Cutaneous manifestations and considerations in COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

COVID-19 had a great impact on medical approaches among dermatologist. This systematic review focuses on all skin problems related to COVID-19, including primary and secondary COVID-related cutaneous presentations and the experts recommendations about dermatological managements especially immunomodulators usage issues. Search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase and ScienceDirect. Other additional resources were searched included Cochrane, WHO, Medscape and coronavirus dermatology resource of Nottingham university. The search completed on May 3, 2020. Three hundred seventy-seven articles assigned to the inclusion and exclusion groups. Eighty-nine articles entered the review. Primary mucocutaneous and appendageal presentations could be the initial or evolving signs of COVID-19. It could be manifest most commonly as a maculopapular exanthamatous or morbiliform eruption, generalized urticaria or pseudo chilblains recognized as "COVID toes" (pernio-like acral lesions or vasculopathic rashes). During pandemic, Non-infected non-at risk patients with immune-medicated dermatologic disorders under treatment with immunosuppressive immunomodulators do not need to alter their regimen or discontinue their therapies. At-risk o suspected patients may need dose reduction, interval increase or temporary drug discontinuation (at least 2 weeks). Patients with an active COVID-19 infection should hold the biologic or non-biologic immunosuppressives until the complete recovery occur (at least 4 weeks).

Successful treatment of severe subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus with rituximab in an adolescent.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus is rare in children. Most patients respond well to conventional therapy with prednisone, hydroxychloroquine, or both. Other case reports and small series have reported successful clearance with rituximab in adults. We report an adolescent who obtained remission with rituximab after failing conventional therapy.

Long-term survival analysis of free flap reconstruction in patients with collagen vascular disorders.

BACKGROUND: Collagen vascular disorders (CVD) are inflammatory diseases that can affect the blood vessels and soft tissues. Patients with CVD are often immunosuppressed, prone to hyper-coagulation, and represent a challenging patient cohort for free tissue transfer. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with CVD who underwent free flap reconstructions from 2000-2020 was performed at our institution. Inclusion criteria were patients 18 years old or older with the clinical diagnosis of CVD, including rheumatoid arthritis, Raynaud phenomenon, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and sarcoidosis. A time-to-event analysis was performed to identify predictors of surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients and 96 free flaps were included. The most common CVD were rheumatoid arthritis (n=36) and Raynaud's phenomenon (n=9). Type of flap included abdominal-based flap (26%), trunk-based flaps (32.3%), and extremity-based flaps (19.8%). The mean age was 56.7±14.6 years, and the mean BMI was 27.5±5.9 kg/m2. Antibody positivity was present in 25.6% of patients; 59% were on chronic steroids, 6.4% were on chronic anticoagulation, 35.9% had radiation therapy, and 29.5% had chemotherapy. Nine percent of patients had a history of prior flap loss, and 11.5% had a history of DVT or arterial thrombosis. The flap loss rate was 3.8%. Steroid treatment was associated with an increased risk of major complications after adjusting for the type of flap HR 2.5(1.3-4.9), p= 0.01. Specifically associated with a higher risk of cellulitis, OR 5.1 (1.1-24.5), p=0.02, and abscess, OR 5.7 (1.2-27.1), p=0.01. CONCLUSION: Free flap reconstruction can be safely performed in patients with CVD. Perioperative optimization of steroids is important to promote wound healing and stabilize disease activity.