Full spectrum flow cytometry-powered comprehensive analysis of PBMC as biomarkers for immunotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR-TKI resistance.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy has limited benefits in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) failure. However, data about efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy remain controversial, probably attributed to the heterogeneity among such population, and robust efficacy biomarkers are urgent to explore. METHODS: A total of 60 eligible patients who received ICI plus chemotherapy after EGFR-TKI treatment failure were enrolled, 24 of whom peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were collected at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment. We have designed a 23-color-antibody panel to detect PBMC by full spectrum flow cytometry. RESULTS: For EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC patients: 1) ICI plus chemotherapy achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 21.7% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.4 months. 2) clinical characteristics associated with worse efficacy included liver metastasis and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) > 200. 3) the proportion of immune cell subset associated with better efficacy was higher baseline effective CD4+T cells (E4). 4) the baseline expression of immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) on cell subsets associated with better efficacy included: higher expression of CD25 on dendritic cells (DC) and central memory CD8+T cells (CM8), and higher expression of Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) on effective memory CD8+T cells (EM8). 5) the expression of ICPs after 2 cycles of treatment associated with better efficacy included: higher expression of CD25 on CD8+T/EM8 /natural killer (NK) cells. 6) the dynamic changes of ICPs expression associated with worse efficacy included: significantly decrease of T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) expression on regular T cells (Tregs) and decrease of V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) expression on Th1. 7) a prediction model for the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy was successfully constructed with a sensitivity of 62.5%, specificity of 100%, and area under curve (AUC) = 0.817. CONCLUSIONS: Some EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC patients could indeed benefit from ICI plus chemotherapy, but most patients are primary resistant to immunotherapy. Comprehensive analysis of peripheral immune cells using full spectrum flow cytometry showed that compared to the proportion of cell subsets, the expression type and level of ICPs on immune cells, especially CD25, were significantly correlated with the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Osteosclerotic change as a therapeutic response to gefitinib in symptomatic non-small cell lung cancer bone metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in the overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, the effects of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment on bone metastasis remain unclear. This study investigated radiological responses to gefitinib regarding bone metastasis in patients. METHODS: We treated 260 patients with NSCLC and symptomatic bone metastasis. Thirty-seven patients harboring EGFR mutation were treated with gefitinib for more than 30 days and followed up for more than 3 months (GEF group). We performed a retrospective observational study by selecting 36 cases without EGFR-TKI treatment, at least 3 months of follow-up, and at least two radiological evaluations as the control group. We assessed the best overall radiological response, interval from treatment initiation to appearance of a radiological response, and the local response maintenance rate. RESULTS: The best effect in the GEF group was 98% partial response or better, which was significantly higher than the 57% observed in the control group (p < 0.001). The GEF and control groups maintained 83% and 42% local response maintenance rates at one year, respectively (p < 0.001). In the GEF with radiotherapy group, the local response maintenance rate was maintained at 92% at 1 year, while in the GEF without RT group, there was a decrease in the local response maintenance rate from 270 days. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib treatment for bone metastases in patients harboring EGFR mutation resulted in a beneficial osteosclerotic change in most patients. Combined gefitinib and radiotherapy provide long-lasting local control of bone metastases.

Phase I study of TAS-121, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

Purpose We investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of TAS-121, a novel, potent, and highly selective third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in Japanese patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with EGFR-TKI. Methods This was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center, dose escalation, phase I study conducted in three phases (dose escalation, expansion, and extension phases). TAS-121 was administered orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) under fasting conditions in a 21-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during Cycle 1 of the dose escalation phase. Results In total, 134 patients received treatment. Five and three patients presented a DLT with the QD and BID regimens, respectively. The DLTs were drug-induced liver injury, platelet count decreased, urticaria, interstitial lung disease, and left ventricular failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 10 mg/day QD and 8 mg/day BID in the dose escalation phase. The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were dermatological toxicity (89.6%), platelet count decreased (67.2%), and pyrexia (44%) among all patients. Rate of discontinuations due to ADRs at the MTD level were 11.1% with TAS-121 10 mg/day QD and 7.9% with TAS-121 8 mg/day BID. Among 86 T790M-positive patients (confirmed by blood serum sampling in most patients), the objective response rate (ORR) was 28% and highest at 8 mg/day BID (39%). Among 16 T790M-negative patients, the ORR was 19%. Conclusions TAS-121 was well tolerated up to the MTD and demonstrated antitumor activity in Japanese T790M-positive NSCLC patients. Clinical trial registration: JapicCTI-142651.

Case report: EGFR-TKI rechallenge after osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease: a case report and literature review.

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, EGFR-TKI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD), a well-known adverse effect, can seriously affect the treatment outcome. There is currently no international consensus on the efficacy and safety of re-administration of EGFR-TKI after EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. Case summary: We report a case of a 62-year-old male with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR L858R mutation who was treated with osimertinib at a dose of 80 mg/day as first-line therapy. On the sixth day of treatment, the patient developed grade 4 ILD, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and paroxysmal dry cough. Arterial blood gas analysis indicated the presence of type I respiratory failure, while the chest CT scan revealed newly developed ground-glass opacities in both lungs and a considerable amount of pleural effusion on the left side. Subsequently, the patient was administered methylprednisolone for anti-inflammatory therapy, in conjunction with oxygen therapy, anti-infection treatment, and closed thoracic drainage, which resulted in a favourable recovery and discharge after 18 days. During this period, the patient adhered to third-generation EGFR-TKI oral targeted therapy. Nevertheless, within a week of discharge, the patient was readmitted due to the recurrence of chest tightness and shortness of breath. A chest CT scan indicated a recurrent ILD. Despite the administration of high-dose methylprednisolone for 9 days, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate, ultimately resulting in death. Conclusion: It is of the utmost importance to conduct a meticulous evaluation of the severity of osimertinib-induced ILD in order to ascertain the potential risks and benefits of EGFR-TKI rechallenge. Particularly, for patients with grade 4 ILD, firm drug discontinuation should be considered.

Negative impact of ratio of the microvascular area to tumor area on the response to EGFR-TKI in non-small cell lung cancer with an EGFR mutation.

Background: The clinical impact of tumor microvessels on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether a tumor microenvironment, abundant in microvessels, affects EGFR-TKI efficacy in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations. Methods: We retrospectively studied the data of 40 post-operative patients with recurrent NSCLC and EGFR mutations who received EGFR-TKIs as a first-line treatment at Kumamoto University Hospital from January 2010 to February 2021. Tumor sections were retrieved from the tissue registry and analyzed for CD34-positive microvessels using immunohistochemical techniques. The ratio of microvascular area to tumor area (RMV), which is the CD34-positive microvascular area compared to the total tumor area, was measured using StrataQuest. The predictive value of RMV on treatment outcome, assessed via progression-free survival (PFS), was evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The median PFS in the high RMV group (≥0.058) was significantly shorter than that in the low RMV group [<0.058; 296 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 217-374 vs. 918 days, 95% CI: 279-1,556, P=0.002]. Multivariate analysis revealed that high RMV was an independent negative predictor of PFS (hazard ratio, 3.21; 95% CI: 1.18-8.76, P=0.022). Conclusions: High RMV may critically affect EGFR-TKI resistance in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations.

Efficacy of ICI-based treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1≥50% who developed EGFR-TKI resistance.

Introduction: Platinum-based chemotherapy is still the standard of care for Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after developing EGFR-TKI resistance. However, no study focusing on the role of immuno checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based treatments for EGFR mutated NSCLC patients who carried programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) greater than 50% progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the outcomes of ICI-based treatments for EGFR mutated NSCLC patients carried PD-L1 TPS≥50% after developing EGFR-TKI resistance and to explore the population that may benefited from ICI-based treatment. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and PD-L1 TPS≥50% who have failed prior EGFR-TKI therapies without T790M mutation at Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2018 and June 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were utilized to evaluate the outcomes of this study. Results: A total of 146 patients were included. Up to June 20th, 2022, median follow-up was 36.7 months (IQR, 12.5-44.2 months). Among the population, 66 patients (45.2%) received chemotherapy, the remaning (54.8%) received ICI-based treatment, including 56 patients(70.0%) received ICI combined with chemotherapy (IC) and 24 patients (30.0%) received ICI monotherapy (IM). In IC group,31 patients received ICI combined with chemotherapy,19 patients received ICI combined with antiangiogenic therapy and remaing received ICI combined with chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. Survival analysis shown that patients who received ICI-based treatment had better progress-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those treated with other therapy (median PFS, 10.0 vs. 4.0 months, P<0.001; median OS, 39.5 vs. 24.2 months, P<0.001). What's more, patients who treated with IC treatment had a superior survival time than those received IM treatment (median PFS, 10.3 vs. 7.0 months, P<0.001; median OS, 41.6 vs. 32.4 months, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis found that the PFS and OS benefit of IC was evident in all subgroups. Conclusions: For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and PD-L1 TPS≥50% who have failed prior EGFR-TKI therapies without T790M mutation, ICI-based treatment could provide a more favorable survival than classical chemotherapy. What' s more, compared with ICI monotherapy, ICI combined with chemotherapy seems to be the preferred treatment.

Rechallenge of afatinib for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with osimertinib: a multicenter phase II trial protocol (REAL study).

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and contributed to the development of precision medicine. Osimertinib is a standard first-line (1L) treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC and has demonstrated superior survival benefits over previous-generation TKIs. However, resistance to osimertinib is nearly inevitable, and subsequent treatment strategies remain unmet medical needs in this setting. Afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, exhibits activity against certain uncommon EGFR mutation types in the 1L setting. There are a few case reports on the efficacy of afatinib against EGFR-dependent resistance after osimertinib treatment, although these have not been prospectively investigated. Methods: The present phase II, single-arm multicenter trial aims to verify the efficacy and safety of afatinib rechallenge after 1L osimertinib resistance. Patients (aged ≥20 years) with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations (deletion of exon 19 or L858R) who were previously treated with 1L osimertinib and second-line chemotherapy other than TKIs are considered eligible. Undergoing next-generation sequence-based comprehensive genomic profiling is one of the key inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate; the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, and tolerability. Thirty patients will be recruited in December 2023. Discussion: The results of this study may promote incorporating afatinib rechallenge into the treatment sequence after 1L osimertinib resistance, a setting in which concrete evidence has not been yet established. Registration: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000049225.

Corrigendum: Advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M harbouring TP53 R273C or KRAS G12V cannot benefit from osimertinib based on a clinical multicentre study by tissue and liquid biopsy.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.621992.].

A protocol of a single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of ramucirumab and erlotinib in treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (SPIRAL-BRAIN study).

Background: The combination of erlotinib, a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), and ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) antibody, is one of the most effective treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR mutation. However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of this combination treatment for patients with brain metastases. Methods: This single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study will recruit 32 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation (except for T790M mutation) and brain metastases (asymptomatic or mild symptoms). Patients will be treated with erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/body once daily and ramucirumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is intracranial overall response rate (iORR) and the secondary endpoints are intracranial disease control rate, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial ORR, extracranial PFS, ORR, overall PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned number of enrollments was calculated based on a one-sample binomial test (normal approximation) with a two-sided α level of 5% and 80% power, assuming that the expected iORR is 65% and the iORR threshold is 40%. Discussion: A prospective study to confirm the safety and efficacy of the combined erlotinib plus ramucirumab treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases is ongoing. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051220059.

An exploration of the clinical progression models of osimertinib in the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Classifying the progression pattern had been proved to be momentous for predicting efficacy and guiding treatment in the 1st/2nd generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), while lack evidence in the 3rd generation EGFR-TKIs. This study aimed to classify tumor progression of osimertinib in EGFR+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exploring the characteristics and the clinical significance of each progression pattern. Methods: After screening 1,125 lung cancer patients, 168 EGFR T790M+ advanced patients using osimertinib were enrolled and divided into two groups and five clinical progression models according to the time course of the tumor progression. The prognosis and characteristics, such as gender, age, metastases, of each model were analyzed and compared by Kaplan-Meier method, t-test, and linear regression. Results: Complete follow-up data were available for 117 of the 168 patients. Progressive disease (PD) occurred in 89 patients at an average onset of 6.59 months since using osimertinib, with 79.78% of patients experiencing enlargement of some preexisting lesions before PD. Among the five progression models, the 'Rapid Enlargement' (10.11%) model, the 'Rapid New Lesion' model (10.11%), the 'Delayed Enlargement' model (29.21%), the 'Delayed New Lesion' model (15.73%), and the 'Non-targeted Enlargement' model (34.83%), the 'Non-targeted Enlargement' model had the worst prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.1 months (P=0.046). The mPFS of other models was similar, with the largest difference in the time interval between the beginning of osimertinib treatment to the first appearance of target lesion enlargement (Tm-e). Smoking history (P=0.046) and the location of the initial (P=0.048), enlarged (P=0.003), and progressive lesions (P=0.002) affected the progression models, while gender, age, and treatment lines had no effect. The Tm-e was related to the overall disease control time with a correlation coefficient of 0.667 (P=0.000). The appearance of a malignant pleural effusion had an impact on progression. Conclusions: We tried to create a classification system for describing the failure of the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib including two groups, subdivided into five progression models based on the time course of tumor lesion changes. The system might be conducive to predict the prognosis and be potential to assist in selecting subsequent treatment strategies.

Osimertinib showed efficacy on contralateral multiple ground-glass nodules after segmentectomy for lung adenocarcinoma harboring primary EGFR-T790M mutation: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Multiple ground-glass nodules (mGGNs) in the lung has been defined as synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC), it is has been very difficult challenging to differentiate SMPLC from intrapulmonary metastases, and its treatment remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case simultaneously involving mGGNs and lung adenocarcinoma harboring primary EGFR-T790M mutation, in which the patient underwent the radical resection of lesions in the left upper lung, and continued the osimertinib treatment for the residual mGGNs in all lobes of the right lung. These mGGNs displayed different responses to osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS: We reported a successful strategy on the postoperative treatment for mGGNs. For those that cannot be completely resected, the chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy have been performed instead. The EGFR-TKI therapy strategy showed significant advantages, but how to achieve even better therapeutic effect needs more researches.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced EGFR-Mutated non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs: Real-World evidence from a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pretreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is controversial. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to examine the efficacy of ICIs in a real world setting. Patients and methods: We collected 116 consecutive NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations who received ICIs alone or in combination after failure to respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and 99 patients were included for final analysis. The impacts of ICIs on the patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The relationships between outcomes and clinical characteristics were analyzed. Results: The ORR in patients with target lesions was 31.25% (95% CI: 22.18-41.52), and the DCR in all patients was 65.66% (95% CI: 55.44-74.91). The overall median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.6), and the median OS was 15.9 months (95% CI: 10.8-23.8). The outcomes were better in patients receiving combination therapy with ECOG scores of 0-1 and no more than 2 lines of prior therapy, with a median PFS of 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-13.3) and a median OS of 29.0 months (95% CI: 11.7-NE). Primary EGFR mutation type and treatment mode were found to have a notable impact on clinical outcomes. Both median PFS and OS in patients with EGFR L858R mutation were significantly shorter than those in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) (PFS: 2.5 versus 6.7 months, HR: 1.80, log-rank P=0.011; OS: 9.8 versus 26.9 months, HR: 2.48, log-rank P=0.002). Patients receiving combination therapy had notably longer median PFS and OS than those receiving monotherapy (PFS: 5.2 versus 3.0 months, HR: 0.54, log-rank P=0.020; OS: 19.0 versus 7.4 months, HR: 0.46, log-rank P=0.009). Conclusions: Our study suggests that ICI-based combination therapy is a potential strategy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI failure. The efficacy may differ according to EGFR subtypes.

Clinical practice of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeted drugs combined with gadolinium oxide nanoparticles in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

It was to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) targeted drugs combined with hyaluronic acid-gadolinium sesquioxide-nanoparticles (HA-Gd2O3-NPs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, 70 patients with stage IV EGFR mutant NSCLC diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University were selected. They were randomly divided into the combined group (35 cases) and the control group (35 cases). HA-Gd2O3-NPs were prepared by hydrothermal polymerization, and combined with EGFR-TKI in the clinical treatment of NSCLC. The results showed that HA-Gd2O3-NPs were spherical with a uniform particle size of about 124 nm. The NSCLC survival rate of the combined group was 37.2 ± 5.3% under 6 Gy X-ray irradiation, and that of the control group was 98.4 ± 12.6% under 6 Gy X-ray irradiation. The total effective rate of the control group (20%) was significantly lower than that of the study group (42.86%) (P < 0.05). The one-year survival rate of the combined group (94%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (75%) (P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the control group was 8 months, and that in the combined group was 12 months, with statistical difference (P < 0.05). EGFR-TKI targeted drugs combined with HA-Gd2O3-NPs can significantly improve the clinical efficacy of stage IV EGFR mutant NSCLC patients and benefit their survival.

Efficacy of newly discovered DNA aptamers targeting AXL in a lung cancer cell with acquired resistance to Erlotinib.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidences indicate that AXL overexpression or activation is associated with cancer progression and acquired resistance to targeted anti-cancer drugs such as epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Despite recent development of several drugs that target multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), drugs that selectively target AXL signaling are extremely rare. Short nucleic acid aptamers are non-immunogenic molecules with high binding affinity and specificity to their target molecules that could potentially be used as a novel cancer treatment. METHODS: Modified-DNA aptamers were selected on the basis of its ability to bind recombinant human AXL. AXL aptamers were selected for their inhibition of AXL and then selected aptamers were tested for their use to overcome acquired resistant to EGFR-TKI on a lung cancer cell with acquired resistance to erlotinib. RESULTS: These new AXL aptamers inhibited cell viability to an extent of 30-40% in HCC827/ER cells with acquired resistance to erlotinib. The possible mechanism of overcoming the acquired resistance may be by inhibiting the activation of Akt and Erk. Although, aptamers effectively decreased cell viability of erlotinib-resistant cell line, the combination of aptamers and erlotinib did not synergistically decrease the survival of the resistant cell line. CONCLUSIONS: We developed newly modified DNA aptamers that selectively bind to AXL receptors, and assessed their efficacy in a human lung cancer cell with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI.

Next-generation sequencing of tissue and circulating tumor DNA: Resistance mechanisms to EGFR targeted therapy in a cohort of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) has been considered as an effective treatment in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant (EGFR-mutant) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most patients develop acquired resistance eventually. Here, we compared and analyzed the genetic alterations between tissue assay and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and further explored the resistance mechanisms after EGFR-TKI treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR), Cobas® ARMS-PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on tissue samples after pathological diagnosis. Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and NGS were performed on plasma samples. The association between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included. The success rate of re-biopsy was 91.89% (34/37). The total detection rate of EGFR T790M was 62.16% (23/37) and the consistency between tissue and ctDNA was 78.26% (18/23). Thirty-four patients were analyzed retrospectively. For tissue re-biopsy, 24 patients harbored concomitant mutations. Moreover, tissue re-biopsy at resistance showed 21 patients (21/34, 61.76%) had the concomitant somatic mutation. The three most frequent concomitant mutations were TP53 (18/34, 52.94%), MET (4/34, 11.76%), and PIK3CA (4/34, 11.76%). Meanwhile, 21 patients (21/34, 61.76%) with EGFR T790M mutation. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were better in patients with T790M mutation (p = 0.010 and p = 0.017) or third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.073). Interestingly, concomitant genetic alterations were significantly associated with a worse prognosis for patients with EGFR T790M mutation receiving third-generation EGFR-TKIs (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-platforms are feasible and highly consistent for re-biopsy after EGFR-TKI resistance. Concomitant genetic alterations may be associated with a poor prognosis for patients with EGFR T790M mutation after third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Advanced NSCLC Patients With EGFR T790M Harboring TP53 R273C or KRAS G12V Cannot Benefit From Osimertinib Based on a Clinical Multicentre Study by Tissue and Liquid Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) almost always acquire resistance, and the development of novel techniques analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have made it possible for liquid biopsy to detect genetic alterations from limited amount of DNA with less invasiveness. While a large amount of patients with EGFR exon 21 p.Thr790 Met (T790M) benefited from osimertinib treatment, acquired resistance to osimertinb has subsequently become a growing challenge. METHODS: We performed tissue and liquid rebiopsy on 50 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Plasma samples underwent droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) examinations. Corresponding tissue samples underwent NGS and Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Cobas) examinations. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients evaluated, the mutation detection rates of liquid biopsy group and tissue biopsy group demonstrated no significant differences (41/48, 85.4% vs. 44/48, 91.7%; OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.15 to 1.95). Overall concordance, defined as the proportion of patients for whom at least one identical genomic alteration was identified in both tissue and plasma, was 78.3% (36/46, 95% CI=0.39 to 2.69). Moreover, our results showed that almost half of the patients (46%, 23/50) resistant to first-generation EGFR-TKI harbored p.Thr790 Met (T790M) mutation. 82.6% (19/23) of the T790M positive patients were analyzed by liquid biopsy and 60.9% (14/23) by tumor tissue sequencing. Meanwhile, a wide range of uncommon mutations was detected, and novel mechanisms of osimertinib resistance were discovered. In addition, 16.7% (2/12) of the T790M positive patients with either TP53 R237C or KRAS G12V failed to benefit from the subsequent osimertinib treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasized that liquid biopsy is applicable to analyze the drug resistance mechanisms of NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, we discovered two uncommon mutations, TP53 R273C and KRAS G12V, which attenuates the effectiveness of osimertinib.

High serum C-reactive protein levels predict survival in patients with treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies greatly depending on whether or not it can receive molecular-targeted drug treatment including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We investigated the clinical utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels measured at the time of diagnosis in EGFR-mutant and wild-type NSCLC patients who had undergone first-line therapy. METHODS: Serum CRP levels were analyzed in 213 patients, of whom 89 patients had advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. We used Cox proportional hazards models to study the relationship between CRP and overall survival (OS). CRP cutoff values were obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Mean serum CRP level in treated NSCLC patients were not significantly different in patients with or without EGFR mutations. The optimal CRP cutoff values were 8.1 mg/L for EGFR-mutated NSCLC and 16.7 mg/L for EGFR-wild NSCLC. Based on multivariate analysis, high CRP level (EGFR-mutated, HR: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.331-4.619, P=0.004; EGFR-wild, HR: 3.625, 95% CI: 2.149-6.116, P<0.001) was a significant and independent negative prognostic factor for OS in patients with or without EGFR mutations. CONCLUSIONS: High CRP levels predicted a lack of response to treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with or without EGFR mutations. Thus, the CRP level is a good and easy to use prognostic factor and objective indicator for clinical practice.

Anlotinib or platinum-pemetrexed as second-line therapy in EGFR T790M-negative lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Clinical management of T790M-negative patients after first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment failure is controversial. Anlotinib is a novel multi-target TKI for tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation, and it has been approved as a thirdline or beyond treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of anlotinib as a second-line therapy compared with platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in T790M-negative patients after first-line EGFR-TKIs failed remains unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 20 patients who were given anlotinib and 42 patients who received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy as a control after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy progression. All the patients were confirmed to be T790M-negative using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test. The primary end point included progression-free survival (PFS) time, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate. RESULTS: The duration of PFS was significantly longer in the platinum-pemetrexed group than in the anlotinib group (median, 4.5 vs. 3.0 months; HR, 1.972; 95% CI, 1.078 to 3.607; P=0.021). The response rate was significantly better in the platinum-pemetrexed group (30.9%) than that in the anlotinib group (15%), and disease control rate (DCR) of both groups was 70% and 83%, respectively. All the adverse events in anlotinib group appeared to be manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib was less effective than platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in T790M-negative NSCLC patients after disease progression with first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy failure.

Effect of ß-Blocker in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving First-Generation EGFR-TKIs.

BACKGROUND: Through activation of adrenergic receptors, chronic stress can trigger the secretion of neurotransmitters and hormones that enhance tumor growth, increase angiogenesis, and promote drug resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ß-blockers in patients receiving first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma under first-line EGFR-TKIs between 2011 and 2014 in the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The effects of ß-blockers use, defined as ≥60 defined daily doses within 180 days before initiation of EGFR-TKI therapy, on the 2-year time-to-discontinuation (TTD) of EGFR-TKIs and 4-year overall survival (OS) were investigated using Cox regression analyses with inverse propensity score weighting and sensitivity analysis in subgroup with either hypertension or ischemic heart diseases. RESULTS: Among 4988 enrolled patients, 552 (11.1%) were in the ß-blocker group. Patients in the ß-blocker group were more likely to be older than 75 and had diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular comorbidities. In Cox regression analysis, ß-blocker usage was associated with a longer TTD (hazard ratio, HR: 0.91 [0.86-0.96]) and OS (HR: 0.68 [0.64-0.72]). The results also favored ß-blocker group in sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naïve patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma under first-line EGFR-TKIs, prior use of ß-blocker was associated with a better outcome. The findings encourage further prospective clinical study to validate the possibility of ß-blockers as adjuvant anticancer therapy.

Concomitant genetic alterations are associated with response to EGFR targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are considered to be more effective than chemotherapy in the treatment of EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in addition to EGFR-sensitive mutations, the genetic factors that affect the prognosis of patients who receive TKI treatment are not yet clear. METHODS: The clinical data of 36 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation who received TKI treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Liquid re-biopsy with next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed to analyze genetic alterations and potential resistance mechanisms. RESULTS: All of the patients harbored actionable sensitive EGFR mutations by NGS, with the major types being 19del or 21L858R (52.78%, 19/36 and 55.56%, 20/36, respectively). The 3 most frequent accompanying somatic mutations were TP53 (12, 48.4%), KRAS (7, 19.44%) and PIK3CA (3, 8.33%). Concomitant mutations were present in 16 patients (44.44%). The occurrence of co-mutation was found to be significantly related to a history of smoking [87.5% (7 of 8) vs. 32.14% (9 of 28); Pearson chi-square, P=0.005]. Patients who received EGFR-TKIs treatment (P=0.0079) or third-generation EGFR-TKIs only (P=0.0468) had better progression-free survival (PFS). Concomitant mutations were significantly related to lower objective response rates (43.75% vs. 80.0%; P=0.024) and poorer PFS (P<0.001). Patients with concomitant genetic alterations had a worse response after receiving EGFR-TKIs treatment (P=0.0033). CONCLUSIONS: Our research underscores the importance of using multiple molecular profiles. Concomitant genetic alterations were significantly associated with response to EGFR targeted therapy in NSCLC. Therefore, research on multi-drug or sequential therapy to address the covariation that drives drug resistance is urgently needed.