Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty compared to total elbow replacement for distal humeral fractures: a registry analysis of 906 procedures.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow replacement (TER) is an accepted treatment for complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (HA) is also a potential surgical option for unreconstructable fractures and avoids the concerns regarding mechanical wear and functional restrictions associated with TER. In the current literature, there are limited data available to compare the revision rates of HA and TER for the treatment of fracture. We used data from a large national arthroplasty registry to compare the outcome of HA and TER undertaken for fracture/dislocation and to assess the impact of demographics and implant choice on revision rates. METHODS: Data obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from May 2, 2005, to December 31, 2021, included all procedures for primary elbow replacement with primary diagnosis of fracture or dislocation. The analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 293 primary HA and 631 primary TER procedures included. The cumulative percentage revision (CPR) rate at 9 years was 9.7% for HA (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0, 15.7), and 11.9% (95% CI 8.5, 16.6) for TER. When adjusted for age and gender, there was a significantly higher risk of revision after 3 months for TER compared to HA (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.22, 5.03, P = .012). There was no difference in the rate of revision for patients aged <55 years or ≥75 years when HA and TER procedures were compared. In primary TER procedures, loosening was the most common cause of revision (3.6% of primary TER procedures), and the most common type of revision in primary TER involved revision of the humeral component only (2.6% of TER procedures). TER has a higher rate of first revision for loosening compared to HA (HR 4.21, 95% CI 1.29, 13.73; P = .017). In HA procedures, instability (1.7%) was the most common cause for revision. The addition of an ulna component was the most common type of revision (2.4% of all HA procedures). CONCLUSION: For the treatment of distal humerus fractures, HA had a lower revision rate than TER after 3 months when adjusted for age and gender. Age <55 or ≥75 years was not a risk factor for revision when HA was compared to TER. Loosening leading to revision is more prevalent in TER and increases with time. In HA, the most common type of revision involved addition of an ulna component with preservation of the humeral component.

Clinical outcomes for linked fixation of distal humerus fractures: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: O'Driscoll popularized the principle of linked column fixation for distal humerus fractures. Despite the linked column concept being widely accepted, there are few reported techniques to accomplish this goal. A novel device was designed based on the principles of linked columns. An interlocking beam is used to connect the medial and lateral plates, creating a unified fixed angle construct. Our primary objective was to report clinical outcomes across multiple institutions for a linking beam used in distal humerus fracture fixation. METHODS: A retrospective series was collected from five institutions for the TiBeam (Skeletal Dynamics, Miami, FL, USA) with a minimum follow-up of six months. Acute and chronic treatment of distal humerus fracture patterns, and all plate configurations were included for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 36 cases were collected at a mean age of 52 years and a mean follow-up of 19.3 months. AO C-type fractures were 56% of the series. The median MEPS was 85 (IQR 76.3 to 90), the median DASH was 21.4 (IQR 15.9 to 30), and the median VASa was 3.5 (IQR 2 to 5). An olecranon osteotomy was used in 86% of cases and an anatomic plate was used for fixation of the osteotomy in 94% of those cases. There were three cases of olecranon plate removal for a rate across the series of 13.7%. DISCUSSION: Our short-term results demonstrate satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of revision for distal humerus fracture fixed with a linking beam. Further, the rate of removal for the olecranon osteotomy plate was lower than historical reports for aggregate methods of osteotomy fixation.

Does timing of total elbow arthroplasty after distal humerus fracture affect 2-year complication rates?

BACKGROUND: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) remains the gold standard for adult distal humerus fractures (DHF). However, indications for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) continue to expand and the incidence of primary and salvage TEA for DHF has increased. The objective of this study was to compare complication and reoperation rate for acute versus delayed primary and salvage TEA performed for DHF. METHODS: Patients who underwent TEA for DHF were identified in the PearlDiver database. Patients were sorted into three cohorts: (1) acute TEA (within 2 weeks of diagnosis), (2) delayed TEA (between 2 weeks and 6 months after diagnosis), and (3) salvage TEA (after failed ORIF, malunion, nonunion, delayed treatment between 6 months-1 year or post-traumatic arthritis). Multivariate analysis was utilized to assess for confounding variables and covariates when identify differences in complications between cohorts. RESULTS: 788 patients underwent acute TEA, 213 patients underwent delayed TEA, and 422 patients underwent salvage TEA after DHF. The incidence of PJI (8.5% vs. 3.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.60, P=0.002) and triceps injury (2.4% vs. 0.4%, OR 6.29, P=0.012) were higher in the delayed compared to acute cohort. The incidence of revision (8.5% vs. 2.1%, OR 3.76, P< 0.001), periprosthetic fracture (4.3% vs. 1.1%, OR 3.64, P=0.002), PJI (14.7% vs 3.4%, OR 4.36, P< 0.001), triceps injury (2.6% vs. 0.4%, OR 5.70, P=0.008), and wound complications (6.9% vs 2.9%, OR 2.33, P=0.002) were higher in the salvage compared to acute cohort. There was an increased rate of revision (8.5% vs. 1.9%, OR 6.08, P=0.002) in the salvage compared to delayed cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing salvage TEA after DHF have increased rates of at 2 years postoperatively including revision, periprosthetic fracture, PJI, triceps injury, and wound complications. The salvage cohort also had an increased risk of revision when compared to the delayed cohort. However, other than revision rates, patients in the salvage and delayed cohorts have similar postoperative complication rates.

Biomechanical analysis of different osteosynthesis configurations in the pin and plate fixation method for distal humerus fractures.

Distal humerus fractures commonly occur in adults with low bone mineral density causing major technical challenges for orthopedic surgeons. Persian fixation method was introduced as a novel technique to stabilize small fragments in comminuted distal humerus fractures using a set of K-wires and a reconstruction plate. The present study aims to measure this technique's stiffness and stability of this technique and analyze the effect of influential parameters with numerical simulation and biomechanical testing on a cadaveric specimen. Validation of the finite element (FE) model was conducted based on results of experiments. The results indicated that Delta configuration mainly led to a higher stiffness in the case of axial loading and anterior bending compared to L configuration. Analyzing the influential factors of this technique suggests that changes in diameter and number of K-wires have a similarly significant effect on the construct stiffness while the height of plate had a slight influence. Also, the diameter of wires was the most effective parameter for implant failure, particularly in the 3-pin construct, which caused a reduction in failure risk by about 60%. The results revealed that the Persian fixation method would achieve suitable stability compared to the dual-plating technique.

The Outcomes of Intra-Articular Distal Humerus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Parallel Precontoured Plates in the Elderly.

PURPOSE: Inconsistent outcomes have been reported in several prior studies of elderly patients with distal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). We evaluated the outcomes of ORIF using modern precontoured plates exclusively in a parallel orientation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify the patients aged over 65 years who sustained an isolated distal humerus fracture between 2015 and 2019. We identified 22 patients who underwent distal humerus ORIF using parallel, precontoured locking plates. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, physical examination findings, and radiographic data. Outcomes were assessed with Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores and Mayo Elbow Performance scores. Complications were evaluated by a review of the patient's medical record and postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 18 were women and 4 were men; the average age was 78 years (SD, 8.5 years), and the patients were followed for an average of 33 months. The sample consisted of 19 AO type C, 1 type B, and 2 type A fractures. At the final follow-up, the mean arc of total elbow flexion was 107° (SD, 18.9°; range 40° to 130°), with mean elbow flexion of 129° (SD, 11.7°; range, 120° to 140°) and mean extension of 22° (SD, 12.9°; range 0° to 90°). The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 19 (SD, 14.4), and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance score was 86 (SD, 10.2). Complications occurred in 5 (23%) patients, requiring 4 subsequent surgeries, of which 1 was a conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients who underwent ORIF of the distal humerus using a parallel construct demonstrated good functional outcomes and similar complications to those in previously reported studies. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Rate of Complications After Capitellum Fracture Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to determine the incidence of complications following surgical fixation of an acute capitellum fracture. We secondarily aimed to compare the complication rate between anterior-to-posterior (A-P) versus posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screw insertion. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched to identify studies on surgical fixation of capitellum fractures in skeletally mature patients. The main outcome was the rate of complication after fracture fixation. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of the fixation technique on the outcomes after surgery. An inverse variance method using random or fixed effects models was used to perform a meta-analysis based on the degree of heterogeneity between studies. Study heterogeneity was evaluated using Q statistics to calculate the I2 index. RESULTS: We included 42 studies in the final analysis. The most reported complications after surgical fixation of capitellum fractures included elbow pain (21%), radiocapitellar arthritis (19%), hardware removal (17%), and heterotopic ossification (13%). When groups were stratified based on the direction of screw insertion, the mean rate of avascular necrosis was higher in the P-A direction (29% vs 11%). In comparison, the rate of revision fixation (2.9% vs 6.7%) and heterotopic ossification (7.3% vs 22%) were higher in the A-P direction. Transient posterior interosseous nerve palsy was reported in four patients in four studies, of whom three patients had A-P screw fixation. CONCLUSION: Fixation of a displaced capitellum fracture is recommended when possible. However, patients should be counseled about the potential risk of complications and chances of undergoing an unplanned surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Complications of Early Versus Delayed Total Elbow Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of wound complications and heterotopic ossification (HO) between patients who underwent acute total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and those who underwent delayed TEA performed for the treatment of distal humerus fractures. Our hypothesis was that delayed surgery will have fewer wound complications but a higher rate of HO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 104 patients who had undergone TEA performed at 1 of 3 institutions following a distal humerus fracture. The acute cohort, comprising 69 patients, underwent TEA within 2 weeks; the delayed cohort, comprising 35 patients, received treatment between 2 weeks and 6 months. The rates of wound complications, HO, clinically relevant HO (requiring excision or resulting in loss of functional range of motion), and reoperation were recorded. These patients were followed up for an average of 52 (interquartile range, 18.5-117) weeks. RESULTS: Wound complications occurred in 10 patients (14.5%) in the early group and 7 (20.0%) in the delayed group. The overall rate of HO was 56.7% (59 patients). The rate of clinically relevant HO was 26.0% (27 patients), which was similar between the groups. Reoperation occurred in 20 patients (19.2%), which was similar between the groups. In the early group, 3 reoperations were performed for wound complications and 4 for HO. No patients required reoperation for these indications in the delayed group. The mean flexion-extension and supination-pronation arcs were 20°-130° and 80°-80°, respectively, which were similar between the groups. Rheumatoid arthritis and younger age were associated with increased odds of wound complications and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of reoperation, wound complications, and HO were overall higher than those previously reported; however, the study was underpowered to determine a difference between early and delayed treatment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Ulnar Nerve Neuropathy After Surgery for Intraarticular Distal Humerus Fractures: An Analysis of 116 Patients.

PURPOSE: To identify the incidence and the factors associated with a postoperative ulnar nerve neuropathy in patients who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 116 patients who had undergone surgery between January 2011 and December 2020. Age, sex, BMI, mechanism of injury, open or closed fracture, operation time, tourniquet time, and nerve injury at the final examination were collected from medical charts. We essentially used the paratricipital approach. In cases in which the reduction of intraarticular bone fragments was difficult, olecranon osteotomy was used. Ulnar nerve function was graded according to a modified system of McGowan. We conducted logistic regression analysis to investigate factors of neuropathy using items identified as statistically significant in univariate analysis as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (29.3%) had persistent neuropathy at the final follow-up. In the modified McGowan classification, 28 patients had grade 1 and 6 patients had grade 2 neuropathy. Olecranon osteotomy emerged as a distinct explanatory variable for the prophylaxis of ulnar nerve neuropathy in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.73). Anterior transposition, however, was not a statistically significant factor (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-4.56). CONCLUSIONS: Olecranon osteotomy was the only independent factor associated with preventing the occurrence of ulnar nerve neuropathy. Ulnar nerve transposition might not be associated with prevention of ulnar nerve neuropathy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Controversies in the Management of Bicolumnar Fractures of the Distal Humerus.

Bicolumnar fractures of the distal humerus pose numerous treatment challenges for upper-extremity surgeons. Although open reduction and internal fixation demonstrates advantages compared with nonsurgical treatment, restoration of osseous anatomy can be difficult, particularly for comminuted, intra-articular fractures. Despite well-recognized complications, total elbow arthroplasty remains an option for elderly patients with fractures not amenable to fixation. Although indications remain controversial, distal humerus hemiarthroplasty has emerged as a potential alternative to total elbow arthroplasty in carefully selected patients with nonreconstructable fractures. Numerous controversies remain with respect to the management decisions for these complex injuries, including the optimal surgical approach, management of the ulnar nerve, and ideal fixation constructs for open reduction internal fixation. Our purpose is to review the management of bicolumnar distal humerus fractures in adult patients and discuss current controversies related to treatment.

Percent articular exposure of the distal humerus with triceps fascial tongue approach compared with olecranon osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Distal humerus fractures are common and can be difficult to treat. No one approach to the distal humerus has been shown to be superior to another; however, the olecranon osteotomy remains the gold standard for complex, intra-articular fractures. Understanding the percent of articular exposure with approaches to the distal humerus is important for success. The goal of this study is to show the percent of articular exposure of the triceps fascial tongue approach as compared with the olecranon osteotomy. METHODS: Twelve fresh frozen cadavers were separated randomly into 2 groups of 6 each. The first group of 6 specimens was allocated to the triceps fascial tongue approaches with the collaterals maintained and with the collaterals released off the ulna and elbow dislocated. The second group of 6 was allocated to the triceps fascial tongue approach while maintaining the collaterals followed by an olecranon osteotomy. The articular exposure was marked after performing each approach, and the percent of articular exposure was quantified by using 3D scanning. Standard deviations were calculated for each. RESULTS: The average percent visualization of the distal humerus articular surface in the fascial tongue approach while maintaining the collaterals was 36% in the first cohort and 37% in the second cohort with a standard deviation of 5% in both cohorts. The average percent of the distal humerus articular surface exposed in the fascial tongue approach with the collaterals released off the ulna and elbow dislocated was 85.09% with a standard deviation of 4%. The average percent of the distal humerus articular surface exposed in the olecranon osteotomy group was 57.9% with a standard deviation of 5%. CONCLUSION: The triceps fascial tongue approach allows for visualization of about one-third of the joint, which may be adequate for many intra-articular distal humerus fractures. For added exposure of the articular surface, the collaterals may be elevated from the ulna and the elbow dislocated allowing for a substantial increase in percent of articular exposure compared with the collateral retaining fascial tongue approach and the olecranon osteotomy.

Modified paratricipital approach without mobilization of the ulnar nerve prevents postoperative ulnar neuropathy in distal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: In distal humerus fracture surgery, postoperative ulnar neuropathy is a common complication. The present study assessed the utility of the modified paratricipital approach for preventing ulnar neuropathy. This approach preserved the continuity of the attachment of the triceps with the ulnar nerve and allowed anterior subluxation of the ulnar nerve onto the hardware to be avoided. METHODS: From December 2018 to March 2020, 13 patients who underwent surgery for distal humerus fracture through the modified paratricipital approach at our hospital were prospectively enrolled in the study. Ulnar neuropathy, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. RESULTS: No postoperative ulnar neuropathy was observed. At the final follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance score was 97.7 (range, 85-100). The mean arc motion was 132.7° (range, 115°-145°) with a mean flexion contracture of 4.2° (range, 0°-10°) and mean flexion of 136.2° (range, 120°-145°). Hardware breakage leading to a loss of reduction occurred in one case, but the other fractures united. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the effectiveness of the modified paratricipital approach for preventing postoperative ulnar neuropathy. The modified paratricipital approach is a safe and reliable method of performing distal humerus fracture surgery.

Comparison of 90-day complication rates and readmissions of primary total elbow arthroplasty in elective and traumatic cases: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare the 90 day complication rates of primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) performed for arthritis (primary-OA; rheumatoid arthritis-RA) versus those performed for distal humerus fractures (DHF). METHODS: Patients who underwent a TEA from 2015 to 2021 were identified from our institutional database and placed into cohorts based on surgical indications (TEA-OA, TEA-RA and TEA-DHF). Chart review was conducted to analyze the prevalence of complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and secondary procedures in the first 90 day post-operative period. Complications included but were not limited to wound complications, hematoma, infection (superficial or deep), nerve palsy, periprosthetic fracture/failure and others. RESULTS: 49 patients who underwent TEA were included in this study: (DHF = 19, OA = 14, RA = 16). Six complications occurred within the first 90 days of surgery. There were two periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in the OA group, requiring irrigation and debridement (I & D) within the first 90 days of surgery. There were three post-operative ulnar nerve palsies and one PJI requiring I & D in the TEA-RA group. Compared to the TEA-DHF and TEA-OA groups, the RA group had higher rates of all-cause complications (p = 0.03) and nerve palsy (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences between groups in readmissions (p = 0.27) or secondary interventions (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The 90-day complication/readmission rates of TEA preformed for DHFs is lower than those preformed for OA and RA. These differences could be related to the underlying chronic inflammatory etiology and side effect of treatments (intraarticular steroid injection, and biologics) received by patients with arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study, level IV.

Surgical management of distal humerus gunshot fractures: descriptive case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report our 5 years surgical experience and the rate of neurovascular injury following gunshot fractures of the distal humerus in a in level-1 Trauma Centre in South Africa. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 25 consecutive adult gunshot injuries to the distal humerus. Demographic and injury data were extracted from clinical case notes and electronic operative records. Imaging archives were used to classify fractures according to the AO/OTA classification. RESULTS: Twenty-five male patients, with mean age of 32-years-old, sustained gunshot injuries to the distal humerus. Eleven patients had multiple gunshots. Forty-four percent of patients underwent Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), 20% had confirmed brachial artery injury. Limbs with vascular injury were salvaged with arterial repair and external fixation. Fractures were extra-articular in 20 cases (80%). Nineteen fractures were classified as highly comminuted. Nerve injuries occurred in 52% and were all managed expectantly. Only 32% of patients attended follow-up beyond 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: These are rare challenging injuries with high rates of neurovascular damage. This demographic of patients is poorly compliant with follow up highlighting the need for high-quality early care. Brachial artery injury should be excluded with CTA and can be managed with arterial repair and external fixation. All fractures in this series were surgically managed with conventional anatomical plate and screw fixation techniques. For nerve injury, we advocate expectant management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Outcomes of AO/OTA C-type fractures of the distal humerus after open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate constructs in patients at least 65 years old.

BACKGROUND: Modern treatment options of distal humerus fractures of active elderly patients are osteosynthesis and total elbow arthroplasty. The evidence of outcomes of ORIF after AO/OTA C-type fractures mostly predates the adoption of locking plates. We evaluated the results of open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures treated exclusively with anatomic locking plates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 39 patients aged 65 years or above with ORIF for AO/OTA C-type distal humerus fracture using locking plates was analysed. 23 provided follow-up data and 14 attended a follow-up visit. Primary outcome was the Oxford Elbow Score. Secondary outcomes were Mayo Elbow Performance Score, quickDASH, satisfaction, range of motion, complications and revision surgeries. RESULTS: Mean Oxford Elbow Score pain was 83 (SD 17), Oxford Elbow Score function 83 (17) and Oxford Elbow Score social-psychological 79 (20). Mean total Oxford Elbow Score was 81 (15). Among the 14 patients who attended a follow-up visit, Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85 (17), qDASH 19 (16), active arc of motion 119 (19) degrees. Mayo Elbow Performance Score and arc of motion were worse than on the healthy side. One patient had a serious deep infection. Eleven patients had at least one revision surgery, of which 6 were implant removals and 2 subsequent total elbow arthroplasties. CONCLUSIONS: Distal AO/OTA C-type distal humerus fractures in older adults can be treated reliably and with good outcomes with ORIF using modern locking plates. The mean qDASH scores are similar to population normal values, but when compared to the healthy arm, single-arm outcomes indicated somewhat impaired function. About 1 in 4 patients had at least one revision surgery.

Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of distal humerus fractures: long-term clinical results.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty is a treatment for unreconstructable distal humerus fractures; implant longevity remains a concern, especially in younger patients. However, distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (DHH) offers an alternative with potential long-term advantages. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 10 patients who underwent DHH for distal humerus fractures over a 4-year period (2008-2012) by a single surgeon. Patients underwent testing of range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), visual analog scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores. Average patient age at surgery was 71.9 years (range 56-81 years); average follow-up was 115.2 months (range 96-144 months). RESULTS: Patients maintained improvements in MEPS (mean 88, range 75-100) and DASH scores (mean 37.1, range 11.21-55.09), along with no statistically significant decrease in range of motion or scores in comparison to either short- or midterm results. Mean VAS score was 2.2 (range 0-7), SANE 69 (range 55-85), ASES 76.66 (range 51.67-100), and CCI 4.3 (range 1-7). Participants had an average flexion of 126° (range: 90°-140°), extension of 36° (range: 30°-45°), supination of 66° (range: 60°-70°), and pronation of 64° (range: 45°-80°). No elbow dislocations, subluxations, or heterotopic ossification were observed. Complications included 1 fracture and 1 complaint of prominent hardware. Four patients were deceased, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: This long-term review suggests that DHH may be an effective treatment for certain distal humerus fractures. The data suggest that elbow range of motion and functional use are maintained from comparison with short- and midterm studies, with no appreciable change in radiographic cartilage wear along the radius or ulna.

Standardized fracture creation in the distal humerus and the olecranon for surgical training and biomechanical testing.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical training and biomechanical testing require models that realistically represent the in vivo injury condition. The aim of this work was to develop and test a method for the generation of distal humerus fractures and olecranon fractures in human specimens, while preserving the soft tissue envelope. METHODS: Twenty-one cadaveric upper extremity specimens (7 female, 14 male) were used. Two different experimental setups were developed, one to generate distal humerus fractures and one to generate olecranon fractures. Specimens were placed in a material testing machine and fractured with a predefined displacement. The force required for fracturing and the corresponding displacement were recorded and the induced energy was derived of the force-displacement graphs. After fracturing, CT imaging was performed and fractures were classified according to the AO classification. RESULTS: Eleven distal humerus fractures and 10 olecranon fractures with intact soft tissue envelope could be created. Distal humerus fractures were classified as AO type C (n = 9) and as type B (n = 2), all olecranon fractures were classified as AO type B (n = 10). Distal humerus fractures required significantly more load than olecranon fractures (6077 N ± 1583 vs 4136 N ± 2368, p = 0.038) and absorbed more energy until fracture than olecranon fractures (17.8 J ± 9.1 vs 11.7 J ± 7.6, p = 0.11), while the displacement at fracture was similar (5.8 mm ± 1.6 vs 5.9 mm ± 3.1, p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: The experimental setups are suitable for generating olecranon fractures and distal humerus fractures with intact soft tissue mantle for surgical training and biomechanical testing.

Distal humerus fracture in patients over 70 years of age: results of open reduction and internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: Due to the complexity of distal humerusfractures and often poor bone quality in elderly patients, these entities remain a challenge. However, because of a high rate of complications related to total elbow prostheses, reconstruction of distal humerus fractures should still be considered a therapeutic option, also in the elderly patient. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation and to evaluate whether the results justify reconstruction even in elderly patients. We hypothesized that despite advanced age, reasonable clinical results can be achieved, using a standardized surgical technique and aftertreatment protocol for the treatment of distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2012, 30 patients with a mean age of 78 years at the time of injury with a recent distal humerus fracture were evaluated. All patients underwent the identical aftertreatment protocol with no weight bearing for 6 weeks and weekly increasing range of motion. Follow-up rate was 90%. 22 patients were treated with double plate, 4 with single plate, and 1 with screw fixation only. Patients were evaluated based on clinical criteria. Primary outcome measures were Mayo Elbow Performance Score, VAS and joint range of motion, secondary was radiological evaluation. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years (min. 1 year, max. 9 years, SD ± 2), the average range of motion was flexion of 127° (min. 100°; max. 150°; SD ± 16.5) and average loss of extension of 20.9° (min. 5°; max. 40°; SD ± 11). Average pronation and supination was 68.3° (min. 0°; max. 90°; SD ± 25.3) and 75.3° (min. 0°; max. 90°; SD ± 19.7), respectively. Average Mayo Elbow Performance (MEPS) score was 88.7 (min. 60; max. 100; SD ± 12.1). 6 patients developed heterotopic ossification without significant effect on the clinical outcome. 7 patients had radiological evidence of at least partial non-union with one requiring revision, 2 discrete hardware dislocations were treated conservatively. There were no infections in the presented cohort. Our results regarding the surgical approach showed significantly higher patient satisfaction scores in the osteotomy group, compared to the group with Triceps-On Approach (PTOA). CONCLUSION: The present data support indication for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) even in the elderly patient. Advanced age should not be seen as a contraindication for ORIF of fractures of the distal humerus. Although the rate of complications is higher than in younger patients, complications such as non-union are often asymptomatic, patient satisfaction scores are high, and the possible devastating complications of failed elbow replacement can be evaded. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Complications of articular distal humeral fracture fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Distal humeral fractures are relatively rare injuries in adults. Fractures that involve the articular surface can be particularly challenging to treat. Open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) remains the preferred treatment for most intra-articular distal humeral fractures, depending on the degree of comminution and functional demands of the patient. Many surgical approaches, fixation techniques, and potential complications have been described in the literature; however, the relative incidence and associated characteristics of these complications have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of complications and reoperations after ORIF for intra-articular distal humeral fractures. We sought to provide practical guidance to surgeons and offer insights on the avoidance and prognosis of complications through a systematic review of the published literature over the past 20 years. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting complications and reoperation rates after ORIF for intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Subgroup analysis was conducted for complication rates between type 13B and 13C fractures, olecranon osteotomy and non-osteotomy approaches, and parallel and perpendicular plating. RESULTS: Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria (2362 elbows; 5 level II, 2 level III, and 76 level IV studies). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years. The majority of fractures were type C (83%), the remainder were type B (17%). Of the fractures, 71% were closed whereas 9% were open; this was not reported for 20%. The mean postoperative flexion arc was 110°. The overall complication rate was 53%, and the overall reoperation rate was 21%. Although a parallel plating approach resulted in a lower rate of fixation failure requiring revision (1% vs. 6%, P < .001), a perpendicular plating approach showed a significantly lower rate of overall complications (45% vs. 54%, P = .006). This was primarily driven by lower rates of wound dehiscence (0.1% vs. 5%, P < .001), neuropathy (9% vs. 13%, P = .03), and implant prominence (3% vs. 7%, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review is the largest report of complications and reoperations of intra-articular distal humeral fractures after ORIF in the current literature. These results suggest that complications may be more frequent than previously understood. In contrast to prior small comparative studies, our study observed a significantly higher overall complication rate with parallel plating than with perpendicular plating. Perpendicular plating for intra-articular distal humeral fractures may be considered if adequate fixation and biomechanical stability can be achieved.

Surgical tips and tricks for coronal shear fractures of the elbow.

INTRODUCTION: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus represent an uncommon lesion and could be burdened by high complications. This complex lesion requires an accurate reduction and surgical fixation for a better outcome. Different techniques have been described, however no standard protocol have been proposed. Purpose of this retrospective study, is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome with posterior cannulated self-tapping headless screws followed by an early-active-motion protocol and to outline the surgical tips and tricks for different fracture patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2019, a consecutive series of 24 patients with coronal shear fracture undergoing ORIF were included in the study. Fractures were classified according to Dubberley's classification. Cannulated self-tapping headless screws were used to fix the fragments. When necessary, additional cannulated half-threaded screws on the lateral edge of the humerus were used, as well as bone chips and fibrin sealant on severe comminution. All patients underwent an assisted early-active-motion rehabilitation protocol. Mean follow-up was 30 months; patients underwent standard X-rays and clinical outcome assessment with range of motion, Broberg and Morrey score and MEPI score. RESULTS: Surgical fixation with headless screw guaranteed complete healing of all shear fractures examined, no loss of reduction were reported. ROM assessment showed good results with an average arc of 113.1°. Excellent to good Broberg-Morrey and MEPI score were reported. No cases of avascular necrosis nor post-traumatic osteoarthritis resulted in our series. Complications occurred in 16.6% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Coronal shear fracture represents a challenging injury to treat. Anatomical reduction and the use of cannulated self-tapping headless screws from posterior provide a stable fixation, high union rates and good elbow function, with a low cartilage damage and risks of necrosis over 2 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Development of three-dimensional preoperative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: To reproduce anatomical reduction and appropriate implant placement/choices during osteosynthesis for elbow fractures, we developed a 3D preoperative planning system. To assess the utility of 3D digital preoperative planning for the osteosynthesis of distal humerus fractures, we evaluated the reproducibility of implant reduction shapes and placements in patients with distal humerus fractures. METHODS: Twelve patients with distal humerus fractures who underwent osteosynthesis using 3D preoperative planning were evaluated. Reduction shapes were evaluated by the angle between the diaphysis axis and a line connecting the vertices of the medial epicondyle and the lateral epicondyle (epicondyle angle), and the angle between the diaphysis axis and the articular surface (joint angle) in the coronal plane, and the distance between the anterior diaphysis and the anterior articular surface in the sagittal plane (anterior distance) based on 3D images of the distal humerus. In addition, the implant positions were evaluated by the positions of the proximal and posterior edge of the plate, and the angle of the plate to the epicondyle line. The reproducibility was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficients of the parameters between pre- and postoperative images. RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.545, 0.802, and 0.372 for the epicondyle angle, joint angle, and anterior distance, respectively. The differences in the measurements between the preoperative plan and postoperative reduction were 2.1 ± 2.1 degrees, 2.3 ± 1.8 degrees, and 2.8 ± 2.0 mm, for the epicondyle angle, joint angle, and anterior distance, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.983, 0.661, and 0.653 for the proximal and posterior plate positions, and the angle to the epicondyle, respectively. The differences in the measurements between the preoperative plan and postoperative reduction were 3.3 ± 2.1 mm, 2.7 ± 1.7 mm and 9.7 ± 9.8 degrees, for the plate positions of proximal and posterior edge, and the angle of the plate to the epicondyle line, respectively. There were significant correlations for the epicondyle angle, joint angle, and plate positions. CONCLUSIONS: 3D preoperative planning for osteosynthesis of distal humerus fracture was reproducible for the reduction shape of the coronal view and the plate positions. It may be helpful for acquiring practical images of osteosynthesis in distal humerus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, a case-control study.