Venetoclax in biomarker-selected multiple myeloma patients: Impact of exposure on clinical efficacy and safety.

Venetoclax, a potent BCL-2 inhibitor, is currently under development for treatment of t(11;14) Multiple myeloma (MM). The objective of this research was to investigate the exposure-response relationships of venetoclax for a phase 1/2 study evaluating venetoclax monotherapy or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory MM. A total of 117 patients receiving venetoclax at 300, 600, 800, 900, or 1200 mg were included in the analysis. The impact of venetoclax exposures on efficacy (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) as well as safety (treatment-emergent adverse effects (grade ≥3) of neutropenia, infection, and any grade of serious treatment-emergent adverse effects) was evaluated. In the t(11;14)-positive subpopulation, venetoclax exposure relationships to PFS and OS indicated a trend of longer PFS and OS with higher exposures. Moreover, logistic regression analyses for clinical response (ORR and ≥VGPR rate) demonstrated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) relationship with exposure. Evaluation of the exposure-safety relationships demonstrated a lack of a relationship between venetoclax exposures (AUCavg ) and grade ≥3 infections, grade ≥3 neutropenia, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events or any grade serious treatment-emergent adverse events. These findings support further study of venetoclax at 800 mg QD dose in combination with dexamethasone in the t(11;14)-positive patient population where increased efficacy was observed without an increase in safety events.Clinical Trial: NCT01794520 registered 20 February 2013.

Model-informed dose selection for an investigational human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugate FS-1502 in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-expressing advanced malignant solid tumours.

AIMS: The dose-escalation phase (phase Ia study) of a novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) FS-1502 included a dose range from 0.1 to 3.5 mg/kg in HER2-expressing advanced malignant solid tumours. However, the defined maximum tolerated dose was not reached. This model-informed approach integrated population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modelling and exposure-response (E-R) analysis to facilitate dose selection for phase II. METHODS: The PopPK model was constructed using PK data from 109 Chinese patients who received doses of 0.1-3.5 mg/kg FS-1502 every 3 (Q3W) or 4 weeks during a phase I dose-escalation and dose expansion trial. The structural model consisted of compartment models for FS-1502 and unconjugated monomethyl auristatin F. E-R was explored for the percentage change in tumour size, overall response rate and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: A semi-mechanistic 2-analyte PopPK model was developed. The FS-1502 PK data were best described by a 2-compartment PK model with parallel linear and nonlinear Michaelis-Menten eliminations. The PK of unconjugated monomethyl auristatin F was described by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination. E-R analysis supported the clinically meaningful efficacy of FS-1502 at 2.3 mg/kg and above. However, 2.3 mg/kg Q3W was considered to have a better benefit-risk balance due to a lower incidence of safety events without a significant reduction in efficacy compared to 3.0 mg/kg Q3W. CONCLUSION: This PopPK and E-R analysis guided the recommended phase II dose selection of 2.3 mg/kg Q3W and supported body weight-based dosing for an investigational HER2 ADC FS-1502.

Efficacy of different indocyanine green doses in fluorescent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative bile duct injury is a significant complication in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography (NIFC) can reduce this complication. Therefore, determining the optimal indocyanine green (ICG) dosage for effective NIFC is crucial. This study aimed to determine the optimal ICG dosage for NIFC. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial at a single tertiary referral center, including 195 patients randomly assigned to three groups: lower dose (0.01 mg/BMI) ICG (n = 63), medium dose (0.02 mg/BMI) ICG (n = 68), and higher dose (0.04 mg/BMI) ICG (n = 64). Surgeon satisfaction and detection rates for seven biliary structures were compared among the three dose groups. RESULTS: Demographic parameters did not significantly differ among the groups. The medium dose (72.1%) and higher dose ICG groups (70.3%) exhibited superior visualization of the common hepatic duct compared to the lower dose group (41.3%) (p < 0.001). No differences existed between the medium and higher dose groups. Similar trends were observed for the common bile duct and cystic common bile duct junction. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing fluorescent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the 0.02 mg/BMI dose of indocyanine green demonstrated better biliary structure detection rates than the 0.01 mg/BMI dose and was non-inferior to the 0.04 mg/BMI dose.

Application of quantitative pharmacology analysis to support early clinical development of oncology drugs: dose selection.

The selection of appropriate starting dose and suitable method to predict an efficacious dose for novel oncology drug in the early clinical development stage poses significant challenges. The traditional methods of using body surface area transformation from toxicology studies to predict the first-in human (FIH) starting dose, or simply selecting the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) as efficacious dose or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), are usually inadequate and risky for novel oncology drugs.Due to the regulatory efforts aimed at improving dose optimisation in oncology drug development, clinical dose selection is now shifting away from these traditional methods towards a comprehensive benefit/risk assessment-based approach. Quantitative pharmacology analysis (QPA) plays a crucial role in this new paradigm. This mini-review summarises the use of QPA in selecting the starting dose for oncology FIH studies and potential efficacious doses for expansion or phase 2 trials. QPA allows for a more rational and scientifically based approach to dose selection by integrating information across studies and development phases.In conclusion, the application of QPA in oncology drug development has the potential to significantly enhance the success rates of clinical trials and ultimately support clinical decision-making, particularly in dose selection.

Bayesian model averaging of longitudinal dose-response models.

Selecting a safe and clinically beneficial dose can be difficult in drug development. Dose justification often relies on dose-response modeling where parametric assumptions are made in advance which may not adequately fit the data. This is especially problematic in longitudinal dose-response models, where additional parametric assumptions must be made. This paper proposes a class of longitudinal dose-response models to be used in the Bayesian model averaging paradigm which improve trial operating characteristics while maintaining flexibility a priori. A new longitudinal model for non-monotonic longitudinal profiles is proposed. The benefits and trade-offs of the proposed approach are demonstrated through a case study and simulation.

Strategies for successful dose optimization in oncology drug development: a practical guide.

Dose optimization is a critical challenge in drug development. Historically, dose determination in oncology has followed a divergent path from other non-oncology therapeutic areas due to the unique characteristics and requirements in Oncology. However, with the emergence of new drug modalities and mechanisms of drugs in oncology, such as immune therapies, radiopharmaceuticals, targeted therapies, cytostatic agents, and others, the dose-response relationship for efficacy and toxicity could be vastly varied compared to the cytotoxic chemotherapies. The doses below the MTD may demonstrate similar efficacy to the MTD with an improved tolerability profile, resembling what is commonly observed in non-oncology treatments. Hence, alternate strategies for dose optimization are required for new modalities in oncology drug development. This paper delves into the historical evolution of dose finding methods from non-oncology to oncology, highlighting examples and summarizing the underlying drivers of change. Subsequently, a practical framework and guidance are provided to illustrate how dose optimization can be incorporated into various stages of the development program. We provide the following general recommendations: 1) The objective for phase I is to identify a dose range rather than a single MTD dose for subsequent development to better characterize the safety and tolerability profile within the dose range. 2) At least two doses separable by PK are recommended for dose optimization in phase II. 3) Ideally, dose optimization should be performed before launching the confirmatory study. Nevertheless, innovative designs such as seamless II/III design can be implemented for dose selection and may accelerate the drug development program.

Considerations for the development of guidance on dose level selection for developmental and reproductive toxicity studies.

In 2022, the European Chemicals Agency issued advice on the selection of high dose levels for developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies indicating that the highest dose tested should aim to induce clear evidence of reproductive toxicity without excessive toxicity and severe suffering in parental animals. In addition, a recent publication advocated that a 10% decrease in body weight gain should be replaced with a 10% decrease in bodyweight as a criterion for dose adequacy. Experts from the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals evaluated these recent developments and their potential impact on study outcomes and interpretation and identified that the advice was not aligned with OECD test guidelines or with humane endpoints guidance. Furthermore, data analysis from DART studies indicated that a 10% decrease in maternal body weight during gestation equates to a 25% decrease in body weight gain, which differs from the consensus of experts at a 2010 ILSI/HESI workshop. Dose selection should be based on a biological approach that considers a range of other factors. Excessive dose levels that cause frank toxicity and overwhelm homeostasis should be avoided as they can give rise to effects that are not relevant to human health assessments.

Challenges, approaches and enablers: effectively triangulating towards dose selection in pediatric rare diseases.

Dose selection is an integral part of a molecule's journey to become medicine. On top of typical challenges faced in dose selection for more common diseases, pediatric rare disease has additional unique challenges due to the combination of 'rare' and 'pediatric' populations. Using the central theme of maximizing 'relevant' information to overcome information paucity, dose selection strategy in pediatric rare diseases is discussed using a triangulation concept involving challenges, approaches and very importantly, enablers. Using actual examples, unique scenarios are discussed where specific enablers allowed certain approaches to be used to overcome the challenges. The continued need for model-informed drug development is also discussed using examples of where modeling and simulation tools have been successfully used in bridging available information to select pediatric doses in rare disease. Additionally, challenges with translation and associated dose selection of new modalities such as gene therapy in rare diseases are examined with the lens of continuous learning and knowledge development that will enable pediatric dose selection of these modalities with confidence.

Calculation of Phase 2 dose-finding study sample size for reliable Phase 3 dose selection.

Sample sizes of Phase 2 dose-finding studies, usually determined based on a power requirement to detect a significant dose-response relationship, will generally not provide adequate precision for Phase 3 target dose selection. We propose to calculate the sample size of a dose-finding study based on the probability of successfully identifying the target dose within an acceptable range (e.g., 80%-120% of the target) using the multiple comparison and modeling procedure (MCP-Mod). With the proposed approach, different design options for the Phase 2 dose-finding study can also be compared. Due to inherent uncertainty around an assumed true dose-response relationship, sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the sample size calculations to deviations from modeling assumptions are recommended. Planning for a hypothetical Phase 2 dose-finding study is used to illustrate the main points. Codes for the proposed approach is available at https://github.com/happysundae/posMCPMod.

Pharmacodynamics and Bactericidal Activity of Bedaquiline in Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Bedaquiline is a diarylquinoline antimycobacterial drug and a key component of several regimens in clinical development for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) but with ongoing phase 3 trials that include assessment of simplified dosing. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of bedaquiline Mycobacterium tuberculosis-killing kinetics in adults with pulmonary TB was developed to inform dose selection of bedaquiline-containing regimens. The model parameters were estimated with data from the 14-day early bactericidal activity (EBA) study TMC207-CL001 conducted in Cape Town, South Africa. The study included 60 adult males and females with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB, who were administered bedaquiline with loading doses on the first 2 days followed by once-daily 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, or 400 mg. The modeling results included expected values (means ± standard deviations [SDs]) for a maximum drug kill rate constant equal to 0.23 ± 0.03 log10 CFU/mL sputum/day, a half-maximum effective plasma concentration equal to 1.6 ± 0.3 mg/L, and an average time to onset of activity equal to 40 ± 7 h. Model simulations showed that once-daily 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg (without loading doses) attained 40%, 50%, and 60%, respectively, of an expected maximum 14-day EBA equal to 0.18 log10 CFU/mL/day, or 10 h/day assessed by liquid culture time to positivity (TTP). Additional simulations illustrated efficacy outcomes during 8 weeks of treatment with the recommended and alternative dosages. The results demonstrate a general mathematical and statistical approach to the analysis of EBA studies with broad application to TB regimen development.

Pharmacodynamics and Bactericidal Activity of Combination Regimens in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Application to Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Pyrazinamide.

A critical barrier to codevelopment of tuberculosis (TB) regimens is a limited ability to identify optimal drug and dose combinations in early-phase clinical testing. While pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target attainment is the primary tool for exposure-response optimization of TB drugs, the PD target is a static index that does not distinguish individual drug contributions to the efficacy of a multidrug combination. A PKPD model of bedaquiline-pretomanid-pyrazinamide (BPaZ) for the treatment of pulmonary TB was developed as part of a dynamic exposure-response approach to regimen development. The model describes a time course relationship between the drug concentrations in plasma and their individual as well as their combined effect on sputum bacillary load assessed by solid culture CFU counts and liquid culture time to positivity (TTP). The model parameters were estimated using data from the phase 2A studies NC-001-(J-M-Pa-Z) and NC-003-(C-J-Pa-Z). The results included a characterization of BPaZ activity as the most and least sensitive to changes in pyrazinamide and bedaquiline exposures, respectively, with antagonistic activity of BPa compensated by synergistic activity of BZ and PaZ. Simulations of the NC-003 study population with once-daily bedaquiline at 200 mg, pretomanid at 200 mg, and pyrazinamide at 1,500 mg showed BPaZ would require 3 months to attain liquid culture negativity in 90% of participants. These results for BPaZ were intended to be an example application with the general approach aimed at entirely novel drug combinations from a growing pipeline of new and repurposed TB drugs.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses as Support for Meropenem-Vaborbactam Dosing Regimens and Susceptibility Breakpoints.

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a fixed-dose beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor with potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment analyses were undertaken using population pharmacokinetic models, nonclinical PK-PD targets for efficacy, in vitro surveillance data, and simulation to provide support for 2 g meropenem-2 g vaborbactam every 8 h (q8h) administered as a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, and dosing regimens adjusted for patients with renal impairment. Simulated patients varying by renal function measure (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], mL/min/1.73 m2 and absolute eGFR, mL/min) and resembling the clinical trial population (complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis) were generated. The PK-PD targets for meropenem, the percentage of time on day 1 that free-drug plasma concentrations were above the MIC (%T>MIC), and vaborbactam, the ratio of free-drug plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) on day 1 to the MIC (AUC:MIC ratio), were calculated. Percent probabilities of achieving meropenem free-drug plasma %T>MIC and vaborbactam free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio targets were assessed. MIC distributions for Enterobacterales, KPC-producing Enterobacterales, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were considered as part of an algorithm to assess PK-PD target attainment. For assessments of free-drug plasma PK-PD targets associated with a 1-log10 CFU reduction from baseline, percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment ranged from 81.3 to 100% at meropenem-vaborbactam MIC values of 4 or 8 µg/mL among simulated patients. The results of these PK-PD target attainment analyses provide support for a dosing regimen of 2 g meropenem-2 g vaborbactam q8h administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion, with dosing regimens adjusted for patients with renal impairment and a meropenem-vaborbactam susceptibility breakpoint of ≤8 µg/mL (tested with a fixed vaborbactam concentration of 8 µg/mL) for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa based on these dosing regimens.

Dose Selection for Phase III Clinical Evaluation of Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections.

Antibiotics are the current standard-of-care treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). However, increasing rates of bacterial antibiotic resistance necessitate novel therapeutic options. Gepotidacin is a first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that selectively inhibits bacterial DNA replication by interaction with the bacterial subunits of DNA gyrase (GyrA) and topoisomerase IV (ParC). Gepotidacin is currently in clinical development for the treatment of uUTIs and other infections. In this article, we review data for gepotidacin from nonclinical studies, including in vitro activity, in vivo animal efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models that informed dose selection for phase III clinical evaluation of gepotidacin. Based on this translational package of data, a gepotidacin 1,500-mg oral dose twice daily for 5 days was selected for two ongoing, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator phase III clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of gepotidacin in adolescent and adult female participants with uUTIs (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT04020341 and NCT04187144).

EC50 images, a novel endpoint from PET target occupancy studies, reveal spatial variation in apparent drug affinity.

PURPOSE: We recently introduced voxel-level images of drug occupancy from PET via our "Lassen plot filter." Occupancy images revealed clear dependence of 11C-flumazenil displacement on dose of GABAa inhibitor, CVL-865, but with different scales in different brain regions. We hypothesized that regions requiring higher drug concentrations to achieve desired occupancy would have higher EC50 values. We introduce an "EC50 image" from human data to evaluate this hypothesis. METHODS: Five healthy subjects were scanned with the nonselective GABAa tracer, 11C-flumazenil, before and (twice) after administration of CVL-865. We created ten occupancy images and applied an Emax model locally to create one EC50 image. We also performed simulations to confirm our observations of regional variation in EC50 and to identify the main source of variability in EC50. RESULTS: As expected, the EC50 image revealed spatial variation in apparent drug affinity. High EC50 was found in areas of low occupancy for a given drug dose. Simulations demonstrated that sampling from an inadequate range of plasma drug concentrations could impair precision. CONCLUSION: Our results argue for (a) confidence in the ability of the EC50 images to identify regional differences and (b) a need to tailor the range of drug doses in an occupancy study to regularize the precision of the EC50 throughout the brain. The EC50 image could add value to early-phase drug development by identifying regional variation in affinity that might impact therapy or safety and by guiding dose selection for later-phase trials.

Venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships in patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

This study evaluated venetoclax population pharmacokinetics (popPK) in patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia and assessed the relationship between venetoclax exposure and clinical response for venetoclax in combination with either a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). A total of 771 patients who received venetoclax from 5 Phase 1-3 studies were included in the popPK model. Exposure-response analyses included data from 575 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus HMA and 279 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus LDAC. The popPK model successfully characterized venetoclax plasma concentrations over time and confirmed venetoclax exposure did not vary significantly with age, weight, sex, mild to moderate hepatic impairment, or mild to severe renal impairment. Asian patients had 67% higher mean relative bioavailability than non-Asian patients, however the range of exposures in Asian patients was similar to non-Asian patients. For all efficacy endpoints with both treatment combinations, efficacy was higher in the venetoclax treatment groups compared with the respective control arm of placebo plus azacitidine or LDAC. Within patients who received venetoclax, no significant exposure-efficacy relationships were identified for either treatment combination, indicating that the beneficial effects of venetoclax were already maximized in the dose ranges studied. There was no apparent effect of venetoclax exposure on treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia or infections for either combination. Rates of treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 neutropenia were higher in the venetoclax treatment arms compared with the respective control arms; however, within patients who received venetoclax, there was only a shallow relationship or no apparent relationship with venetoclax exposure for venetoclax plus HMA or LDAC, respectively. Along with the efficacy and safety data previously published, the exposure-response analyses support the venetoclax dose regimens of 400 mg once daily (QD) plus HMA and 600 mg QD plus LDAC in treatment-naïve AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

An adaptive clinical trial design to identify the target dose of tenecteplase for treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fibrinolytic therapy with tenecteplase has been proposed for patients with pulmonary embolism but the optimal dose is unknown. Higher-than-necessary dosing is likely to cause excess bleeding. We designed an adaptive clinical trial to identify the minimum and assumed safest dose of tenecteplase that maintains efficacy. METHODS: We propose a Bayesian adaptive, placebo-controlled, group-sequential dose-finding trial using response-adaptive randomization to preferentially allocate subjects to the most promising doses, dual analyses strategies (continuous and dichotomized) using a gatekeeping approach to maximize clinical impact, and interim stopping rules to efficiently address competing trial objectives. The operating characteristics of the proposed design were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation across multiple hypothetical efficacy scenarios. RESULTS: Simulation demonstrated response-adaptive randomization can preferentially allocate subjects to doses which appear to be performing well based on interim data. Interim decision-making, including the interim evaluation of both analysis strategies with gatekeeping, allows the trial to continue enrollment when success with the dichotomized analysis strategy appears sufficiently likely and to stop enrollment and declare superiority based on the continuous analysis strategy when there is little chance of ultimately declaring superiority with the dichotomized analysis. CONCLUSION: The proposed design allows evaluation of a greater number of dose levels than would be possible with a non-adaptive design and avoids the need to choose either the continuous or the dichotomized analysis strategy for the primary endpoint.

Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies.

Prior to registering and marketing any new pharmaceutical, (agro)chemical or food ingredient product manufacturers must, by law, generate data to ensure human safety. Safety testing requirements vary depending on sector, but generally repeat-dose testing in animals form the basis for human health risk assessments. Dose level selection is an important consideration when designing such studies, to ensure that exposure levels that lead to relevant hazards are identified. Advice on dose level selection is provided in test guidelines and allied guidance documents, but it is not well harmonised, particularly for selection of the highest dose tested. This paper further builds on concepts developed in a technical report by the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) which recommends pragmatic approaches to dose selection considering regulatory requirements, animal welfare and state of the art scientific approaches. Industry sectors have differing degrees of freedom to operate regarding dose level selection, depending on the purpose of the studies and the regulatory requirements/legislation, and this is reflected in the overall recommended approaches. An understanding of systemic exposure should be utilised where possible (e.g., through toxicokinetic approaches) and used together with apical endpoints from existing toxicity studies to guide more appropriate dose level selection. The highest dose should be limited to a reasonable level, causing minimal but evident toxicity to the test animals without significantly compromising their well-being. As the science of predictive human exposure further develops and matures, this will provide exciting and novel opportunities for more human-relevant approaches to dose level selection.

10% Body weight (gain) change as criterion for the maximum tolerated dose: A critical analysis.

The concept of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was introduced in the seventies for carcinogenicity testing and was defined as the highest dose inducing clear toxicity, but not mortality by causes other than cancer. As estimation of the MTD in a carcinogenicity study, the highest dose that causes a 10% decrease in body weight compared to control animals over the course of a 90-day study, was formulated as a suitable criterion. This criterion was not seen as indicator of excessive toxicity but as a means to avoid false negative outcomes in a carcinogenicity study, as tumor formation may be reduced when body weight is significantly decreased. The body weight-based MTD criterion, however, turned up in carcinogenicity test guidelines and guidance (e.g., from OECD) as the highest dose that causes a 10% decrease in body weight gain relative to controls. Moreover, the 10% decrease in body weight gain criterion for MTD also ended up in test guidelines and guidances for toxicity endpoints other than carcinogenicity, so outside the context it was intended for. A 10% decrease in body weight gain relative to controls is however not a biologically relevant effect as it corresponds to less than 3% body weight reduction relative to controls in a 90-day study, which is within the normal variation in body weight. It therefore should certainly not be considered as a condition of excessive toxicity. Using the 10% lower weight gain criterion and incorrectly associating it with excessive toxicity has major implications for top dose selection in regulatory safety studies, resulting in tests performed at doses too low to elicit toxicity. This negatively impacts the reliability of studies and their regulatory usability; moreover, it results in a waste of experimental animals, which is ethically highly undesirable. Hence, our plea is to remove this MTD criterion for top dose selection in test guidelines and guidances for toxicity endpoints other than carcinogenicity and to reinstall the original 10% decrease in body weight criterion in test guidelines and guidances for carcinogenicity.

Survey of tumorigenic sensitivity in 6-month rasH2-Tg mice studies compared with 2-year rodent assays.

The pharmacokinetic endpoint of a 25-fold increase in human exposure is one of the specified criteria for high-dose selection for 2-year carcinogenicity studies in rodents according to ICH S1C(R2). However, this criterion is not universally accepted for 6-month carcinogenicity tests in rasH2-Tg mice. To evaluate an appropriate multiple for rasH2-Tg mice, we evaluated data for 53 compounds across five categories of rasH2-Tg mouse-positive [(1) genotoxic and (2) non-genotoxic] carcinogens and rasH2-Tg mouse-negative [(3) non-genotoxic carcinogens with clear or uncertain human relevance; (4) non-genotoxic rodent-specific carcinogens; and (5) non-carcinogens], and surveyed their tumorigenic activities and high doses in rasH2-Tg mice and 2-year rodent models. Our survey indicated that area under the curve (AUC) margins (AMs) or body surface area-adjusted dose ratios (DRs) of tumorigenesis in rasH2-Tg mice to the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) were 0.05- to 5.2-fold in 6 category (1) compounds with small differences between models and 0.2- to 47-fold in 7 category (2) including three 2-year rat study-negative compounds. Among all 53 compounds, including 40 compounds of the rasH2-Tg mouse-negative category (3), (4), and (5), no histopathologic risk factors for rodent neoplasia were induced only at doses above 50-fold AM or DR in rasH2-Tg mice except for two compounds, which induced hyperplasia and had no relationship with the tumors observed in the rasH2-Tg mouse or 2-year rodent studies. From the results of these surveys, we confirmed that exceeding a high dose level of 50-fold AM in rasH2-Tg mouse carcinogenicity studies does not appear to be of value.

Effect of Body Weight and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Dihydroartemisinin: Food and Drug Administration Basis for Dose Determination of Artesunate for Injection in Pediatric Patients With Severe Malaria.

For treatment of severe malaria, the World Health Organization recommends 3 mg/kg intravenous artesunate in pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg. Here we describe the Food and Drug Administration's rationale for selecting 2.4 mg/kg in pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg based on literature review and independent analyses.