Alternative Tissue Fixation Protocols Dramatically Reduce the Impact of DNA Artifacts, Unraveling the Interpretation of Clinical Comprehensive Genomic Profiling.

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples represent the cornerstone of tissue-based analysis in precision medicine. Targeted next-generation sequencing panels are routinely used to analyze a limited number of genes to guide treatment decision-making for advanced-stage patients. The number and complexity of genetic alterations to be investigated are rapidly growing; in several instances, a comprehensive genomic profiling analysis is needed. The poor quality of genetic material extracted from FFPE samples may impact the feasibility/reliability of sequencing data. We sampled 9 colorectal cancers to allow 4 parallel fixations: (1) neutral buffered formalin (NBF), (2) acid-deprived formalin fixation (ADF), (3) precooled ADF (coldADF), and (4) glyoxal acid free (GAF). DNA extraction, fragmentation analysis, and sequencing by 2 large next-generation sequencing panels (OCAv3 and TSO500) followed. We comprehensively analyzed library and sequencing quality controls and the quality of sequencing results. Libraries from coldADF samples showed significantly longer reads than the others with both panels. ADF-derived and coldADF-derived libraries showed the lowest level of noise and the highest levels of uniformity with the OCAv3 panel, followed by GAF and NBF samples. The data uniformity was confirmed by the TSO500 results, which also highlighted the best performance in terms of the total region sequenced for the ADF and coldADF samples. NBF samples had a significantly smaller region sequenced and displayed a significantly lower number of evaluable microsatellite loci and a significant increase in single-nucleotide variations compared with other protocols. Mutational signature 1 (aging and FFPE artifact related) showed the highest (37%) and lowest (17%) values in the NBF and coldADF samples, respectively. Most of the identified genetic alterations were shared by all samples in each lesion. Five genes showed a different mutational status across samples and/or panels: 4 discordant results involved NBF samples. In conclusion, acid-deprived fixatives (GAF and ADF) guarantee the highest DNA preservation/sequencing performance, thus allowing more complex molecular profiling of tissue samples.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of salivary gland carcinoma: Analysis of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database in Japan.

Comprehensive information on genetic alterations in salivary gland cancer (SGC) is limited. This study aimed to elucidate the genetic and clinical characteristics of patients with SGC using the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database, a Japanese national genomic database. We analyzed data of 776 patients with SGC registered in the C-CAT database between June 1, 2019, and June 30, 2023. Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common histologic type, followed by salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) and adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified. Genetic data of 681 patients receiving FoundationOne® CDx were analyzed. We identified specific features of the combination of TP53 and CDKN2A alterations among the histological types. Specific LYN amplification was mainly detected in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and myoepithelial carcinoma. For SDC, the frequency of ERBB2 and BRAF alterations were higher in cases with metastatic lesions than in those with primary lesions. Although 28.6% patients were offered recommended treatment options, only 6.8% received the recommended treatments. This study highlights the differences in genetic alterations among the histological types of SGC, with comprehensive genomic profiling tests revealing lower drug accessibility. These findings could contribute to the development of personalized treatment for patients with SGC.

Factors predictive of second-line chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: An analysis of the National Genomic Profiling Database.

Of the drugs used in second-line chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), trabectedin is effective for liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma (L-sarcoma), eribulin for liposarcoma, and pazopanib for non-liposarcoma. The indications for these drugs in STS other than L-sarcoma have not been established. Here we explored the prognosis, mutation profiles, and drug-response factors in STS using real-world big data. Clinicogenomic data on 1761 patients with sarcoma who underwent FoundationOne CDx were obtained from a national database in Japan. Patients with TP53 and KDM2D mutations had a significantly shorter survival period of 253 (95% CI, 99-404) and 330 (95% CI, 20-552) days, respectively, than those without mutations. Non-supervised clustering based on mutation profiles generated 13 tumor clusters. The response rate (RR) to trabectedin was highest in an MDM2-amplification cluster (odds ratio [OR]: 2.2; p = 0.2). The RR was lowest for eribulin in an MDM2-amplification cluster (OR: 0.4; p = 0.03) and highest in a TERT-mutation cluster (OR: 3.0; p = 0.03). The RR was highest for pazopanib in a PIK3CA/PTEN-wild type cluster (OR: 2.1; p = 0.03). In particular, patients harboring mutations in genes regulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway had a lower RR than patients without mutations (OR: 0.3; p = 0.04). In STS, mutation profiles were more useful in predicting the drug response than histology. The present study demonstrated the potential of tailored therapy guided by mutation profiles established by comprehensive genomic profiling testing in optimizing second-line chemotherapy for STS. The findings of this study will hopefully contribute some valuable insights into enhancing STS treatment strategies and outcomes.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology clinical guidelines: Molecular testing for colorectal cancer treatment, 5th edition.

Molecular testing to determine optimal therapies is essential for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In October 2022, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published the 5th edition of the Molecular Testing Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. In this guideline, in patients with unresectable CRC, RAS/BRAF V600E mutational and mismatch repair tests are strongly recommended prior to first-line chemotherapy to select optimal first- and second-line therapies. In addition, HER2 testing is strongly recommended because the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab combination is insured after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in Japan. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based RAS testing is also strongly recommended to assess the indications for the readministration of anti-EGFR antibodies. Both tissue- and ctDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling tests are strongly recommended to assess the indications for targeted molecular drugs, although they are currently insured in patients with disease progression after receiving standard chemotherapy (or in whom disease progression is expected in the near future). Mutational and mismatch repair testing is strongly recommended for patients with resectable CRC, and RAS/BRAF V600E mutation testing is recommended to estimate the risk of recurrence. Mutational and mismatch repair and BRAF testing are also strongly recommended for screening for Lynch syndrome. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is strongly recommended for estimating the risk of recurrence based on clinical evidence, although MRD testing was not approved in Japan at the time of the publication of this guideline.

Patient survey on cancer genomic medicine in Japan under the national health insurance system.

In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been reimbursed under the national health care system for solid cancer patients who have finished standard treatment. More than 50,000 patients have taken the test since June 2019. We performed a nation-wide questionnaire survey between March 2021 and July 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 80 designated Cancer Genomic Medicine Hospitals. Of the 933 responses received, 370 (39.7%) were web based and 563 (60.3%) were paper based. Most patients (784, 84%) first learned about CGP tests from healthcare professionals, and 775 (83.1%) gave informed consent to their treating physician. At the time of informed consent, they were most worried about test results not leading to novel treatment (536, 57.4%). On a scale of 0-10, 702 respondents (75.2%) felt that the explanations of the test result were easy to understand (7 or higher). Ninety-one patients (9.8%) started their recommended treatment. Many patients could not receive recommended treatment because no approved drugs or clinical trials were available (102/177, 57.6%). Ninety-eight patients (10.5%) did not wish their findings to be disclosed. Overall satisfaction with the CGP test process was high, with 602 respondents (64.5%) giving a score of 7-10. The major reason for choosing 0-6 was that the CGP test result did not lead to new treatment (217/277, 78.3%). In conclusion, satisfaction with the CGP test process was high. Patients and family members need better access to information. More patients need to be treated with genomically matched therapy.

Nationwide data from comprehensive genomic profiling assays for detecting driver oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer.

Driver oncogenes are investigated upfront at diagnosis using multi-CDx systems with next-generation sequencing techniques or multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. Additionally, from 2019, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assays have been available in Japan for patients with advanced solid tumors who had completed or were expected to complete standard chemotherapy. These assays are expected to comprehensively detect the driver oncogenes, especially for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no reports of nationwide research on the detection of driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC who undergo CGP assays, especially in those with undetected driver oncogenes at diagnosis. In this study, we investigated the proportion of driver oncogenes detected in patients with advanced NSCLC with undetectable driver oncogenes at initial diagnosis and in all patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays. We retrospectively analyzed data from 986 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays between August 2019 and March 2022, using the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database. The proportion of driver oncogenes newly detected in patients with NSCLC who tested negative for driver oncogenes at diagnosis and in all patients with NSCLC were investigated. Driver oncogenes were detected in 451 patients (45.7%). EGFR was the most common (16.5%), followed by KRAS (14.5%). Among the 330 patients with undetected EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF V600E mutations at diagnosis, 81 patients (24.5%) had newly identified driver oncogenes. CGP assays could be useful to identify driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC, including those initially undetected, facilitating personalized treatment.

Breadth versus depth: whole transcriptome sequencing has reduced sensitivity for detection of clinically relevant fusions compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling.

While there is great potential for unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches-eg, whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS)-for exploration, discovery, and clinical application in the realm of oncology, there are limitations that should be considered when relying on these methodologies for clinical decision making. When using WTS for the detection of clinically relevant gene fusions in tumor specimens, a key consideration is whether a limited coverage depth (approximately 30-50X) is sufficient for detecting these events, especially in samples with low tumor purity. We demonstrate the reduced sensitivity of both a commercial WTS assay for the detection of clinically relevant fusions in analytical validation control samples and of a research use only (RUO) WTS assay for the detection of clinically relevant fusions in real-world clinical samples compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Notably, the RUO WTS assay would not have reported 30% (6/20) of fusions detected using RNA CGP assays in fusion-positive tumor samples, highlighting a potential disadvantage of broader sequencing.

Insights of Clinical Significance From 109 695 Solid Tumor Tissue-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiles.

BACKGROUND: FoundationOneCDx is approved in the US and Japan as a companion diagnostic test to identify patients with cancer who may benefit from treatment with 30 drug therapies in the US and 23 in Japan. Tumor profiling with FoundationOneCDx also detects genomic findings with evidence of clinical significance that may inform clinical care decisions beyond companion diagnostic claims. This observational study reports the breadth and impact of clinical decision insights from FoundationOneCDx solid tumor profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive test result reports for patients with solid tumor diagnoses (n = 109 695) were retrospectively analyzed for clinically significant predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic genomic alterations and signatures, determined in accordance with professional guidelines. Interventional clinical trials with targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors were matched to tumor profiles based on evidence that the genomic finding may be an actionable, investigational, or hypothetical target in the patient's tumor type. RESULTS: In 14 predefined cancer types (80.7% of analyzed solid tumors), predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic markers were reported in 47.6%, 13.2%, and 4.5% of samples, respectively, accounting for a total of 51.2% of tumor profiles. Pan-cancer predictive markers of tumor mutational burden (TMB) of 10 or more mutations per megabase, high microsatellite instability (MSI), or NTRK1/2/3 fusions were observed in 15.6%, 2.0%, and 0.1% of solid tumors, respectively. Most solid tumor profiles (89.2%) had genomic results that could theoretically inform decisions on the selection of immunotherapy and targeted therapy clinical trials. CONCLUSION: For this real-world population of patients with FoundationOneCDx solid tumor profiles in the routine course of clinical care, clinically significant findings were reported for approximately half of patients with genomic results.

Colorectal cancer harboring EGFR kinase domain duplication response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is a rare, recurrent oncogenic variant that constitutively activates EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer. Herein, we report the case of a 70-year-old man with resectable colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. He relapsed with multiple liver metastases and received standard chemotherapy until his disease became refractory. Comprehensive genomic profiling of his postoperative colorectal cancer tissue revealed EGFR-KDD. He was treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), afatinib and achieved a partial response (- 55%) after 8 weeks; however, he developed massive malignant ascites after 13 weeks. Osimertinib, another EGFR-TKI, controlled his tumors for 9 months. Patient-derived cancer organoids from his malignant ascites confirmed sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. The findings suggest that EGFR-TKIs can be a potential treatment option for this molecular subgroup.

The value of virtual molecular tumor boards for informed clinical decision-making.

Genomic profiling and other new technologies have increased the volume and complexity of information available for guiding clinical decision-making in precision oncology. Consequently, there is a need for multidisciplinary expert teams, in the form of molecular tumor boards (MTBs), who can translate this information into a therapeutic plan, including matching patients to suitable clinical trials. Virtual MTBs (vMTBs) can help to overcome many of the challenges associated with in-person MTBs, such as limited time availability, access to appropriate experts or datasets, or interactions between institutions. However, real-world experience from vMTBs is lacking. Here, we describe oncologists' vMTB experiences and the value of working with multicenter and/or multinational vMTBs. We also address knowledge gaps and barriers that could affect the implementation of vMTBs in routine clinical practice. Case studies from Argentina, Turkey, and Portugal illustrate the value of informed clinical decision-making by vMTBs, including expansion of therapeutic options for patients, faster time to treatment, and the resulting improvement in patient outcomes or impact of vMTB discussions on patients. With the uptake of comprehensive genomic profiling and the evolution of some cancers now being conceptualized as a collection of rare diseases with small patient populations based on molecular profiling, the importance of MTBs has increased in modern cancer management. However, an adjustment in clinical decision-making by healthcare professionals is required and evidence of the added value of vMTBs is lacking. Existing vMTBs and recommendations from participating oncologists could point toward a structured evaluation and analysis of this new platform.

Comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy captures tumor heterogeneity and identifies cancer vulnerabilities in patients with RAS/BRAFV600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the CAPRI 2-GOIM trial.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence supports tumor tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Data on liquid biopsy-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) CGP are scarce and mainly retrospective. Prospective comparison between the two tests is not currently available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAPRI 2-GOIM trial investigates efficacy and safety of ctDNA-driven, cetuximab-based sequence of three treatment lines in patients with RAS/BRAFV600E wild-type (WT) mCRC, as determined by the local laboratory. Before first-line therapy, CGP is carried out with FoundationOne (F1) CDx and F1 Liquid (F1L) CDx (324 genes) on tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA, respectively. RESULTS: For 2/207 (0.96%) patients, no ctDNA was detected by F1L CDx. No patient displayed tumor fraction (TF) below 1%, whereas elevated ctDNA (TF ≥ 10%) was detected among 140/205 (68.3%) patients. One thousand and thirteen genomic variants were identified. F1L CDx found KRAS, NRAS, or BRAFV600E alterations in 19 patients, whose tumors were classified as RAS/BRAFV600E WT by the local laboratory. Both F1 CDx and F1L CDx were available for 164/205 (80%) patients. A concordance of 61.4% between the two tests was observed. The concordance increased to 72.7% for F1L CDx with TF ≥ 10%. Concordance for genes potentially involved in anti-epidermal growth factor receptor resistance was found in 137/164 (83%) patients, increasing to 91.5% for F1L CDx with TF ≥ 10%. A higher number of genomic alterations was detected by F1L CDx compared with F1 CDx, including six cases with KRAS and NRAS alterations. Overall, 109/205 (53.2%) patients displayed at least one actionable genomic alteration (I to IIIB), according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT). CONCLUSION: Baseline liquid biopsy-based CGP is feasible, has high concordance with tumor tissue-based CGP, could better recapitulate tumor heterogeneity, and is clinically informative by identifying additional actionable genomic alterations in approximately half of RAS/BRAFV600E WT mCRC patients.

Comprehensive genomic profiling on metastatic Melanoma: results from a network screening from 7 Italian Cancer Centres.

BACKGROUND: The current therapeutic algorithm for Advanced Stage Melanoma comprises of alternating lines of Targeted and Immuno-therapy, mostly via Immune-Checkpoint blockade. While Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of solid tumours has been approved as a companion diagnostic, still no approved predictive biomarkers are available for Melanoma aside from BRAF mutations and the controversial Tumor Mutational Burden. This study presents the results of a Multi-Centre Observational Clinical Trial of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling on Target and Immuno-therapy treated advanced Melanoma. METHODS: 82 samples, collected from 7 Italian Cancer Centres of FFPE-archived Metastatic Melanoma and matched blood were sequenced via a custom-made 184-gene amplicon-based NGS panel. Sequencing and bioinformatics analysis was performed at a central hub. Primary analysis was carried out via the Ion Reporter framework. Secondary analysis and Machine Learning modelling comprising of uni and multivariate, COX/Lasso combination, and Random Forest, was implemented via custom R/Python scripting. RESULTS: The genomics landscape of the ACC-mela cohort is comparable at the somatic level for Single Nucleotide Variants and INDELs aside a few gene targets. All the clinically relevant targets such as BRAF and NRAS have a comparable distribution thus suggesting the value of larger scale sequencing in melanoma. No comparability is reached at the CNV level due to biotechnological biases and cohort numerosity. Tumour Mutational Burden is slightly higher in median for Complete Responders but fails to achieve statistical significance in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis via several thresholding strategies. Mutations on PDGFRB, NOTCH3 and RET were shown to have a positive effect on Immune-checkpoint treatment Overall and Disease-Free Survival, while variants in NOTCH4 were found to be detrimental for both endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this study show the value and the challenge of a genomics-driven network trial. The data can be also a valuable resource as a validation cohort for Immunotherapy and Target therapy genomic biomarker research.

Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Target-Enhanced Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test.

Evaluation of the test performance of the Target enhanced whole-genome sequencing (TE-WGS) assay for comprehensive oncology genomic profiling. The analytical validation of the assay included sensitivity and specificity for single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), and structural variants (SVs), revealing a revealed a sensitivity of 99.8% for SNVs and 99.2% for indels. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 99.3% SNVs and 98.7% indels. Clinical validation was benchmarked against established orthogonal methods and demonstrated high concordance with reference methods. TE-WGS provides insights beyond targeted panels by comprehensive analysis of key biomarkers and the entire genome encompassing both germline and somatic findings.

Comprehensive genomic evaluation of advanced and recurrent breast cancer patients for tailored precision treatments.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate genetic alterations within breast cancer in the setting of recurrent or de novo stage IV disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 22 patients with recurrent breast cancer (n = 19) and inoperable de novo stage IV breast cancer (n = 3). For next generation sequencing, FoundationOneCDx (F1CDx) (Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) was performed in 21 patients and FoundationOneLiquid CDx was performed in 1 patient. RESULTS: Median age was 62.9 years (range, 33.4-82.1). Pathological diagnoses of specimens included invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 19), invasive lobular carcinoma (n = 2), and invasive micropapillary carcinoma (n = 1). F1CDx detected a median of 4.5 variants (range, 1-11). The most commonly altered gene were PIK3CA (n = 9), followed by TP53 (n = 7), MYC (n = 4), PTEN (n = 3), and CDH1 (n = 3). For hormone receptor-positive patients with PIK3CA mutations, hormonal treatment plus a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor was recommended as the treatment of choice. Patients in the hormone receptor-negative and no human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression group had significantly higher tumor mutational burden than patients in the hormone receptor-positive group. A BRCA2 reversion mutation was revealed by F1CDx in a patient with a deleterious germline BRCA2 mutation during poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor treatment. CONCLUSION: Guidance on tailored precision therapy with consideration of genomic mutations was possible for some patients with information provided by F1CDx. Clinicians should consider using F1CDx at turning points in the course of the disease.

A single-institution retrospective study of comprehensive genomic profiling tests based on C-CAT findings for advanced solid cancers.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, as the availability of precision therapies expands, there is increasing reliance on genomic profiling assays to help identify the most appropriate treatment options for patients with advanced cancers. We retrospectively investigated the results of comprehensive genomic profiling tests from the time insurance coverage began until recently and examined the status of genetic analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the analysis results of 300 patients with advanced solid tumors who consented to comprehensive genomic profiling tests from October 2019 to December 2022. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling tests, analysis results for 274 patients were obtained, and were reviewed by the Clinical Genome Expert Panel. Six specimens (2%) were discontinued due to patient deaths and deteriorations in general condition. The three most frequently occurring actionable genomic alterations observed were TP53 (47.4%), KRAS (28.1%) and CDKN2A (20.4%). The most common druggable variant was CDKN2A, which was noted in 52 (19%) of 274 patients. The next most common were PIK3CA, BRAF, KRAS and PTEN. The cancer types that showed a greater median number of actionable alterations comprised thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, comprehensive genomic profiling tests have the potential to be valuable in identifying genomic abnormalities. Even if there is no effective treatment at present, it may lead to a treatment in the future. Comprehensive genomic profiling tests should be considered for any cancer.

Availability of genome-matched therapy based on clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) provides new opportunities for patients with advanced cancer to receive genome-matched therapies, but the availability rate of these remains low. We reviewed our CGP cases and suggested possible strategies to improve the current status from a clinical perspective. METHODS: Druggable genomic alterations and barriers to accessing genome-matched therapies were investigated in 653 patients with 30 various types of cancers who underwent CGP. RESULTS: While the availability rate of genome-matched therapies as a whole was 9.5%, CGP was useful in some cancer types. Patients with thyroid cancer and lung cancer harbored druggable genomic alterations at high rates, while sarcoma rarely harbored these alterations (100%, 76%, and 15.2%, respectively). In contrast, the availability rate of genome-matched therapies was highest in patients with sarcoma and head and neck cancer (HNC) (60% and 40%, respectively). One hundred thirteen patients (63.5%) had multiple barriers to accessing genome-matched therapy. Of 178 patients, 21 patients (11.8%) could not be considered for genome-matched therapies solely because of the deterioration of their performance status. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the usefulness of CGP for patients with sarcoma and HNC in addition to lung cancer in clinical practice. Performing CGP at the front line has the potential to improve the availability of genome-matched therapy.

Real-world application of comprehensive genomic profiling for gynecological malignancies: a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: The actual status of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) applications in Japan has not been clarified. We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the real-world application of CGP in gynecological malignancies. METHODS: Nine designated cancer hospitals participated in this study. Patients who underwent CGP in 2020-2021 were assigned to the CGP group (n = 134). For the population that would have been eligible for CGP, patients who received initial treatment in 2015-2016 and were either alive with disease or died of disease at 5 years follow up were included in the control group (n = 316). We compared clinicopathological characteristics including tumor type (cervix, corpus, ovary, and others including sarcoma) and age. We also investigated the context of CGP-recommended treatment. RESULTS: The CGP group had significantly fewer cervical cases and more others cases (cervix/corpus/ovary/others: CGP, 22/44/56/12; control, 89/79/142/6; p = 0.0003). The CGP group was significantly younger than the control group (median: CGP, 54.0; control, 65.0; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with cervical and ovarian cancers were significantly younger in the CGP group. Among the CGP group, 17 patients (12.7%) received CGP-recommended treatments, 15 of which were not covered by public insurance. The survival time after CGP in 17 patients was longer than in the other 117 cases (median 21 vs. 11 months). CONCLUSION: There was significant selection bias in tumor type and age for the application of CGP for gynecological malignancies in clinical practice in Japan. While CGP often recommended drugs not covered by public insurance, prognosis can be improved by use of CGP.

Clinical utility of a comprehensive genomic profiling test for patient with advanced biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) comprises a heterogeneous group of malignancies with poor prognosis because of the limited treatment options. With the recent advances of next generation sequencing technologies, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been widely introduced into daily clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter, observation cohort study. The genomic and clinical data of 85 BTC patients, who underwent CGP testing from August 2021 to September 2023, were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 62 (73%) cases in which treatment recommendations were raised during expert meetings, including 34 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 20 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and 8 gall bladder carcinoma (GBC). The drug accessibility rate of the BTC patients was 15.3% (13 cases): ten ICCs, two ECCs, and one GBC. Five ICC patients (three male and two female) with the FGFR2 fusion gene were treated with pemigatinib. Those patients who received a genomically matched therapy had significantly longer median overall survival than those patients who not received. (n = 13; not reached [95% CI not reached-not reached] vs n = 72; 8.6 months [95% CI 6.6-10.0]; hazard ratio 0.24 [95% CI 0.12-0.49], p = 0.013). The median observation period of pemigatinib treatment was 15.4 months (range 10.1-27.4). The responses were classified as PR in three patients, SD in one patient and PD in one patient. The median progression free survival is 9.0 months. No patient had grade 3/4 AEs requiring discontinuation of the treatment. CONCLUSION: The drug accessibility rate of ICC is high and pemigatinib is effective and well-tolerated in ICC patients harboring FGFR2 gene fusions.

Genomic landscape of comprehensive genomic profiling in patients with malignant solid tumors in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can aid the discovery of clinically useful, candidate antitumor agents; however, the variant annotations sometimes differ among the various types of CGP tests as well as the public database. The aim of this study is to clarify the genomic landscape of evaluating detected variants in patients with a malignant solid tumor. METHODS: The present, cross-sectional study used data from 57,084 patients with a malignant solid tumor who underwent CGP at the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) between June 1, 2019 and August 18, 2023. The pathogenicity of the variants was annotated using public databases. RESULTS: As a result of re-annotation of the detected variants, 20.1% were pathogenic and 1.4% were benign. The mean number of pathogenic variants was 4.30 (95% confidence interval: 4.27-4.32) per patient. Of the entire cohort, 5.7% had no pathogenic variant. The co-occurrence of the genes depended on the tumor type. Germline findings were detected in 6.2%, 8.8%, and 15.8% of the patients using a tumor/normal panel, tumor-only panel, and liquid panel, respectively, with the most common gene being BRCA2 followed by TP53 and BRCA1. CONCLUSIONS: The detected variants should be re-annotated because several benign variants or variants of unknown significance were included in the CGP, and the genomic landscape derived from these results will help researchers and physicians interpret the results of CGP tests. The method of extracting presumptive, germline, pathogenic variants from patients using a tumor-only panel or circulating tumor DNA panel requires improvement.

An approach for improvement of the accuracy of cancer gene panel testing.

BACKGROUND: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly being employed for genotype-directed therapies in patients with advanced cancer. However, tissue availability may limit their potential applications. In Japan, the cost of cancer gene panel tests is covered by public insurance for patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumors once in their lifetime. Therefore, it is essential to improve the success rate (reportability) and accuracy of CGP tests. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with efficient and accurate CGP testing using relevant information obtained from real-world data. METHODS: This study included 159 samples analyzed using tumor-only panel FoundationOne® CDx cancer genome profiling (F1CDx) and 85 samples analyzed using matched-pair panel OncoGuide™ NCC Oncopanel system (NCCOP) at St. Marianna University Hospital. Sample characteristics (fixation conditions, storage period, histology, tumor cell ratio, and genomic tumor cell content), CGP performance, and quality control status were evaluated across all 244 tested samples. RESULTS: In 237/244 samples (97.1%), CGP testing results were successfully obtained [F1CDx, 99.4% (158/159) and NCCOP, 92.9% (79/85)]. An increased number of fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, and necrotic tumor cells, long-term storage, and/or prolonged fixation of tissue sections were involved in the unreported results and/or qualified CGP results. In addition, a negative correlation between median insert size values and ΔΔCq was observed in the NCCOP system. CONCLUSION: We identified various factors associated with efficient and accurate CGP testing using relevant information obtained from real-world data, suggesting that thorough selection and preparation of tissue sections could optimize CGP and maximize useful information.