Impact of Selective Posterior Cruciate Ligament Fiber Release on Femoral Rollback in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Computational Study.

BACKGROUND: Partial or total release of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is often performed intraoperatively in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) to alleviate excessive femoral rollback. However, the effect of the release of selected fibers of the PCL on femoral rollback in CR-TKA is not well understood. Therefore, we used a computational model to quantify the effect of selective PCL fiber releases on femoral rollback in CR-TKA. METHODS: Computational models of 9 cadaveric knees (age: 63 years, range 47 to 79) were virtually implanted with a CR-TKA. Passive flexion was simulated with the PCL retained and after serially releasing each individual fiber of the PCL, starting with the one located most anteriorly and laterally on the femoral notch and finishing with the one located most posteriorly on the medial femoral condyle. The experiment was repeated after releasing only the central PCL fiber. The femoral rollback of each condyle was defined as the anterior-posterior distance between tibiofemoral contact points at 0° and 90° of flexion. RESULTS: Release of the central PCL fiber in combination with the anterolateral (AL) fibers, reduced femoral rollback a median of 1.5 [0.8, 2.1] mm (P = .01) medially and by 2.0 [1.2, 2.5] mm (P = .04) laterally. Releasing the central fiber alone reduced the rollback by 0.7 [0.4, 1.1] mm (P < .01) medially and by 1.0 [0.5, 1.1] mm (P < .01) laterally, accounting for 47 and 50% of the reduction when released in combination with the AL fibers. CONCLUSIONS: Releasing the central fibers of the PCL had the largest impact on reducing femoral rollback, either alone or in combination with the release of the entire AL bundle. Thus, our findings provide clinical guidance regarding the regions of the PCL that surgeons should target to reduce femoral rollback in CR-TKA.

Changes in femoral rollback and rotation with increasing coupling in knee arthroplasty-a biomechanical in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: After total knee arthroplasty, 10-30% of patients still complain about knee pain, even after exact positioning of the components. Altered knee kinematics are crucial in this regard. The aim of our study was to experimentally determine the influence of different degrees of component coupling of knee prostheses on joint kinematics during muscle-loaded knee flexion in-vitro. METHODS: Femoral rollback and femoral rotation of a standard cruciate retaining (GCR), a posterior stabilized (GPS), a rotational hinge (RSL) and a total hinge (SSL) design of the same series of knee replacement implants (SL-series) of one single manufacturer (Waldemar Link GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) were analyzed and set in relation to the motion of the corresponding native knee in a paired study design. All different coupling degrees were analyzed in the same human knees. To simulate muscle loaded knee flexion, a knee simulator was used. Kinematics were measured with an ultrasonic motion capture system and integrated in a calculated coordinate system via CT-imaging. RESULTS: The largest posterior motion on the lateral side was found for the native knee (8.7 ± 7.0 mm), followed by the GPS (3.2 ± 5.1 mm) and GCR (2.8 ± 7.3 mm) implants, while no motion was found for the RSL (0.1 ± 3.0 mm) and the SSL (-0.6 ± 2.7 mm) implants. In contrast, on the medial side, only the native knee showed a posterior motion (2.1 ± 3.2 mm). Regarding femoral external rotation, the only implant where the observed difference did not reach statistical significance when compared to the native knee was the GCR (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The GCR and GPS kinematics closely imitate those of the native joint. Medial femoral rollback is reduced, however, with the joint pivoting around a rotational center located in the medial plateau. Without additional rotational forces, the coupled RSL and SSL prostheses closely resemble each other with no femoral rollback or relevant rotational component. The femoral axis, however, shifts ventrally in both models when compared with their primary counterparts. The positioning of the coupling mechanism in the femoral and tibial component thus can already lead to altered joint kinematics even in prostheses with an identical surface geometry.

Knee kinematics are variously influenced by different correction angles in high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

PURPOSE: Literature reveals good to excellent data concerning patient satisfaction, as well as long-term outcomes after high tibial osteotomy (HTO). These results might be influenced by changes of knee kinematics through the procedure. However, exact influence of HTO on tibiofemoral kinematics remains unknown so far. METHODS: We conducted this study on 10 knees of Thiel embalmed whole cadavers. Knee kinematics were assessed by a navigation device before HTO, after medial open-wedge HTO of 5°, respectively after medial open-wedge HTO of 10°. RESULTS: Results revealed a significant femoral rollback/tibial internal rotation at increasing knee flexion from 80° after medial open-wedge HTO of 5° and 10°. Lesser femoral rollback/tibial internal rotation was seen after 5° HTO compared to 10° HTO until knee flexion of 70°. CONCLUSION: Results reveal a significant change of tibiofemoral kinematics only after knee flexion of 80° and more, independently from the degree of tibial osteotomy. Adjacent structures, especially the ACL, seem thus more strained by sagittal slope changes rather than changes in coronal leg axis. HTO leads to changes in knee kinematics at flexion degrees of 80 and more. To what extent this influences adjacent structures like the ACL or meniscus should be further investigated.

Kinetic Sensors for Ligament Balance and Kinematic Evaluation in Anatomic Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Sensor technology was introduced to intraoperatively analyse the differential pressure between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee during primary TKA using a sensor to assess if further balancing procedures are needed to achieve a "balanced" knee. The prognostic role of epidemiological and radiological parameters was also analysed. A consecutive series of 21 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were enrolled and programmed for TKA in our unit between 1 September 2020 and 31 March 2021. The VERASENSE Knee System (OrthoSensor Inc., Dania Beach, FL, USA) has been proposed as an instrument that quantifies the differential pressure between the compartments of the knee intraoperatively throughout the full range of motion during primary TKA, designed with a J-curve anatomical femoral design and a PS "medially congruent" polyethylene insert. Thirteen patients (61.90%) showed a "balanced" knee, and eight patients (38.10%) showed an intra-operative "unbalanced" knee and required additional procedures. A total of 13 additional balancing procedures were performed. At the end of surgical knee procedures, a quantitatively balanced knee was obtained in all patients. In addition, a correlation was found between the compartment pressure of phase I and phase II at 10° of flexion and higher absolute pressures were found in the medial compartment than in the lateral compartment in each ROM degree investigated. Moreover, those pressure values showed a trend to decrease with the increase in flexion degrees in both compartments. The "Kinetic Tracking" function displays the knee's dynamic motion through the full ROM to evaluate joint kinetics. The obtained kinetic traces reproduced the knee's medial pivot and femoral rollback, mimicking natural knee biomechanics. Moreover, we reported a statistically significant correlation between the need for soft tissue or bone resection rebalancing and severity of the initial coronal deformity (>10°) and a preoperative JLCA value >2°. The use of quantitative sensor-guided pressure evaluation during TKA leads to a more reproducible "balanced" knee. The surgeon, evaluating radiological parameters before surgery, may anticipate difficulties in knee balance and require those devices to achieve the desired result objectively.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics.

Knee kinematics is an analysis of motion pattern that is utilized to assess a comparative, biomechanical performance of healthy nonimplanted knees, injured nonimplanted knees, and various prosthetic knee designs. Unfortunately, a consensus between implanted knee kinematics and outcomes has not been reached. One might hypothesize that the kinematic variances between the nonimplanted and implanted knee might play a role in patient dissatisfaction following TKA. There is a wide range of TKA designs available today. With such variety, it is important for surgeons and engineers to understand the various geometries and kinematic profiles of available prostheses. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with the pertinent information related to TKA kinematics.

Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

PURPOSE: As the aims of changes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs are to reinstate more natural kinematics, the current study evaluated the in vivo kinematics in patients who underwent a cruciate retaining gradually changing femoral radius ("G-CURVE") against a cruciate retaining conventional changing femoral radius ("J-CURVE") geometry TKA design. The hypothesis of the study is that the G-CURVE design would allow a substantial increase in the femoral rollback compared to the J-CURVE design. METHODS: Retrospective study design. Thirty patients were included (G-CURVE, n = 20; J-CURVE, n = 10). Single-plane fluoroscopic analysis and marker-based motion capture gait analysis was performed to analyse dynamic tibiofemoral motion during weight-bearing and unloaded activities at 24 month after index surgery. RESULTS: The analysis of the medial and lateral points on the tibia plateau during the unloaded flexion-extension and the weight-bearing lunge activities revealed a significant difference in femoral rollback in G-CURVE TKA above 60° (p = 0.001) and 30° (p = 0.02) of knee flexion, respectively. Moreover, the lateral condyle of the G-CURVE showed a higher extent of femoral rollback while the lateral condyle of the J-CURVE rolled forward. CONCLUSION: At 2 years post-operative, the G-CURVE TKA showed significant differences in femoro-tibial translation in comparison with the J-CURVE system, in vivo. The G-CURVE resulted in an increased lateral rollback and simultaneously in an elimination of the paradoxical medial roll-forward present in the J-CURVE design. Moreover, knee kinematics analysis showed significant differences between unloaded and weight-bearing conditions revealing the impact of load and muscle force. The analysis conducted in this study contributes to further understand the principal movement characteristics in widely used older designs in comparison with recently developed concepts to get a better overview on their potential benefits on in vivo kinematics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Preserving the PCL during the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that the PCL insertion may be damaged during the tibial cut performed in total knee arthroplasty. We investigated the maximum thickness of a tibial cut that preserves the PCL insertion and to what extent the posterior slope of the tibial cut and that of the patient's tibial plateaus affect the outcome. METHODS: MR images of 83 knees were analysed. The maximum thickness of a tibial cut that preserves the PCL using a posterior slope of 0°, 3°, 5° and parallel to the patient's slope of the tibial plateau, was evaluated. Correlations between the results and the degrees of the posterior slope of the patient's tibial plateaus were also investigated. RESULTS: The maximum thickness of a tibial cut that preserves the entire PCL insertion was, on average, 5.5, 4.7, 4.2 and 3.1 mm when a posterior slope of 0°, 3°, 5° and parallel to the patients' tibial plateaus was used, respectively. When the 25th percentile was considered, the maximum thickness of a tibial cut that preserved the PCL was 4 and 3 mm with a tibial cut of 0° and 5° of posterior slope, respectively. The maximum thickness of a tibial cut that preserved the PCL was significantly greater in patients with a sagittal slope of the tibial plateaus more than 8° than in those with a sagittal slope less than 8°. CONCLUSION: In cruciate retaining implants, the PCL insertion may be spared in the majority of patients by performing a tibial cut of 4 mm, or even less when a posterior slope of 3°-5° is used. The clinical relevance of our study is that the execution of a conservative tibial cut, followed by a second tibial resection to achieve the thickness required for the tibial component to be implanted, may be an alternative technique to spare the PCL in CR TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Clinical Relevance of Posterior Osteophyte Formation in Ultra-congruent Total Knee Arthroplasty: Midterm Radiographic Rollback and Impingement Analysis.

Background: Posterior femoral condylar osteophytes were frequently observed in patients with the ultra-congruent (UC) deep-dish design prosthesis. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to verify the clinical relevance of osteophyte formation in the UC design. Methods: From March 2014 to February 2018, a comparative study was conducted on 96 knees using the UC design. They were divided into 2 groups (group 1: osteophyte +, group 2: osteophyte -). Intraoperative findings, indirect femoral rollback assessment using 30° flexion and active full flexion lateral radiographs, serial change of the osteophyte, and outcomes were compared. Results: The mean follow-up period was 49.35 ± 3.47 months in group 1 and 47.52 ± 3.37 months in group 2. Posterior component coverage was significantly different between the groups: group 1 exhibited more underhang and group 2 exhibited more overhang (p = 0.022). On the indirect assessment of the femoral rollback, there was a statistically significant difference in deep flexion and change in distance (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in the American Knee Society knee and function score, and group 2 showed significant improvement in pain compared to group 1 in Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index pain score (p = 0.029). Conclusions: Posterior condylar osteophyte formation was related to posterior impingement. It was more frequently observed in the underhang of the femoral component and insufficient femoral rollback. In addition, it changed with time and caused negative effects, including a gradual decrease in flexion and more pain.

Maximum flexion and lateral rollback revealed better patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an important outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, we cannot predict how and why patients are satisfied or dissatisfied with TKA. The hypothesis of this study was that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) correlate with in vivo kinematics after TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred knees were analyzed after TKA. The in vivo kinematics of deep knee bending motion were estimated from single-plane fluoroscopy using a two-to-three-dimensional registration technique. Active knee flexion, femoral rotation and rollback were evaluated. The PROs were obtained after surgery using the 2011 Knee Society Scoring System (KSS), and their relationship with in vivo kinematics was determined. RESULTS: The average minimum and maximum flexion were -2.4 ± 7.3° and 113.2 ± 13.6°, respectively. The average femoral rotation was 7.4 ± 3.4°, and the average medial and lateral rollback were 2.4 ± 4.8 mm and 7.2 ± 5.6 mm, respectively. The multiple regression analysis revealed that the maximum flexion angle significantly contributed to symptoms and satisfaction. In addition, lateral rollback was also a significant factor affecting patient satisfaction. Lateral rollback and lateral Anterior-Posterior (AP) position at maximum flexion were correlated with the maximum flexion angle, whereas femoral rotation did not correlate with flexion angles. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum flexion and lateral rollback are important for better patient satisfaction after TKA. To obtain the maximum flexion angle, it was necessary to perform the normal kinematic pattern with a large amount of lateral rollback.

Mobile bearing shows larger rollback motion than fixed bearing in total knee arthroplasty using a medial stabilising technique with a navigation system.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the intraoperative knee kinematics of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a medial stabilising technique (MST-TKA) and compare the kinematics between mobile- and fixed-bearing MST-TKAs. We hypothesised that mobile-bearing MST-TKA would result in greater physiological kinematic motion than fixed-bearing MST-TKA. Methods: Twenty-one and 20 knees underwent mobile- and fixed-bearing MST-TKAs using a navigation system (Orthopilot® ver. 6.0; B. Braun Aesculap), respectively. In the preoperative and postoperative kinematic analysis, the knee was moved manually from 0° to 120°, and femoral anteroposterior translations of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and lateral femoral condyle (LFC) were recorded every 0.1 s from 0° to 120°. Data were subsequently extracted from the software every 10° of flexion and compared between the two groups, and the correlation coefficients between preoperative and postoperative kinematics were calculated. Results: In the postoperative analysis, the MFC in the mobile-bearing group showed significant posterior translation at 100°, 110° and 120° compared to the fixed-bearing group (p < 0.01). Similarly, the LFC in the mobile-bearing group showed significant posterior translation at 100°, 110° and 120° compared to the fixed-bearing group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). In the mobile-bearing group, the preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior translations of the MFC and LFC were correlated (p < 0.01), while in the fixed-bearing group, there was no correlation. Conclusion: The femoral rollback motion in the mobile-bearing MST-TKA correlated with the preoperative kinematics and was larger than that in the fixed-bearing group. Level of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic prospective cohort study.

In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design.

Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNETM Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFCTM (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior-posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77-11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84-8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery.

Prospective sequential comparison of femoral roll-back between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an intra-operative sensor.

BACKGROUND: Implant design and surgical techniques affect postoperative knee kinematics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to compare femoral roll-back between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA in the same knee by objectively quantifying the contact point kinematics of the tibiofemoral joint using a sensor. METHODS: In the present prospective study, we used an intraoperative sensor to compare medial and lateral roll-back during 0-120° knee flexion in 33 knees that underwent CR and PS TKA. We also examined the relationship between mediolateral balance and the lateral-to-medial roll-back ratio. We defined the contact percentage position as the vertical length to the contact point divided by the anteroposterior length of the tibial plate. RESULTS: The roll-back percentage following PS TKA (19.8 ± 5.1%) was significantly higher than that after CR TKA in both the medial (19.8 ± 5.1% versus 7.1 ± 2.5%, P < 0.001) and lateral (26.8% ± 3.8% versus 18.7 ± 3.8%, P < 0.001) compartments. The medial contact pressure at 90° was significantly correlated with the increased lateral-to-medial roll-back ratio in both CR and PS TKA (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PS TKA resulted in a higher percentage of femoral roll-back in the medial and lateral compartments than CR TKA. CR TKA caused a higher lateral-to-medial roll-back ratio compared to PS TKA. To reproduce medial pivot knee motion similar to that of a normal knee, the medial soft tissue needed to be balanced more tightly than the lateral soft tissue during TKA. These findings provide some clinical evidence of TKA design selection and proper mediolateral balancing for successful TKA.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes, Femoral Rollback and Sagittal Stability of Anterior-Stabilized Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has improved leaps and bounds in terms of design to improve clinical outcomes and achieve better rehabilitation of the patients. Ultra-congruent inserts (UC) were designed to replace the need for posterior stabilized (PS) implants. The purpose of this review was to evaluate clinical outcomes, femoral rollback, functional scores, range of motion, sagittal laxity, complication rates, and isokinetic performance between UC and PS TKA among RCTs. METHODS: Electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, opengrey, and Cochrane were searched from date of inception up to mid-April 2021, and meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. This study analyzed outcomes, femoral rollback, tibial sagittal laxity and isokinetic performance. RESULTS: Ten RCTs identified 852 knees, of which 420 underwent UC TKAs and 432 underwent PS TKA. Compared to UC TKA, a significantly better sagittal stability (p = 0.17) and femoral rollback (p < 0.00001) in PS TKAs was noted, although no statistically significant difference was found in the assessment of the range of motion (p = 0.19) and functional scores. Both the groups had similar isokinetic performance with extensor torque (p = 0.97) and flexor torque (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with the current meta-analysis that there are no added benefits for UC over PS inserts and these inserts have a higher sagittal laxity and less femoral roll back in cruciate sacrificing UC knee. But since there are no long-term wear data, UC inserts with CS technique should be used cautiously and may be used only when the PCL cannot be balanced adequately. There is no evidence or only a few to support the superiority of the AS TKA in terms of clinical outcomes or isokinetic performance or femoral external rotation over PS TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Giovanni Alfonso Borelli: The Precursor of Medial Pivot Concept in Knee Biomechanics.

A new philosophy of science and medicine had spread throughout the 17th-century Italy: the "Scientific Revolution." Giovanni Alfonso Borelli (1608-1679) was one of the most charismatic and brilliant scientists of his generation in Europe. He extended to biology the rigorous analytic methods developed by his indirect mentor Galileo in the field of mechanics. In his masterpiece " De Motu Animalium ," Borelli analyzed structure, motion, balance, and forces concerning almost all the principal joints of the human body, in static and dynamic situations. In particular, he accurately studied the anatomy and biomechanics of the knee joint. He sustained that femoral condyles shift backward during flexion, allowing a wider range of movement. Furthermore, he observed that, when the knee flexes, the lateral condyle moves backward more than the medial condyle: this concept is nowadays known as medial pivoting. The aim of this article is to describe the life and work of this important Italian scientist and to present his unrecognized contribution to modern knee biomechanics.

The risk of sacrificing the PCL in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and the relationship to the sagittal inclination of the tibial plateau.

BACKGROUND: In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a partial avulsion of PCL may occur when en-bloc tibial osteotomy is performed. We evaluated the effects of a tibial cut performed with different degrees of posterior slope on PCL insertion and whether the results are affected by the sagittal inclination of the patient's tibial plateau. METHODS: We selected 83 MRIs of knees showing mild or no degenerative changes. The effects of a simulated tibial cut performed with a posterior slope of 0°, 3°, 5° and parallel to the patient's tibial plateau inclination on PCL insertion in the proximal tibia were investigated. The results were correlated with the degree of posterior inclination of the tibial plateau. RESULTS: Every angle we used for the tibial cut caused a PCL avulsion greater than 50%. The percentage of PCL avulsion significantly increased with increasing the posterior slope of the tibial cut. Patients with sagittal tibial plateau inclination <5° showed greater PCL avulsion than those with sagittal inclination >8°. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the PCL insertion is likely to be sacrificed when resection of the proximal tibia is performed en-block. The risk of PCL avulsion is reduced in patients showing a marked posterior inclination of the tibial plateau, but even in this group of patients a surgical technique aimed at sparing most of the PCL insertion is necessary.