Therapist Adherence to Two Treatments for Adolescent Suicide Risk: Association to Outcomes and Role of Therapeutic Alliance.

In psychotherapy research, adherence refers to the extent to which therapists deliver a treatment as intended. This study examined whether therapist adherence to two different manualized treatments was associated with improved client outcomes and whether the association was moderated by therapeutic alliance. The study sample included 320 video recordings of therapy sessions from 118 cases in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) with family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy (FE-NST). Recordings were selected from early, middle, and late stages of treatment. The adherence measure consisted of 24 items representing essential therapist interventions from both treatments. Trained raters coded tapes from both therapies. Adolescent self-report of alliance was measured at session 4. Adherence to ABFT was associated with a significant increase in family cohesion at mid-treatment but not at posttreatment. Adherence to FE-NST was significantly associated with an increase in suicide ideation posttreatment. Using therapeutic alliance as a moderator, adherence to ABFT was significantly associated with a reduction in suicide ideation, family conflict, and higher client satisfaction posttreatment. Alliance did not positively affect the association of FE-NST adherence to outcomes. Findings suggest that adherence to ABFT interventions may be better linked to treatment outcomes when adolescents feel a strong alliance with their therapist. Implications for future research and therapist training are explored.

En la investigación sobre psicoterapia, la adhesión se refiere al grado en el cual los terapeutas brindan un tratamiento según lo previsto. Este estudio analizó si la adhesión del terapeuta a dos tratamientos estandarizados diferentes estuvo asociada con mejores resultados en los pacientes y si la asociación estuvo moderada por la alianza terapéutica. La muestra del estudio incluyó 320 videograbaciones de sesiones de terapia de 118 casos en un ensayo aleatorizado controlado donde se comparó la terapia familiar basada en el apego (TFBA) con la terapia de apoyo no directiva optimizada por la familia (TAND-OF). Se eligieron grabaciones de las etapas iniciales, intermedias y finales del tratamiento. El instrumento de medición de la adhesión consistió en 24 ítems que representaban intervenciones esenciales del terapeuta de ambos tratamientos. Un grupo de calificadores capacitados codificaron las grabaciones de ambas terapias. El autoinforme de alianza de los adolescentes se midió en la cuarta sesión. La adhesión a la TFBA estuvo asociada con un aumento considerable de la cohesión familiar en la mitad del tratamiento, pero no después del tratamiento. La adhesión a la TAND-OF estuvo asociada considerablemente con un aumento de la ideación suicida después del tratamiento. Utilizando la alianza terapéutica como moderadora, la adhesión a la TFBA estuvo asociada considerablemente con una reducción de la ideación suicida, el conflicto familiar y una mayor satisfacción del paciente después del tratamiento. La alianza no afectó positivamente la asociación de la adhesión a la TAND-OF con los resultados. Los resultados sugieren que la adhesión a las intervenciones de TFBA puede asociarse mejor con los resultados del tratamiento cuando los adolescentes sienten una alianza fuerte con su terapeuta. Se analizan las implicancias para futuras investigaciones y para la capacitación de los terapeutas.

What Does it Mean to be a Common Factors Informed Family Therapist?

The common factors paradigm in couple and family therapy has gained popularity over the past several decades, leading many therapists to refer to themselves as common factors family therapists. Despite this, no consensus exists on what it means to be a common factors family therapist, or if such a designation even makes sense given that the common factors paradigm is not a model. Synthesizing the existing common factors literature, a case is made for the designation "common factors informed family therapist," and the following six core principles are outlined that characterize this designation: (1) sees overlap among theories; (2) passionate about theory, not a theory; (3) client centered; (4) monitors hope and the therapeutic alliance; (5) views clients as people rather than objects; and (6) prioritizes healing over therapy. Each of the concepts is discussed in depth, and clinical implications are provided.

El paradigma de factores comunes en la terapia de parejas y familiar ha cobrado popularidad en las últimas décadas, haciendo que muchos terapeutas se refieran a sí mismos como terapeutas de factores comunes. A pesar de esto, no hay un consenso acerca de qué significa ser un terapeuta de factores comunes, o si dicha designación realmente tiene sentido, dado que el paradigma de factores comunes no es un modelo. A base de una síntesis de la literatura de factores comunes existente, se aboga por la designación "terapeuta familiar informado por factores comunes", y se esbozan seis principios fundamentales que caracterizan esta designación; 1) ve que las teorías se entrecruzan; 2) apasionado por lo teórico, no por una teoría; 3) centrado en los clientes; 4) está pendiente de la esperanza y la alianza terapéutica; 5) ve a los clientes como personas en vez de objetos; y 6) se preocupa más por la sanación que por la terapia. Se discute cada concepto a profundidad y se proporcionan las implicaciones clínicas.

Family Therapy for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders: A Critical Review.

Eating disorder-focused family therapy has emerged as the strongest evidence-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa, supported by evidence from nine RCTs, and there is increasing evidence of its efficacy in treating adolescent bulimia nervosa (three RCTs). There is also emerging evidence for the efficacy of multifamily therapy formats of this treatment, with a recent RCT demonstrating the benefits of this approach in the treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa. In this article, we critically review the evidence for eating disorder-focused family therapy through the lens of a moderate common factors paradigm. From this perspective, this treatment is likely to be effective as it provides a supportive and nonblaming context that: one, creates a safe, predictable environment that helps to contain anxiety generated by the eating disorder; two, promotes specific change early on in treatment in eating disorder-related behaviors; and three, provides a vehicle for the mobilization of common factors such as hope and expectancy reinforced by the eating disorder expertise of the multidisciplinary team. In order to improve outcomes for young people, there is a need to develop an improved understanding of the moderators and mediators involved in this treatment approach. Such an understanding could lead to the refining of the therapy, and inform adaptations for those families who do not currently benefit from treatment.

Psicoterapias postestructuralistas y factores de cambio: posibilidades para una práctica efectiva / Poststructuralist psychotherapies and change factors: possibilities for effective practice

The evidence in psychotherapy out come research points to the importance of the common factors in therapeutic change, which depend largely on patient participation. Models of post-structuralist orientation in systemic psychotherapy promote direct and explicitly change/common factors, as the therapeutic alliance, expectatives and extra-therapeutic factors, allowing the accommodation, relevant instance giving the consultant a decisive role for therapeutic change. The poststructuralist models are good instances formational, especially for the acquisition of skill stomobilize change factors.

La evidencia en investigación de resultados en psicoterapia señala la relevancia de los factores comunes en el cambio terapéutico, los cuales dependen en buena medida de la participación y protagonismo del paciente. Los modelos de orientación post-estructuralista en psicoterapia sistémica promueven de forma directa y explícita los factores de cambio/comunes, como la alianza terapéutica, las expectativas y los factores extra-terapéuticos, permitiendo la acomodación, instancia relevante que otorga al consultante un rol decisivo para el cambio terapéutico. Los modelos posestructuralistas son buenas instancias formativas, en especial para la adquisición de destrezas que movilicen factores de cambio.

De qué hablamos (los psiquiatras) cuando hablamos de psicoterapia / What we (psychiatrists) talk when we talk about psychotherapy

Basado en casi 40 años de práctica de psicoterapia, tanto en la consulta privada como en instituciones psiquiátricas, revisamos algunas definiciones y los datos más relevantes de la investigación en psicoterapia sobre alianza terapéutica, factores comunes y “mecanismos” del proceso de cambio. Finalmente presentamos la psicoterapia de apoyo como el modelo “por defecto” y probablemente el más utilizado por los psiquiatras.

Based on almost 40 years of psychotherapy practice -office-based and in psychiatric institutions-, we review some definitions and the most relevant psychotherapy research data on therapeutic alliance, common factors and "mechanisms" of the change process. Finally we present supportive psychotherapy as the "default" model and probably the most used by psychiatrists.