RESUMO
Students' new knowledge is gradually built up in the context of the task for which it is required and consolidated by applying it to clinical cases. As students see more and more clinical cases the knowledge emerges from an associative mesh of different levels of understanding. During tutorial clinical teaching, residents should be gradually exposed to an increasing range of real-world learning tasks and increasing levels of complexity. This exposure allows them to gradually develop shortcuts in the retrieval of their knowledge. This commentary provides a rationale for the construction of knowledge and the pivotal role that clinical tutorial teaching plays in this task.
RESUMO
This paper is the English translation and adaptation of my inaugural lecture in Amsterdam for the Chair Anthropology of Everyday Ethics in Health Care. I argue that the challenges in health care may look daunting and unsolvable in their scale and complexity, but that it helps to consider these problems in their specificity, while accepting that some problems may not be solved but have become chronic. The paper provides reflections on how to develop a scientific approach that does not aim to eradicate bad things but explores ways in which to live with them. Crucial in this quest is the attention to how we conceptualize problems, and whether this is specific enough for addressing present day concerns. I propose an anthropology of everyday ethics as a way to study people's everyday ways of handling a variety of goods in practice. I draw specific attention to exploring aesthetic values in everyday life amongst these, values that are used abundantly to qualify events in everyday life but rarely theorized in philosophy or social science.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Filosofia Médica , Antropologia/éticaRESUMO
In this paper I compare the methodology of two of the most famous epidemiological studies: The Midtown Manhattan Study (1952-60) and the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (1980-5). At first sight, there are few features that distinguish them; both were studies of large samples of the general population; they both used highly sophisticated methods of data analysis and standardized instruments; and they involved interviewers who were not professional clinicians. However, if we carefully compare the protocols that define how 'clinical' information is collected, we realize that some important changes in methodology were not only due to practical necessities, but also involved an important transformation in the role of the interviewer and the skills traditionally associated with the clinician.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Psiquiatria , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Estudos EpidemiológicosRESUMO
This work continues along a visionary path of using Semantic Web standards such as RDF and ShEx to make healthcare data easier to integrate for research and leading-edge patient care. The work extends the ability to use ShEx schemas to validate FHIR RDF data, thereby enhancing the semantic web ecosystem for working with FHIR and non-FHIR data using the same ShEx validation framework. It updates FHIR's ShEx schemas to fix outstanding issues and reflect changes in the definition of FHIR RDF. In addition, it experiments with expressing FHIRPath constraints (which are not captured in the XML or JSON schemas) in ShEx schemas. These extended ShEx schemas were incorporated into the FHIR R5 specification and used to successfully validate FHIR R5 examples that are included with the FHIR specification, revealing several errors in the examples.
Assuntos
Ecossistema , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic restricted face-to-face contact between students and educators, limiting continual assessment of student's clinical skill development. This led to rapid transformational online adaptations to nursing education. This article will present and discuss the introduction of a clinical 'viva voce' approach, which has been used at one university to formatively assess students' clinical learning and reasoning skills using virtual methods. The Virtual Clinical Competency Conversation (V3C) was developed using the 'Think aloud approach' and involved facilitated one-to-one discussion based on two questions from a bank of 17 predefined clinically focused questions. A total of 81 pre-registration students completed the formative assessment process. Overall, feedback from students and academic facilitators was positive and facilitated both learning and consolidation in a safe and nurturing way. Further local evaluation is continuing to measure the impact of the V3C approach on student learning now that some aspects of face-to-face education have resumed.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Educação em Enfermagem , Estudantes de Enfermagem , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Aprendizagem , Competência ClínicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Knowledge graphs (KGs) play a key role to enable explainable artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare. Constructing clinical knowledge graphs (CKGs) against heterogeneous electronic health records (EHRs) has been desired by the research and healthcare AI communities. From the standardization perspective, community-based standards such as the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) are increasingly used to represent and standardize EHR data for clinical data analytics, however, the potential of such a standard on building CKG has not been well investigated. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate methods and tools that expose the OMOP CDM-based clinical data repositories into virtual clinical KGs that are compliant with FHIR Resource Description Framework (RDF) specification. METHODS: We developed a system called FHIR-Ontop-OMOP to generate virtual clinical KGs from the OMOP relational databases. We leveraged an OMOP CDM-based Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) data repository to evaluate the FHIR-Ontop-OMOP system in terms of the faithfulness of data transformation and the conformance of the generated CKGs to the FHIR RDF specification. RESULTS: A beta version of the system has been released. A total of more than 100 data element mappings from 11 OMOP CDM clinical data, health system and vocabulary tables were implemented in the system, covering 11 FHIR resources. The generated virtual CKG from MIMIC-III contains 46,520 instances of FHIR Patient, 716,595 instances of Condition, 1,063,525 instances of Procedure, 24,934,751 instances of MedicationStatement, 365,181,104 instances of Observations, and 4,779,672 instances of CodeableConcept. Patient counts identified by five pairs of SQL (over the MIMIC database) and SPARQL (over the virtual CKG) queries were identical, ensuring the faithfulness of the data transformation. Generated CKG in RDF triples for 100 patients were fully conformant with the FHIR RDF specification. CONCLUSION: The FHIR-Ontop-OMOP system can expose OMOP database as a FHIR-compliant RDF graph. It provides a meaningful use case demonstrating the potentials that can be enabled by the interoperability between FHIR and OMOP CDM. Generated clinical KGs in FHIR RDF provide a semantic foundation to enable explainable AI applications in healthcare.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão , Data Warehousing , Atenção à Saúde , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating effect on people across the globe. Its impact on medical students' education has also been profound. Here, we aimed to comprehensively determine the nature of this impact on their choice of specialty. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students in Saudi Arabia during the pandemic from May to June 2021. Data collected from 1984 medical students were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 810 (40.8%) respondents reported that the pandemic could affect their choice of specialty, with the majority being in the third year (n = 235). Across all class-years, the most common reason chosen was the inability to explore specialties of interest (n = 539, 66.5%). Another reason cited was the inability to support residency application (n = 175, 21.6%). A majority expressed concerns regarding enrollment in research activities. As high as 17.9% (n = 356) of the respondents admitted that they were trying to avoid specialty with frontline exposure to COVID-19, while 353 students (17.8%) were considering local training programs only. While examining certainty levels, of the 1174 (59.2%) students who reported not being affected by the pandemic, 924 (78.7%) had a weak certainty level. The majority were in the third (54.8%, n = 342) and fourth years (44.8%, n = 212). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first attempt to thoroughly examine the effect of COVID-19 on medical students' choice of specialty. This effect unfurled in 4 out of 10 surveyed students. Many students reported concerns regarding the inability to explore medical specialties and the inadequacy of obtained clinical knowledge. However, a subsidiary effect was observed among students who were assertive about their choice of specialty. These findings shed new light on the exigency of establishing a career counseling framework designed to meet individual learner needs, thereby galvanizing their morale. Further research could explore the long-term implications of the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties Matching System.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Escolha da Profissão , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Pandemias , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bias in reasoning rather than knowledge gaps has been identified as the origin of most diagnostic errors. However, the role of knowledge in counteracting bias is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether knowledge of discriminating features (findings that discriminate between look-alike diseases) predicts susceptibility to bias. DESIGN: Three-phase randomized experiment. Phase 1 (bias-inducing): Participants were exposed to a set of clinical cases (either hepatitis-IBD or AMI-encephalopathy). Phase 2 (diagnosis): All participants diagnosed the same cases; 4 resembled hepatitis-IBD, 4 AMI-encephalopathy (but all with different diagnoses). Availability bias was expected in the 4 cases similar to those encountered in phase 1. Phase 3 (knowledge evaluation): For each disease, participants decided (max. 2 s) which of 24 findings was associated with the disease. Accuracy of decisions on discriminating features, taken as a measure of knowledge, was expected to predict susceptibility to bias. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents at Erasmus MC, Netherlands. MAIN MEASURES: The frequency with which higher-knowledge and lower-knowledge physicians gave biased diagnoses based on phase 1 exposure (range 0-4). Time to diagnose was also measured. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-two physicians participated. Higher-knowledge physicians yielded to availability bias less often than lower-knowledge physicians (0.35 vs 0.97; p = 0.001; difference, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.28-0.95]). Whereas lower-knowledge physicians tended to make more of these errors on subjected-to-bias than on not-subjected-to-bias cases (p = 0.06; difference, 0.35 [CI, - 0.02-0.73]), higher-knowledge physicians resisted the bias (p = 0.28). Both groups spent more time to diagnose subjected-to-bias than not-subjected-to-bias cases (p = 0.04), without differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of features that discriminate between look-alike diseases reduced susceptibility to bias in a simulated setting. Reflecting further may be required to overcome bias, but succeeding depends on having the appropriate knowledge. Future research should examine whether the findings apply to real practice and to more experienced physicians.
Assuntos
Médicos , Resolução de Problemas , Viés , Erros de Diagnóstico , Humanos , Países BaixosRESUMO
Phenomenon: Research on clinicians' knowledge and attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBTQ+) health topics has relied mostly on small early-career samples. The influence of clinical experience on knowledge and attitudes has not been examined. The study purpose was to examine physicians' and advanced practice providers' (a) self-perceived knowledge and attitudes about LGBTQ + health topics, (b) the relationship between clinical experience and self-perceived knowledge and attitudes, and (c) preferences for LGBTQ + medical education.Approach: An online anonymous survey was emailed to 3667 physicians and advanced practice providers at a large southeastern multisite healthcare institution. Logistic regression determined associations between clinical experience, knowledge, and attitudes.Findings: There were 880 (24.0%) respondents. Most were physicians (70%). Thirty-eight percent had more than 15 years of experience. Fifty-four percent preferred online education. Few reported sophisticated knowledge of six LGBTQ + health topics (6%-10%). The majority felt that these were either important or very important for all physicians. After accounting for demographics, experience was not associated with knowledge or attitudes.Insights: Knowledge gaps yet positive attitudes suggest that additional training on LGBTQ + patients is warranted and likely to be well received. The lack of influence of experience on knowledge and attitudes may suggest that training is applicable to clinicians of all experience levels. Future research should determine if knowledge and attitudes toward LGBTQ + health topics influence culturally competent healthcare practices.
Assuntos
Homossexualidade Feminina , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Atitude , Bissexualidade , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In Japan, between 2010 and 2020, there were two post-graduate training curricula for post-graduate medical education, as follows: comprehensive rotation programmes (CRPs), which require rotation in at least seven clinical departments; and limited rotation programmes (LRPs), which require rotation in fewer clinical departments. The curriculum that should be used for standardized Japanese post-graduate training has long been debated. Multiple studies show that post-graduate trainees who trained with CRPs were more satisfied and confident and gained more clinical experience than those who trained with LRPs. However, a comparison of objective measurements of the clinical knowledge of Japanese post-graduate trainees has not been reported. The aim of this study is to objectively measure and compare the clinical knowledge of trainees in CRPs and LRPs using a component of the Professional and Linguistic Assessment Board test (PLAB test). METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted in February and March 2020. Post-graduate trainees who graduated from medical school were voluntarily recruited from general hospitals in Japan. To objectively measure the trainees' basic clinical knowledge, the PLAB test was adapted from the UK. The cut-off point was set at 63%, as recommended by the UK General Medical Council. A statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether post-graduate programme differences contributed to the trainees' test scores. RESULTS: Twenty-two facilities volunteered to participate after recruitment, and 97 trainees from 19 facilities participated in the study. Thirty-one participants (32%) were in a CRP, and 66 participants (68%) were in an LRP. According to multiple logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratio of CRP trainees being in the high-scoring group was 5.16 (95% CI: 1.28-20.73, p<0.05). Mean differences in the scores in paediatrics, mental health and neurology were statistically higher among CRP trainees than LRP trainees. CONCLUSION: Post-graduate trainees who were in a CRP had better basic clinical competence knowledge (PLAB test) scores and performed better when tested in a wider range of subspecialties. Not only exam performance but also clinical performance and the longitudinal trend of trainees' competency in post-graduate medical training should be evaluated in future studies.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Criança , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Japão , RotaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are often the first healthcare professionals that patients contact with their illnesses and requests for medical information, which is enhanced following the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Community pharmacists are expected and required to possess a broad spectrum of knowledge and skills. Self-assessment of these competencies is needed for their self-improvement. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To assess pharmacists' clinical knowledge and practice in the safe use of contraceptives, and to compare the scores obtained by external observation with pharmacists' self-assessment of their knowledge as well as investigate the significance of preceptorship experiences. Contraceptives was chosen as the subject area in view of high rates of abortions as a means of contraception in Bosnia and Herzegovina. METHODS: A questionnaire approach was used. The questionnaire included the following: the first domain contained two case scenarios (safe use of contraceptives), which evaluated clinical knowledge, a second domain in which pharmacists self-assessed their knowledge to resolve cases from the first domain and a third domain that measured the demographics of pharmacists (including experience in preceptorship). Dispensing practice was evaluated in the second domain. The questionnaires were distributed to a convenient sample of 100 pharmacists at the Annual Meeting of Bosnia and Herzegovina Pharmacists. The results were presented as counts (%). The groups (preceptors and non-preceptors) were compared using Mann-Whitney U test, paired assessments were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's correlation was used to assess the correlation between variables. RESULTS: Of the 100 pharmacists invited to participate, 84 completed the questionnaire (84 % response rate). There was no agreement between pharmacists' real knowledge (average score - case 1: 2.71, case 2: 3.3) and their self-assessment (average score - case 1: 3.77, case 2: 3.91). There was no statistically significant difference in the actual knowledge of pharmacists (experienced/non-experienced in precepting), while the difference in the self-assessment was significant between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists appear to overrate themselves, which leads to self-enhancement bias, in which the experience in precepting has some influence. Pharmacists' capability in performing an objective self-assessment of their clinical knowledge needs to be carefully studied in the future to fully benefit patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Farmacêuticos , Anticoncepcionais , Feminino , Humanos , Pandemias , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2 , AutoimagemRESUMO
COVID-19 presents many challenges, both clinical and philosophical. In this paper we discuss a major lacuna that COVID-19 revealed in our philosophy and understanding of medicine. Whereas we have some understanding of how physician-scientists interrogate the world to learn more about medicine, we do not understand the epistemological costs and benefits of the various ways clinicians acquire new knowledge in their fields. We will also identify reasons this topic is important both when the world is facing a pandemic and when it is not.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Filosofia Médica , Pesquisa Biomédica , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Conhecimento , Papel do MédicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a dreaded condition that can lead to paralysis and severe disability. With few treatment options available for patients who have suffered from SCI, it is important to develop prospective databases to standardize data collection in order to develop new therapeutic approaches and guidelines. Here, the authors present an overview of their multicenter, prospective, observational patient registry, Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in SCI (TRACK-SCI). METHODS: Data were collected using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) common data elements (CDEs). Highly granular clinical information, in addition to standardized imaging, biospecimen, and follow-up data, were included in the registry. Surgical approaches were determined by the surgeon treating each patient; however, they were carefully documented and compared within and across study sites. Follow-up visits were scheduled for 6 and 12 months after injury. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in the TRACK-SCI study. In this overview, basic clinical, imaging, neurological severity, and follow-up data on these patients are presented. Overall, 78.8% of the patients were determined to be surgical candidates and underwent spinal decompression and/or stabilization. Follow-up rates to date at 6 and 12 months are 45% and 36.3%, respectively. Overall resources required for clinical research coordination are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The authors established the feasibility of SCI CDE implementation in a multicenter, prospective observational study. Through the application of standardized SCI CDEs and expansion of future multicenter collaborations, they hope to advance SCI research and improve treatment.
Assuntos
Elementos de Dados Comuns , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (USA) , Gravidade do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/classificação , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Self-assessment is an important introspective skill that dental professionals will utilise throughout their professional career. Its value lies in its ability to help individuals identify areas of strengths and weakness, and subsequently seek further development of professional skills where needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between self-assessed confidence and the assessment grade of final year dental students based on the professional attributes and competencies of newly qualified dentists outlined by the Australian Dental Council (ADC). METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained prior to distribution of a questionnaire with 45 statements to final year dental students. The survey was created based on the learning outcomes of the ADC guidelines in the domains of "scientific and clinical knowledge" and "patient care." Participants indicated their level of self-assessed confidence by marking "X" on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from zero ("No Confidence") to 10 cm ("Very Confident"). The assessment grade was based on OSCE, viva voce, case report and written paper. RESULTS: A total of 58 (71.6%) dental students participated in the survey. The reported self-assessed confidence over two domains were under "patient care": clinical information gathering 8.92 ± 1.07 cm (range =3.94-10.0 cm: n = 58; 100%), clinical diagnosis and management planning 8.26 ± 1.34 cm (range =0.50-9.95 cm: n = 55; 94.8%), clinical treatment and evaluation, 6.07 ± 1.69 cm (range =0-10.00 cm: n = 55; 94.8%), and "scientific and clinical knowledge": 6.98 ± 1.58 cm (range =0-10.00 cm: n = 58; 100.0%). Within these categories, high confidence was reported for routine dental care (caries management and preventive care) whilst lower confidence was reported for the management of oral medicine and pathologies, dental emergencies, trauma, paediatric dentistry and prosthodontics. Correlation between the assessment grade and the overall score of self-assessed confidence is low positive (r = .225) and not statistically significant (n = 46; P = .132, Spearman'sρ). CONCLUSIONS: The final year dental students appear to have good overall self-assessed confidence in core areas of general dentistry. However, confidence seems to be over-estimated when compared with summative assessment.
Assuntos
Educação em Odontologia , Estudantes de Odontologia , Austrália , Criança , Competência Clínica , Odontologia Geral , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are a common yet challenging encounter in primary care. The aim of this study was to explore how general practitioners (GPs) understand and handle MUS. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 23 GPs. Participants with varied clinical experience were purposively recruited. The data were analysed thematically, using the concept of framing as an analytical lens. RESULTS: The GPs alternated between a biomedical frame, centred on disease, and a biopsychosocial frame, centred on the sick person. Each frame shaped the GPs' understanding and handling of MUS. The biomedical frame emphasised the lack of objective evidence, problematized subjective patient testimony, and manifested feelings of uncertainty, doubt and powerlessness. This in turn complicated patient handling. In contrast, the biopsychosocial frame emphasised clinical experience, turned patient testimony into a valuable source of information, and manifested feelings of confidence and competence. This in turn made them feel empowered. The GPs with the least experience relied more on the biomedical frame, whereas their more seasoned seniors relied mostly on the biopsychosocial frame. CONCLUSION: The biopsychosocial frame helps GPs to understand and handle MUS better than the biomedical frame does. Medical students should spend more time learning biopsychosocial medicine, and to integrate the clinical knowledge of their peers with their own.
Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Sintomas Inexplicáveis , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Relações Médico-Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos Somatoformes/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The perceived relative safety of thoracic thrust joint manipulation (TTJM) has contributed to evidence supporting its use. Yet, TTJM is not without risk, where transient side effects (SE) and severe adverse events (AE) have been documented. With evidence supporting the importance of prethrust examination in reducing AE in other spinal regions this study investigated TTJM knowledge and pre-TTJM examination. Method: An e-survey, informed by existing evidence and expertise was designed and piloted. Eligibility criteria: UK-trained physiotherapists who use TTJM. Recruitment via professional networks and social media from December 2016 to February 2017. Data analysis included descriptive analyses (means, standard deviation and frequencies/central tendencies), and content analysis (themes and frequencies) for free text data. Results: From 306 responses, the sample comprised 146 (53%) males, mean (SD) age 36.37(8.68) years, with 12.88(8.67) years in practice, 11.07(8.14) years specialization, working in National Health Service/private practice (81%) and performing 0-5 TTJM/week (86%). EXAMINATION: 40% (n = 83) utilized pre-TTJM examination with 45% (n = 139) adapting the examination for different regions. Technique selection and effect: preferred technique was prone rotational TTJM (67%). Perception of the primary underlying effect was neurophysiological (54%), biomechanical (45%) or placebo (1%). Knowledge: Levels of agreement were found for contraindications (85%), precautions (75%), and red flags (86%) with more variability for risks including AE and SE (61%). DISCUSSION: UK physiotherapists demonstrated good knowledge and agreement of contraindications, precautions, and red flags to TTJM. With <50% respondents utilizing pre-TTJM examination, variable knowledge of TTJM risks, and therapeutic effects of TTJM further research is required.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) occur in approximately 17,000 people in the US each year. The average length of hospital stay is 11 days, and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) rates as high as 65% are reported in these patients. There is no consensus on the appropriate timing of chemical DVT prophylaxis for this critically injured patient cohort. The object of this study was to determine if low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was safe and effective if given within 24 hours of SCI. METHODS The Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in SCIs study is a prospective observational study conducted by the UCSF Brain and Spinal Injury Center. Protocol at this center includes administration of LMWH within 24 hours of SCI. Data were retrospectively reviewed to determine DVT rate, pulmonary embolism (PE) rate, and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. There were 3 DVTs (6.1%), 2 PEs (4.1%), and no hemorrhagic complications. Regression modeling did not find an association between DVT and/or PE and age, American Spinal Injury Association grade, sex, race, or having undergone a neurosurgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS A standardized protocol in which LMWH is given to patients with SCI within 24 hours of injury is effective in keeping venous thromboembolism at the lower end of the reported range, and is safe, with a zero rate of adverse bleeding events.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Most healthcare services use information and communication technologies to reduce and redistribute the workload associated with follow-up of chronic conditions. However, the lack of normalization of the information handled in and exchanged between such services hinders the scalability and extendibility. The use of medical standards for modelling and exchanging information, especially dual-model based approaches, can enhance the features of screening services. Hence, the approach of this paper is twofold. First, this article presents a generic methodology to model patient-centered clinical processes. Second, a proof of concept of the proposed methodology was conducted within the diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening service of the Health Service of Navarre (Spain) in compliance with a specific dual-model norm (openEHR). As a result, a set of elements required for deploying a model-driven DR screening service has been established, namely: clinical concepts, archetypes, termsets, templates, guideline definition rules, and user interface definitions. This model fosters reusability, because those elements are available to be downloaded and integrated in any healthcare service, and interoperability, since from then on such services can share information seamlessly.
Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde/normas , Informática Médica/métodos , Informática Médica/normas , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Retina/patologia , Espanha , Integração de Sistemas , Interface Usuário-ComputadorRESUMO
The Habermasian concept of 'interest' has had a profound effect on the characterization of scientific disciplines. Going beyond issues unrelated to the theory itself, intra-theoretical interest characterizes the specific ways of approaching any science-related discipline, defining research topics and methodologies. This approach was developed by Jürgen Habermas in relation to empirical-analytical sciences, historical-hermeneutics sciences, and critical sciences; however, he did not make any specific references to health sciences. This article aims to contribute to shaping a general epistemological framework for health sciences, as well as its specific implications for the medical and nursing areas, via an analysis of the basic knowledge interests developed by Habermas.
Assuntos
Conhecimento , Teoria de Enfermagem , Ciência , HumanosRESUMO
This study examined the effectiveness of a systematic approach to the clinical management of COVID-19, focusing on nursing turnover. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, a clinical process support system based on structured clinical knowledge (Team Compass with the Patient Condition Adaptive Path System; TC-PCAPS) was developed, and implemented in hospitals. In 2020, the COVID-19 clinical management system (COVID-19-CMS) was developed. In this study, the effectiveness of implementing both systems was analyzed. The analysis covered hospitals N, T, and B, where TC-PCAPS implementation started in 2019, 2020, and 2022, respectively. Data for the period from 2018 to 2022 were collected and compared. RESULTS: Hospitals N and T implemented TC-PCAPS in the first year and the COVID-19-CMS in the following year. The nurse turnover rates of these hospitals were lower than those of the prefectures in which they were located. There was a trend towards a gradual reduction in nurse turnover. In contrast, hospital B, which had only just started to introduce these systems, saw a gradual increase in nurse turnover. CONCLUSION: The data collected from these three hospitals suggested that this systematic approach has the potential to reduce nurse turnover, in addition to the previously reported ability of TC-PCAPS to reduce nurse overtime. In Japan, there is a need to respond to future pandemics and reform the work styles of physicians and nurses. The abovementioned systematic approach has great potential for contributing to both of these aims.