Clinical Relevance of the Feces Sign in Small-Bowel Obstruction Due to Adhesions Depends on Its Location.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate if the feces sign can be used to predict successful nonoperative treatment or progression to ischemia in patients with small-bowel obstruction (SBO) due to adhesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this single-center retrospective observational study involving a blinded independent review by two radiologists of 237 consecutive CT examinations of 216 patients with SBO due to adhesions (age: mean, 70.9 years; median, 74 years; interquartile range, 62-84 years), the location of the transition zone (TZ), number of TZs, and presence and location of the feces sign relative to the TZ were recorded. The reference standard for diagnosing ischemia was surgical and pathologic findings (n = 108 CT examinations) or, when treatment was nonoperative (n = 129 CT examinations), clinical outcome. Factors associated with successful nonoperative treatment and ischemia were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A feces sign was seen in 88 of 237 CT examinations (37.1%). The feces sign was at the TZ, which we refer to as the "TZ feces" sign, in 82 of 88 (93.2%) patients; between two TZs, which we refer to as the "trapped feces" sign, in 14 (15.9%) patients; and in both locations in eight (9.1%) patients. By univariate analysis, an isolated TZ feces sign was associated positively with successful nonoperative treatment (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% CI, 1.71-6.66; p < 0.001) and negatively with ischemia (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.85; p = 0.02). Combined TZ and trapped feces signs were associated with ischemia (OR, 24.16; 95% CI, 2.86-203.89; p = 0.003). By multivariate analysis, regardless of the location of the feces sign, the feces sign was not significantly associated with successful nonoperative treatment or progression to ischemia. CONCLUSION: The feces sign is common and helps to identify the TZ. Among the CT signs of SBO, the feces sign does not independently help to predict successful nonoperative treatment or progression to ischemia.

Adhesive small bowel obstruction: predictive factors of laparoscopic failure.

The adoption of laparoscopy for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) patients is debated. The laparoscopic approach has been associated with a considerable conversion-to-open rate. Nonetheless, reliable predictors of conversion are still unclear. The present study aimed to identify factors associated with conversion to open in ASBO patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for ASBO and were admitted to our unit between December 2014 and October 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were categorized into two groups: patients who underwent complete laparoscopy approach (Group 1) and patients converted to open technique (Group 2). Demographic, clinical, and radiological features, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were compared. A total of 168 patients were enrolled: 100 patients (59.5%) were included in Group 1, and 68 patients (40.5%) were included in Group 2. The rate of ischemia (p = 0.023), surgical complications (p = 0.001), operative time (p < 0.0001), days of nasogastric tube maintenance (p < 0.0001), time to canalization (p < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1. Following univariate analysis, the presence of feces signs (p = 0.044) and high mean radiodensity of intraperitoneal free fluid (p = 0.031) were significantly associated with Group 2 compared with Group 1. Following multivariate analysis, the feces sign was a significant predictive factor of conversion (OR 1.965 [IC 95%]; p = 0.046). Laparoscopic treatment is a safe and effective approach in patients affected by ASBO. The feces sign may be a predictive factor of conversion and could guide the surgeon in selecting the appropriate management of patients affected by ASBO.

Association of feces sign with prognosis of non-emergency adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: /Objective: The feces sign has been reported as a possible predictive factor for non-operative treatment of small bowel obstruction. However, its relationship with prognosis of non-emergency adhesive small bowel obstruction remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the feces sign and prognosis of non-emergency adhesive small bowel obstruction. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with non-emergency adhesive small bowel obstruction with the transitional zone visible on computed tomography were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: feces sign positive (n = 40) and negative (n = 52). Clinical features and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models incorporating the feces sign were used to analyze odds of diet resumption and discharge. RESULTS: Patients with feces sign were younger (p = 0.015), had a higher body mass index (p = 0.027), and a lower white blood cell count (p = 0.019) on admission. More patients with feces sign were successfully treated with fasting and/or nasogastric tube placement (p < 0.001), and no patient with feces sign suffered from recurrent obstruction after diet resumption. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with feces sign took less time for diet resumption (p = 0.007) and discharge (p = 0.004) than those without it. Using Cox proportional hazards regression model, the feces sign was reported as an independent predictor of diet resumption (odds ratio 1.685, p = 0.018) and discharge (odds ratio 1.861, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The feces sign is associated with improved odds for diet resumption and discharge.

Small bowel feces sign in association with occlusive mesenteric ischemia.

Small bowel feces sign (SBFS) is a computed tomography (CT) finding that appears as fecal like material in dilated small bowel loops. This sign is usually seen in association with gradually progressive small bowel obstruction. We present a case of occlusive mesenteric ischemia in which the SBFS appeared on CT scan early on in the course of the disease. We put forward a suggested alternative mechanism to the appearance of this sign in association with mesenteric ischemia. The SBFS might have the potential to serve as an early sign of mesenteric ischemia on CT scan.