Transorbital Route to Intracranial Space.

The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach has emerged as a notable and increasingly utilized surgical technique in recent years. This chapter presents an overview of the approach, tracing its historical development and highlighting its growing acceptance within the skull base community.Beginning with an introduction and historical perspective, the chapter outlines the evolution of the transorbital approach, shedding light on its origins and the factors driving its adoption. Subsequently, a comprehensive exploration of the anatomic bone pillars and intracranial spaces accessible via this approach is provided. Hence, five bone pillars of the transorbital approach were identified, namely the lesser sphenoid wing, the anterior clinoid, the sagittal crest, the middle cranial fossa, and the petrous apex. A detailed correlation of those bone targets with respective intracranial areas has been reported.Furthermore, the chapter delves into the practical application of the technique through a case example, offering insights into its clinical utility, indications, and limitations.

Endoscopic transorbital approach for recurrent spheno-orbital meningiomas: single center case series.

Endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs) are finding wide application for skull base lesions, particularly for spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). These tumors have high recurrence rates, and second surgery can often represent a challenge. In this study we analyze our experience of management of recurrent SOMs through a slightly modified eyelid crease approach. Between May 2016 and September 2023, in the Department of Neurosurgery of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo (Pavia, Italy), five consecutive recurrent SOMs have been treated using an endoscopic transorbital approach. Demographic data, preoperatory deficits, lesions characteristics, histology, grade of resection, eventual adjuvant treatments, complications, outcome in terms of symptoms improvement and cosmesis, and hospitalization are described. One patient maintained a right lateral rectus muscle palsy that was already present in the preoperatory, no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were reported. All patients had postoperative periorbital edema, but no other systemic complication was found. All patients had proptosis improvement, two had visual acuity improvement, and best cosmetic outcome was obtained in all cases. Hospitalization varied between 4 and 6 days. ETOAs in the management of recurrent SOMs are safe and have good outcome. Right selection of patients is mandatory, but when feasible, endoscopic surgery can allow a virgin route to a previously operated tumor, guaranteeing a good strategic option.

Endoscopic transorbital approach in children: surgical technique and early results.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors aimed to describe the endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) in children. METHODS: Six pediatric patients (2 girls and 4 boys) underwent the ETOA for paramedian skull base lesions at a single institution between September 2016 and February 2023. RESULTS: The median age at the time of surgery was 7.5 (range 4-18) years. The median follow-up period was 33 (range 9-60) months. In this series, the ETOA level of difficulty included stage 1 (n = 2, 33.3%), stage 3 (n = 3, 50%), and stage 5 (n = 1, 16.7%). The ETOA was performed for tumor resection in 4 cases; the final pathology consisted of fibrous dysplasia, pilocytic astrocytoma, metastatic neuroblastoma, and choroid plexus papilloma. The procedure was also performed for repair of a petrous apex meningocele and for lateral orbital wall decompression of traumatic lateral rectus muscle entrapment. One patient experienced a transient cranial nerve III palsy after the procedure. There were no operative deaths in this series. CONCLUSIONS: In select cases, the ETOA can be considered a minimally invasive alternative for conventional skull base approaches in the armamentarium of pediatric skull base surgery. Further investigation and the accumulation of experience are warranted in the future to enhance the efficacy and applicability of the ETOA in pediatric patients.

360° around the orbit: key surgical anatomy of the microsurgical and endoscopic cranio-orbital and orbitocranial approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Several pathologies either invade or arise within the orbit. These include meningiomas, schwannomas, and cavernous hemangiomas among others. Although several studies describing various approaches to the orbit are available, no study describes all cranio-orbital and orbitocranial approaches with clear, surgically oriented anatomical descriptions. As such, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive guide to the microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to and through the orbit. METHODS: Six formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric head specimens were dissected in the surgical anatomy laboratory at the authors' institution. In each specimen, the following approaches were modularly performed: endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs), including a lateral transorbital approach and a superior eyelid crease approach; endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs), including those to the medial orbit and optic canal; and transcranial approaches, including a supraorbital approach, a fronto-orbital approach, and a 3-piece orbito-zygomatic approach. Each pertinent step was 3D photograph-documented with macroscopic and endoscopic techniques as previously described. RESULTS: Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the orbit afforded excellent access to the medial orbit and medial optic canal. Regarding ETOAs, the lateral transorbital approach afforded excellent access to the floor of the middle fossa and, once the lateral orbital rim was removed, the cavernous sinus could be dissected and the petrous apex drilled. The superior eyelid approach provides excellent access to the anterior cranial fossa just superior to the orbit, as well as the dura of the lesser wing of the sphenoid. Craniotomy-based approaches provided excellent access to the anterior and middle cranial fossa and the cavernous sinus, except the supraorbital approach had limited access to the middle fossa. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines the essential surgical steps for major cranio-orbital and orbitocranial approaches. Endoscopic endonasal approaches offer direct medial access, potentially providing bilateral exposure to optic canals. ETOAs serve as both orbital access and as a corridor to surrounding regions. Cranio-orbital approaches follow a lateral-to-medial, superior-to-inferior trajectory, progressively allowing removal of protective bony structures for proportional orbit access.

Endoscopic transorbital approach bone pillars: a comprehensive stepwise anatomical appraisal.

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach has garnered significant consideration and gained popularity in recent years. Detailed anatomical knowledge along with clinical experience has allowed refinement of the technique as well as expansion of its indications. Using bone as a consistent reference, the authors identified five main bone pillars that offer access to the different intracranial targeted areas for different pathologies of the skull base, with the aim of enhancing the understanding of the intracranial areas accessible through this corridor. METHODS: The authors present a bone-oriented review of the anatomy of the transorbital approach in which they conducted a 3D analysis using Brainlab software and performed dry skull and subsequent cadaveric dissections. RESULTS: Five bone pillars of the transorbital approach were identified: the lesser sphenoid wing, the sagittal crest (medial aspect of the greater sphenoid wing), the anterior clinoid, the middle cranial fossa, and the petrous apex. The associations of these bone targets with their respective intracranial areas are reported in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of consistent bone references after the skin incision has been made and the working space is determined allows a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy of the approach in order to safely and effectively perform transorbital endoscopic surgery in the skull base.

Open-door extended endoscopic transorbital technique to the paramedian anterior and middle cranial fossae: technical notes, anatomomorphometric quantitative analysis, and illustrative case.

OBJECTIVE: The superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach (SETOA) provides a direct and short minimally invasive route to the anterior and middle skull base. Nevertheless, it uses a narrow corridor that limits its angles of attack. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of an "extended" conservative variant of the "standard" endoscopic transorbital approach-termed "open-door"-to enhance the exposure of lesions affecting the paramedian aspect of the anterior and middle cranial fossae. METHODS: First, the authors described the technical nuances of the open-door extended transorbital approach (ODETA). Next, they documented its morphometric advantages over standard SETOA. Finally, they provided a clinical-anatomical application to demonstrate enhanced exposure and better angles of attack to treat lesions occupying the paramedian anterior and middle cranial fossae. Five adult cadaveric specimens (10 sides) initially underwent standard SETOA and then extended open-door SETOA (ODETA to the paramedian anterior and middle fossae). The adjunct of hinge-orbitotomy, through three surgical steps and straddling the frontozygomatic suture, converted conventional SETOA to its extended open-door variant. CT scans were performed before dissection and uploaded to the neuronavigation system for quantitative analysis. The angles of attack on the axial plane that addressed four key landmarks, namely the tip of the anterior clinoid process (ACP), foramen rotundum (FR), foramen ovale (FO), and trigeminal impression (TI), were calculated for both operative techniques and compared. RESULTS: Hinge-orbitotomy of the extended open-door SETOA resulted in several surgical, functional, and esthetic advantages: it provided wider axial angles of attack for each of the target points, with a gain angle of 26.68° ± 1.31° for addressing the ACP (p < 0.001), 29.50° ± 2.46° for addressing the FR (p < 0.001), 19.86° ± 1.98° for addressing the FO (p < 0.001), and 17.44° ± 2.21° for addressing the lateral aspect of the TI (p < 0.001), while hiding the skin scar, avoiding temporalis muscle dissection, preserving flap vascularization, and decreasing the rate of bone infection and degree of orbital content retraction. CONCLUSIONS: The extended open-door technique may be specifically suited for selected patients affected by paramedian anterior and middle fossae lesions, with prevalent anteromedial extension toward the anterior clinoid, the foremost compartment of the cavernous sinus and FR and not completely controlled with the pure endoscopic transorbital approach.

Endoscopic precaruncular medial transorbital and endonasal multiport approaches to the contralateral skull base: a clinicoanatomical study.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive endoscopic endonasal multiport approaches create additional visualization angles to treat skull base pathologies. The sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) approach and superior eyelid lateral transorbital approach, frequently used nowadays, have been referred to as the "third port" when used alongside the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The endoscopic precaruncular contralateral medial transorbital (cMTO) corridor, on the other hand, is an underrecognized but unique port that has been used to repair CSF rhinorrhea originating from the lateral sphenoid sinus recess. However, no anatomical feasibility studies or clinical experience exists to assess its benefits and demonstrate its potential role in multiport endoscopic access to the other contralateral skull base areas. In this study, the authors explored the application and potential utility of multiport EEA combined with the endoscopic cMTO approach (EEA/cMTO) to three target areas of the contralateral skull base: lateral recess of sphenoid sinus (LRSS), petrous apex (PA) and petroclival region, and retrocarotid clinoidocavernous space (CCS). METHODS: Ten cadaveric specimens (20 sides) were dissected bilaterally under stereotactic navigation guidance to access contralateral LRSS via EEA/cMTO. The PA and petroclival region and retrocarotid CCS were exposed via EEA alone, EEA/cMTO, and EEA combined with the sublabial CTM approach (EEA/CTM). Qualitative and quantitative assessments, including working distance and visualization angle to the PA, were recorded. Clinical application of EEA/cMTO is demonstrated in a lateral sphenoid sinus CSF leak repair. RESULTS: During the qualitative assessment, multiport EEA/cMTO provides superior visualization from a high vantage point and better instrument maneuverability than multiport EEA/CTM for the PA and retrocarotid CCS, while maintaining a similar lateral trajectory. The cMTO approach has significantly shorter working distances to all three target areas compared with the CTM approach and EEA. The mean distances to the LRSS, PA, and retrocarotid CCS were 50.69 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.05), 67.11 ± 5.05 mm (p < 0.001), and 50.32 ± 3.6 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean visualization angles to the PA obtained by multiport EEA/cMTO and EEA/CTM were 28.4° ± 3.27° and 24.42° ± 5.02° (p < 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multiport EEA/cMTO to the contralateral LRSS offers the advantage of preserving the pterygopalatine fossa contents and the vidian nerve, which are frequently sacrificed during a transpterygoid approach. This approach also offers superior visualization and better instrument maneuverability compared with EEA/CTM for targeting the petroclival region and retrocarotid CCS.

The anterolateral triangle as window on the foramen lacerum from transorbital corridor: anatomical study and technical nuances.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgical indications for the superior eyelid transorbital endoscopic approach (SETOA) are rapidly expanding over the last years. Nevertheless, as any new technique, a detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the surgical target area, the operative corridor, and the specific surgical landmark from this different perspective is required for a safest and successful surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study is to provide, through anatomical dissections, a detailed investigation of the surgical anatomy revealed by SETOA via anterolateral triangle of the middle cranial fossa. We also sought to define the relevant surgical landmarks of this operative corridor. METHODS: Eight embalmed and injected adult cadaveric specimens (16 sides) underwent dissection and exposure of the cavernous sinus and middle cranial fossa via superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach. The anterolateral triangle was opened and its content exposed. An extended endoscopic endonasal trans-clival approach (EEEA) with exposure of the cavernous sinus content and skeletonization of the paraclival and parasellar segments of the internal carotid artery (ICA) was also performed, and the anterolateral triangle was exposed. Measurements of the surface area of this triangle from both surgical corridors were calculated in three head specimens using coordinates of its borders under image-guide navigation. RESULTS: The drilling of the anterolateral triangle via SETOA unfolds a space that can be divided by the course of the vidian nerve into two windows, a wider "supravidian" and a narrower "infravidian," which reveal different anatomical corridors: a "medial supravidian" and a "lateral supravidian," divided by the lacerum segment of the ICA, leading to the lower clivus, and to the medial aspect of the Meckel's cave and terminal part of the horizontal petrous ICA, respectively. The infravidian corridor leads medially into the sphenoid sinus. The arithmetic means of the accessible surface area of the anterolateral triangle were 45.48 ± 3.31 and 42.32 ± 2.17 mm2 through transorbital approach and endonasal approach, respectively. CONCLUSION: SETOA can be considered a minimally invasive route complementary to the extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the anteromedial aspect of the Meckel's cave and the foramen lacerum. The lateral loop of the trigeminal nerve represents a reliable surgical landmark to localize the lacerum segment of the ICA from this corridor. Nevertheless, as any new technique, a learning curve is needed, and the clinical feasibility should be proven.

Endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic transorbital approach to the skull base is currently growing in popularity, and it is nowadays progressively used as a skull base approach. Clinical experience, along with detailed anatomical knowledge, makes this technique safe and effective. METHOD: We present a step by step description of our technique based on the most recent anatomic references, and clinical experience. In order to better understand every phase of the procedure, we propose to keep on the following scheme, that is (1) skin phase; (2) working space; (3) lesion removal; (4) reconstruction. Hence, alone or in combination with the well-known endonasal pathway, the transorbital avenue seems to be a useful approach for selected skull base lesions. We present our technique, along with an anatomic analysis on cadaveric specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed knowledge of surgical anatomy, and a specific stepwise analysis of each part of the surgical procedure, is notably useful in order to safely and effectively perform a superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital surgery to the skull base.

Extradural anterior clinoidectomy through endoscopic transorbital approach: laboratory investigation for surgical perspective.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic transorbital approach (eTOA) is a new mini-invasive procedure used to explore different areas of the skull base. Authors propose an extradural anterior clinoidectomy (AC) through this corridor, defining the anatomical landmarks of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) projection onto the posterior orbit wall and the technical feasibility of this approach. We describe the exposure of the opticocarotid region and the surgical freedom and the angles of attack obtained with this novel approach. METHODS: Five cadaver heads underwent an eTOA at the Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy of the University of Barcelona. A step-by-step description of the extradural endoscopic transorbital clinoidectomy was provided. A volumetric analysis of the morphometrics characteristics of the sphenoid wings was evaluated before and after dissection using CT scans. Pterional approach was performed to ascertain ACP removal. RESULTS: In all the specimens, it was possible to resect the ACP endo-orbitally aiming an optimal optic canal (OC) unroofing. The surface of the triangle corresponding to the ACP projection onto the posterior orbit wall was 0.42 ± 0.20 cm2. The drilled area to perform the extradural clinoidectomy via eTOA was 3.11 ± 2.27 cm2, and the volume of bone removal corresponding to the greater sphenoid wing (GSW) and lesser sphenoid wing (LSW) was 2.55 ± 1.41 and 0.26 ± 0.18 cm3 respectively. The area of surgical freedom provided by the eTOA was (3.11 ± 2.27cm2), and the angles of attack were 21.39 ± 9.13° in the horizontal axel and 30.63 ± 18.51° in the vertical. CONCLUSIONS: The described extradural anterior clinoidectomy by eTOA uses specific landmarks to localize the ACP on the posterior orbit wall. Resection of the ACP is a technically feasible approach, achieving the main goals of any clinoidectomy.

Biportal endoscopic transorbital approach: a quantitative anatomical study and clinical application.

BACKGROUND: We devised a biportal endoscopic transorbital approach (BiETOA) to gain surgical freedom by making a port for the endoscope and investigated the benefits and limitations of BiETOA. METHODS: A cylindrical port was designed and 3-D printed using biocompatible material. The port was inserted through a keyhole between the superolateral side of the orbital rim and the temporal muscle. An endoscope was inserted through the port, and other instruments were inserted through the conventional transorbital route. BiETOA was used to dissect eight cadaveric heads, and the angle of attack and surgical freedom were assessed. RESULTS: The mean maximal angle of attack was significantly different in BiETOA and endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) (P < 0.01) but not in BiETOA and ETOA lateral orbital rim (LOR) osteotomy (P = 0.207, P = 0.21). The mean surgical freedom was significantly different in BiETOA and ETOA (P < 0.01) and in BiETOA and ETOA LOR osteotomy (P < 0.01). In the clinical cases, tumors were removed successfully without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: BiETOA provided increased surgical freedom and better visibility of deep target lesion and resulted in good surgical and cosmetic outcomes.

Endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes to the petrous apex: anatomic comparative study of two pathways.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgical approaches to the petrous apex region are extremely challenging; while subtemporal approaches and variations represent the milestone of the surgical modules to reach such deep anatomical target, in a constant effort to develop minimally invasive neurosurgical routes, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been tested to get a viable corridor to the petroclival junction. Lately, another ventral endoscopic minimally invasive route, i.e., the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach, has been proposed to access the most lateral aspect of the skull base, including the petrous apex region. Our anatomic study aims to compare and combine such two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways to get full access to the petrous apex. Three-dimensional reconstructions and quantitative and morphometric data have been provided. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were dissected. The lab rehearsals were run as follows: (i) preliminary pre-operative CT scans of each specimen, (ii) pre-dissection planning of the petrous apex removal and its quantification, (iii) petrous apex removal via endoscopic endonasal route, (iv) post-operative CT scans, (v) petrous apex removal via endoscopic transorbital route, and (v) final post-operative CT scan with quantitative analysis. Neuronavigation was used to guide all dissections. RESULTS: The two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways allowed a different visualization and perspective of the petrous apex, and its surrounding neurovascular structures. After both corridors were completed, a communication between the surgical pathways was highlighted, in a so-called connection area, surrounded by the following important neurovascular structures: anteriorly, the internal carotid artery and the Gasserian ganglion; laterally, the internal acoustic canal; superiorly, the abducens nerve, the trigeminal root, and the tentorium cerebelli; inferomedially, the remaining clivus and the inferior petrosal sinus; and posteriorly, the exposed area of the brainstem. Used in a combined fashion, such multiportal approach provided a total of 97% of petrous apex removal. In particular, the transorbital route achieved a mean of 48.3% removal in the most superolateral portion of the petrous apex, whereas the endonasal approach provided a mean of 48.7% bone removal in the most inferomedial part. The difference between the two approaches was found to be not statistically significant (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: The multiportal combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to the petrous apex provides an overall bone removal volume of 97% off the petrous apex. In this paper, we highlighted that it was possible to uncover a common path between these two surgical pathways (endonasal and transorbital) in a so-called connection area. Potential indications of this multiportal approach may be lesions placed in or invading the petrous apex and petroclival regions that can be inadequately reached via transcranial paths or via an endonasal endoscopic route alone.

Endoscopic transorbital approach to anterolateral skull base through inferior orbital fissure: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transorbital approach (eTOA) has been announced as an alternative minimally invasive surgery to skull base. Owing to the inferior orbital fissure (IOF) connecting the orbit with surrounding pterygopalatine fossa (PPF), infratemporal fossa (ITF), and temporal fossa, the idea of eTOA to anterolateral skull base through IOF is postulated. The aim of this study is to access its practical feasibility. METHODS: Anatomical dissections were performed in five human cadaveric heads (10 sides) using 0-degree and 30-degree endoscopes. A stepwise description of eTOA to anterolateral skull base through IOF was documented. The anterosuperior corner of the maxillary sinus in the horizontal plane of the upper edge of zygomatic arch was defined as reference point (RP). The distances between the RP to the foramen rotundum (FR), foramen ovale (FO), and Gasserian ganglion (GG) were measured. The exposed area of anterolateral skull base in the coronal plane of the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus was quantified. RESULTS: The surgical procedure consisted of six steps: (1) lateral canthotomy with cantholysis and preseptal lower eyelid approach with periorbita dissection; (2) drilling of the ocular surface of greater sphenoid wing and lateral orbital rim osteotomy; (3) entry into the maxillary sinus and exposure of PPF and ITF; (4) mobilization of infraorbital nerve with drilling of the infratemporal surface of the greater sphenoid wing and pterygoid process; (5) exposure of middle cranial fossa, Meckel's cave, and lateral wall of cavernous sinus; and (6) reconstruction of orbital floor and lateral orbital rim. The distances measured were as follows: RP-FR = 45.0 ± 1.9 mm, RP-FO = 55.7 ± 0.5 mm, and RP-GG = 61.0 ± 1.6 mm. In comparison with the horizontal portion of greater sphenoid wing, the superior and inferior axes of the exposed area were 22.3 ± 2.1 mm and 20.5 ± 1.8 mm, respectively. With reference to the FR, the medial and lateral axes of the exposed area were 11.6 ± 1.1 mm and 15.8 ± 1.6 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The eTOA through IOF can be used as a minimally invasive surgery to access whole anterolateral skull base. It provides a possible resolution to target lesion involving multiple compartments of anterolateral skull base.

Endoscopic transorbital transtentorial approach to middle incisural space: preclinical cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transorbital approach is a novel development of minimally invasive skull base surgery. Recently, anatomical studies have started to discuss the expanded utilization of endoscopic transorbital route for intracranial intradural lesions. The goal of this cadaveric study is to assess the feasibility of endoscopic transorbital transtentorial approach for exposure of middle incisural space. METHODS: Anatomical dissections were performed in four human cadaveric heads (8 sides) using 0- and 30-degree endoscopes. A stepwise description of endoscopic transorbital transtentorial approach to middle incisural space and related anatomy was provided. RESULTS: Orbital manipulation following superior eyelid crease incision with lateral canthotomy and cantholysis established space for bone drilling. Extradural stage consisted of extensive drilling of orbital roof of frontal bone, lessor, and greater wings of sphenoid bone. Intradural stage was composed of dissection of sphenoidal compartment of Sylvian fissure, lateral mobilization of mesial temporal lobe, and penetration of tentorium. A cross-shaped incision of tentorium provided direct visualization of crural cistern with anterolateral aspect of cerebral peduncle and upper pons. Interpeduncular cistern, prepontine cistern, and anterior portions of ambient and cerebellopontine cisterns were exposed by 30-degree endoscope. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic transorbital transtentorial approach can be used as a minimally invasive surgery for exposure of middle incisural space. Extensive drilling of sphenoid wing and lateral mobilization of mesial temporal lobe are the main determinants of successful dissection. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical feasibility of this novel approach.

Endoscopic endo- and extra-orbital corridors for spheno-orbital region: anatomic study with illustrative case.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Management of selected spheno-orbital meningiomas via the endoscopic transorbital route has been reported. Surgical maneuverability in a narrow corridor as that offered by the orbit may be challenging. We investigate the additional use of an extra-orbital (EXO) path to be used in combination with the endo-orbital (EO) corridor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three human cadaveric heads (six orbits) were dissected at the Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy at the University of Barcelona. The superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach was adopted, introducing surgical instruments via both corridors. Surgical freedom analysis was run to determine directionality of each corridor and to calculate the surgical maneuverability related to three anatomic targets: superior orbital fissure (SOF), foramen rotundum (FR), and foramen ovale (FO). We also reported of a 37-year-old woman with a spheno-orbital meningioma with hyperostosis of the lateral wall of the right orbit, treated with such combined endo-orbital and extra-orbital endoscopic approach. RESULTS: Combining both endo-orbital and extra-orbital corridors permitted a greater surgical freedom for all the targets compared with the surgical freedom of each corridor alone (EO + EXO to SOF: 3603.8 mm2 ± 2452.5 mm2; EO + EXO to FR: 1533.0 mm2 ± 892.2 mm2; EO + EXO to FO: 1193.9 mm2 ± 782.6 mm2). Analyzing the extra-orbital pathway, our results showed that the greatest surgical freedom was gained in the most medial portion of the considered area, namely the SOF (1180.5 mm2 ± 648.3 mm2). Regarding the surgical case, using both pathways, we gained enough maneuverability to nearly achieve total resection with no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: An extra-orbital corridor may be useful to increase the instruments' maneuverability, during a pure endoscopic superior eyelid approach, and to reach the most medial portion of the surgical field from a lateral-to-medial trajectory. Further studies are needed to better define the proper indications for such strategy.

Endoscopic transorbital surgery for spheno-orbital lesions: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic transorbital approach has been recently proposed for the surgical management of spheno-orbital lesions as an alternative to craniotomy surgeries. METHOD: We analyze the technical nuances and what we have changed as our experience increased after the first operations performed for 12 different spheno-orbital lesions. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic transorbital approach is useful for the treatment of selected spheno-orbital lesions and could represent an interesting option in experienced hands. More studies are needed to fully understand its potentialities and limitations.

Endoscopic transorbital route to the petrous apex: a feasibility anatomic study.

BACKGROUND: While the subtemporal approach represents the surgical module milestone designed to reach the petrous apex, a novel ventral route, which is the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach, has been proposed to access the skull base. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of this route to the petrous apex, providing a qualitative and quantitative analysis of this relatively novel pathway. METHODS: Five human cadaveric heads were dissected at the Laboratory of Surgical NeuroAnatomy of the University of Barcelona. After proper dissection planning, anterior petrosectomy via the endoscopic transorbital route was performed. Specific quantitative analysis, as well as dedicated three-dimensional reconstruction, was done. RESULTS: Using the endoscopic transorbital approach, it was possible to reach the petrous apex with an average volume bone removal of 1.33 ± 0.21 cm3. Three main intradural spaces were exposed: cerebellopontine angle, middle tentorial incisura, and ventral brainstem. The first one was bounded by the origin of the trigeminal nerve medially and the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves laterally, the second extended from the origin of the oculomotor nerve to the entrance of the trochlear nerve into the tentorium free edge while the ventral brainstem area was hardly accessible through the straight, ventral endoscopic transorbital trajectory. CONCLUSION: This is the first qualitative and quantitative anatomic study concerning details of the lateral aspect of the incisura and ventrolateral posterior fossa reached via the transorbital window. This manuscript is intended as a feasibility anatomic study, and further clinical contributions are mandatory to confirm the effectiveness of this approach, defining its possible role in the neurosurgical armamentarium.

Exposure of the Cavernous Sinus via the Endoscopic Transorbital and Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches: A Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) and endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in terms of cavernous sinus (CS) exposure. METHODS: Four cadaveric heads (8 sides) were dissected. The CS was accessed using the EEA and ETOA. Stereotactic measurements of the length of the main structures exposed, angles of attack, depths of surgical corridor, and areas of exposure were obtained and compared between the approaches. An illustrative case is also presented. RESULTS: The endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) exposed the lateral and superior compartments of the CS without obstruction by the internal carotid artery (ICA). The EEA exposed all compartments after mobilizing the ICA. Both approaches enabled similar exposure of the cranial nerves. The depth of surgical corridor was significantly shorter with the ETOA (P < 0.01). The areas of lateral compartment exposure were similar. As the number of instruments placed into the surgical channel increased, the available angles of attack with the ETOA became smaller and were smaller than those of the EEA. In the clinical case presented, the tumor was successfully removed without complications. CONCLUSIONS: The ETOA has the advantages of a sterile surgical channel, short operation time, little patient trauma, short surgical corridor, large exposure area, and interdural pathway; moreover, it allows dissection through the interdural space without entering the neurovascular compartment of the CS. Although the space for manipulation of instruments is limited, the ETOA is suitable for treating selected tumors in the superior and lateral compartments of the CS.

Endoscopic transorbital and transcranial multiportal resection of a sphenoorbital meningiomas with custom bone 3D printing reconstruction: Case report.

BACKGROUND: Sphenoorbital meningiomas (SOM) harbor intrinsic features that render their surgical management and the reconstruction of the resulting bony defect overtly challenging. METHODS: A 70-year-old woman, harboring a long-standing left frontotemporal bony swelling conservatively managed, presented with progressive left proptosis. Radiological features were consistent with an en plaque SOM. A one-step multiportal transcranial and endoscopic transorbital approach (TOA) with custom bone three-dimensional (3D) printing reconstruction using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was scheduled. RESULTS: Postoperative functional and aesthetic results were excellent, with proptosis and calvarian deformity resolution. Tumor subtotal resection was achieved. Histopathological diagnosis confirmed a transitional meningioma (WHO grade I). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic TOA, isolated or as part of a multiportal strategy, has entered the surgical armamentarium for the treatment of SOMs. A customized PMMA cranioplasty can be considered a possible option for the reconstruction of large bony defects in a one-step fashion.

Transorbital and supraorbital uniportal multicorridor approach to the orbit, anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossa: Anatomic study.

Introduction: The transorbital route has been proposed for addressing orbital and paramedian skull base lesions. It can be complemented by further marginotomies, as per "extended-transorbital approach" and combined with others ventro-basal approaches featuring the concept of "multiportal surgery". Nevertheless, it cannot address some anatomical regions like the clinoid, carotid bifurcation and the Sylvian fissure. Therefore, we propose a combined transorbital and a supraorbital approach, attainable by a single infra-brow incision, and we called it "Uniportal multicorridor" approach. Research question: The aim of our study is to verify its feasibility and deep anatomical targets through a cadaveric study. Materials and methods: Anatomic dissections were performed at the Laboratory of ICLO Teaching and Research Center (Verona, Italy) on four formalin-fixed cadaveric heads injected with colored neoprene latex (8 sides). A stepwise dissection of the supraorbital and transorbital approaches (with an infra-brow skin incision) to the anterior tentorial incisura, clinoid area, lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, middle temporal fossa, posterior fossa, and Sylvian fissure is described. Results: We analyzed the anatomic areas reached by the transorbital corridor dividing them as follow: lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, middle temporal fossa, posterior fossa, and Sylvian fissure; while the anatomic areas addressed by the supraorbital craniotomy were the clinoid area and the anterior tentorial incisura. Conclusions: The described uniportal multi-corridor approach combines a transorbital corridor and a supraorbital craniotomy, providing a unique intra and extradural control over the anterior, middle, and posterior fossa, tentorial incisura and the Sylvian fissure, via an infra-brow skin incision.