RESUMO
Complicated colon cancer accounts for up to 40% of colon cancer patients. While the management of complicated right colon cancer has some standard recommendations, for complicated left colon cancer single stage or two-stage procedures are subject to controversies. AIM: To study the types of procedures and postoperative morbidity and mortality for complicated left colon cancer patients admitted to the 1st Surgical Clinic of the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Craiova during the past 23 years. We aimed to present the evolution of the surgical management in the emergency procedures for complicated left colon. MATERIAL AND METHOD: retrospective study of patients with complicated left colon cancer admitted to our clinic between 2001 and 2023. We analyzed the postoperative morbidity and mortality of each type of emergency procedure (single stage or two-stage) and compared them throughout three periods of time. Results: Three groups observed: G1 â?" 2001-2010, (96 patients); G2 â?" 2011-2016, (65 patients); G3 â?" 2017-2023, (77 patients). We registered significant increase in single stage procedures from G1 to G2 (11.2% vs. 33.8%). In G3, single stage procedure rate decreased significantly (20.8% vs. 33.8%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality was significantly lower in G2 compared to G1 in both single stage and two-stage procedures. G3 compared to G2 registered significant decrease for single stage procedures but similar for two-stage procedures. CONCLUSION: For left colon emergencies, two-stage procedures seem safer, as resections with primary anastomosis, even with selected cases and experienced surgeons, still associate higher postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Assuntos
Colectomia , Neoplasias do Colo , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colectomia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Romênia/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de Risco , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
Background: Duodenal perforation is a life-threatening condition and ideal approaches for the management of duodenal perforations are nowadays unclear, so numerous variables must be considered. Peptic ulcer disease is the most common disease determining a duodenal perforation, however, there may be other less common causes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all the patients who presented at our Division of General Surgery for a Duodenal Perforation, from September 2018 to December 2019. We focused on patients requiring a tube duodenostomy. Five patients were included in this study. Results: Five patients suffering from a duodenal perforation were analyzed and their data collected. All patients were treated with tube duodenostomy, pyloric exclusion and omega loop gastro-enteroanastomosis. The duodenostomy was removed four weeks after surgery. All patients suffered postsurgical complications ranging from wound infection to pneumonitis; the incidence of severe complications was greater in the older patients. We did not record any deaths four months after the operation. Conclusions: The tube duodenostomy is an old and dated procedure but simple to implement, which may require an increase in post-operative hospitalization, but which subsists as an effective and safe way to treat patients in critical conditions.
Assuntos
Úlcera Duodenal , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada , Humanos , Duodenostomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introduction: The aim of this study is to analyze the progress of hospitalizations and how the emergency operations in our Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Foggia Hospital have changed qualitatively and quantitatively from pre-Covid-19 to today. Methods: Our cohort-study was conducted by analyzing four groups of patients admitted in emergency to our department from 2019 to 2022. Results: We observed a total of 150 patients for the group 1, 25 patients for the group 2, 71 patients for the group 3 and 110 for the group 4, of these 20 were emergency admission during 2019, 16 during 2020, 31 during 2021 and 10 during 2020 (p 0.05); 130 were elective admission during 2019, 9 during 2020, 40 during 2021 and 100 during 2022 (p 0.05). Of the emergency admissions 11 were operated during the no covid period in 2019, 14 during 2020, 29 during 2021, 6 during 2022. Conclusions: The contraction of hospitalizations for urgent and emergency conditions during the first lockdown has been accompanied by positive implications. The measures employed in hospitals to contain the infection determined a reduction in COVID cases, allowing the nearly complete resumption of the surgical activity provided in the pre-COVID era.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Resultado do Tratamento , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
Introduction: Choosing the optimal treatment for patients with complicated colon cancer operated in an emergency remains a challenge. The study aims to identify the factors that influence the therapeutic decision in these patients. Patients and Methods: We included in this retrospective study 449 patients operated in emergency for complicated colon cancer, in the Clinical Emergency County Hospital "St. Ap. Andrei" Galati between 2008-2017. The patients data were collected from the observation sheets, the surgical, imaging and laboratory protocols. Results: The operations performed were: resections with a stoma in 37.63% of cases, resections with anastomosis in 36.97%, stomas in 16.26% and internal derivations in 9.13% of patients. Elderly age was correlated with stomas with or without tumour resection (p 0.05). Preoperative diagnosis of IDH was associated with resections with anastomosis, those with occlusion were associated with internal derivations and those with digestive perforations with resections with a stoma (p 0.05). The stomas were associated with the presence of intraoperatively detected complications (p 0.05). Conclusions: Complicated colon tumours operated on in an emergency require surgical treatment tailored to each patient. It is important to choose the type of treatment taking into account the patient's condition at admission, clinical-paraclinical data, tumour location, tumour complication and the presence of other complications detected intraoperatively.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Estomas Cirúrgicos , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Emergências , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introduction: The study is presenting a personal experience of a Trauma Centre Level I and is try to conclude on optimal medical attitude for patients with retroperitoneal hematoma, still a controversial topic for traumatologists. Material and Method: A retrospective analysis of 22 cases of post-traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma admitted on Bucharest Emergency Hospital between September 2018 August 2021 (including time of Covid-19 pandemic), is presented Results: The patients (males predominance, mean age 43, mean ISS of 23), benefited of nonoperative management on admission for 10 cases (45%) with a failure rate of 4/10 due to recurrent bleeding from spleen injuries and continuous bleeding from mesenteric vessels lesions. CT scan (73% - 16 cases) within 1 hour from the admission and emergency surgery were necessary for 12 cases (55%). 2 patients benefited of angioembolization on admission. Conservative attitude for retroperitoneal hematoma was adopted for 72% cases. Over-all mortality: 18% (4 patients, mean ISS of 36), among 82% polytrauma cases. Conclusions: Algorithm of treatment is adapted to every case of retroperitoneal hematoma but the following sequences are mandatory: rapid transportation to Trauma Centre Level I with medical help, correct resuscitation, immediate relevant imagistic (CT scan), emergency surgery prior to angioembolization (for hemodynamic instable patients) or after it, ICU stabilization of the patient and then definitive repair of the injuries. Despite all, mortality remains high.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , COVID-19 , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Adulto , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematoma/etiologia , Hematoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapiaRESUMO
Background: In the case of patients admitted with acute abdomen at the emergency department, interstitial pulmonary pathology (Covid-19 infections) represents a significant operative risk for the patients. The rate of postoperative complications is high with increased morbidity and mortality, a real challenge for the medical staff and surgical/intensive care unit teams. In emergency settings, patients were examined with targeted clinical and paraclinical parameters that assure a fast diagnosis to optimize a rapid medical and surgical treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study that included patients enrolled and diagnosed with an acute surgical abdomen in Surgical Clinic 1 Tg. Mures Emergency County Hospital. Patients were examined and analyzed at the emergency department UPU-SMURD. We included patients admitted over the two years (2019 and 2020) and divided them into two groups. Results: The total number of patients admitted in the UPU-Smurd emergency department Surgical Clinic I over the two years was 1033. There was a significant reduction in total cases diagnosed with the acute surgical abdomen in the pandemic period (p=0.033). The average time from the admission to the surgical procedure was significantly higher in the pandemic period 380Ã+-2 min in comparison with 222+-3 min (p=0.001) and also with an increased average operative time 223+-3 min versus 145+-2 min (p=0.002). Average hospitalization time was higher in the pandemic period 10+-1 (p=0.031) with no significant difference between the groups regarding Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (p=0.122). Overall mortality has more than doubled, with 31 cases (19%) in the pandemic and 28 (9%) in the non-pandemic. (p=0.001). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has played an essential role in treating acute surgical abdomen cases. The high solicitation rate of the emergency department delayed the diagnosis and treatment of severe surgical cases. As the scale of this pandemic is unprecedented, standard protocols with minor changes do not provide adequate results.
Assuntos
Abdome Agudo , COVID-19 , Abdome , Abdome Agudo/etiologia , Abdome Agudo/cirurgia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introduction: Diverting ostomy is a commonly perfomed procedure but may be associated to its own morbidity (early or late complications). Colostomy-related evisceration is a rare but potentially life threatening condition (requiring emergency surgery), relatively undocumented for its mechanisms. Case report: A male aged 84 was admited for chronic low digestive occlusion due to a locally advanced, stenosing, rectal adenocarcinoma. Prior to neoadjuvant therapy, a loop sigmoidostomy was indicated using a left iliac open aproach, with no preparation of the colic content. The sigmoid was loaded with hard stools. The parietal breach was reaproximated by 2 monofilament nylon sutures, fascial and colocutaneus fixation. Colostomy was opened two days later, but was not functional (postoperative paralytic ileus). Parastomal evisceration of ileum in day 3, dehiscence of parietal suture. Emergency operation, using the same aproach. Results: Favourable outcome. Thoraco-abdominal CT scan: N0,M0. Pelvic MRI: proliferative mass of inferior and middle rectum, involving mesorectum fascia, levator ani and a few regional lymphatic nodes. Radio-chemotherapy and abdomino-perineal resection. Pathologic result: colorectal adenocarcinoma, G2, ypT1ypN0, ICD-O: 8140/3. Conclusions: We rewiewed 8 case reports published since 2011, equally distributed as late or early complications. There was no connection with the princeps indication (colorectal cancer in half of cases); neither related to topography (transverse or sigmoid) or type of colostomy (loop or end). Occurence of the complication is not time-dependent (5 to18 months in late, 3 to 12 days for early eviscerations). The main premise is colostomy itself (a place of reduced parieto-abdominal resistence), stressed by increassed intra-abdominal pressure (eg. bronchopulmonary disease, digestive obstruction). Predisposing factors for late evisceration seems to be related to spontaneous rupture of parastomal hernia/colostomy prolapse. As for early evisceration, both technical details and surgical strategy must be considered (indequate fixation; creation of a larger than necessary colostomy aperture).
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Colostomia/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Hérnia Ventral/etiologia , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Pseudo-Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Masculino , Protectomia , Neoplasias Retais/complicações , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
The emergency surgery for colorectal cancer is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality due to factors related to the characteristics of the patients but also the therapeutic attitude. This study aims to identify the surgical interventions associated with the postoperative complications, with the main causes of morbidity, with the reinterventions and with the postoperative deaths. We included in this retrospective study 431 patients hospitalized and operated in an emergency for complicated colorectal malignant tumors in the Surgery II Clinic of the Clinical Emergency County Hospital "Sf. Ap. Andrei from Galati, in the period 2008-2017. The patients data were collected from observation sheets, operative protocols, pathological, imaging and laboratory bulletins, at the time of the emergency intervention, as well as from those of subsequent admissions in patients who benefited from serial interventions. The postoperative morbidity was 10.44%. The resections with anastomosis were associated with the presence of postoperative complications (p 0.01): pseudomembranous colitis, (p 0.01) and postoperative intestinal occlusion (p 0.01). The practice of lymph node dissection was associated with postoperative complications (p 0.01): pseudomembranous colitis (p 0.01) and intestinal occlusion (p 0.01). The reinterventions were associated with resections with anastomosis (p 0.01), lymph node dissection (p 0.01) or patients with open /semi-open abdomen (p 0.04). The postoperative mortality was 9.28%. It was associated with the practice of lymph node dissection (p 0.01), of the ileostomy (p 0.01), with the open /semi-open abdomen (p 0.04). Patients with colostomy had the lowest number of hospitalization days (p 0.01). The resections with anastomosis per primam and the lymph node dissection were associated with morbidity. The type of main surgery did not influence the postoperative mortality, this being associated with the concomitant surgery: the lymph node dissection, the ileostomy, and the abdomen closure type. The reinterventions were associated with resections with anastomosis per primam, with lymph node dissection and with the open /semi-open abdomen. The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in patients with a colostomy.
Assuntos
Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Enterostomia/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Emergências , Enterostomia/métodos , Humanos , Protectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Specific risk factors for gastroduodenal surgery in cirrhotic patients have been identified, which dictates for a more personalized management. The retrospective study was conducted between 2012-2019 on twelve patients (7 cases of duodenal ulcer, 2 cases of gastric ulcer and 3 patients with gastric cancer). We took into account a number of possible factors involved in the unfavorable evolution of patients, based on data published in the literature so far. In order to follow the involvement of each factor we compared two groups of patients, one with unfavorable evolutions, exitus and another with favorable evolutions. Emergency surgery, the presence of ascites at the time of intervention, a higher than 30 MELD score, alcoholic cirrhosis, liver encephalopathy and liver failure are common factors that are found in a high percentage (between 75% and 100%) in patients who have had an unfavorable evolution, exitus. The same risk factors are found in much lower percentages in patients who have evolved favorably postoperatively, most between 12.5% and 25%. We analyzed preoperative aspects, surgical approach, complications and risk factors for these patients, compared them with the results of our study and identified future therapeutic possibilities. For CHILD B or C patients, the indication for surgery should be discussed in advance with a multidisciplinary team. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or discontinuation of D2 dissection should be considered in these patients.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/cirurgia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Úlcera Gástrica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Dissecação/efeitos adversos , Dissecação/métodos , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Úlcera Gástrica/complicaçõesRESUMO
Introduction: Complicated colon cancer most frequently presents as obstruction and needs emergency surgery. Most of these patients receive their diagnosis when presenting for complicated disease and by that time the disease is usually advanced. While concerned first with the survival of the patient, the curative intent of the resection following the principles of oncologic resection may come in second place. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 consecutive patients with complicated colon cancer that suffered emergency surgery between January 2017 and September 2018. The principles of oncologic resection were analyzed in terms of resection margins and retrieved lymph nodes and/or multivisceral resections in order to achieve clear margins. Intestinal obstruction was observed in 58 patients (85.3%), perforation was found in 8 patients (11.8%) while lower gastrointestinal bleeding complicated 2 cases (2.9%). Twenty-two patients had distant metastases at presentation, and overall 29 patients (42,6%) had stage IV disease. Clear circumferential margins were achieved in 55 cases while longitudinal margins were found to be invaded in 2 cases and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater than 13.7. The mean hospital stay was 13.9 days and the observed in hospital mortality was 19.1%. Results: The outcomes of surgery for complicated colon cancer in our department fall within the reported literature results. Conclusion: The principles of oncologic resection in terms of surgical margins and retrieved lymph nodescan be respected during emergency surgery and offer the intent of cure for these patients with advanced disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Emergency general surgery patients are at significant risk of postoperative complications and mortality compared with their elective counterparts. Although challenged by some studies, increasing evidence shows that emergency colectomy for cancer is associated with worse early postoperative and long-term outcomes. Methods: We have included all patients with colon cancer admitted to the Emergency Hospital of Bucharest between January 2011 and January 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: (1) colon tumor; (2) left-sided localization of the tumor; (3) pathology exam revealing adenocarcinoma. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) rectal cancers; (2) benign pathology (e.g. diverticulitis). Results: We included 615 patients with left-sided colon cancer. 275 (44.7%) patients presented complicated disease. The complication was represented by obstruction in 205 (33.3%) patients (OG), hemorrhage in 55 (8.9%) patients (HG), and perforation in 15 (2.4%) patients (PG). The anastomotic leakage rate was similar between obstructive and elective cases (6.2% versus 6.5%, P 0.05), but was significantly higher for hemorrhagic patients (16%) (P=0.046). The 30-day complication rate and mortality were significantly higher in emergency patients (P 0.05). Conclusions: We found significant worse short- and long-term outcomes for patients with nonelective left-sided colon cancer resections. Correlating the ominous prognosis with the high incidence of the complicated disease, we may emphasize the impact on de complicated colon cancer on the general population.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Colectomia , Colo Descendente/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Idoso , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Backround/Objective: To assess the impact of emergency surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease (CD) and to evaluate the disease course while observing different factors that may influence it. Methods: Information on 37 consecutive patients which were diagnosed and operated in emergency for CD complications and the the relapse rate (regarded as a second surgery) were retrospectively evaluated. Results: The risk of relapse and second surgery was increased in males under 50 years and in those who benefited from an anastomosis during the first invervention while stomy seemed to reduce the rate of surgical relapse. The median duration until relapse was 2,3 years while a percentage of 33% required reintervention. Conclusions: The majority of patients with CD will undergo at least one surgical intervention during their lifetime and one third of them will relapse requiring a second intervention. Although medical treatment has seen great advancements, surgery requirements have remained unchanged as the mainstay treatment in emergent complications of CD. The age of the patients, smoking status and the postoperative medication influence the rate of postoperative recurrence.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Emergências , Reoperação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/mortalidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Reoperação/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Romênia , Distribuição por Sexo , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Geriatric surgery is rising and projected to continue at a greater rate. There is already concern about the poor outcomes for the emergency surgery in elderly. How to manage the available resources to improve outcomes in this group of patients is an important object of debate. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of applying ERAS pathways to emergency elderly surgical patients. METHOD: Two searches were undertaken for ERAS protocols in elderly patients and emergency surgery, in order to gather evidence in relation to ERAS in geriatric emergency patients. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, mortality, hospital length of stay and readmission rates. Results: Eighteen studies were included. The majority of patients were older than 70. Elderly patients had fewer postoperative complications and a reduced hospitalization with ERAS compared to conventional care. Emergency surgical patients also had fewer postoperative complications with ERAS compared to conventional care. Hospital stay was reduced in 2 out of 3 studies for emergency surgery. Conclusions: ERAS can be safely applied to elderly and emergency patients with a reduction in postoperative complications, hospitalization and readmission rates. There is evidence to suggest that ERAS is feasible and beneficial for geriatric emergency patients.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Cuidados Críticos , Procedimentos Clínicos , Geriatria , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introduction: Over the past three decades, there has been a recognised need for emergency surgery (ES). Studies of ES have demonstrated variation in patient outcomes depending on admission time or day. ES as a subspecialty is still under consideration in Europe despite being recognised as such in the US. This article reviews this need and addresses the issues required to develop ES as a separate surgical subspecialty in Europe. METHOD: A survey on ES was developed by the Educational Committee of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) and sent to all ESTES members with 102 responses received. Results: Of the responses, 93.1% had completed training. 75.3% of respondents report that ES should be a recognised subspecialty and 79% report that ES is capable of offering a rewarding career. 90% report that ES should have dedicated post-graduate training programme with 69.8% in agreement that dedicated emergency surgeons have improved outcomes following ES. CONCLUSION: Developing ES as a subspecialty in Europe would improve patient outcomes and facilitate resource allocation. This advancement is, however, still in its infancy and its evolution would require overhaul of our current European system, training methods and understanding of the role of emergency surgeons in ES.
Assuntos
Emergências , Cirurgia Geral/tendências , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnósticoRESUMO
Background: As physicians, Mobile smartphones, laptops and tablets are now an integral part of our day to day activities including personal communications as well as our routine clinical practice. Methods: A digital survey was designed to explore the usage of mobile smartphones and the associated apps among surgeons in Trauma and Emergency departments. It was sent to 850 members of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Results: A total of 91 responses were received with 60.4% aged between 35 and 54 years. Only 24.1%of respondents found the available apps extremely useful in their practice, however 75.9% of participants agreed on not being able to identify a certain good application to rely on. CONCLUSION: Despite the widespread use of smartphones among doctors of different grades and specialties, there is a preference shown towards the use of instant messenger apps and the use of the camera for clinical photos. The usefulness of current available apps appears to be limited due to the absence of a regulating body to check the validity of data and peer review the contents of apps leaving a huge responsibility on the individual doctor using the app to rely on its results.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Aplicativos Móveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Competência Clínica/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , União Europeia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Introduction: Perioperative application of multimodal rehabilitation pathways represents the anticipated evolution of a concept that has arisen in recent decades, initially named fast-track surgery and known today as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). This concept refers to the use of standardised perioperative care protocols that are supported by evidence-based medicine and aim to reduce surgical trauma and stress. Although application of such protocols to emergency surgery has produced favourable results, the use of ERAS in the geriatric emergency surgery setting has not been widely applied, and no studies have produced results that support its use in this setting. However, ERAS could help improve outcomes in this group of patients, who already have high surgical morbidity and mortality rates. Material and Methods: In preparation for a lecture presented at the 18th European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (Bucharest, May 2017), the authors performed a literature search using the terms "ERAS", "fast-track", "emergency surgery", "emergency medicine", "multimodal rehabilitation" and "elderly patient" to gather scientific evidence with which to present suggestions in support of their opinion that ERAS could be applied successfully to improve postoperative outcomes for geriatric emergency patients. CONCLUSION: Urgent surgical treatment of elderly patients is associated with morbidity and mortality rates higher than those of younger patients, and there is room for improvement. A multimodal rehabilitation program seems to be a good working model for achieving this goal.