Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an innovative imaging tool for breast cancer detection, involving intravenous injection of a contrast medium and the assessment of lesion enhancement in two phases: early and delayed. The aim of the study was to analyze the topographic concordance of lesions detected in the early- versus delayed phase acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approved by the Ethics Committee (No. 118/20), this prospective study included 100 women with histopathological confirmed breast neoplasia (B6) at the Radiodiagnostics Department of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital of Novara, Italy from May 1, 2021, to October 17, 2022. Participants underwent CEM examinations using a complete protocol, encompassing both early- and delayed image acquisitions. Three experienced radiologists blindly analyzed the CEM images for contrast enhancement to determine the topographic concordance of the identified lesions. Two readers assessed the complete study (protocol A), while one reader assessed the protocol without the delayed phase (protocol B). The average glandular dose (AGD) of the entire procedure was also evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrated high concordance among the three readers in the topographical identification of lesions within individual quadrants of both breasts, with a Cohen's κ > 0.75, except for the lower inner quadrant of the right breast and the retro-areolar region of the left breast. The mean whole AGD was 29.2 mGy. The mean AGD due to CEM amounted to 73% of the whole AGD (21.2 mGy). The AGD attributable to the delayed phase of CEM contributed to 36% of the whole AGD (10.5 mGy). CONCLUSIONS: As we found no significant discrepancy between the readings of the two protocols, we conclude that delayed-phase image acquisition in CEM does not provide essential diagnostic benefits for effective disease management. Instead, it contributes to unnecessary radiation exposure.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and dynamic breast MRI techniques for diagnosing breast lesions, assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEM's using histopathological findings, and compare lesion size measurements obtained from both methods with pathological size. Materials and methods: This prospective study included 120 lesions, of which 70 were malignant, in 104 patients who underwent CEM and MRI within a week. Two radiologists independently evaluated the MR and CEM images in separate sessions, using the BI-RADS classification system. Additionally, the maximum sizes of lesion were measured. Diagnostic accuracy parameters and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for the two modalities. The correlation between the maximum diameter of breast lesions observed in MRI, CEM, and pathology was analyzed. Results: The overall diagnostic values for MRI were as follows: sensitivity 97.1%, specificity 60%, positive predictive value (PPV) 77.3%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93.8%, and accuracy 81.7%. Correspondingly, for CEM, the sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 97.14%, 81.67%, 60%, 77.27%, and 93.75%, respectively. The ROC analysis of CEM revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.907 for observer 1 and 0.857 for observer 2, whereas MRI exhibited an AUC of 0.910 for observer 1 and 0.914 for observer 2. Notably, CEM showed the highest correlation with pathological lesion size (r = 0.660 for observer 1 and r = 0.693 for observer 2, p < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: CEM can be used with high sensitivity and similar diagnostic performance comparable to MRI for diagnosing breast cancer. CEM proves to be a successful diagnostic method for precisely determining tumor size.

Radiomics of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been regarded as one of the standard treatments for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. No previous study has investigated the feasibility of using a contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-based radiomics nomogram to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a CESM-based radiomics nomogram to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 118 patients were enrolled, which are divided into a training dataset including 82 patients (with 21 pCR and 61 non-pCR) and a testing dataset of 36 patients (with 9 pCR and 27 non-pCR). The tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented by two radiologists on the low-energy and recombined images and radiomics features were extracted. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the intra- and inter-observer agreements of ROI features extraction. In the training set, the variance threshold, SelectKBest method, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to select the optimal radiomics features. Radiomics signature was calculated through a linear combination of selected features. A radiomics nomogram containing radiomics signature score (Rad-score) and clinical risk factors was developed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve were used to evaluate prediction performance of the radiomics nomogram, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the radiomics nomogram. RESULTS: The intra- and inter- observer ICCs were 0.769-0.815 and 0.786-0.853, respectively. Thirteen radiomics features were selected to calculate Rad-score. The radiomics nomogram containing Rad-score and clinical risk factor showed an encouraging calibration and discrimination performance with area under the ROC curves of 0.906 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.840-0.966) in the training dataset and 0.790 (95% CI: 0.554-0.952) in the test dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The CESM-based radiomics nomogram had good prediction performance for pCR after NAC in breast cancer; therefore, it has a good clinical application prospect.

An approach to dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM) using a double layer filter: dosimetric and image quality assessment.

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM) is a recently developed advanced technique in digital mammography that uses an iodinated intravenous contrast agent to assess tumor angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of DE-CESM recombined images in terms of radiation dose and image quality. A 50% fibroglandular-50% adipose, custom-made phantom with iodine inserts of 1.0 mgI cm-3, 2.0 mgI cm-3, 4.0 mgI cm-3was used for the estimation of mean glandular dose (MGD) and the image quality. Low-energy (LE) images were acquired with the W/Rh, W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu and W/Rh + 0.5 mm Al while high energy images (HE) are acquired with the W/Rh, W/Rh + 0.06 mm Ba, W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu, and W/Rh + 0.03 mm Ce anode filter combinations. The total MGD was reduced up to a maximum from 1.75 mGy to 1.45 mGy by using Rh + 0.01 mm Cu double-layer filter for both LE and HE imaging of 50 mm, standard 50% fibroglandular phantom compared to Rh single-layer filter with W target. The minimum total MGD reduction (1.69 mGy) was observed when Rh + 0.5 mm Al was used for LE and Rh + 0.06 mm Ba was used for HE exposure. The image quality was comparable with the single-layer filter. The use of W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu or W/Rh + 0.5 mm Al as target/filter combination for LE exposure and W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu for HE exposure can reduce the additional radiation dose delivered by DE-CESM without degrading the image quality.

[Contrast-enhanced mammography]. / Kontrastmittelunterstützte Mammographie.

Early detection is of great importance for the successful treatment of breast cancer and for a good prognosis. Contrast-enhanced mammography and especially contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) show promising initial results and are a valuable addition to currently available methods. The advantage of these methods is that imaging of both breasts can be performed in a single examination with a single contrast agent application. The accuracy of CESM is similar to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), easily available at low costs, which is why this procedure is increasingly used in the diagnostic work up of breast cancer. CESM is also a good alternative to MRI if this cannot be performed due to contraindications.

Preoperative prediction of histologic grade in invasive breast cancer by using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography-based radiomics.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), and preoperatively discriminate low-grade (grade I/II) and high-grade (grade III) invasive breast cancer. METHOD: A total of 205 patients with CESM examination and pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer were retrospectively enrolled. We randomly divided patients into two independent sets namely, training set (164 patients) and test set (41 patients) with a ratio of 8:2. Radiomics features were extracted from the low-energy and subtracted images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression were established for feature selection, which were then utilized to construct three classification models namely, low energy, subtracted images and their combined model to discriminate high- and low-grade invasive breast cancer. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to confirm performance of three models in training set. The clinical usefulness was evaluated by using decision curve analysis (DCA). An independent test set was used to confirm the discriminatory power of the models. To test robustness of the result, we used 100 times LGOCV (leave group out cross validation) to validate three models. RESULTS: From initial radiomics feature pool, 17 and 11 features were selected for low-energy image and subtracted image, respectively. The combined model using 28 features showed the best performance for preoperatively evaluating the histologic grade of invasive breast cancer, with an area under the curve, AUC = 0.88, and 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 0.92 in the training set and AUC = 0.80 (95%CI 0.67 to 0.92) in the test set. The mean AUC of LGOCV is 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: CESM-based radiomics model is a non-invasive predictive tool that demonstrates good application prospects in preoperatively predicting histological grade of invasive breast cancer.

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography without and with a delayed image for diagnosing malignancy among mass lesions in dense breast.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyse the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) based on morphologic and enhancement patterns of mass lesions in dense breast using different protocols: CESM without delayed image and CESM with delayed image. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 151 informed women with suspicious for malignancy mass lesions in dense breast were included in this study. All of them underwent CESM using 2 protocols. A total of 155 lesions were pathomorphologically verified. We analysed morphologic patterns on low-energy (LE) images and recombined images (RI) by defining the shape, margin, and dynamic patterns based on delayed images. RESULTS: The comparative analysis revealed that the shape and margins on RI were more significant than those on LE images. The dynamic indicators of CESM were found to be highly significant in dense breasts. The correlation between kinetic curve and histological results demonstrated that a persistent type of curve was common for benign lesions, accounting for 15/22 (68.1%); plateau and washout - for malignant lesions, accounting for 24/89 (26.9%) and 61/89 (68.5%), respectively. Delayed image leads to an increase of specificity up to 12.4%, which is statistically significant. The area under the curve (AUC) in CESM with delayed image is larger than that in CESM without delayed image (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CESM is sensitive for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. CESM with delayed image has higher specificity than CESM without delayed image. Delayed images with plateau and washout are typical for malignancy.

Clinical performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in pre-surgical evaluation of breast malignant lesions in dense breasts: a single center study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, with ultrasound, full field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and size estimation of histologically proven breast tumors. METHODS: This open-label, single center, prospective study, included 160 dense breast women with at least one suspicious mammary lesion evaluated by ultrasound, full field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in whom a mammary tumor was histologically proven after surgery performed at the European Institute of Oncology between January 2013 and December 2015. Following the complete diagnostic procedure, the patients were further investigated by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography prior to surgery. RESULTS: Overall, the detection rate of malignant breast lesions (in situ and invasive) was 93.8% (165/176) for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 94.4% (168/178) for ultrasound, 85.5 (147/172) for full field digital mammography and 97.7% (173/177) for magnetic resonance imaging. Radiological measurements were concordant with the post-surgical pathological measurements of the invasive tumor (i.e., within 5 mm) in: 64.6% for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 62.0% for ultrasound, 45.2% for full field digital mammography (p < 0.0001) and 69.9% for magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.28); underestimated in: 17.4% for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 19.6% for ultrasound, 24.2% for full field digital mammography (p = 0.03) and 6.7% for magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.0005); and overestimated in: 16.2% for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 16.6% for ultrasound, 16.6% for full field digital mammography and 22.7% for magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves on full field digital mammography and is comparable to ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in terms of detection sensitivity and size estimation of malignant lesions in dense breasts.

Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in preoperative staging of malignant breast lesions, beyond standard assessment with digital mammography and ultrasound, as a base for a future prospective randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients, with confirmed or strongly suspected malignant breast lesions after standard assessment (digital mammography (DM) and ultrasound (US)), scheduled for primary surgery, were invited to undergo CEM as an additional preoperative procedure. The primary endpoint was change in treatment due to CEM findings, defined as mastectomy instead of partial mastectomy or contrariwise, bilateral surgery instead of unilateral or neoadjuvant treatment instead of primary surgery. Accuracy in tumour extent estimation compared to histopathology was evaluated by Bland-Altman statistics. Number of extra biopsies and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: In 10/47 patients (21%), findings from CEM affected the primary treatment. Agreement with histopathology regarding extent estimation was better for CEM (mean difference - 1.36, SD ± 18.45) in comparison with DM (- 4.18, SD ± 26.20) and US (- 8.36, SD ± 24.30). Additional biopsies were taken from 19 lesions in 13 patients. Nine biopsies showed malignant outcome. No major adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of preoperative additional CEM was found to be satisfactory without any serious negative effects. Results imply an added value of CEM in preoperative staging of breast cancer. Further evaluation in larger prospective randomized trials is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03402529. Registered 18 January 2018-retrospectively registered.

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Guide to Interpretation and Reporting.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to discuss the essential steps involved in performing, interpreting, managing, and reporting findings on contrast-enhanced mammography for successful implementation into clinical practice. CONCLUSION: To successfully implement contrast-enhanced mammography into clinical practice, an understanding about the acquisition of images, image interpretation, and reporting of the spectrum of negative, benign, and malignant findings is essential.

Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).

The aim of our study was to assess the performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients, about the valuation of the extension of disease and in measurement of lesions. Then, we selected retrospectively, among the 1500 patients underwent to CEDM at the Breast Diagnostics Department of the Careggi University Hospital of Florence and the National Cancer Institute of Milan from September 2016 to November 2018, 31 women (mean age 57.1 aa; range 41-78 aa) with a definitive histological diagnosis of ILC. CEDM has proved to be a promising imaging technique, being characterized by a sensitivity of 100% in the detection of the index lesion, and of 84.2% in identifying any adjunctive lesions: It was the presence of a non-mass enhancement (NME) to lower the sensitivity of the technique (25% vs. 100% for mass-like enhancements or a mass closely associated with a NME). Specificity in the characterization of additional lesions was 66.7%, and the diagnosis of the extension of disease was correct in 77.4% of cases: NME also led to a decrease in diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of disease extension up to 40% versus 85% for masses and 80% for masses associated with NME (M/NME). Moreover, in 12/31 (38.7%), CEDM allowed to correctly identify lesions not shown by mammography + ultrasonography + tomosynthesis: In the half of these (6/12), there was a multicentricity, thus allowing an adequate surgical planning change. CEDM was also very accurate in analyzing the maximum diameter of the masses, while it was much less reliable in the case of the M/NME and pure NME. In conclusion, CEDM is a new promising imaging technique in the loco-regional preoperative staging and in the evaluation of disease extension for ILC, especially in case of mass enhancement lesions.

The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to discuss facilitators of and barriers to future implementation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the United States. CONCLUSION: CEM provides low-energy 2D mammographic images analogous to digital mammography and contrast-enhanced recombined images that allow assessment of neovascularity similar to that offered by MRI. The utilization of CEM in the United States is currently low but could increase rapidly given the many potential indications for its clinical use.

Comparative Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to provide a more accurate estimation of the radiation dose of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) relative to that of 2D digital mammography and tomosynthesis using phantom and patient data and an accepted dosimetry protocol that eliminates vendor-specific average glandular dose (AGD) estimates while including breast density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient and phantom AGD estimation was performed using two vendors (system 1 and system 2) in five imaging modes, including 2D, 3D, and CESM imaging. Patient AGD was retrospectively estimated from 45 patients who underwent mammography with all imaging modes during 2012-2016. Patient and phantom AGD were estimated using accepted European and International Atomic Energy Agency protocols for dosimetry and were compared across imaging modes using a paired t test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Phantom data showed that the imaging modes with the lowest to highest AGDs were system 1 2D, followed by system 2 2D and system 2 3D, which had comparable values (p = 0.6), followed by system 1 CESM, and then by system 2 2D plus 3D. One hundred eighty views in 45 patients showed that the system 1 CESM AGD was 1.8 times greater than the system 1 2D AGD (p < 0.001), 1.2 times greater than the system 2 2D AGD (p < 0.001), 1.2 times greater than the system 2 3D AGD (p < 0.001), and 0.6 times less than the system 2 2D plus 3D AGD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CESM dose for system 1 is within an acceptable range as compared with other commonly performed mammographic examinations and should not preclude its use as a diagnostic breast imaging tool.

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant-chemotherapy (NAC) is considered the standard treatment for locally advanced breast carcinomas. Accurate assessment of disease response is fundamental to increase the chances of successful breast-conserving surgery and to avoid local recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast-enhanced-MRI (MRI) in the evaluation of tumor response to NAC. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained. Fifty-four consenting women with breast cancer and indication of NAC were consecutively enrolled between October 2012 and December 2014. Patients underwent both CESM and MRI before, during and after NAC. MRI was performed first, followed by CESM within 3 days. Response to therapy was evaluated for each patient, comparing the size of the residual lesion measured on CESM and MRI performed after NAC to the pathological response on surgical specimens (gold standard), independently of and blinded to the results of the other test. The agreement between measurements was evaluated using Lin's coefficient. The agreement between measurements using CESM and MRI was tested at each step of the study, before, during and after NAC. And last of all, the variation in the largest dimension of the tumor on CESM and MRI was assessed according to the parameters set in RECIST 1.1 criteria, focusing on pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (85%) completed the study. CESM predicted pCR better than MRI (Lin's coefficient 0.81 and 0.59, respectively). Both methods tend to underestimate the real extent of residual tumor (mean 4.1mm in CESM, 7.5mm in MRI). The agreement between measurements using CESM and MRI was 0.96, 0.94 and 0.76 before, during and after NAC respectively. The distinction between responders and non-responders with CESM and MRI was identical for 45/46 patients. In the assessment of CR, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 84%, respectively, for CESM, and 87% and 60% for MRI. CONCLUSION: CESM and MRI lesion size measurements were highly correlated. CESM seems at least as reliable as MRI in assessing the response to NAC, and may be an alternative if MRI is contraindicated or its availability is limited.

Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare radiation dose received during contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) using high- and low-energy projections with radiation dose received during 2D full field digital mammography (FFDM) and 3D tomosynthesis on phantoms and patients with varying breast thickness and density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single left craniocaudal projection was chosen to determine the doses for 6214 patients who underwent 2D FFDM, 3662 patients who underwent 3D tomosynthesis, and 173 patients who underwent CESM in this retrospective study. Dose measurements were also collected in phantoms with composition mimicking nondense and dense breast tissue. RESULTS: Average glandular dose (AGD) ± SD was 3.0 ± 1.1 mGy for CESM exposures at a mean breast thickness of 63 mm. At this thickness, the dose was 2.1 mGy from 2D FFDM and 2.5 mGy from 3D tomosynthesis. The nondense phantom had a mean AGD of 1.0 mGy with 2D FFDM, 1.3 mGy with 3D tomosynthesis, and 1.6 mGy with CESM. The dense breast phantom had a mean AGD of 1.3 mGy with 2D FFDM, 1.4 mGy with 3D tomosynthesis, and 2.1 mGy with CESM. At a compressed thickness of 4.5 cm, radiation exposure from CESM was approximately 25% higher in dense breast phantoms than in nondense breast phantoms. The dose in the dense phantom at a compressed thickness of 6 cm was approximately 42% higher than the dose in the nondense phantom at a compressed thickness of 4.5 cm. CONCLUSION: CESM was found to increase AGD at a mean breast thickness of 63 mm by approximately 0.9 mGy and 0.5 mGy compared with 2D FFDM and 3D tomosynthesis, respectively. Of note, CESM provides a standard image (similar to 2D FFDM) that is obtained using the low-energy projection. Overall, the AGD from CESM falls below the dose limit of 3 mGy set by Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations.

Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to discuss whether the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) render it a viable diagnostic alternative to breast MRI. CONCLUSION: That CEDM couples low-energy images (comparable to the diagnostic quality of standard mammography) and subtracted contrast-enhanced mammograms make it a cost-effective modality and a realistic substitute for the more costly breast MRI.

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a promising problem-solving tool in women referred from a breast cancer screening program. We aimed to study the validity of preliminary results of CESM using a larger panel of radiologists with different levels of CESM experience. METHODS: All women referred from the Dutch breast cancer screening program were eligible for CESM. 199 consecutive cases were viewed by ten radiologists. Four had extensive CESM experience, three had no CESM experience but were experienced breast radiologists, and three were residents. All readers provided a BI-RADS score for the low-energy CESM images first, after which the score could be adjusted when viewing the entire CESM exam. BI-RADS 1-3 were considered benign and BI-RADS 4-5 malignant. With this cutoff, we calculated sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve. RESULTS: CESM increased diagnostic accuracy in all readers. The performance for all readers using CESM was: sensitivity 96.9 % (+3.9 %), specificity 69.7 % (+33.8 %) and area under the ROC curve 0.833 (+0.188). CONCLUSION: CESM is superior to conventional mammography, with excellent problem-solving capabilities in women referred from the breast cancer screening program. Previous results were confirmed even in a larger panel of readers with varying CESM experience. KEY POINTS: • CESM is consistently superior to conventional mammography • CESM increases diagnostic accuracy regardless of a reader's experience • CESM is an excellent problem-solving tool in recalls from screening programs.

Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM) for evaluation of suspicious malignant microcalcifications. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-six DE-CESMs were reviewed from 2012-2013, 59 cases fulfilled the following criteria and were enrolled for analysis: (1) suspicious malignant microcalcifications (BI-RADS 4) on mammogram, (2) no related mass, (3) with pathological diagnoses. The microcalcification morphology and associated enhancement were reviewed to analyse the accuracy of the diagnosis and cancer size measurements versus the results of pathology. RESULTS: Of the 59 microcalcifications, 22 were diagnosed as cancers, 19 were atypical lesions and 18 were benign lesions. Twenty (76.9 %) cancers, three (11.55 %) atypia and three (11.55 %) benign lesions revealed enhancement. The true-positive rate of intermediate- and high-concern microcalcifications was significantly higher than that of low-concern lesions (93.75 % vs. 50 %). Overall, the diagnostic sensitivity of enhancement was 90.9 %, with 83.78 % specificity, 76.92 % positive predictive value, 93.94 % negative predictive value and 86.4 % accuracy. Performance was good (AUC = 0.87) according to a ROC curve and cancer size correlation with a mean difference of 0.05 cm on a Bland-Altman plot. CONCLUSIONS: DE-CESM provides additional enhancement information for diagnosing breast microcalcifications and measuring cancer sizes with high correlation to surgicohistology. KEY POINTS: • DE-CESM provides additional enhancement information for diagnosing suspicious breast microcalcifications. • The enhanced cancer size closely correlates to microscopy by Bland-Altman plot. • DE-CESM could be considered for evaluation of suspicious malignant microcalcifications.

The tumour border on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and its relation to histological characteristics of invasive breast cancer.

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is one of the new diagnostic modalities implemented in clinical practice. In the case of these techniques, there are two major issues to be addressed: (1) their diagnostic usefulness, and (2) the relation between parameters assessed using these techniques and well-known diagnostic/prognostic/predictive markers (histological, clinical, and molecular). Therefore, we studied the relationship between the tumour margin assessed on CESM and (1) tumour borders defined on the basis of macroscopic and microscopic examination, (2) pT, (3) pN, and (4) tumour grade in a group of 82 breast cancer patients. Based on CESM, the tumour border was defined as sharp, indistinct or spiculated, whereas in the case of lesions showing weak or medium enhancement on CESM the borders were classified as unspecified. We found a statistically significant relationship between tumour margin on CESM and (1) macroscopic border (a spiculated margin on CESM was found only in carcinomas with an invasive border on histological examination; p = 0.004), (2) pT (p = 0.016), and (3) pN (nodal involvement was observed most frequently in carcinomas with a spiculated or indistinct margin on CESM; p = 0.045). Moreover, in cases with an undefined margin on CESM (cases showing weak or medium enhancement on CESM), both invasive and pushing borders were found on histological examination. The results of our preliminary study suggest that it is possible to assess macroscopic borders of examined lesions on the basis of CESM imaging. This might be useful in planning the extent of surgical excision. On the other hand, the assessment of the tumour margin on CESM might not be precise in cases showing weak enhancement.