RESUMO
Background: Limited research has been conducted to investigate the impact of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in heart failure (HF) patients with different levels of estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (ePASP). Methods: A total of 468 patients suffering from HF and secondary MR were enrolled and categorized into non-severe and severe MR groups based on the degree of MR. The primary endpoint of the study was a composite of cardiovascular death and a first-heart-failure hospitalization. The secondary endpoints were the primary outcomes, individually. The outcomes of the two groups were compared. Patients were further classified based on whether their ePASP was ≥ 50 mmHg or < 50 mmHg. Subsequently, the outcomes of the non-severe and severe MR groups were compared within each ePASP category. Results: In a median (SD) follow-up of 694 (410) days, severe MR was associated with higher risk for primary endpoints in patients with heart failure, especially in those with ePASP ≥ 50 mmHg. In patients with ePASP < 50 mmHg, the prognostic value of severe MR was diminished. Conclusions: Assessment of the severity of MR can identify heart failure patients who are at greater risks for poor clinical outcomes. Additionally, the prognostic value of secondary MR was more pronounced in patients with elevated ePASP.
RESUMO
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is linked to higher rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis of PH is important for clinical treatment. The estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (ePASP ≥ 35â mmHg) measured by echocardiography helps screen PH patients. In this paper, we report a novel PH screening method through a mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system. Methods: In the retrospective study, patients admitted to our hospital between January 2022 and April 2023 were classified into PH and control groups using ePASP and compared with acoustic cardiographic parameters. According to ePASP, PH severity was classified as mild, moderate, and severe. We analyzed the first and second heart sound (S1, S2) characteristics, including amplitude (S1A, S2A), energy (S1E, S2E), and frequency (S1F, S2F). Results: The study included 209 subjects, divided into PH (n = 121) and control (n = 88) groups. Pearson correlation analysis confirmed the positive correlation between S2F and ePASP. The diagnostic performance of S2F as assessed by the area under the ROC curve was 0.775 for PH. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing ePASP ≥ 35â mmHg when S2F ≥ 36â Hz were found to be 79.34% and 67.05%, respectively, according to ROC analysis. Severity classification was performed using S2F, the area under the ROC curve was 0.712-0.838 for mild PH, 0.774-0.888 for moderate PH, and 0.826-0.940 for severe PH. Conclusions: S2F collected by the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system offers a convenient method for remote PH screening, potentially improving PH management and outcomes.