Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 51(5): 1540-1553, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31588660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification of men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (cSPCa) remains challenging despite the increasing use of MRI. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a unique biparametric MRI protocol (IMPROD bpMRI) combined with clinical and molecular markers in men with cSPCa. STUDY TYPE: Prospective single-institutional clinical trial (NCT01864135). SUBJECTS: Eighty men with cSPCa. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, surface array coils. Two T2 -weighted and three diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions: 1) b-values 0, 100, 200, 300, 500 s/mm2 ; 2) b-values 0,1500 s/mm2 ; 3) b-values 0, 2000 s/mm2 . ASSESSMENT: IMPROD bpMRI examinations were qualitatively (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score) and quantitatively (DWI-based Gleason grade score) prospectively reported. Men with IMPROD bpMRI Likert 3-5 had two targeted biopsies followed by 12-core systematic biopsies (SB); those with IMPROD bpMRI Likert 1-2 had only SB. Additionally, 2-core from normal-appearing prostate areas were obtained for the mRNA expression of ACSM1, AMACR, CACNA1D, DLX1, PCA3, PLA2G7, RHOU, SPINK1, SPON2, TMPRSS2-ERG, and TDRD1 measured by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate and multivariate analysis using regularized least-squares, feature selection and tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation (TLPOCV), as well as 10 random splits of the data in training-testing sets, were used to evaluate the mRNA, clinical and IMPROD bpMRI parameters in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (SPCa) defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4. The evaluation metric was the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: IMPROD bpMRI Likert demonstrated the highest TLPOCV AUC of 0.92. The tested clinical variables had AUC 0.56-0.73, while the mRNA and additional IMPROD bpMRI parameters had AUC 0.50-0.67 and 0.65-0.89 respectively. The combination of clinical and mRNA biomarkers produced TLPOCV AUC of 0.87, the highest TLPOCV performance without including IMPROD bpMRI Likert. DATA CONCLUSION: The qualitative IMPROD bpMRI Likert score demonstrated the highest accuracy for SPCa detection compared with the tested clinical variables and mRNA biomarkers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1540-1553.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Medição de Risco , Inibidor da Tripsina Pancreática de Kazal
2.
Urol Oncol ; 34(6): 255.e15-22, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26857646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic power of molecular markers in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) using apparently benign areas as targeted by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In the study, 99 consecutive men with clinical suspicion of PCa in a prospective controlled trial (IMPROD, NCT01864135) were included. In addition to 12-core systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies, cores from normal-appearing prostate areas, based on clinical examination, ultrasound, and biparametric prostate MRI, were obtained. The RNA transcript levels of ACSM1, AMACR, CACNA1D, DLX1, KLK3, PCA3, PLA2G7, RHOU, SPINK1, SPON2, TMPRSS2-ERG, and TDRD1 were measured with quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of the 99 men, 69 were diagnosed with PCa, 31 with primary Gleason pattern 3 and 38 with primary Gleason 4 or 5. TDRD1 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were 1.3 times higher (P = 0.029) and the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG mRNAs more frequent in biopsies from men diagnosed with PCa (27/69, 39%) than in men without (5/30, 16%) (P = 0.035). The 2 markers identified aggressive PCa defined as Gleason sum≥7 at biopsy: median TDRD1 mRNA level was 1.4 higher (P = 0.005) and TMPRSS2-ERG expression more frequent (P<0.001) in high-grade cancer. A multivariate analysis of mRNA expression of 11 candidate genes combined with KLK3, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage-free PSA, and prostate volume improved the discrimination between aggressive and nonaggressive PCa (area under the curve = 0.77) compared with the use of the candidate genes or clinical parameters alone. However, serum PSA, percentage-free PSA, and prostate volume resulted in the best discrimination between non-organ-confined PCa (T3) from organ-confined PCa (T2) and healthy prostate (area under the curve = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Of the 11 studied genes, TDRD1 and TMPRSS2-ERG were able to statistically significantly differentiate men with PCa from men without it as single markers. However, a multivariate analysis using 15 features outperformed each individual marker in identifying aggressive PCa.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Proteínas de Transporte/genética , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue
3.
Epigenetics ; 10(9): 803-9, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26186366

RESUMO

Aberrant DNA methylation is a common epigenetic alteration found in colorectal adenomas and cancers and plays a role in cancer initiation and progression. Aberrantly methylated DNA loci can also be found infrequently present in normal colon tissue, where they seem to have potential to be used as colorectal cancer (CRC) risk biomarkers. However, detection and precise quantification of the infrequent methylation events seen in normal colon is likely beyond the capability of commonly used PCR technologies. To determine the potential for methylated DNA loci as CRC risk biomarkers, we developed MethyLight droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays and compared their performance to the widely used conventional MethyLight PCR. Our analyses demonstrated the capacity of MethyLight ddPCR to detect a single methylated NTRK3 allele from among more than 3125 unmethylated alleles, 25-fold more sensitive than conventional MethyLight PCR. The MethyLight ddPCR assay detected as little as 19 and 38 haploid genome equivalents of methylated EVL and methylated NTRK3, respectively, which far exceeded conventional MethyLight PCR (379 haploid genome equivalents for both genes). When assessing methylated EVL levels in CRC tissue samples, MethyLight ddPCR reduced coefficients of variation (CV) to 6-65% of CVs seen with conventional MethyLight PCR. Importantly, we showed the ability of MethyLight ddPCR to detect infrequently methylated EVL alleles in normal colon mucosa samples that could not be detected by conventional MethyLight PCR. This study suggests that the sensitivity and precision of methylation detection by MethyLight ddPCR enhances the potential of methylated alleles for use as CRC risk biomarkers.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Metilação de DNA , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/genética , Progressão da Doença , Haploidia , Humanos , Receptor trkC/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA