibitors and if there is a difference between them or if there is a class effect among their results. EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and the CVD-study are used to answer this question. Additional information from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 and Dapa-HF trials is studied.

Drug-diagnostic co-development: challenges and issues.

Diagnostic tests have become increasingly important for optimizing drug use. Ideally, a companion diagnostic test is developed concurrently with a corresponding therapeutic product (co-development). However, the diagnostic test may also be developed to optimize treatment with previously approved therapeutic agents (follow-up-development). In co-development, the effectiveness of an agent in marker-defined patients is confirmed by an enrichment trial design. In follow-up-development, a biomarker is validated by prospective and/or retrospective analyses of unselected design trials. A prospectively designed trial is the gold-standard approach to biomarker validation, but retrospective validation can be used to efficiently determine effective treatments for marker-defined patients. Accumulation and systematization of examples of drug-diagnostic development will aid in the effective development of companion diagnostics.

Exploring adverse drug events at the class level.

BACKGROUND: While the association between a drug and an adverse event (ADE) is generally detected at the level of individual drugs, ADEs are often discussed at the class level, i.e., at the level of pharmacologic classes (e.g., in drug labels). We propose two approaches, one visual and one computational, to exploring the contribution of individual drugs to the class signal. METHODS: Having established a dataset of ADEs from MEDLINE, we aggregate drugs into ATC classes and ADEs into high-level MeSH terms. We compute statistical associations between drugs and ADEs at the drug level and at the class level. Finally, we visualize the signals at increasing levels of resolution using heat maps. We also automate the exploration of drug-ADE associations at the class level using clustering techniques. RESULTS: Using our visual approach, we were able to uncover known associations, e.g., between fluoroquinolones and tendon injuries, and between statins and rhabdomyolysis. Using our computational approach, we systematically analyzed 488 associations between a drug class and an ADE. CONCLUSIONS: The findings gained from our exploratory techniques should be of interest to the curators of ADE repositories and drug safety professionals. Our approach can be applied to different drug-ADE datasets, using different drug classification systems and different signal detection algorithms.

Pitavastatin: evidence for its place in treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

Statins, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, are the most potent pharmacologic agents for lowering total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). They have become an accepted standard of care in the treatment of patients with known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention) and also those at increased risk of cardiovascular events. There are currently six statin drugs commercially available in the US. Although they are chemically similar and have the same primary mechanisms of action in lowering TC and LDL-C, there are differences in their efficacy or potency, metabolism, drug-drug interactions, and individual tolerability. Considering the numbers of patients who need LDL-C-lowering therapy and questions of individual tolerance and therapeutic response, having a variety of agents to choose from is beneficial for patient care. This paper presents background information on statin treatment and reviews data regarding a new agent, pitavastatin, which has recently been approved for clinical use.