Retrospective analysis of negative cytology results correlated with a positive high-risk in the human papillomavirus result and subsequent results of patients over a period of three years.

This research paper evaluates the efficacy of co-testing in precluding cervical cancer, with a particular focus on distinguishable outcomes of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vs. cytology tests. A retrospective review of 5948 patients, who tested positive for high-risk HPV but showed negative cytologic findings, revealed that 15.006% tested positive in subsequent screenings. A comparative analysis of various commercial HPV tests highlighted the precision of mRNA-based HPV testing by Aptima (Hologic) in reducing the likelihood of false-negative cytology. The paper challenges the conviction that a negative cytology alone suffices advocating for a condensed testing interval in instances of positive HPV outcomes, thereby facilitating earlier intervention and optimal preventive care. These findings unveil an exigency for reconsidering preventive strategies based on test outcomes.

Underestimated risk of cancer in solitary thyroid nodules ≥3 cm reported as benign.

BACKGROUND: The study aims to assess the risk of cancer in solitary thyroid nodules ≥30 mm in size reported as Bethesda II, and its implications. METHOD: The clinical records of 202 patients, who underwent thyroid lobectomy for solitary nodules measuring ≥30 mm, reported as Bethesda II on preoperative FNAC between Jan 2015 and Apr 2016 were reviewed. Data collected included nodule size and consistency, and final histopathology results. The risk of cancer and the recommended management according to ATA guidelines were the outcomes of interest. Comparisons were then made between two size categories: (30-40 mm; n = 72; C1) and (>40 mm; n = 130; C2), and two nodule consistencies. RESULTS: Mean nodule size was 43.2 mm (range 30-92). Ninety-five percent were solid and 5% were predominantly cystic. The risk of cancer was 22.8% (46/202) with no size threshold, or graded increase in risk observed. Based on biologic behavior, 50% of cancers were considered clinically significant. Accordingly, the risk of cancer for which surgery is recommended was 11.4% (23/202). The risk of cancer requiring total thyroidectomy was 9.4% and was influenced by nodule size (19 vs. 60% in C1 and C2, respectively; p = 0.01). Predominantly cystic nodules had a greater risk of malignancy compared to predominantly solid nodules even after adjusting for size (40 vs. 9.9%; p = 0.01 and 40 vs. 12.5%; p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: The risk of malignancy in Bethesda II solitary nodules ≥30 mm is considerable implying a need for changing the way these are approached and refining cytopathology reporting.

Reasons for truly negative cytology reports preceding the diagnoses of invasive cervical cancer-Results of a false-negative cytology audit in Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.

BACKGROUND: False-negative (FN) results in cervical cancer (CC) screening pose significant risk for participants and should be audited. The aim of the study was to analyse the results of audit of FN slides collected in 2010-2013 in Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program (CCSP) and to seek for risk factors of obtaining true-negative result (TN; not containing abnormal cells as confirmed in audit) before CC diagnosis. METHODS: Screening database was merged with National Cancer Registry to identify negative slides preceding histologically confirmed CC diagnosis up to 42 months. Two blinding slides were randomly assigned per each FN. The whole set was reassessed independently by three pathologists with 30 years of experience in cytology evaluation. Final audit result was established in the case of ≥2 coherent reports. Agreement rates and kappa (κ) coefficients were calculated. Logistic analysis of risk factors for obtaining TN result was performed. RESULTS: Of 374 included FNs, 204 were considered abnormal (54.6%) and 91 were confirmed negative for intraepithelial neoplasia (24.3%). Agreement between experts was moderate for FNs (κ = 0.266) and fair for blinding slides (κ = 0.142) when grouping abnormal slides. Adenocarcinoma diagnosis elevated the risk of TN result (OR = 3.83); detection of macroscopic changes on the cervix and smoking lowered the risk (OR = 0.39, OR = 0.40 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Misinterpretation was the main reason for FN cytology in the CCSP which indicated the need of further personnel training to increase screening quality. Rather low agreement between auditors requires further insight. A standardised process of auditors' selection should be planned to increase audit quality.

High-Risk Types of Human Papilloma Virus DNA Testing in Women with False Negative Cytology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-risk types of human papilloma virus (hrHPV) DNA testing is reliable for selection patients in need of further investigation with colposcopy in women with increased risk of high-grade cervical lesions as a result of false negative cytology. The secondary objective was to compare the sensitivity of hrHPV testing on self-collected versus physician-collected samples for the detection of histological high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). METHODS: Sixty-three patients identified with a missed abnormality following the re-evaluation of benign cervical cytology were included. A patient-collected and a physician-collected sample for HPV, colposcopy and cervical specimen collection for histology and cytology were performed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of hrHPV testing of physician-collected samples for CIN2+ was 100% (95% CI 82.7-100), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (95% CI 93.3-100). The sensitivity of the self-sampling device to identify CIN2+ was 84.6% (95% CI 59.1-96.7), and the NPV was 94.4% (95% CI 83.4-98.8). The differences in the sensitivity and NPV between the 2 methods were non-significant. The agreement between the 2 methods regarding the HPV results was good, with a kappa value of 0.74 (95% CI 0.57-0.91). CONCLUSION: The current findings indicate that physician-collected samples for hrHPV DNA testing may be used as triage for the colposcopy of women with false negative cytology.